Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982) 0.06
    0.055877626 = product of:
      0.19557168 = sum of:
        0.12358427 = weight(_text_:case in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12358427 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.68003565 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
        0.071987405 = product of:
          0.14397481 = sum of:
            0.14397481 = weight(_text_:studies in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14397481 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.87287253 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Series
    Case studies in library automation; no.1
  2. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.02
    0.021365764 = product of:
      0.074780166 = sum of:
        0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052964687 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.021815477 = product of:
          0.043630954 = sum of:
            0.043630954 = weight(_text_:studies in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043630954 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
  3. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.02
    0.016772296 = product of:
      0.11740606 = sum of:
        0.11740606 = weight(_text_:management in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11740606 = score(doc=2054,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.8426531 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
  4. Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990) 0.01
    0.010377328 = product of:
      0.07264129 = sum of:
        0.07264129 = weight(_text_:management in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07264129 = score(doc=1916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Series
    New directions in information management; 21
  5. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985) 0.01
    0.010088513 = product of:
      0.07061958 = sum of:
        0.07061958 = weight(_text_:case in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07061958 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  6. Molto, M.: Improving full text search performance through textual analysis (1993) 0.01
    0.0059299017 = product of:
      0.04150931 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.614-632
  7. Kristensen, J.: Expanding end-users' query statements for free text searching with a search-aid thesaurus (1993) 0.01
    0.0059299017 = product of:
      0.04150931 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=6621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.6, S.733-744
  8. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: Full-text information retrieval : further analysis and clarification (1990) 0.01
    0.0059299017 = product of:
      0.04150931 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.437-447
  9. Turtle, H.; Flood, J.: Query evaluation : strategies and optimizations (1995) 0.01
    0.0059299017 = product of:
      0.04150931 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.6, S.831-850
  10. Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995) 0.01
    0.005188664 = product of:
      0.036320645 = sum of:
        0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036320645 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    New review of document and text management. 1995, no.1, S.63-83
  11. Melucci, M.: Passage retrieval : a probabilistic technique (1998) 0.01
    0.005188664 = product of:
      0.036320645 = sum of:
        0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036320645 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.1, S.43-68
  12. Shewale, N.G.: Information delivery of full-text databases in academic and research libraries using hypermedia (1998) 0.01
    0.005188664 = product of:
      0.036320645 = sum of:
        0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036320645 = score(doc=3566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information management in academic and research libraries: Proceedings of the 5th National convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), Bhubaneswar, India, 4-5 March 1998. Ed. by M. Mahapatra et al
  13. Pirkola, A.; Jarvelin, K.: ¬The effect of anaphor and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database (1995) 0.00
    0.0037061884 = product of:
      0.025943318 = sum of:
        0.025943318 = weight(_text_:management in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025943318 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.2, S.199-216
  14. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.00
    0.003672827 = product of:
      0.025709787 = sum of:
        0.025709787 = product of:
          0.051419575 = sum of:
            0.051419575 = weight(_text_:studies in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051419575 = score(doc=4214,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.3117402 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
  15. Voorbij, H.: Title keywords and subject descriptors : a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences (1998) 0.00
    0.003672827 = product of:
      0.025709787 = sum of:
        0.025709787 = product of:
          0.051419575 = sum of:
            0.051419575 = weight(_text_:studies in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051419575 = score(doc=4721,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.3117402 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In order to compare the value of subject descriptors and title keywords as entries to subject searches, two studies were carried out. Both studies concentrated on monographs in the humanities and social sciences, held by the online public access catalogue of the National Library of the Netherlands. In the first study, a comparison was made by subject librarians between the subject descriptors and the title keywords of 475 records. They could express their opinion on a scale from 1 (descriptor is exactly or almost the same as word in title) to 7 (descriptor does not appear in title at all). It was concluded that 37 per cent of the records are considerably enhanced by a subject descriptor, and 49 per cent slightly or considerably enhanced. In the second study, subject librarians performed subject searches using title keywords and subject descriptors on the same topic. The relative recall amounted to 48 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. Failure analysis revealed the reasons why so many records that were found by subject descriptors were not found by title keywords. First, although completely meaningless titles hardly ever appear, the title of a publication does not always offer sufficient clues for title keyword searching. In those cases, descriptors may enhance the record of a publication. A second and even more important task of subject descriptors is controlling the vocabulary. Many relevant titles cannot be retrieved by title keyword searching because of the wide diversity of ways of expressing a topic. Descriptors take away the burden of vocabulary control from the user.
  16. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.00
    0.0036359131 = product of:
      0.02545139 = sum of:
        0.02545139 = product of:
          0.05090278 = sum of:
            0.05090278 = weight(_text_:studies in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05090278 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In their 2005 study, Gross and Taylor found that more than a third of records retrieved by keyword searches would be lost without subject headings. A review of the literature since then shows that numerous studies, in various disciplines, have found that a quarter to a third of records returned in a keyword search would be lost without controlled vocabulary. Other writers, though, have continued to suggest that controlled vocabulary be discontinued. Addressing criticisms of the Gross/Taylor study, this study replicates the search process in the same online catalog, but after the addition of automated enriched metadata such as tables of contents and summaries. The proportion of results that would be lost remains high.
  17. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.00
    0.0032002942 = product of:
      0.02240206 = sum of:
        0.02240206 = product of:
          0.04480412 = sum of:
            0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480412 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  18. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.00
    0.0032002942 = product of:
      0.02240206 = sum of:
        0.02240206 = product of:
          0.04480412 = sum of:
            0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480412 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
  19. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.00
    0.0032002942 = product of:
      0.02240206 = sum of:
        0.02240206 = product of:
          0.04480412 = sum of:
            0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480412 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  20. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.00
    0.0032002942 = product of:
      0.02240206 = sum of:
        0.02240206 = product of:
          0.04480412 = sum of:
            0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480412 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197