Search (102 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. Mochel, K.: Search in the Web shopping environment (2006) 0.04 
    0.03617969 = product of:
  0.12662892 = sum of:
    0.10702712 = weight(_text_:case in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10702712 = score(doc=5301,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.58892816 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
    0.019601801 = product of:
      0.039203603 = sum of:
        0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039203603 = score(doc=5301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The author presents a design case study of a search user interface for Web catalogs in the context of online shopping for consumer products such as clothing, furniture, and sporting goods. The case study provides a review of the user data for the user interface (UI), and the resulting redesign recommendations. Based on the case study and its user data, a set of common user requirements for searching in the context of online shopping is provided.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:23:19
  2. Richards, S.: ¬The use of metaphors in iconic interface design (1994) 0.04 
    0.035609603 = product of:
  0.12463361 = sum of:
    0.08827448 = weight(_text_:case in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08827448 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.48573974 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
    0.03635913 = product of:
      0.07271826 = sum of:
        0.07271826 = weight(_text_:studies in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07271826 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.44086722 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Describes the interrelationship that exists between icons and metaphors and discusses the problems of designing iconic computer interfaces that embed useful metaphors. Uses various case studies to illustrate the issues raised and draws outline conclusions
  3. ¬A graphical user interface : the case of the British Library network OPAC (1996) 0.03 
    0.028032223 = product of:
  0.09811278 = sum of:
    0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036320645 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
    0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061792135 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Presents the selected findings of a research project based on the British Library Network Online Public Access Catalogue (NOPAC) carried out in the department of information and library management at the University of Northumbria in Newcastle, UK over the academic year 1994/95. Data was collected by means of interviews with NOPAC users especially on use made of the NOPAC and on attitudes towards the NOPAC's interface. Discusses the views of users as they relate to: display features; mode of interaction; help/user assistance; extra features available; and usability. Lists important points which emerged from the survey concerning the NOPAC service
  4. Fidel, R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Cleal, B.; Bruce, H.: ¬A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction : a case study of collaborative information retrieval (2004) 0.03 
    0.02763396 = product of:
  0.096718855 = sum of:
    0.07490338 = weight(_text_:case in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07490338 = score(doc=2997,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
    0.021815477 = product of:
      0.043630954 = sum of:
        0.043630954 = weight(_text_:studies in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043630954 = score(doc=2997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    While most research in the area of human-information behavior has focused an a single dimension-either the psychological or the social-this case study demonstrated the importance of a multidimensional approach. The Cognitive Work Analysis framework guided this field study of one event of collaborative information retrieval (CIR) carried out by design engineers at Microsoft, including observations and interviews. Various dimensions explained the motives for this CIR event and the challenges the participants encountered: the cognitive dimension, the specific task and decision, the organization of the teamwork, and the organizational culture. Even though it is difficult at times to separate one dimension from another, and all are interdependent, the analysis uncovered several reasons for design engineers to engage in CIR, such as when they are new to the organization or the team, when the information lends itself to various interpretations, or when most of the needed information is not documented. Similar multidimensional studies will enhance our understanding of human-information behavior.
  5. Callahan, E.: Interface design and culture (2004) 0.03 
    0.025241597 = product of:
  0.08834559 = sum of:
    0.06777776 = weight(_text_:europe in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06777776 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.26919046 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
    0.020567829 = product of:
      0.041135658 = sum of:
        0.041135658 = weight(_text_:studies in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041135658 = score(doc=4281,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.24939215 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    It is common knowledge that computer interfaces in different cultures vary. Interface designers present information in different languages, use different iconography to designate concepts, and employ different standards for dates, time, and numbers. These manifest differences beg the question of how easily an interface designed in one country can be used in and transferred to another country. Are the challenges involved in adaptation merely cosmetic or are they shaped by more profound forces? Do all cultures respond to interfaces in similar ways, or does culture itself shape user comprehension? If culture is a factor in explaining varied user reactions to comparable interfaces, what specific cultural dimensions are responsible for the divergences? Do differences reside mainly at the level of national cultures, or do they depend an other variables such as class, gender, age, education, and expertise with technology? In the face of a potentially large number of explanatory variables, how do we delimit a workable concept of culture and yet remain cognizant of other factors that might shape the results of culture and interface research? Questions such as these have been asked in the ergonomics community since the early 1970s, when the industrialization of developing countries created a need for more research an cultural differences (Honold, 1999), resulting in an increased interest in the universal applicability of ergonomic principles. This trend continued after the reunification of Germany and the emergence of market economies in Eastern Europe (Nielsen, 1990). In the mid-1990s, as markets outside the U.S. rapidly expanded, it became necessary to develop appropriate user interfaces for non-Western cultures in order to facilitate international cooperation. This fresh impetus for research led to the development of practical guidelines and a body of Gase studies and examples of possible solutions. Most recently we have seen attempts to provide a theoretical foundation for cross-cultural usability engineering and experimental comparison studies (Honold, 1999).
  6. Mandl, T.; Stempfhuber, M.: Softwareergonomische Gestaltung von Wirtschaftsinformationssystemen am Beispiel von ELVIRA (1998) 0.02 
    0.022825489 = product of:
  0.07988921 = sum of:
    0.051886637 = weight(_text_:management in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051886637 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
    0.028002575 = product of:
      0.05600515 = sum of:
        0.05600515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05600515 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  7. Harris, C.; Allen, R.B.; Plaisant, C.; Shneiderman, B.: Temporal visualization for legal case histories : from interpersonal communication to online information process (1999) 0.02 
    0.021400966 = product of:
  0.14980675 = sum of:
    0.14980675 = weight(_text_:case in 6715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14980675 = score(doc=6715,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.8243277 = fieldWeight in 6715, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6715)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses visualization of legal information using a tool for temporal information called LifeLines. The direct and indirect histories of cases can become very complex. We explored ways that LifeLines could aid in viewing the links between the original case and the direct and indirect histories. The Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation and Hewlett Packard Company case is used to illustrate the prototype. For example, if users want to find out how the rulings or statutes changed throughout this case, they could retrieve this information within a single display. Using the timeline, users could also choose at which point in time they would like to begin viewing the case. LifeLines support various views of a case's history. For instance, users can view the trial history of a case, the references involved in a case, and citations made to a case. The paper describes improvements to LifeLines that could help in providing a more
  8. Ashton, J.: Development of the British Library's OPAC 97 : the value of a user-centred approach (1998) 0.02 
    0.020661244 = product of:
  0.07231435 = sum of:
    0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036320645 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
    0.035993703 = product of:
      0.071987405 = sum of:
        0.071987405 = weight(_text_:studies in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071987405 = score(doc=1100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Reviews the development of the British Library OPAC services leading up to the launch of OPAC 97, offering access to 9 mio bibliographic records and attempts to show the value of a user centred approach in the project management involved in developing such a service as recommended by Human Computer Interaction (HCI) studies. Reviews the evaluation studies of the Online Catalogue, the Network OPAC, a web prototype interface and of OPAC 97 and discusses the results in relation to the OPAC 97 project. Although the OPAC 97 interface made use of various HCI recommendations, user feedback sometimes contradicted these in specific instances, revealing the value of detailed user evaluation in developing services
  9. Larsen, G.: Advances in OPACs in Europe : an overview (1994) 0.02 
    0.019365076 = product of:
  0.13555552 = sum of:
    0.13555552 = weight(_text_:europe in 7028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13555552 = score(doc=7028,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 7028, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7028)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  10. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02 
    0.018297652 = product of:
  0.06404178 = sum of:
    0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036320645 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
    0.027721135 = product of:
      0.05544227 = sum of:
        0.05544227 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05544227 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  11. Käki, M.; Aula, A.: Controlling the complexity in comparing search user interfaces via user studies (2008) 0.02 
    0.017709637 = product of:
  0.061983727 = sum of:
    0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031131983 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
    0.030851744 = product of:
      0.06170349 = sum of:
        0.06170349 = weight(_text_:studies in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06170349 = score(doc=2024,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Over time, researchers have acknowledged the importance of understanding the users' strategies in the design of search systems. However, when involving users in the comparison of search systems, methodological challenges still exist as researchers are pondering on how to handle the variability that human participants bring to the comparisons. This paper present methods for controlling the complexity of user-centered evaluations of search user interfaces through within-subjects designs, balanced task sets, time limitations, pre-formulated queries, cached result pages, and through limiting the users' access to result documents. Additionally, we will present our experiences in using three measures - search speed, qualified search speed, and immediate accuracy - to facilitate the comparison of different search systems over studies.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.82-91
  12. Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006) 0.02 
    0.01588443 = product of:
  0.111191005 = sum of:
    0.111191005 = sum of:
      0.071987405 = weight(_text_:studies in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071987405 = score(doc=5302,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041336425 = queryNorm
          0.43643627 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
      0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039203603 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041336425 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:30:09
  13. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Mitev, N.N.: Online library catalogues : the interactive dimension (1989) 0.01 
    0.010377328 = product of:
  0.07264129 = sum of:
    0.07264129 = weight(_text_:management in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07264129 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Perspectives in information management 1. Ed.: C. Oppenheim
  14. Yazici, H.; Muthuswamy, K; Vila, J.: ¬An intelligent system approach for graphical user interface management (1994) 0.01 
    0.010270892 = product of:
  0.07189624 = sum of:
    0.07189624 = weight(_text_:management in 8216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07189624 = score(doc=8216,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 8216, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8216)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Examines the role of user, task, and system characteristics in determining display methods, and uses an expert system for system-user interface management within the context of a decision support system. The architecture of expert system interface manager (ESIM) and the prototype developed for display selection are presented. Future implications of the prototype system for user interface management are discussed
  15. Hamilton, A.: Interface metaphors and logical analogues : a question of terminology (2000) 0.01 
    0.010088513 = product of:
  0.07061958 = sum of:
    0.07061958 = weight(_text_:case in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07061958 = score(doc=4381,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The paper is laid out as follows: Part 1 discusses the emergence of, and theoretical justification for, the interface metaphor design principle; part 2 discusses roles for tropes in the communication of new concepts and information; part 3 reviews the case study on which the paper is based
  16. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Interactive query expansion in an OPAC : interface and retrieval issues (1995) 0.01 
    0.008894852 = product of:
  0.062263966 = sum of:
    0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062263966 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 3(1995) no.2, S.172-185
  17. Pollitt, A.S.: Intelligent interfaces to online databases (1990) 0.01 
    0.008894852 = product of:
  0.062263966 = sum of:
    0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062263966 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Expert systems for information management. 3(1990) no.1, S.49-69
  18. Calvi, L.: Navigation and disorientation : a case study (1997) 0.01 
    0.008827448 = product of:
  0.061792135 = sum of:
    0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061792135 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  19. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.01 
    0.008314609 = product of:
  0.05820226 = sum of:
    0.05820226 = product of:
      0.11640452 = sum of:
        0.11640452 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11640452 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  20. Zamir, O.; Etzioni, O.: Grouper : a dynamic clustering interface to Web search results (1999) 0.01 
    0.007566384 = product of:
  0.052964687 = sum of:
    0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 6207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052964687 = score(doc=6207,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041336425 = queryNorm
        0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 6207, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6207)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Clustering is an effective way of organizing documents into collections for ease of browsing. Recently with the growth of WWW, clustering has become a paradigm for organizing search results. Online systems face many new challenges, including the need for fast response time, generating high quality clusters with simple descriptions for novice users, and working with document distributions that violates many traditional assumptions. How do different clustering algorithms trade off quality of clusters and speed? What modifications are necessary to adapt traditional clustering algorithm to the WWW? How do these system scale to larger document collection? How do these systems evaluate the quality of the cluster they generate? How are the clusters generated in each case, and are there any processing after cluster generation to improve on the cluster quality?

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 89
  • d 12

Types

  • a 94
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications