-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.11
0.11206607 = product of:
0.26148748 = sum of:
0.062909216 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062909216 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.08738727 = weight(_text_:case in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08738727 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.48085782 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.111191005 = sum of:
0.071987405 = weight(_text_:studies in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071987405 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039203603 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
- Theme
- Content Management System
-
Salminen, A.; Jauhiainen, E.; Nurmeksela, R.: ¬A life cycle model of XML documents (2014)
0.06
0.0587332 = product of:
0.13704413 = sum of:
0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062263966 = score(doc=1553,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052964687 = score(doc=1553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
0.021815477 = product of:
0.043630954 = sum of:
0.043630954 = weight(_text_:studies in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043630954 = score(doc=1553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Electronic documents produced in business processes are valuable information resources for organizations. In many cases they have to be accessible long after the life of the business processes or information systems in connection with which they were created. To improve the management and preservation of documents, organizations are deploying Extensible Markup Language (XML) as a standardized format for documents. The goal of this paper is to increase understanding of XML document management and provide a framework to enable the analysis and description of the management of XML documents throughout their life. We followed the design science approach. We introduce a document life cycle model consisting of five phases. For each of the phases we describe the typical activities related to the management of XML documents. Furthermore, we also identify the typical actors, systems, and types of content items associated with the activities of the phases. We demonstrate the use of the model in two case studies: one concerning the State Budget Proposal of the Finnish government and the other concerning a faculty council meeting agenda at a university.
-
Bailey, C.W. Jr.: Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography (2003)
0.06
0.0586659 = product of:
0.1368871 = sum of:
0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031131983 = score(doc=1656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.07490338 = weight(_text_:case in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07490338 = score(doc=1656,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.030851744 = product of:
0.06170349 = sum of:
0.06170349 = weight(_text_:studies in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06170349 = score(doc=1656,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Content
- Table of Contents 1 Economic Issues* 2 Electronic Books and Texts 2.1 Case Studies and History 2.2 General Works* 2.3 Library Issues* 3 Electronic Serials 3.1 Case Studies and History 3.2 Critiques 3.3 Electronic Distribution of Printed Journals 3.4 General Works* 3.5 Library Issues* 3.6 Research* 4 General Works* 5 Legal Issues 5.1 Intellectual Property Rights* 5.2 License Agreements 5.3 Other Legal Issues 6 Library Issues 6.1 Cataloging, Identifiers, Linking, and Metadata* 6.2 Digital Libraries* 6.3 General Works* 6.4 Information Integrity and Preservation* 7 New Publishing Models* 8 Publisher Issues 8.1 Digital Rights Management* 9 Repositories and E-Prints* Appendix A. Related Bibliographies by the Same Author Appendix B. About the Author
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.042742908 = product of:
0.09973345 = sum of:
0.020754656 = weight(_text_:management in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020754656 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.06777776 = weight(_text_:europe in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06777776 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.26919046 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.01120103 = product of:
0.02240206 = sum of:
0.02240206 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02240206 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 70(2018) no.6, S.592-607
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.028828064 = product of:
0.06726548 = sum of:
0.020754656 = weight(_text_:management in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020754656 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.03530979 = weight(_text_:case in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03530979 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.1942959 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.01120103 = product of:
0.02240206 = sum of:
0.02240206 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02240206 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.557-575
-
Xia, J.: ¬A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing (2010)
0.02
0.024926724 = product of:
0.08724353 = sum of:
0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061792135 = score(doc=3429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
0.02545139 = product of:
0.05090278 = sum of:
0.05090278 = weight(_text_:studies in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05090278 = score(doc=3429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This research applies statistical time series analysis to examine the changing pattern of scholars' attitudes toward open-access (OA) journal publishing from the early 1990s. By synthesizing survey results in existing studies, this research focuses on representative aspects of the attitudes and behaviors recorded through the years. It finds that although an increase in the publishing and awareness rates of scholars with regard to OA journals has been observed, scholars have been consistently concerned with the low prestige of such journals and their lack of peer review, which is not the case in practice. It is hoped that the findings will provide useful information for the improvement of OA advocacy.
-
Donaldson, B.; Barrett, H.: Adapting directories to CD-ROM (1996)
0.02
0.024206344 = product of:
0.1694444 = sum of:
0.1694444 = weight(_text_:europe in 7283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1694444 = score(doc=7283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 7283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7283)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Bob Donaldson, Managing Editor of the directories: The Software Users Year Book and The Computers Users Year Book; published by Learned Information Europe Ltd.; offers some advice to directory publishers who are considering publishing on CD-ROM based on experiences with these 2 titles
-
Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017)
0.02
0.02256537 = product of:
0.07897879 = sum of:
0.06777776 = weight(_text_:europe in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06777776 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.26919046 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.01120103 = product of:
0.02240206 = sum of:
0.02240206 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02240206 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
-
Abad-García, M.-F.; González-Teruel, A.; González-Llinares, J.: Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding spanish articles in repositories (2018)
0.02
0.020023016 = product of:
0.070080556 = sum of:
0.025943318 = weight(_text_:management in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025943318 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the usefulness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar (GS) for evaluating open access (OA) policies that demand a deposit in a repository. A case study was designed focusing on 762 financed articles with a project of FIS-2012 of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Spanish national health service's main management body for health research. Its finance is therefore subject to the Spanish Government OA mandate. A search was carried out for full-text OA copies of the 762 articles using the four tools being evaluated and with identification of the repository housing these items. Of the 762 articles concerned, 510 OA copies were found of 353 unique articles (46.3%) in 68 repositories. OA copies were found of 81.9% of the articles in PubMed Central and copies of 49.5% of the articles in an institutional repository (IR). BASE and GS identified 93.5% of the articles and OpenAIRE 86.7%. Recolecta identified just 62.2% of the articles deposited in a Spanish IR. BASE achieved the greatest success, by locating copies deposited in IR, while GS found those deposited in disciplinary repositories. None of the tools identified copies of all the articles, so they need to be used in a complementary way when evaluating OA policies.
-
Olivieri, R.: Academic publishing in transition : the academic publishers response (1995)
0.02
0.01838906 = product of:
0.12872341 = sum of:
0.12872341 = sum of:
0.07271826 = weight(_text_:studies in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07271826 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
0.05600515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05600515 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Discusses the changing forces of demand, supply and technical change in the field of academic publishing. Covers electronic publishing; the UnCover document delivery service from B.H. Blackwell; the work of Blackwell Science and Blackwell Publishers and electronic pilot studies
- Source
- IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.02
0.018260393 = product of:
0.06391137 = sum of:
0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04150931 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.02240206 = product of:
0.04480412 = sum of:
0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04480412 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Alexander, M.: Digitising books, manuscripts and scholarly materials : preparation, handling, scanning, recognition, compression, storage formats (1998)
0.02
0.018260393 = product of:
0.06391137 = sum of:
0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04150931 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
0.02240206 = product of:
0.04480412 = sum of:
0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04480412 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:00:52
- Source
- Information management and technology. 31(1998) no.2, S.77-81
-
Frandsen, T.F.: ¬The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system : three science fields (2009)
0.02
0.017709637 = product of:
0.061983727 = sum of:
0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031131983 = score(doc=4210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
0.030851744 = product of:
0.06170349 = sum of:
0.06170349 = weight(_text_:studies in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06170349 = score(doc=4210,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The greatest number of open access journals (OAJs) is found in the sciences and their influence is growing. However, there are only a few studies on the acceptance and thereby integration of these OAJs in the scholarly communication system. Even fewer studies provide insight into the differences across disciplines. This study is an analysis of the citing behaviour in journals within three science fields: biology, mathematics, and pharmacy and pharmacology. It is a statistical analysis of OAJs as well as non-OAJs including both the citing and cited side of the journal to journal citations. The multivariate linear regression reveals many similarities in citing behaviour across fields and media. But it also points to great differences in the integration of OAJs. The integration of OAJs in the scholarly communication system varies considerably across fields. The implications for bibliometric research are discussed.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.1, S.131-141
-
Dorward, A.: SGML in publishing : why use the standard? (1995)
0.02
0.017649153 = product of:
0.061772034 = sum of:
0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036320645 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.02545139 = product of:
0.05090278 = sum of:
0.05090278 = weight(_text_:studies in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05090278 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- As database techniques are becoming more widely used in publishing and as publishers seek to utilise the growing possibilities of multimedia, there is a growing awareness of the possibilities offered by SGML as a neutral format for safeguarding content independent of proprietary hardware and software. Pindar is a service company with over 10 years' experience in working with different IT projects utilising the standard and its associated tools. 3 current cas studies, involving technical documentation and reference publishing, demonstrate how and why SGML is becoming useful for document management outside the traditional areas of the aerospace and defence industries, where it was first developed
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.02
0.017649153 = product of:
0.061772034 = sum of:
0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036320645 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.02545139 = product of:
0.05090278 = sum of:
0.05090278 = weight(_text_:studies in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05090278 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This article reveals different patterns of scholarly communication in the XML research field on the Web and in print journals in terms of author visibility, and challenges the common practice of exclusively using the ISI's databases to obtain citation counts as scientific performance indicators. Results from this study demonstrate both the importance and the feasibility of the use of multiple citation data sources in citation analysis studies of scholarly communication, and provide evidence for a developing "two tier" scholarly communication system.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1403-1418
-
Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995)
0.02
0.017379664 = product of:
0.06082882 = sum of:
0.044027276 = weight(_text_:management in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044027276 = score(doc=1385,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.016801544 = product of:
0.033603087 = sum of:
0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033603087 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
- Date
- 22. 1.1996 18:26:45
-
Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.; Hubbard, B.; Millington, P.; Anders, J.H.S.; Hussain, A.: Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012 : past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities (2014)
0.02
0.01711647 = product of:
0.11981529 = sum of:
0.11981529 = weight(_text_:europe in 1542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11981529 = score(doc=1542,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.47586602 = fieldWeight in 1542, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1542)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews the worldwide growth of open-access (OA) repositories, 2005 to 2012, using data collected by the OpenDOAR project. Initial repository development was focused on North America, Western Europe, and Australasia, particularly the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia, followed by Japan. Since 2010, there has been repository growth in East Asia, South America, and Eastern Europe, especially in Taiwan, Brazil, and Poland. During the period, some countries, including France, Italy, and Spain, have maintained steady growth, whereas other countries, notably China and Russia, have experienced limited growth. Globally, repositories are predominantly institutional, multidisciplinary and English-language based. They typically use open-source OAI-compliant software but have immature licensing arrangements. Although the size of repositories is difficult to assess accurately, available data indicate that a small number of large repositories and a large number of small repositories make up the repository landscape. These trends are analyzed using innovation diffusion theory, which is shown to provide a useful explanatory framework for repository adoption at global, national, organizational, and individual levels. Major factors affecting both the initial development of repositories and their take-up include IT infrastructure, cultural factors, policy initiatives, awareness-raising activity, and usage mandates. Mandates are likely to be crucial in determining future repository development.
-
Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998)
0.01
0.014711247 = product of:
0.10297872 = sum of:
0.10297872 = sum of:
0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058174606 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04480412 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 16:56:06
-
Dalen, H.P. van; Henkens, K.: Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture : a worldwide survey (2012)
0.01
0.014523807 = product of:
0.101666644 = sum of:
0.101666644 = weight(_text_:europe in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101666644 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- How does publication pressure in modern-day universities affect the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards in science? By using a worldwide survey among demographers in developed and developing countries, the authors show that the large majority perceive the publication pressure as high, but more so in Anglo-Saxon countries and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. However, scholars see both the pros (upward mobility) and cons (excessive publication and uncitedness, neglect of policy issues, etc.) of the so-called publish-or-perish culture. By measuring behavior in terms of reading and publishing, and perceived extrinsic rewards and stated intrinsic rewards of practicing science, it turns out that publication pressure negatively affects the orientation of demographers towards policy and knowledge sharing. There are no signs that the pressure affects reading and publishing outside the core discipline.
-
Walsh, J.A.; Cobb, P.J.; Fremery, W. de; Golub, K.; Keah, H.; Kim, J.; Kiplang'at, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Mahony, S.; Oh, S.G.; Sula, C.A.; Underwood, T.; Wang, X.: Digital humanities in the iSchool (2022)
0.01
0.012606538 = product of:
0.044122882 = sum of:
0.025943318 = weight(_text_:management in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025943318 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.018179566 = product of:
0.03635913 = sum of:
0.03635913 = weight(_text_:studies in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03635913 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The interdisciplinary field known as digital humanities (DH) is represented in various forms in the teaching and research practiced in iSchools. Building on the work of an iSchools organization committee charged with exploring digital humanities curricula, we present findings from a series of related studies exploring aspects of DH teaching, education, and research in iSchools, often in collaboration with other units and disciplines. Through a survey of iSchool programs and an online DH course registry, we investigate the various education models for DH training found in iSchools, followed by a detailed look at DH courses and curricula, explored through analysis of course syllabi and course descriptions. We take a brief look at collaborative disciplines with which iSchools cooperate on DH research projects or in offering DH education. Next, we explore DH careers through an analysis of relevant job advertisements. Finally, we offer some observations about the management and administrative challenges and opportunities related to offering a new iSchool DH program. Our results provide a snapshot of the current state of digital humanities in iSchools which may usefully inform the design and evolution of new DH programs, degrees, and related initiatives.
