Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.01 
    0.0135978535 = product of:
  0.054391414 = sum of:
    0.054391414 = product of:
      0.08158712 = sum of:
        0.040977873 = weight(_text_:29 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040977873 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
        0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060925 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2018) H.1, S.21-29
  2. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01 
    0.006836923 = product of:
  0.027347691 = sum of:
    0.027347691 = product of:
      0.082043074 = sum of:
        0.082043074 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082043074 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  3. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.01 
    0.0067595965 = product of:
  0.027038386 = sum of:
    0.027038386 = product of:
      0.08111516 = sum of:
        0.08111516 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08111516 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
    4. 8.2019 19:52:29
    Issue
    [29. Juli 2019].
  4. Moebius, R.: ¬Die Zitiercommunity (2019) 0.01 
    0.005853982 = product of:
  0.023415929 = sum of:
    0.023415929 = product of:
      0.070247784 = sum of:
        0.070247784 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070247784 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 4.2019 10:29:34
  5. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.01 
    0.0058013215 = product of:
  0.023205286 = sum of:
    0.023205286 = product of:
      0.069615856 = sum of:
        0.069615856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069615856 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
  6. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.01 
    0.0054537673 = product of:
  0.021815069 = sum of:
    0.021815069 = product of:
      0.06544521 = sum of:
        0.06544521 = weight(_text_:theory in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06544521 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    British novelist E.M. Forster once complained that long books "are usually overpraised" because "the reader wishes to convince others and himself that he has not wasted his time." To test his theory we collected reader ratings for 737 books tagged as "classic literature" on Goodreads.com, a review aggregator with 80m members. The bias towards chunky tomes was substantial. Slim volumes of 100 to 200 pages scored only 3.87 out of 5, whereas those over 1,000 pages scored 4.19. Longer is better, say the readers.
  7. Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015) 0.00 
    0.0039026549 = product of:
  0.015610619 = sum of:
    0.015610619 = product of:
      0.046831857 = sum of:
        0.046831857 = weight(_text_:29 in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046831857 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 6.2016 10:29:10
  8. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.00 
    0.0038675477 = product of:
  0.015470191 = sum of:
    0.015470191 = product of:
      0.04641057 = sum of:
        0.04641057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04641057 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  9. Ergül, A.; Böhm, A.; Schmidt, E.; Hissen, S.; Sariklis, T.: Erfolgsfaktoren für die Durchsetzung von PDF/A als weltweiter Standard für elektronische Langzeitarchivierung (2012) 0.00 
    0.0034148227 = product of:
  0.013659291 = sum of:
    0.013659291 = product of:
      0.040977873 = sum of:
        0.040977873 = weight(_text_:29 in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040977873 = score(doc=4794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    12. 1.2013 18:29:53
  10. Beinert, T.; Schoger, A.: Vernachlässigte Pflicht oder Sammlung aus Leidenschaft? : Zum Stand der Webarchivierung in deutschen Bibliotheken (2015) 0.00 
    0.0034148227 = product of:
  0.013659291 = sum of:
    0.013659291 = product of:
      0.040977873 = sum of:
        0.040977873 = weight(_text_:29 in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040977873 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    12. 1.2016 9:45:29
  11. Gutknecht, C.: Zahlungen der ETH Zürich an Elsevier, Springer und Wiley nun öffentlich (2015) 0.00 
    0.0034148227 = product of:
  0.013659291 = sum of:
    0.013659291 = product of:
      0.040977873 = sum of:
        0.040977873 = weight(_text_:29 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040977873 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    http://wisspub.net/2015/08/29/zahlungen-der-eth-zuerich-an-elsevier-springer-und-wiley-nun-oeffentlich/
  12. Martin, K.; Quan-Haase, A.: Are e-books replacing print books? : tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching (2013) 0.00 
    0.0034086048 = product of:
  0.013634419 = sum of:
    0.013634419 = product of:
      0.040903255 = sum of:
        0.040903255 = weight(_text_:theory in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040903255 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article aims to understand the adoption of e-books by academic historians for the purpose of teaching and research. This includes an investigation into their knowledge about and perceived characteristics of this evolving research tool. The study relied on Rogers's model of the innovation-decision process to guide the development of an interview guide. Ten semistructured interviews were conducted with history faculty between October 2010 and December 2011. A grounded theory approach was employed to code and analyze the data. Findings about tradition, cost, teaching innovations, and the historical research process provide the background for designing learning opportunities for the professional development of historians and the academic librarians who work with them. While historians are open to experimenting with e-books, they are also concerned about the loss of serendipity in digital environments, the lack of availability of key resources, and the need for technological transparency. The findings show that Rogers's knowledge and persuasion stages are cyclical in nature, with scholars moving back and forth between these two stages. Participants interviewed were already weighing the five characteristics of the persuasion stage without having much knowledge about e-books. The study findings have implications for our understanding of the diffusion of innovations in academia: both print and digital collections are being used in parallel without one replacing the other.
  13. Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.; Hubbard, B.; Millington, P.; Anders, J.H.S.; Hussain, A.: Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012 : past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities (2014) 0.00 
    0.0034086048 = product of:
  0.013634419 = sum of:
    0.013634419 = product of:
      0.040903255 = sum of:
        0.040903255 = weight(_text_:theory in 1542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040903255 = score(doc=1542,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 1542, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1542)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the worldwide growth of open-access (OA) repositories, 2005 to 2012, using data collected by the OpenDOAR project. Initial repository development was focused on North America, Western Europe, and Australasia, particularly the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia, followed by Japan. Since 2010, there has been repository growth in East Asia, South America, and Eastern Europe, especially in Taiwan, Brazil, and Poland. During the period, some countries, including France, Italy, and Spain, have maintained steady growth, whereas other countries, notably China and Russia, have experienced limited growth. Globally, repositories are predominantly institutional, multidisciplinary and English-language based. They typically use open-source OAI-compliant software but have immature licensing arrangements. Although the size of repositories is difficult to assess accurately, available data indicate that a small number of large repositories and a large number of small repositories make up the repository landscape. These trends are analyzed using innovation diffusion theory, which is shown to provide a useful explanatory framework for repository adoption at global, national, organizational, and individual levels. Major factors affecting both the initial development of repositories and their take-up include IT infrastructure, cultural factors, policy initiatives, awareness-raising activity, and usage mandates. Mandates are likely to be crucial in determining future repository development.
  14. García, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R.; Fdez-Valdivia, J.: ¬The principal-agent problem in peer review : an interactionist perspective on everyday use of biomedical information (2015) 0.00 
    0.0034086048 = product of:
  0.013634419 = sum of:
    0.013634419 = product of:
      0.040903255 = sum of:
        0.040903255 = weight(_text_:theory in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040903255 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In economics, the principal-agent problem is the difficulty in motivating one party (the agent), to act in the best interests of another (the principal) rather than in his own interests. We consider the example of a journal editor (the principal) wondering whether his or her reviewer (the agent) is recommending rejection of a manuscript because it does not have enough quality to be published or because the reviewer dislikes effort and he/she must work to acquire in-depth knowledge of the content of the manuscript. The reviewer's effort provides him or her with superior information about a manuscript's quality. If this information is not correctly communicated, the reviewer has more information when compared with the journal editor. This inherently leads to an encouragement of moral hazard, where the editor will not know whether the reviewer has done his or her job in accordance to the editor's interest. Prescriptions need to be given as to how the journal editor should control the reviewers to curb self-interest. Besides the associate editors monitoring the peer-review process, incentives can be employed to limit moral hazard on the part of the reviewer. Drawing on agency theory, we examine the incentives motivating the reviewers to expend effort to generate information about the quality of submissions. This model predicts that for reviewers early in their careers, promotion-based incentives may mean there is no need for within-job incentives, but also that within-job rewards for a referee's performance should depend on individual differences in ability and promotion opportunities.
  15. Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019) 0.00 
    0.0033841045 = product of:
  0.013536418 = sum of:
    0.013536418 = product of:
      0.04060925 = sum of:
        0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060925 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
  16. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.00 
    0.0033841045 = product of:
  0.013536418 = sum of:
    0.013536418 = product of:
      0.04060925 = sum of:
        0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060925 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  17. Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018) 0.00 
    0.0033841045 = product of:
  0.013536418 = sum of:
    0.013536418 = product of:
      0.04060925 = sum of:
        0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060925 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:52
  18. Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019) 0.00 
    0.0029006607 = product of:
  0.011602643 = sum of:
    0.011602643 = product of:
      0.034807928 = sum of:
        0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034807928 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
  19. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.00 
    0.0029006607 = product of:
  0.011602643 = sum of:
    0.011602643 = product of:
      0.034807928 = sum of:
        0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034807928 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  20. Brown, D.J.: Repositories and journals: are they in conflict? : a literature review of relevant literature (2010) 0.00 
    0.0024391594 = product of:
  0.009756638 = sum of:
    0.009756638 = product of:
      0.029269911 = sum of:
        0.029269911 = weight(_text_:29 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029269911 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:35:08

Authors

Languages

  • e 18
  • d 14

Types

  • a 32
  • el 9
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications