Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Soergel, D."
  1. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.01
    0.011346022 = product of:
      0.079422146 = sum of:
        0.079422146 = sum of:
          0.051419575 = weight(_text_:studies in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051419575 = score(doc=1344,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.3117402 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.028002575 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028002575 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This review introduces a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking to provide a theoretical basis for: - empirical studies that improve our understanding of the cognitive process and mechanisms of sensemaking and integration of results of such studies; - education in critical thinking and sensemaking skills; - the design of sensemaking assistant tools that support and guide users. The paper reviews and extends existing sensemaking models with ideas from learning and cognition. It reviews literature on sensemaking models in human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive system engineering, organizational communication, and library and information sciences (LIS), learning theories, cognitive psychology, and task-based information seeking. The model resulting from this synthesis moves to a stronger basis for explaining sensemaking behaviors and conceptual changes. The model illustrates the iterative processes of sensemaking, extends existing models that focus on activities by integrating cognitive mechanisms and the creation of instantiated structure elements of knowledge, and different types of conceptual change to show a complete picture of the cognitive processes of sensemaking. The processes and cognitive mechanisms identified provide better foundations for knowledge creation, organization, and sharing practices and a stronger basis for design of sensemaking assistant systems and tools.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  2. Soergel, D.: Information structure management : a unified framework for indexing and searching in database, expert, information-retrieval, and hypermedia systems (1994) 0.01
    0.008894852 = product of:
      0.062263966 = sum of:
        0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 2984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062263966 = score(doc=2984,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 2984, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2984)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  3. Soergel, D.: Mathematical analysis of documentation systems : an attempt to a theory of classification and search request formulation (1967) 0.01
    0.00630532 = product of:
      0.04413724 = sum of:
        0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04413724 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    As an attempt to make a general structural theory of information retrieval, a documentation system (DS) is defined as a formal system consisting of (a) a set o of objects (documents); (b) a set A++ of elementary attributes (key-words), from which further attributes may be constructed: A++ generates A; (c) a set of axioms of the form X++(x)=m (m¯M, M a set of constant connecting attributes with objects: from the axioms further theorems (=true statements) may be constructed. By use of the theorems, different mappings O -> P(o) (P(o) set of all subsets of o) (search question -> set of documents retrieved) are defined. The type of a DS depends on two basic decisions: (1) choice of the rules for the construction of attributes and theorems, e.g., logical product in coordinate indexing; links. (2) choice of M; M may consist of the two constants 'applicable' and 'not applicable', or some positive integers, ...; Further practical decisions: A++ hierarchical or not; kind of mapping; introduction of roles (=further attributes). The most simple case - ordinary two-valued Coordinate Indexing - is discusssed in detail; o is a free distributive (but not Boolean) lattice, the homographic image a ring of subsets of o; instead of negation which is not useful, a useful retrieval operation 'praeternagation' is introduced. Furthermore these are discussed: a generalized definition of superimposed coding, some functions for the distance of objects or attributes; optimization and automatic derivation of classifications. The model takes into account term-term relations and document-document relations. It may serve as a structural framework in terms of which the functional problems of retrieval theory may be expressed more clearly
  4. Soergel, D.; Popescu, D.: Organization authority database design with classification principles (2015) 0.01
    0.00630532 = product of:
      0.04413724 = sum of:
        0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04413724 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    We illustrate the principle of unified treatment of all authority data for any kind of entities, subjects/topics, places, events, persons, organizations, etc. through the design and implementation of an enriched authority database for organizations, maintained as an integral part of an authority database that also includes subject authority control / classification data, using the same structures for data and common modules for processing and display of data. Organization-related data are stored in information systems of many companies. We specifically examine the case of the World Bank Group (WBG) according to organization role: suppliers, partners, customers, competitors, authors, publishers, or subjects of documents, loan recipients, suppliers for WBG-funded projects and subunits of the organization itself. A central organization authority where each organization is identified by a URI, represented by several names and linked to other organizations through hierarchical and other relationships serves to link data from these disparate information systems. Designing the conceptual structure of a unified authority database requires integrating SKOS, the W3C Organization Ontology and other schemes into one comprehensive ontology. To populate the authority database with organizations, we import data from external sources (e.g., DBpedia and Library of Congress authorities) and internal sources (e.g., the lists of organizations from multiple WBG information systems).
  5. Komlodi, A.; Marchionini, G.; Soergel, D.: Search history support for finding and using information : user interface design recommendations from a user study (2007) 0.01
    0.006289611 = product of:
      0.044027276 = sum of:
        0.044027276 = weight(_text_:management in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044027276 = score(doc=892,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Recording search histories, presenting them to the searcher, and building additional interface tools on them offer many opportunities for supporting user tasks in information seeking and use. This study investigated the use of search history information in legal information seeking. Qualitative methods were used to explore how attorneys and law librarians used their memory and external memory aids while searching for information and in transferring to information use. Based on the findings, interface design recommendations were made for information systems. Results of the study from the legal user group presented evidence of the usefulness of search histories and history-based interface tools. Both user manifestations and researcher observations revealed that searchers need historical information in information seeking. Search histories were found to be useful in many user tasks: memory support, search system use, information seeking, information use, task management, task integration, and collaboration. Integrating information across various user tasks and collaborating with others are extensions of traditional information-seeking and use models. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools and guidelines building on search history information.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.1, S.10-29
  6. Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.; Soergel, D.: Towards integrated systems for KOS management, mapping, and access : Coli-conc and its collaborative computer-assisted KOS mapping tool Cocoda (2018) 0.01
    0.0059299017 = product of:
      0.04150931 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  7. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.00
    0.0039601624 = product of:
      0.027721135 = sum of:
        0.027721135 = product of:
          0.05544227 = sum of:
            0.05544227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05544227 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  8. Soergel, D.: Digital libraries and knowledge organization (2009) 0.00
    0.0037061884 = product of:
      0.025943318 = sum of:
        0.025943318 = weight(_text_:management in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025943318 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter describes not so much what digital libraries are but what digital libraries with semantic support could and should be. It discusses the nature of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and how KOS can support digital library users. It projects a vision for designers to make and for users to demand better digital libraries. What is a digital library? The term \Digital Library" (DL) is used to refer to a range of systems, from digital object and metadata repositories, reference-linking systems, archives, and content management systems to complex systems that integrate advanced digital library services and support for research and practice communities. A DL may offer many technology-enabled functions and services that support users, both as information producers and as information users. Many of these functions appear in information systems that would not normally be considered digital libraries, making boundaries even more blurry. Instead of pursuing the hopeless quest of coming up with the definition of digital library, we present a framework that allows a clear and somewhat standardized description of any information system so that users can select the system(s) that best meet their requirements. Section 2 gives a broad outline for more detail see the DELOS DL Reference Model.
  9. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.00
    0.0032002942 = product of:
      0.02240206 = sum of:
        0.02240206 = product of:
          0.04480412 = sum of:
            0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480412 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
  10. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.00
    0.0024002206 = product of:
      0.016801544 = sum of:
        0.016801544 = product of:
          0.033603087 = sum of:
            0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033603087 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
  11. Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014) 0.00
    0.0024002206 = product of:
      0.016801544 = sum of:
        0.016801544 = product of:
          0.033603087 = sum of:
            0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033603087 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015) 0.00
    0.002000184 = product of:
      0.0140012875 = sum of:
        0.0140012875 = product of:
          0.028002575 = sum of:
            0.028002575 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028002575 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    27.11.2015 20:52:22