-
Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014)
0.03
0.0309997 = product of:
0.108498946 = sum of:
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.06436171 = sum of:
0.03635913 = weight(_text_:studies in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03635913 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.028002575 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028002575 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- In recent years, Hjørland has developed a typology of basic epistemological approaches to KO that identifies four basic positions - empiricism, rationalism, historicism/hermeneutics, and pragmatism -with which to characterize the epistemological bases and methodological orientation of KOSs. Although scholars of KO have noted that the design of a single KOS may incorporate epistemological-methodological features from more than one of these approaches, studies of concrete examples of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism have been rare. In this paper, we consider the phenomenon of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism in one theoretically significant family of KOSs - namely analytico-synthetic, or faceted, KOSs - by examining two cases - Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI) and Brian Vickery's method of facet analysis (FA) for document classification. We show that both of these systems combined classical features of rationalism with elements of empiricism and pragmatism and argue that such eclecticism is the norm, rather than the exception, for such KOSs in general.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Satija, M.P.: Save the national heritage : revise the Colon Classification (2015)
0.03
0.028487684 = product of:
0.09970689 = sum of:
0.07061958 = weight(_text_:case in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07061958 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
0.029087303 = product of:
0.058174606 = sum of:
0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058174606 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The paper presents a case for the revival of Colon Classification (CC). It traces the status of CC in brief and discusses its features. The author brings to light attempts made at providing a base for continuous improvements in the scheme and bringing it back to life. Measures for the revival of CC are suggested.
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.239-248
-
Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015)
0.02
0.017804801 = product of:
0.062316805 = sum of:
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
0.018179566 = product of:
0.03635913 = sum of:
0.03635913 = weight(_text_:studies in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03635913 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Computers have transformed from single isolated devices to entry points into a worldwide network of information exchange. Consequently, support in the exchange of data, information, and knowledge is becoming the key issue in computer technology today. The increasing volume of data available on the Web makes information retrieval a tedious and difficult task. Researchers are now exploring the possibility of creating a semantic web, in which meaning is made explicit, allowing machines to process and integrate web resources intelligently. The vision of the semantic web introduces the next generation of the Web by establishing a layer of machine-understandable data. The success of the semantic web depends on the easy creation, integration and use of semantic data, which will depend on web ontology. The faceted approach towards analyzing and representing knowledge given by S R Ranganathan would be useful in this regard. Ontology development in different fields is one such area where this approach given by Ranganathan could be applied. This paper presents a case of developing ontology for the field of banking.
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.281-285
-
Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014)
0.02
0.016611008 = product of:
0.058138527 = sum of:
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
0.0140012875 = product of:
0.028002575 = sum of:
0.028002575 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028002575 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Categories, or concepts of high generality representing the most basic kinds of entities in the world, have long been understood to be a fundamental element in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), particularly faceted ones. Commentators on facet analysis have tended to foreground the role of categories in the structuring of controlled vocabularies and the construction of compound index terms, and the implications of this for subject representation and information retrieval. Less attention has been paid to the variety of ways in which categories can shape the overall architectonic framework of a KOS. This case study explores the range of functions that categories took in structuring various aspects of an early analytico-synthetic KOS, Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI). Within SI, categories not only functioned as mechanisms to partition an index vocabulary into smaller groupings of terms and as elements in the construction of compound index terms but also served as means of defining the units of indexing, or index items, incorporated into an index; determining the organization of card index files and the articulation of the guide card system serving as a navigational aids thereto; and setting structural constraints to the establishment of cross-references between terms. In all these ways, Kaiser's system of categories contributed to the general systematicity of SI.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010)
0.02
0.015977843 = product of:
0.05592245 = sum of:
0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036320645 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.019601801 = product of:
0.039203603 = sum of:
0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039203603 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
-
Maltby, A.; Gill, L.: ¬The case for Bliss : modern classification practice and principles in the context of the Bibliographic classification (1979)
0.01
0.01261064 = product of:
0.08827448 = sum of:
0.08827448 = weight(_text_:case in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08827448 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.48573974 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998)
0.01
0.008827448 = product of:
0.061792135 = sum of:
0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061792135 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Content
- This article compares the qualitative method of grounded theory (GT) with Ranganathan's construction of faceted classifications (FC) in library and information science. Both struggle with a core problem-i.e., the representation of vernacular words and processes, empirically discovered, which will, although ethnographically faithful, be powerful beyond the single instance or case study. The article compares Glaser and Strauss's (1967) work with that of Ranganathan(1950).
-
Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017)
0.01
0.008827448 = product of:
0.061792135 = sum of:
0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061792135 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
-
Asundi, A.Y.: Domain specific categories and relations and their potential applications : a case study of two arrays of agriculture schedule of Colon Classification (2012)
0.01
0.007566384 = product of:
0.052964687 = sum of:
0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052964687 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Broughton, V.: Concepts and terms in the faceted classification : the case of UDC (2010)
0.01
0.00630532 = product of:
0.04413724 = sum of:
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=4065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬A faceted classification of general concepts (2011)
0.01
0.00630532 = product of:
0.04413724 = sum of:
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- General concepts are all those form-categorial concepts which - attached to a specific concept of a classification system or thesaurus - can help to widen, sometimes even in a syntactical sense, the understanding of a case. In some existing universal classification systems such concepts have been named "auxiliaries" or "common isolates" as in the Colon Classification (CC). However, by such auxiliaries, different kinds of such concepts are listed, e.g. concepts of space and time, concepts of races and languages and concepts of kinds of documents, next to them also concepts of kinds of general activities, properties, persons, and institutions. Such latter kinds form part of the nine aspects ruling the facets in the Information Coding Classification (ICC) through the principle of using a Systematiser for the subdivision of subject groups and fields. Based on this principle and using and extending existing systems of such concepts, e.g. which A. Diemer had presented to the German Thesaurus Committee as well as those found in the UDC, in CC and attached to the Subject Heading System of the German National Library, a faceted classification is proposed for critical assessment, necessary improvement and possible later use in classification systems and thesauri.
-
Gnoli, C.; Pullman, T.; Cousson, P.; Merli, G.; Szostak, R.: Representing the structural elements of a freely faceted classification (2011)
0.01
0.00630532 = product of:
0.04413724 = sum of:
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Freely faceted classifications allow for free combination of concepts across all knowledge domains, and for sorting of the resulting compound classmarks. Starting from work by the Classification Research Group, the Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) project has produced a first edition of a general freely faceted scheme. The system is managed as a MySQL database, and can be browsed through a Web interface. The ILC database structure provides a case for identifying and representing the structural elements of any freely faceted classification. These belong to both the notational and the verbal planes. Notational elements include: arrays, chains, deictics, facets, foci, place of definition of foci, examples of combinations, subclasses of a faceted class, groupings, related classes; verbal elements include: main caption, synonyms, descriptions, included terms, related terms, notes. Encoding of some of these elements in an international mark-up format like SKOS can be problematic, especially as this does not provide for faceted structures, although approximate SKOS equivalents are identified for most of them.
-
Faceted classification today : International UDC Seminar 2017, 14.-15. Spetember, London, UK. (2017)
0.01
0.0059299017 = product of:
0.04150931 = sum of:
0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04150931 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Faceted analytical theory is a widely accepted approach for constructing modern classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies. While the advantages of faceted approach are broadly accepted and understood the actual implementation is coupled with many challenges when it comes to data modelling, management and retrieval. UDC Seminar 2017 revisits faceted analytical theory as one of the most influential methodologies in the development of knowledge organization systems.
-
Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008)
0.01
0.0052413424 = product of:
0.036689393 = sum of:
0.036689393 = weight(_text_:management in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036689393 = score(doc=2497,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Content
- The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
-
Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments
0.00
0.004447426 = product of:
0.031131983 = sum of:
0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031131983 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The Bliss Bibliographic Classification is the only example of a fully faceted general classification scheme in the Western world. Although it is the object of much interest as a model for other tools it suffers from the lack of a web presence, and remedying this is an immediate objective for its editors. Understanding how this might be done presents some challenges, as the scheme is semantically very rich and complex in the range and nature of the relationships it contains. The automatic management of these is already in place using local software, but exporting this to a common data format needs careful thought and planning. Various encoding schemes, both for traditional classifications, and for digital materials, represent variously: the concepts; their functional roles; and the relationships between them. Integrating these aspects in a coherent and interchangeable manner appears to be achievable, but the most appropriate format is as yet unclear.
-
Raghavan, K.S.: ¬The Colon Classification : a few considerations on its future (2015)
0.00
0.0041553294 = product of:
0.029087303 = sum of:
0.029087303 = product of:
0.058174606 = sum of:
0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058174606 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.231-238
-
Panigrahi, P.: Ranganathan and Dewey in hierarchical subject classification : some similarities (2015)
0.00
0.0041553294 = product of:
0.029087303 = sum of:
0.029087303 = product of:
0.058174606 = sum of:
0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058174606 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.265-267
-
Rout, R.; Panigrahi, P.: Revisiting Ranganathan's canons in online cataloguing environment (2015)
0.00
0.0041553294 = product of:
0.029087303 = sum of:
0.029087303 = product of:
0.058174606 = sum of:
0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 2796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058174606 = score(doc=2796,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 2796, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2796)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.286-289
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.00
0.004000368 = product of:
0.028002575 = sum of:
0.028002575 = product of:
0.05600515 = sum of:
0.05600515 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05600515 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.00
0.0032002942 = product of:
0.02240206 = sum of:
0.02240206 = product of:
0.04480412 = sum of:
0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04480412 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
