-
Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011)
0.03
0.031854097 = product of:
0.06370819 = sum of:
0.050073773 = weight(_text_:representation in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050073773 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
0.013634419 = product of:
0.040903255 = sum of:
0.040903255 = weight(_text_:theory in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040903255 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
-
Mai, J.-E.: Folksonomies and the new order : authority in the digital disorder (2011)
0.02
0.02478525 = product of:
0.099141 = sum of:
0.099141 = weight(_text_:representation in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099141 = score(doc=4553,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.50323373 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- While the organization and representation of information and knowledge have historically been done by professionals, the rise of social media has spread the notion that this can be done more collaboratively. A more collaborative approach would entail a change in the role of professionals and in the goals and values of the systems. This paper explores the notion of authority and the role of professionals in a changing environment where more people participate in the organization and representation of information and knowledge. The paper questions the traditional role of the professionals and argues that systems must be designed to facilitate trust and authority, and that the authority of folksonomies and systems comes from the users' collective interpretations and meaning production.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.0058013215 = product of:
0.023205286 = sum of:
0.023205286 = product of:
0.069615856 = sum of:
0.069615856 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069615856 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011)
0.00
0.0040903254 = product of:
0.016361302 = sum of:
0.016361302 = product of:
0.049083903 = sum of:
0.049083903 = weight(_text_:theory in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049083903 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.00
0.0039026549 = product of:
0.015610619 = sum of:
0.015610619 = product of:
0.046831857 = sum of:
0.046831857 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046831857 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.29-53
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.00
0.0034184614 = product of:
0.013673846 = sum of:
0.013673846 = product of:
0.041021537 = sum of:
0.041021537 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041021537 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Belous, Y.: Children as architects of Web directories : an exploratory study (2007)
0.00
0.0034086048 = product of:
0.013634419 = sum of:
0.013634419 = product of:
0.040903255 = sum of:
0.040903255 = weight(_text_:theory in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040903255 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Children are increasingly using the Web. Cognitive theory tells us that directory structures are especially suited for information retrieval by children; however, empirical results show that they prefer keyword searching. One of the reasons for these findings could be that the directory structures and terminology are created by grown-ups. Using a card-sorting method and an enveloping system, we simulated the structure of a directory. Our goal was to try to understand what browsable, hierarchical subject categories children create when suggested terms are supplied and they are free to add or delete terms. Twelve groups of four children each (fourth and fifth graders) participated in our exploratory study. The initial terminology presented to the children was based on names of categories used in popular directories, in the sections on Arts, Television, Music, Cinema, and Celebrities. The children were allowed to introduce additional cards and change the terms appearing on the 61 cards. Findings show that the different groups reached reasonable consensus; the majority of the category names used by existing directories were acceptable by them and only a small minority of the terms caused confusion. Our recommendation is to include children in the design process of directories, not only in designing the interface but also in designing the content structure as well.
-
Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010)
0.00
0.0034086048 = product of:
0.013634419 = sum of:
0.013634419 = product of:
0.040903255 = sum of:
0.040903255 = weight(_text_:theory in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040903255 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
-
Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006)
0.00
0.0033841045 = product of:
0.013536418 = sum of:
0.013536418 = product of:
0.04060925 = sum of:
0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060925 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 1.2008 19:22:48
-
Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008)
0.00
0.0029006607 = product of:
0.011602643 = sum of:
0.011602643 = product of:
0.034807928 = sum of:
0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034807928 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:39:22
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.00
0.0024172175 = product of:
0.00966887 = sum of:
0.00966887 = product of:
0.02900661 = sum of:
0.02900661 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02900661 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Hayman, S.; Lothian, N.: Taxonomy directed folksonomies : integrating user tagging and controlled vocabularies for Australian education networks (2007)
0.00
0.0019513274 = product of:
0.0078053097 = sum of:
0.0078053097 = product of:
0.023415929 = sum of:
0.023415929 = weight(_text_:29 in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023415929 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:29:46
-
Yi, K.; Chan, L.M.: Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings : an exploratory study (2009)
0.00
0.0019513274 = product of:
0.0078053097 = sum of:
0.0078053097 = product of:
0.023415929 = sum of:
0.023415929 = weight(_text_:29 in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023415929 = score(doc=3616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 6.2010 14:29:15
-
Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007)
0.00
0.0019337739 = product of:
0.0077350955 = sum of:
0.0077350955 = product of:
0.023205286 = sum of:
0.023205286 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023205286 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
