Search (64 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.08
    0.081285715 = product of:
      0.32514286 = sum of:
        0.32514286 = sum of:
          0.16196862 = weight(_text_:theory in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16196862 = score(doc=3339,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042818543 = queryNorm
              0.90964836 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.081955746 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.081955746 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042818543 = queryNorm
              0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.0812185 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0812185 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042818543 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
    Source
    Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honor of J.H. Shera. Ed. by H. Rawski
  2. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.04
    0.03728526 = product of:
      0.14914104 = sum of:
        0.14914104 = product of:
          0.22371155 = sum of:
            0.13089041 = weight(_text_:theory in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13089041 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
            0.09282114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09282114 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  3. Hoeber, O.; Yang, X.D.: Evaluating WordBars in exploratory Web search scenarios (2008) 0.03
    0.029915206 = product of:
      0.059830412 = sum of:
        0.050073773 = weight(_text_:representation in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050073773 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
        0.009756638 = product of:
          0.029269911 = sum of:
            0.029269911 = weight(_text_:29 in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029269911 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Web searchers commonly have difficulties crafting queries to fulfill their information needs; even after they are able to craft a query, they often find it challenging to evaluate the results of their Web searches. Sources of these problems include the lack of support for constructing and refining queries, and the static nature of the list-based representations of Web search results. WordBars has been developed to assist users in their Web search and exploration tasks. This system provides a visual representation of the frequencies of the terms found in the first 100 document surrogates returned from an initial query, in the form of a histogram. Exploration of the search results is supported through term selection in the histogram, resulting in a re-sorting of the search results based on the use of the selected terms in the document surrogates. Terms from the histogram can be easily added or removed from the query, generating a new set of search results. Examples illustrate how WordBars can provide valuable support for query refinement and search results exploration, both when vague and specific initial queries are provided. User evaluations with both expert and intermediate Web searchers illustrate the benefits of the interactive exploration features of WordBars in terms of effectiveness as well as subjective measures. Although differences were found in the demographics of these two user groups, both were able to benefit from the features of WordBars.
    Date
    29. 7.2008 15:30:02
  4. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.023303289 = product of:
      0.093213156 = sum of:
        0.093213156 = product of:
          0.13981973 = sum of:
            0.08180651 = weight(_text_:theory in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08180651 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.4594418 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
            0.05801322 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05801322 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
  5. Attfield, S.; Blandford, A.; Dowell, J.: Information seeking in the context of writing : a design psychology interpretation of the "problematic situation" (2003) 0.02
    0.0212445 = product of:
      0.084978 = sum of:
        0.084978 = weight(_text_:representation in 4451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084978 = score(doc=4451,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.4313432 = fieldWeight in 4451, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4451)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information seeking does not occur in a vacuum but invariably is motivated by some wider task. It is well accepted that to understand information seeking we must understand the task context within which it takes place. Writing is amongst the most common tasks within which information seeking is embedded. This paper considers how writing can be understood in order to account for embedded information seeking. Following Sharples, the paper treats writing as a design activity and explore parallels between the psychology of design and information seeking. Significant parallels can be found and ideas from the psychology of design offer explanations for a number of information seeking phenomena. Next, a design-oriented representation of writing tasks as a means of providing an account of phenomena such as information seeking uncertainty and focus refinement is developed. The paper illustrates the representation with scenarios describing the work of newspaper journalists.
  6. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.02
    0.017370509 = product of:
      0.069482036 = sum of:
        0.069482036 = product of:
          0.10422305 = sum of:
            0.06941512 = weight(_text_:theory in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06941512 = score(doc=331,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
            0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034807928 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is a topic of increasing interest in many disciplines. However, the dynamics of this behavior remain elusive. The extant research has taken cognitive and behavioral perspectives to study information-seeking behavior, and observed its dynamics in multiple sessions. However, the underlying mechanisms that govern the dynamics of information-seeking behavior are not well understood. With a focus on interactive information retrieval behavior, this study proposes an integrated framework based on activity theory. This framework is not only comprehensive and integrated, but also offers an explanation of the mechanisms governing the interaction between users' cognitive states and their manifested behavior when using an information retrieval system. A set of four propositions are advanced to describe the mechanisms. The implications are discussed.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  7. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.02
    0.016642187 = product of:
      0.06656875 = sum of:
        0.06656875 = product of:
          0.09985312 = sum of:
            0.07084651 = weight(_text_:theory in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07084651 = score(doc=1073,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.39788827 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
            0.02900661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02900661 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  8. Twidale, M.B.; Nichols, D.M.: Collaborative browsing and visualization of the search process (1996) 0.02
    0.015022131 = product of:
      0.060088523 = sum of:
        0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 5827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060088523 = score(doc=5827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 5827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5827)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We describe how to support the process of collaborative browsing and how to integrate support for the social aspects of information searching activities into information systems and particularly their interfaces. The use of library resources is often stereotyped as a solitary activity. However, informal observations indicate significant collaboration between users despite the fact that existing systems fail to support this. We describe the Ariadne system which does attempt to support collaboration by providing a visualization of the search process. Storage of search histories as digital object allows them to be manipulated and communicated. An explicit representation of a search history supports discussion of search strategies and concepts by explicit pointing to prior activities even when one of the participants may be a novice lacking the appropriate vocabulary. Several different types of activity, synchronous and asynchronous, remote and co-located, can be supported by search process re-use. We outline some of the issues of privacy concerned with the storage of users' searches
  9. Raskutti, B.; Zukerman, I.: Generating queries and replies during information-seeking interactions (1997) 0.02
    0.015022131 = product of:
      0.060088523 = sum of:
        0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 1662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060088523 = score(doc=1662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 1662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1662)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of naturally occuring information-seeking dialogues indicates that they consist of several distinct discourse segments, such as greeting, request, clarification, information transfer and closing. Presents a mechanism for generating queries during the clarification stage and answers during the information transfer stage. Given a hierarchical representation of the alternatives possibly intended by a user and the probabilities of these alternatives, the mechanism determines whether a query must be posed and if so, the actual query to be posed. The mechanism also enters into a negotiation process to alter the user's specifications when a user's intentions cannot be satisfied by means of a single plan. The mechanisms for negotiation, query and answer generation have been implemented into RADAR, a computerized information provider that Recognizes And Discriminates between Alternatives and Responds and functions as a travel agent
  10. Ferrández, O.; Izquierdo, R.; Ferrández, S.; Vicedo González, J.L.: Addressing ontology-based question answering with collections of user queries (2009) 0.02
    0.015022131 = product of:
      0.060088523 = sum of:
        0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 4212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060088523 = score(doc=4212,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 4212, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4212)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents QACID an ontology-based Question Answering system applied to the CInema Domain. This system allows users to retrieve information from formal ontologies by using as input queries formulated in natural language. The original characteristic of QACID is the strategy used to fill the gap between users' expressiveness and formal knowledge representation. This approach is based on collections of user queries and offers a simple adaptability to deal with multilingual capabilities, inter-domain portability and changes in user information requirements. All these capabilities permit developing Question Answering applications for actual users. This system has been developed and tested on the Spanish language and using an ontology modelling the cinema domain. The performance level achieved enables the use of the system in real environments.
  11. Abacha, A.B.; Zweigenbaum, P.: MEANS: A medical question-answering system combining NLP techniques and semantic Web technologies (2015) 0.02
    0.015022131 = product of:
      0.060088523 = sum of:
        0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 2677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060088523 = score(doc=2677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2677)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Question Answering (QA) task aims to provide precise and quick answers to user questions from a collection of documents or a database. This kind of IR system is sorely needed with the dramatic growth of digital information. In this paper, we address the problem of QA in the medical domain where several specific conditions are met. We propose a semantic approach to QA based on (i) Natural Language Processing techniques, which allow a deep analysis of medical questions and documents and (ii) semantic Web technologies at both representation and interrogation levels. We present our Semantic Question-Answering System, called MEANS and our proposed method for "Answer Search" based on semantic search and query relaxation. We evaluate the overall system performance on real questions and answers extracted from MEDLINE articles. Our experiments show promising results and suggest that a query-relaxation strategy can further improve the overall performance.
  12. Dumitrescu, A.; Santini, S.: Full coverage of a reader's interests in context-based information filtering (2021) 0.02
    0.015022131 = product of:
      0.060088523 = sum of:
        0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060088523 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We present a collection of algorithms to filter a stream of documents in such a way that the filtered documents will cover as well as possible the interest of a person, keeping in mind that, at any given time, the offered documents should not only be relevant, but should also be diversified, in the sense of covering all the interests of the person. We use a modification of the WEBSOM algorithm to create a user model based on a self-organizing network trained using a collection of documents representative of the person's interests. We introduce the concepts of freshness and coverage. A document is fresh if it belongs to a semantic area of interest to a person for which no documents were seen in the recent past; a group of documents has coverage to the extent to which it is a good representation of all the interests of a person. Our tests show that these algorithms can effectively increase the coverage of the documents that are shown to the user without overly affecting precision.
  13. Yuan, X.; Belkin, N.J.: Investigating information retrieval support techniques for different information-seeking strategies (2010) 0.01
    0.012518443 = product of:
      0.050073773 = sum of:
        0.050073773 = weight(_text_:representation in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050073773 = score(doc=3699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We report on a study that investigated the efficacy of four different interactive information retrieval (IIR) systems, each designed to support a specific information-seeking strategy (ISS). These systems were constructed using different combinations of IR techniques (i.e., combinations of different methods of representation, comparison, presentation and navigation), each of which was hypothesized to be well suited to support a specific ISS. We compared the performance of searchers in each such system, designated experimental, to an appropriate baseline system, which implemented the standard specified query and results list model of current state-of-the-art experimental and operational IR systems. Four within-subjects experiments were conducted for the purpose of this comparison. Results showed that each of the experimental systems was superior to its baseline system in supporting user performance for the specific ISS (that is, the information problem leading to that ISS) for which the system was designed. These results indicate that an IIR system, which intends to support more than one kind of ISS, should be designed within a framework which allows the use and combination of different IR support techniques for different ISSs.
  14. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.011655304 = product of:
      0.046621215 = sum of:
        0.046621215 = product of:
          0.06993182 = sum of:
            0.035123892 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035123892 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
            0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034807928 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  15. Wilson, T.D.: Activity theory and information seeking (2008) 0.01
    0.0109075345 = product of:
      0.043630138 = sum of:
        0.043630138 = product of:
          0.13089041 = sum of:
            0.13089041 = weight(_text_:theory in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13089041 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Cole, C.: ¬A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge (2011) 0.01
    0.0076218722 = product of:
      0.030487489 = sum of:
        0.030487489 = product of:
          0.09146246 = sum of:
            0.09146246 = weight(_text_:theory in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09146246 = score(doc=4474,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a theory of information need for information retrieval (IR). Information need traditionally denotes the start state for someone seeking information, which includes information search using an IR system. There are two perspectives on information need. The dominant, computer science perspective is that the user needs to find an answer to a well-defined question which is easy for the user to formulate into a query to the system. Ironically, information science's best known model of information need (Taylor, 1968) deems it to be a "black box"-unknowable and nonspecifiable by the user in a query to the information system. Information science has instead devoted itself to studying eight adjacent or surrogate concepts (information seeking, search and use; problem, problematic situation and task; sense making and evolutionary adaptation/information foraging). Based on an analysis of these eight adjacent/surrogate concepts, we create six testable propositions for a theory of information need. The central assumption of the theory is that while computer science sees IR as an information- or answer-finding system, focused on the user finding an answer, an information science or user-oriented theory of information need envisages a knowledge formulation/acquisition system.
  17. Vakkari, P.: ¬A theory of the task-based information retrieval process : a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study (2001) 0.01
    0.007084652 = product of:
      0.028338607 = sum of:
        0.028338607 = product of:
          0.08501582 = sum of:
            0.08501582 = weight(_text_:theory in 4493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08501582 = score(doc=4493,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.47746593 = fieldWeight in 4493, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4493)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this article is threefold: (1) to give a summary of empirical results reported earlier on relations between students' problem stages in the course of writing their research proposals for a master's thesis and the information sought, choice of search terms and tactics and relevance assessments of the information found for that task; (2) to show how the findings of the study refine Kuhlthau's model of the information search process in the field of information retrieval (IR); and (3) to construe a tentative theory of a task-based IR process based on the supported hypotheses. The results of the empirical studies show that there is a close connection between the students' problem stages (mental model) in the task performance and the information sought, the search tactics used and the assessment of the relevance and utility of the information found. The corroborated hypotheses expand the ideas in Kuhlthau's model in the domain of IR. A theory of task-based information searching based on the empirical findings of the study is presented.
  18. Xu, Y.; Liu, C.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval : part II: an empirical study from the activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.007084652 = product of:
      0.028338607 = sum of:
        0.028338607 = product of:
          0.08501582 = sum of:
            0.08501582 = weight(_text_:theory in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08501582 = score(doc=333,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.47746593 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is complicated. Activity theory is a powerful theoretical instrument to untangle the "complications." Based on activity theory, a comprehensive framework is proposed in Part I (Y. Xu, 2007) of this report to describe interactive information retrieval (IIR) behavior. A set of propositions is also proposed to describe the mechanisms governing users' cognitive activity and the interaction between users' cognitive states and manifested retrieval behavior. An empirical study is carried out to verify the propositions. The authors' experimental simulation of 81 participants in one search session indicates the propositions are largely supported. Their findings indicate IIR behavior is planned. Users adopt a divide-and-conquer strategy in information retrieval. The planning of information retrieval activity is also partially manifested in query revision tactics. Users learn from previously read documents. A user's interaction with a system ultimately changes the user's information need and the resulting relevance judgment, but the dynamics of topicality perception and novelty perception occur at different paces.
  19. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.01
    0.006768209 = product of:
      0.027072836 = sum of:
        0.027072836 = product of:
          0.0812185 = sum of:
            0.0812185 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0812185 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  20. Jacobson, F.F.; Jacobson, M.J.: Representative cognitive learning theories and BI : a case study of end user searching (1993) 0.01
    0.0054537673 = product of:
      0.021815069 = sum of:
        0.021815069 = product of:
          0.06544521 = sum of:
            0.06544521 = weight(_text_:theory in 7228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06544521 = score(doc=7228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 7228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7228)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    To be successful at online searching, students must be able to apply the concepts and skills learned in the classroom to a variety of complex products and search conditions. Examines an online searching instructional programme for high school seniors from the perspective of several cognitive learning theories, and proposes a synthesized approach to applying learning theory to bibliographic instruction

Years

Languages

  • e 62
  • d 1
  • More… Less…