Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  1. Beghtol, C.: Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus : the case of fiction studies (1995) 0.02
    0.023947554 = product of:
      0.08381643 = sum of:
        0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 7728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052964687 = score(doc=7728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 7728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7728)
        0.030851744 = product of:
          0.06170349 = sum of:
            0.06170349 = weight(_text_:studies in 7728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170349 = score(doc=7728,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 7728, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports research that used descriptor subfields in MLA Bibliography online to quantify literary warrant in the domain of scholarly work about fiction (i.e., 'fiction studies'). The research used Hulme's concept of literary warrant and Kernan's description of the interactive processes of literature and literary scholarship to justify quantifying existing subject indexing in existing bibliographic records as a first step in the domain analysis of a field. It was found that certain of the MLA Bibliography onle's descriptor subfields and certain of the descriptor terms within those subfields occured more often than would occur by chance. The techniques used in the research might be extended to domain analysis of other fields. Use of the methodology might improve the ability to evaluate existing and to design future subject access systems
  2. Briggs, B.S.: ¬A case for classifies fiction (1973) 0.02
    0.020177025 = product of:
      0.14123917 = sum of:
        0.14123917 = weight(_text_:case in 1006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14123917 = score(doc=1006,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.7771836 = fieldWeight in 1006, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1006)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  3. Kinnell, M.: Managing fiction in libraries (1991) 0.02
    0.01657458 = product of:
      0.11602206 = sum of:
        0.11602206 = weight(_text_:management in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11602206 = score(doc=754,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.83271974 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers fiction management in the context of all the other management functions of libraries, including resource management, service development, staff management and the marketing of services. Children's and adolescent fiction management are included
  4. Denham, D.: Back to basics : training and education opportunities for the exploitation of fiction in public libraries (1996) 0.01
    0.014711247 = product of:
      0.10297872 = sum of:
        0.10297872 = sum of:
          0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058174606 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
          0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04480412 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the importance of fiction, and the role of the librarian in the successful acquisition and exploitation of fiction books. Examines training and education in this area for both students and practising librarians, and provides details of some possible ways of updating skills through a course being offered by the School of Information Studies at the University of Central England in Birmingham
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:18:22
  5. Saarti, J.: Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri (1999) 0.01
    0.012872341 = product of:
      0.09010638 = sum of:
        0.09010638 = sum of:
          0.05090278 = weight(_text_:studies in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05090278 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
          0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039203603 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the theoretical questions involved in the indexing of fiction from several viewpoints: general principles of fiction indexing, and the making of book indexes for novels and other fictional works. Describes the work undertaken to develop fiction thesauri with particular reference to work done in Scandinavia, notably in the development of Kaunokki: the Finnish Thesaurus for Fiction, by Helsinki University Library and BTJ Group Ltd. Briefly presents notes on the structure of Kaunokkis with some examples of its practical use and user feedback from several years' experience of its use in Finnish public libraries. Concludes that the widest field for additional studies would be in the building up of special information systems for fiction.
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  6. Bell, H.: On the indexability of butterflies (1992) 0.01
    0.010088513 = product of:
      0.07061958 = sum of:
        0.07061958 = weight(_text_:case in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07061958 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Most publishers, who are cost-conscious, and the majority of authors, who are creativity-conscious, oppos indexes for fiction. However, maintains, that there is a case to be made for the indexing of serious fiction, whose readers have the same needs for information retrieval with regard to characters, places and events, as readers of biographies and histories
  7. Vernitski, A.; Rafferty, P.: Approaches to fiction retrieval research : from theory to practice? (2011) 0.01
    0.007566384 = product of:
      0.052964687 = sum of:
        0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052964687 = score(doc=4720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter considers fiction retrieval research and initiatives, providing an overview of some of the approaches that have been developed. In particular, it describes two recent approaches to fiction retrieval that have made use of theoretical concepts drawn from literary theory. Fiction is an interesting information domain because it includes documents that serve two purposes, which are reading for pleasure and scholarly study (Beghtol, 1994), but fiction retrieval has not always focused on both aspects. In the 19th century, the approach was to treat fiction from a knowledge perspective within general classification schemes. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) contain classes for literature, with the main subdivision in each case being the language in which it is written. Further subdivision is possible based on literary form, historical period or the works of an individual author (Riesthuis, 1997).
  8. Guard, A.: ¬An antidote for browsing : subject headings for fiction (1991) 0.01
    0.0064005884 = product of:
      0.04480412 = sum of:
        0.04480412 = product of:
          0.08960824 = sum of:
            0.08960824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08960824 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:00
  9. OCLC/LC fiction headings project : too little, too late? (1992) 0.01
    0.0064005884 = product of:
      0.04480412 = sum of:
        0.04480412 = product of:
          0.08960824 = sum of:
            0.08960824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08960824 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:14
  10. Stünkel, M.: Neuere Methoden der inhaltlichen Erschließung schöner Literatur in öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01
    0.0064005884 = product of:
      0.04480412 = sum of:
        0.04480412 = product of:
          0.08960824 = sum of:
            0.08960824 = weight(_text_:22 in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08960824 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    4. 8.2006 21:35:22
  11. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a computer-aided user-system dialogue based on an analysis of users' search behaviour (1984) 0.01
    0.0062329937 = product of:
      0.043630954 = sum of:
        0.043630954 = product of:
          0.08726191 = sum of:
            0.08726191 = weight(_text_:studies in 1044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08726191 = score(doc=1044,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 1044, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1044)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Social science information studies. 4(1984), S.167-183
  12. Schneider, A.: ¬Die Verzeichnung und sachliche Erschließung der Belletristik in Kaysers Bücherlexikon und im Schlagwortkatalog Georg/Ost (1980) 0.01
    0.005600515 = product of:
      0.039203603 = sum of:
        0.039203603 = product of:
          0.078407206 = sum of:
            0.078407206 = weight(_text_:22 in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078407206 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:07:22
  13. Walker, R.: Categorization 0.01
    0.005188664 = product of:
      0.036320645 = sum of:
        0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 1019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036320645 = score(doc=1019,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1019, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1019)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    It is a self-evident truth that there is a complete mismatch between the common forms of stock presentation and the observed patterns of public library use. It is sad, however, to see the term display dropped in favour of categorization, since desplay suggests the concept of periodic changes of categories. Fiction needs categorization, but to achieve consistency a basic all-embracing classification is called for. Or at least we should agree to some standard descriptors for the contents of a novel. This means that a librarian will be forced to analyse books and relate them to readers. In other words he must become a 'book person' which, however, is heresy in this mad management world
  14. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.01
    0.005188664 = product of:
      0.036320645 = sum of:
        0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036320645 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
  15. Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992) 0.00
    0.004800441 = product of:
      0.033603087 = sum of:
        0.033603087 = product of:
          0.067206174 = sum of:
            0.067206174 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067206174 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:39
  16. Velthoven, A.: 'Heeft u nog een mooi boek voor mij?' : het adviseren van romanlezers (1994) 0.00
    0.0045258994 = product of:
      0.031681295 = sum of:
        0.031681295 = product of:
          0.06336259 = sum of:
            0.06336259 = weight(_text_:22 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06336259 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 22(1994) no.11, S.22-23
  17. Birdi, B.; Ford, N.: Towards a new sociological model of fiction reading (2018) 0.00
    0.004498276 = product of:
      0.03148793 = sum of:
        0.03148793 = product of:
          0.06297586 = sum of:
            0.06297586 = weight(_text_:studies in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06297586 = score(doc=4540,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.3818022 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Although much previous research has considered how we read, less attention has been paid to why we read, and the influence not only of individual or text-related factors on a reader's intention to read, but also of broader societal factors. This article presents a novel, empirically-based model of fiction reading in a public library context, taking into account the characteristics differentiating the readers of individual fiction genres. It begins with a literature review of factors motivating a reading choice or habit, and of the effects of reading different fiction genres, before introducing three previous studies by the first author into readers' attitudes towards, and engagement with, fiction and selected fiction genres. The methodologies are then summarized both for the three previous studies and the present study. The authors present a combined analysis that integrates the findings of the previous studies in order to generate a new, evidence-based model for the reading of fiction genres. Incorporating both demographic and motivational aspects, this model illustrates how the broad themes of the fiction reader profile interrelate, giving them a new causal ordering. Finally, there is a discussion of the implications of this work for library and information science research and practitioner communities.
  18. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A framework for indexing and representation of information based on work domain analysis : a fiction classification example (1994) 0.00
    0.004447426 = product of:
      0.031131983 = sum of:
        0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031131983 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  19. Scharl, A.; Hubmann-Haidvogel, A.H.; Jones, A.; Fischl, D.; Kamolov, R.; Weichselbraun, A.; Rafelsberger, W.: Analyzing the public discourse on works of fiction : detection and visualization of emotion in online coverage about HBO's Game of Thrones (2016) 0.00
    0.004447426 = product of:
      0.031131983 = sum of:
        0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031131983 = score(doc=842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=842)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.129-138
  20. Gonçalo Oliveira, H.: Automatic generation of poetry inspired by Twitter trends (2016) 0.00
    0.004447426 = product of:
      0.031131983 = sum of:
        0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 2388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031131983 = score(doc=2388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2388)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management: 7th International Joint Conference, IC3K 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, November 12-14, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: A. Fred et al