-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005)
0.06
0.05507814 = product of:
0.16523442 = sum of:
0.098280884 = weight(_text_:united in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098280884 = score(doc=3880,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.43829006 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06695353 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.304198 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The number and type of Web citations to journal articles in four areas of science are examined: biology, genetics, medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences. For a sample of 5,972 articles published in 114 journals, the median Web citation counts per journal article range from 6.2 in medicine to 10.4 in genetics. About 30% of Web citations in each area indicate intellectual impact (citations from articles or class readings, in contrast to citations from bibliographic services or the author's or journal's home page). Journals receiving more Web citations also have higher percentages of citations indicating intellectual impact. There is significant correlation between the number of citations reported in the databases from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, now Thomson Scientific) and the number of citations retrieved using the Google search engine (Web citations). The correlation is much weaker for journals published outside the United Kingdom or United States and for multidisciplinary journals. Web citation numbers are higher than ISI citation counts, suggesting that Web searches might be conducted for an earlier or a more fine-grained assessment of an article's impact. The Web-evident impact of non-UK/USA publications might provide a balance to the geographic or cultural biases observed in ISI's data, although the stability of Web citation counts is debatable.
-
Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010) (2013)
0.05
0.054579448 = product of:
0.16373834 = sum of:
0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083394095 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08034424 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article provides an overview of studies that have used citation analysis in the field of humanities in the period 1951 to 2010. The work is based on an exhaustive search in databases-particularly those in library and information science-and on citation chaining from papers on citation analysis. The results confirm that use of this technique in the humanities is limited, and although there was some growth in the 1970s and 1980s, it has stagnated in the past 2 decades. Most of the work has been done by research staff, but almost one third involves library staff, and 15% has been done by students. The study also showed that less than one fourth of the works used a citation database such as the Arts & Humanities Citation Index and that 21% of the works were in publications other than library and information science journals. The United States has the greatest output, and English is by far the most frequently used language, and 13.9% of the studies are in other languages.
-
Heneberg, P.: Lifting the fog of scientometric research artifacts : on the scientometric analysis of environmental tobacco smoke research (2013)
0.05
0.045482874 = product of:
0.13644862 = sum of:
0.06949508 = weight(_text_:united in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06949508 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06695353 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.304198 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Previous analyses identified research on environmental tobacco smoke to be subject to strong fluctuations as measured by both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The evolution of search algorithms (based on the Web of Science and Web of Knowledge database platforms) was used to show the impact of errors of omission and commission in the outcomes of scientometric research. Optimization of the search algorithm led to the complete reassessment of previously published findings on the performance of environmental tobacco smoke research. Instead of strong continuous growth, the field of environmental tobacco smoke research was shown to experience stagnation or slow growth since mid-1990s when evaluated quantitatively. Qualitative analysis revealed steady but slow increase in the citation rate and decrease in uncitedness. Country analysis revealed the North-European countries as leaders in environmental tobacco smoke research (when the normalized results were evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively), whereas the United States ranked first only when assessing the total number of papers produced. Scientometric research artifacts, including both errors of omission and commission, were shown to be capable of completely obscuring the real output of the chosen research field.
-
Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998)
0.02
0.017854275 = product of:
0.10712565 = sum of:
0.10712565 = weight(_text_:states in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10712565 = score(doc=5129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0072205393 = product of:
0.043323234 = sum of:
0.043323234 = product of:
0.08664647 = sum of:
0.08664647 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08664647 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.0072205393 = product of:
0.043323234 = sum of:
0.043323234 = product of:
0.08664647 = sum of:
0.08664647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08664647 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.006382115 = product of:
0.03829269 = sum of:
0.03829269 = product of:
0.07658538 = sum of:
0.07658538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07658538 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.00
0.004512837 = product of:
0.027077023 = sum of:
0.027077023 = product of:
0.054154046 = sum of:
0.054154046 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054154046 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.00
0.0038292694 = product of:
0.022975616 = sum of:
0.022975616 = product of:
0.045951232 = sum of:
0.045951232 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045951232 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.00
0.0036102696 = product of:
0.021661617 = sum of:
0.021661617 = product of:
0.043323234 = sum of:
0.043323234 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043323234 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.00
0.003158986 = product of:
0.018953916 = sum of:
0.018953916 = product of:
0.03790783 = sum of:
0.03790783 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790783 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.00
0.003158986 = product of:
0.018953916 = sum of:
0.018953916 = product of:
0.03790783 = sum of:
0.03790783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790783 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.00
0.003158986 = product of:
0.018953916 = sum of:
0.018953916 = product of:
0.03790783 = sum of:
0.03790783 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790783 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
