-
MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000)
0.05
0.046983022 = product of:
0.16444057 = sum of:
0.124838956 = weight(_text_:case in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124838956 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.6869397 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.03960162 = product of:
0.07920324 = sum of:
0.07920324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07920324 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the development of EEVL and outlines the services offered. The potential market for EEVL is discussed, and a case study of promotional activities is presented
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:40:22
-
Sasaki, H.; Kiyoki, Y.: ¬A formulation for patenting content-based retrieval processes in digital libraries (2005)
0.05
0.045390923 = product of:
0.10591215 = sum of:
0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031131983 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052964687 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.021815477 = product of:
0.043630954 = sum of:
0.043630954 = weight(_text_:studies in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043630954 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present a formulation and case studies of the conditions for patenting content-based retrieval processes in digital libraries, especially in image libraries. Inventors and practitioners demand a formulation of the conditions for patenting data-processing processes as computer-related inventions in the form of computer programs. A process for content-based retrieval often consists of a combination of prior disclosed means and also comprises means for parameter setting that is adjusted to retrieve specific kinds of images in certain narrow domains. We focus on requirements for technical advancement (nonobviousness) in the combination of data-processing means, i.e., processes and specification (enablement) on the means for parameter setting in computer programs. Our formulation follows the standards of patent examination and litigation on computer-related inventions in the US. We confirm the feasibility and accountability of our formulation by applying it to several inventions patented in the US.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.1, S.57-74
-
Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001)
0.03
0.033848055 = product of:
0.11846819 = sum of:
0.101666644 = weight(_text_:europe in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101666644 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.016801544 = product of:
0.033603087 = sum of:
0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033603087 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Der vollständige Projektname von Renardus lautet "Academic Subject Gateway Service Europe". Renardus wird von der Europäischen Union im 5. Rahmenprogramm mit dem Schwerpunktthema "Information Society Technologies" im zweiten Thematischen Programm "Benutzerfreundliche Informationsgesellschaft" ('Promoting a User-friendly Information Society') gefördert. Die Projektlaufzeit ist von Januar 2000 bis Juni 2002. Insgesamt zwölf Partner (Principal und Assistant Contractors) aus Finnland, Dänemark, Schweden, Großbritannien, den Niederlanden, Frankreich und Deutschland beteiligen sich an diesem Projekt. Die Europäische Union unterstützt das Projekt mit 1,7 Mio. EURO, die Gesamtkosten belaufen sich inklusive der Eigenbeteiligungen der Partner auf 2,3 Mio. EURO. Das Ziel des Projektes Renardus ist es, über eine Schnittstelle Zugriff auf verteilte Sammlungen von "High Quality" Internet Ressourcen in Europa zu ermöglichen. Diese Schnittstelle wird über den Renardus Broker realisiert, der das "Cross-Searchen" und "Cross-Browsen" über verteilte "Quality-Controlled Subject Gateways" ermöglicht. Ein weiteres Ziel von Renardus ist es, Möglichkeiten von "metadata sharing" zu evaluieren und in kleinen Experimenten zwischen z. B. Subject Gateways und Nationalbibliothek zu testen bzw. zu realisieren
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:32:15
-
Digital libraries for cultural heritage : development, outcomes, and challenges from European perspectives (2017)
0.03
0.02561759 = product of:
0.17932312 = sum of:
0.17932312 = weight(_text_:europe in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17932312 = score(doc=4679,freq=14.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.7122111 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- European digital libraries have existed in diverse forms and with quite different functions, priorities, and aims. However, there are some common features of European-based initiatives that are relevant to non-European communities. There are now many more challenges and changes than ever before, and the development rate of new digital libraries is ever accelerating. Delivering educational, cultural, and research resources-especially from major scientific and cultural organizations-has become a core mission of these organizations. Using these resources they will be able to investigate, educate, and elucidate, in order to promote and disseminate and to preserve civilization. Extremely important in conceptualizing the digital environment priorities in Europe was its cultural heritage and the feeling that these rich resources should be open to Europe and the global community. In this book we focus on European digitized heritage and digital culture, and its potential in the digital age. We specifically look at the EU and its approaches to digitization and digital culture, problems detected, and achievements reached, all with an emphasis on digital cultural heritage. We seek to report on important documents that were prepared on digitization; copyright and related documents; research and education in the digital libraries field under the auspices of the EU; some other European and national initiatives; and funded projects. The aim of this book is to discuss the development of digital libraries in the European context by presenting, primarily to non-European communities interested in digital libraries, the phenomena, initiatives, and developments that dominated in Europe. We describe the main projects and their outcomes, and shine a light on the number of challenges that have been inspiring new approaches, cooperative efforts, and the use of research methodology at different stages of the digital libraries development. The specific goals are reflected in the structure of the book, which can be conceived as a guide to several main topics and sub-topics. However, the author?s scope is far from being comprehensive, since the field of digital libraries is very complex and digital libraries for cultural heritage is even moreso.
- LCSH
- Digital libraries / Europe
Cultural property / Europe / Computer network resources
- Subject
- Digital libraries / Europe
Cultural property / Europe / Computer network resources
-
Niggemann, E.: Europeana: connecting cultural heritage (2009)
0.03
0.025294978 = product of:
0.08853242 = sum of:
0.020754656 = weight(_text_:management in 2816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020754656 = score(doc=2816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2816)
0.06777776 = weight(_text_:europe in 2816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06777776 = score(doc=2816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.26919046 = fieldWeight in 2816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2816)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The European Commission's goal for Europeana is to make European information resources easier to use in an online environment. It will build on Europe's rich heritage, combining multicultural and multilingual environments with technological advances and new business models. The Europeana prototype is the result of a 2-year project that began in July 2007. Europeana.eu went live on 20 November 2008, launched by Viviane Reding, European Commissioner for Information Society and Media. Europeana.eu is about ideas and inspiration. It links the user to 2 million digital items: images, text, sounds and videos. Europeana is a Thematic Network funded by the European Commission under the eContentplus programme, as part of the i2010 policy. Originally known as the European digital library network - EDLnet - it is a partnership of 100 representatives of heritage and knowledge organisations and IT experts from throughout Europe. They contribute to the work packages that are solving the technical and usability issues. The project is run by a core team based in the national library of the Netherlands, the Koninklijke Bibliotheek. It builds on the project management and technical expertise developed by The European Library, which is a service of the Conference of European National Librarians. Content is added via so called aggregators, national or domain specific portals aggegrating digital content and channelling it to Europeana. Most of these portals are being developed in the framework of EU funded projects, e.g. European Film Gateway, Athena and EuropeanaLocal. Overseeing the project is the EDL Foundation, which includes key European cultural heritage associations from the four domains. The Foundation's statutes commit members to: * providing access to Europe's cultural and scientific heritage through a cross-domain portal; * co-operating in the delivery and sustainability of the joint portal; * stimulating initiatives to bring together existing digital content; * supporting digitisation of Europe's cultural and scientific heritage. Europeana.eu is a prototype. Europeana Version 1.0 is being developed and will be launched in 2010 with links to over 6 million digital objects.
-
Blandford, A.; Adams, A.; Attfield, S.; Buchanan, G.; Gow, J.; Makri, S.; Rimmer, J.; Warwick, C.: ¬The PRET A Rapporter framework : evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work (2008)
0.02
0.02136084 = product of:
0.07476294 = sum of:
0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031131983 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.043630954 = product of:
0.08726191 = sum of:
0.08726191 = weight(_text_:studies in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08726191 = score(doc=2021,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The strongest tradition of IR systems evaluation has focused on system effectiveness; more recently, there has been a growing interest in evaluation of Interactive IR systems, balancing system and user-oriented evaluation criteria. In this paper we shift the focus to considering how IR systems, and particularly digital libraries, can be evaluated to assess (and improve) their fit with users' broader work activities. Taking this focus, we answer a different set of evaluation questions that reveal more about the design of interfaces, user-system interactions and how systems may be deployed in the information working context. The planning and conduct of such evaluation studies share some features with the established methods for conducting IR evaluation studies, but come with a shift in emphasis; for example, a greater range of ethical considerations may be pertinent. We present the PRET A Rapporter framework for structuring user-centred evaluation studies and illustrate its application to three evaluation studies of digital library systems.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.4-21
-
Silva, A.J.C.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Laender, A.H.F.; Modesto, M.A.B.; Cristo, M.; Ziviani, N.: Finding what is missing from a digital library : a case study in the computer science field (2009)
0.02
0.020023016 = product of:
0.070080556 = sum of:
0.025943318 = weight(_text_:management in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025943318 = score(doc=4219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=4219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.3, S.380-391
-
Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000)
0.02
0.015977843 = product of:
0.05592245 = sum of:
0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036320645 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.019601801 = product of:
0.039203603 = sum of:
0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039203603 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- 'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:37:55
-
Lee, J.H.; Wishkoski, R.; Aase, L.; Meas, P.; Hubbles, C.: Understanding users of cloud music services : selection factors, management and access behavior, and perceptions (2017)
0.02
0.015676847 = product of:
0.05486896 = sum of:
0.036689393 = weight(_text_:management in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036689393 = score(doc=3596,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.018179566 = product of:
0.03635913 = sum of:
0.03635913 = weight(_text_:studies in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03635913 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Recent, rapid changes in technology have resulted in a proliferation of choices for music storage and access. Portable, web-enabled music devices are widespread, and listeners now enjoy a plethora of options regarding formats, devices, and access methods. Yet in this mobile music environment, listeners' access and management strategies for music collections are poorly understood, because behaviors surrounding the organization and retrieval of music collections have received little formal study. Our current research seeks to enrich our knowledge of people's music listening and collecting behavior through a series of systematic user studies. In this paper we present our findings from interviews involving 20 adult and 20 teen users of commercial cloud music services. Our results contribute to theoretical understandings of users' music information behavior in a time of upheaval in music usage patterns, and more generally, the purposes and meanings users ascribe to personal media collections in cloud-based systems. The findings suggest improvements to the future design of cloud-based music services, as well as to any information systems and services designed for personal media collections, benefiting both commercial entities and listeners.
-
Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001)
0.01
0.013069752 = product of:
0.04574413 = sum of:
0.025943318 = weight(_text_:management in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025943318 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
0.01980081 = product of:
0.03960162 = sum of:
0.03960162 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03960162 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:22
- Source
- Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
-
Severiens, T.; Hohlfeld, M.; Zimmermann, K.; Hilf, E.R.: PhysDoc - a distributed network of physics institutions documents : collecting, indexing, and searching high quality documents by using harvest (2000)
0.01
0.012103172 = product of:
0.0847222 = sum of:
0.0847222 = weight(_text_:europe in 6470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0847222 = score(doc=6470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 6470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6470)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- PhysNet offers online services that enable a physicist to keep in touch with the worldwide physics community and to receive all information he or she may need. In addition to being of great value to physicists, these services are practical examples of the use of modern methods of digital libraries, in particular the use of metadata harvesting. One service is PhysDoc. This consists of a Harvest-based online information broker- and gatherer-network, which harvests information from the local web-servers of professional physics institutions worldwide (mostly in Europe and USA so far). PhysDoc focuses on scientific information posted by the individual scientist at his local server, such as documents, publications, reports, publication lists, and lists of links to documents. All rights are reserved for the authors who are responsible for the content and quality of their documents. PhysDis is an analogous service but specifically for university theses, with their dual requirements of examination work and publication. The strategy is to select high quality sites containing metadata. We report here on the present status of PhysNet, our experience in operating it, and the development of its usage. To continuously involve authors, research groups, and national societies is considered crucial for a future stable service.
-
Haslhofer, B.; Knezevié, P.: ¬The BRICKS digital library infrastructure (2009)
0.01
0.012103172 = product of:
0.0847222 = sum of:
0.0847222 = weight(_text_:europe in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0847222 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Service-oriented architectures, and the wider acceptance of decentralized peer-to-peer architectures enable the transition from integrated, centrally controlled systems to federated and dynamic configurable systems. The benefits for the individual service providers and users are robustness of the system, independence of central authorities and flexibility in the usage of services. This chapter provides details of the European project BRICKS, which aims at enabling integrated access to distributed resources in the Cultural Heritage domain. The target audience is broad and heterogeneous and involves cultural heritage and educational institutions, the research community, industry, and the general public. The project idea is motivated by the fact that the amount of digital information and digitized content is continuously increasing but still much effort has to be expended to discover and access it. The reasons for such a situation are heterogeneous data formats, restricted access, proprietary access interfaces, etc. Typical usage scenarios are integrated queries among several knowledge resource, e.g. to discover all Italian artifacts from the Renaissance in European museums. Another example is to follow the life cycle of historic documents, whose physical copies are distributed all over Europe. A standard method for integrated access is to place all available content and metadata in a central place. Unfortunately, such a solution requires a quite powerful and costly infrastructure if the volume of data is large. Considerations of cost optimization are highly important for Cultural Heritage institutions, especially if they are funded from public money. Therefore, better usage of the existing resources, i.e. a decentralized/P2P approach promises to deliver a significantly less costly system,and does not mean sacrificing too much on the performance side.
-
Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Internet subject gateways (1999)
0.01
0.010377328 = product of:
0.07264129 = sum of:
0.07264129 = weight(_text_:management in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07264129 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- International journal of information management. 19(1999) no.6, S.311-322
-
Praxishandbuch Portalmanagement : Profitable Stategien für Internetportale (2004)
0.01
0.010377328 = product of:
0.07264129 = sum of:
0.07264129 = weight(_text_:management in 4035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07264129 = score(doc=4035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4035)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Pinto, F.; Fraser, M.: Access management, the key to a Portal (2003)
0.01
0.010377328 = product of:
0.07264129 = sum of:
0.07264129 = weight(_text_:management in 4111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07264129 = score(doc=4111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4111)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
EuropeanaTech and Multilinguality : Issue 1 of EuropeanaTech Insight (2015)
0.01
0.009682538 = product of:
0.06777776 = sum of:
0.06777776 = weight(_text_:europe in 1832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06777776 = score(doc=1832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.26919046 = fieldWeight in 1832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1832)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Welcome to the very first issue of EuropeanaTech Insight, a multimedia publication about research and development within the EuropeanaTech community. EuropeanaTech is a very active community. It spans all of Europe and is made up of technical experts from the various disciplines within digital cultural heritage. At any given moment, members can be found presenting their work in project meetings, seminars and conferences around the world. Now, through EuropeanaTech Insight, we can share that inspiring work with the whole community. In our first three issues, we're showcasing topics discussed at the EuropeanaTech 2015 Conference, an exciting event that gave rise to lots of innovative ideas and fruitful conversations on the themes of data quality, data modelling, open data, data re-use, multilingualism and discovery. Welcome, bienvenue, bienvenido, Välkommen, Tervetuloa to the first Issue of EuropeanaTech Insight. Are we talking your language? No? Well I can guarantee you Europeana is. One of the European Union's great beauties and strengths is its diversity. That diversity is perhaps most evident in the 24 different languages spoken in the EU. Making it possible for all European citizens to easily and seamlessly communicate in their native language with others who do not speak that language is a huge technical undertaking. Translating documents, news, speeches and historical texts was once exclusively done manually. Clearly, that takes a huge amount of time and resources and means that not everything can be translated... However, with the advances in machine and automatic translation, it's becoming more possible to provide instant and pretty accurate translations. Europeana provides access to over 40 million digitised cultural heritage offering content in over 33 languages. But what value does Europeana provide if people can only find results in their native language? None. That's why the EuropeanaTech community is collectively working towards making it more possible for everyone to discover our collections in their native language. In this issue of EuropeanaTech Insight, we hear from community members who are making great strides in machine translation and enrichment tools to help improve not only access to data, but also how we retrieve, browse and understand it.
-
Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009)
0.01
0.00919453 = product of:
0.06436171 = sum of:
0.06436171 = sum of:
0.03635913 = weight(_text_:studies in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03635913 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.028002575 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028002575 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:52:32
-
Broughton, V.: Organizing a national humanities portal : a model for the classification and subject management of digital resources (2002)
0.01
0.008894852 = product of:
0.062263966 = sum of:
0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062263966 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Monopoli, M.; Nicholas, D.: ¬A user evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways : case study ADAM (2001)
0.01
0.008827448 = product of:
0.061792135 = sum of:
0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061792135 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Monopoli, M.; Nichols, D.: ¬A user-centred approach to the evaluation of subject based information gateways : case study SOSIG (2000)
0.01
0.008827448 = product of:
0.061792135 = sum of:
0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061792135 = score(doc=710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
