Search (74 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Lee, H.-L.; Clyde, J.: Users' perspectives of the "Collection" and the online catalogue (2004) 0.04 
    0.035898242 = product of:
  0.071796484 = sum of:
    0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060088523 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042818543 = queryNorm
        0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.011707964 = product of:
      0.035123892 = sum of:
        0.035123892 = weight(_text_:29 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035123892 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The paper reports an a study that examined the parameters provided in the online catalogue of a university library for defining its collection and subcollections that would facilitate information seeking. Taking a user-centered approach, the study asked two questions: (1) Does the online catalogue provide a useful collection structure for the users? (2) Are there any parameters that are considered useful by the users for structuring the collection absent from the online catalogue? The online catalogue was found to adequately provide only a few of the user collection and subcollection parameters, including user privilege and document type. However, it lacked most of the important parameters required by the users, including catalogue representation of the entire collection and disciplinary categories for defining subject subcollections.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 15:09:11
  2. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02 
    0.023466839 = product of:
  0.093867354 = sum of:
    0.093867354 = product of:
      0.14080103 = sum of:
        0.082787804 = weight(_text_:29 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082787804 = score(doc=2268,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
        0.05801322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05801322 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    12.12.1998 12:00:29
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  3. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02 
    0.019425508 = product of:
  0.07770203 = sum of:
    0.07770203 = product of:
      0.11655304 = sum of:
        0.058539823 = weight(_text_:29 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058539823 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
        0.05801322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05801322 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  4. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.02 
    0.017370509 = product of:
  0.069482036 = sum of:
    0.069482036 = product of:
      0.10422305 = sum of:
        0.06941512 = weight(_text_:theory in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06941512 = score(doc=54,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034807928 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
  5. Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999) 0.02 
    0.016642187 = product of:
  0.06656875 = sum of:
    0.06656875 = product of:
      0.09985312 = sum of:
        0.07084651 = weight(_text_:theory in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07084651 = score(doc=107,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.39788827 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
        0.02900661 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02900661 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Forty-five years have passed since Lubetzky outlined the primary objectives of the catalog, which should facilitate the identification of specific bibliographic entities, and the explicit recoguition of works and relationships amongthem. Still, our catalogs are better designed to identify specific bibliographic entities than they are to guide users among the network of potential related editions and translations of works. In this paper, we seck to examine qualitatively some interesting examples of families of related works, defined as bibliographic families. Although the cases described here were derived from a random sample, this is a qualitative analysis. We selected these bibliographic families for their ability to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of Leazer's model, which incorporates relationship taxonomies by Tillett and Smiraglia Qualitatice analysis is intended to produce on explanation of a phenomenou, particularly an identification of any palterns observed. Patterns observed in qualitative analysis can be used to affirm external observations of the same phenomena; conclusions can contribute to what is knoton as grounded theory-a unique explanation grounded in the phenomenon under study. We arrive at two statements of grounded theory concerning bibliographic families: cataloger-generated implicit maps among works are inadequate, and qualitative analysis suggests the complexity of even the smallest bibliographic families. We conclude that user behavior study is needed to suggest which alternative maps are preferable.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011) 0.02 
    0.016426787 = product of:
  0.06570715 = sum of:
    0.06570715 = product of:
      0.09856072 = sum of:
        0.057951465 = weight(_text_:29 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057951465 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060925 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:10:37
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  7. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.02 
    0.015540405 = product of:
  0.06216162 = sum of:
    0.06216162 = product of:
      0.09324243 = sum of:
        0.046831857 = weight(_text_:29 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046831857 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.04641057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04641057 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  8. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01 
    0.0135978535 = product of:
  0.054391414 = sum of:
    0.054391414 = product of:
      0.08158712 = sum of:
        0.040977873 = weight(_text_:29 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040977873 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
        0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060925 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
  9. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01 
    0.0135978535 = product of:
  0.054391414 = sum of:
    0.054391414 = product of:
      0.08158712 = sum of:
        0.040977873 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040977873 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060925 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  10. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.01 
    0.012518443 = product of:
  0.050073773 = sum of:
    0.050073773 = weight(_text_:representation in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050073773 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042818543 = queryNorm
        0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
  11. Hedman, T.: Utkast till en deskriptiv teori for katalogsokning / informationsatervinning (1997) 0.01 
    0.01067062 = product of:
  0.04268248 = sum of:
    0.04268248 = product of:
      0.12804744 = sum of:
        0.12804744 = weight(_text_:theory in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12804744 = score(doc=1428,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.7191402 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Library information searching lacks a descriptive theory which explains how a user decides to borrow one book and not another. Such theory should act as a reference framework against which cataloguing rules and the classification system can be measured, and should be based on 2 complementary perspectives, described in detail: modern classification theory, which explains what cataloguing and classification involve, and philosophy of science, which explains what happens when the user meets the catalogue record. Catalogue information must answer which work is described, and why this work on the subject is chosen. A descriptive theory is especially necessary for knowing what new information to add to the catalogue. Discusses this in a subsequent article
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Draft of a descriptive theory of catalogue searching / information retrieval
  12. Dobreski, B.: Authority and universalism : conventional values in descriptive catalog codes (2017) 0.01 
    0.010014754 = product of:
  0.040059015 = sum of:
    0.040059015 = weight(_text_:representation in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040059015 = score(doc=3876,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042818543 = queryNorm
        0.20333713 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Every standard embodies a particular set of values. Some aspects are privileged while others are masked. Values embedded within knowledge organization standards have special import in that they are further perpetuated by the data they are used to generate. Within libraries, descriptive catalog codes serve as prominent knowledge organization standards, guiding the creation of resource representations. Though the historical and functional aspects of these standards have received significant attention, less focus has been placed on the values associated with such codes. In this study, a critical, historical analysis of ten Anglo-American descriptive catalog codes and surrounding discourse was conducted as an initial step towards uncovering key values associated with this lineage of standards. Two values in particular were found to be highly significant: authority and universalism. Authority is closely tied to notions of power and control, particularly over practice or belief. Increasing control over resources, identities, and viewpoints are all manifestations of the value of authority within descriptive codes. Universalism has guided the widening coverage of descriptive codes in regards to settings and materials, such as the extension of bibliographic standards to non-book resources. Together, authority and universalism represent conventional values focused on facilitating orderly social exchanges. A comparative lack of emphasis on values concerning human welfare and empowerment may be unsurprising, but raises questions concerning the role of human values in knowledge organization standards. Further attention to the values associated with descriptive codes and other knowledge organization standards is important as libraries and other institutions seek to share their resource representation data more widely
  13. Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997) 0.01 
    0.009712754 = product of:
  0.038851015 = sum of:
    0.038851015 = product of:
      0.05827652 = sum of:
        0.029269911 = weight(_text_:29 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029269911 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
        0.02900661 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02900661 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.175-177
  14. Holley, R.P.: Constraints of the 3 x 5 card (1984) 0.01 
    0.0078053097 = product of:
  0.031221239 = sum of:
    0.031221239 = product of:
      0.093663715 = sum of:
        0.093663715 = weight(_text_:29 in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093663715 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.1, S.29-35
  15. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01 
    0.0077350955 = product of:
  0.030940382 = sum of:
    0.030940382 = product of:
      0.09282114 = sum of:
        0.09282114 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09282114 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  16. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.01 
    0.0077350955 = product of:
  0.030940382 = sum of:
    0.030940382 = product of:
      0.09282114 = sum of:
        0.09282114 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09282114 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  17. Guerrini, M.: ¬The functions of the catalogue from ICCP to FRBR (2000) 0.01 
    0.006898984 = product of:
  0.027595935 = sum of:
    0.027595935 = product of:
      0.082787804 = sum of:
        0.082787804 = weight(_text_:29 in 3947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082787804 = score(doc=3947,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 3947, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3947)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 8.2005 11:30:41
    29. 8.2005 13:23:12
  18. Layne, S.S.: Brian E. Schottlaender : politics and philosophy of bibliographic control, a conversation (1999) 0.01 
    0.0068296455 = product of:
  0.027318582 = sum of:
    0.027318582 = product of:
      0.081955746 = sum of:
        0.081955746 = weight(_text_:29 in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081955746 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 11:29:35
  19. Buschey, D.; Halle, A.; Harms, R.: Zwanzig Jahre Retrokonversion and der SUB Göttingen : Ein Zwischenbericht (2001) 0.01 
    0.0068296455 = product of:
  0.027318582 = sum of:
    0.027318582 = product of:
      0.081955746 = sum of:
        0.081955746 = weight(_text_:29 in 6510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081955746 = score(doc=6510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6510)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 11:33:24
  20. Bolin, M.K.: Catalog design, catalog maintenance, catalog governance (2000) 0.01 
    0.0068296455 = product of:
  0.027318582 = sum of:
    0.027318582 = product of:
      0.081955746 = sum of:
        0.081955746 = weight(_text_:29 in 493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081955746 = score(doc=493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=493)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 18:46:29

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 52
  • d 18
  • f 2
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 70
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects