Search (81 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Davis, P.M.; Price, J.S.: eJournal interface can influence usage statistics : Implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER (2006) 0.07
    0.066093765 = product of:
      0.19828129 = sum of:
        0.11793706 = weight(_text_:united in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11793706 = score(doc=199,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
        0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08034424 = score(doc=199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The design of a publisher's electronic interface can have a measurable effect on electronic journal usage statistics. A study of journal usage from six COUNTER-compliant publishers at 32 research institutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden indicates that the ratio of PDF to HTML views is not consistent across publisher interfaces, even after controlling for differences in publisher content. The number of full-text downloads may be artificially inflated when publishers require users to view HTML versions before accessing PDF versions or when linking mechanisms, such as CrossRef, direct users to the full text rather than the abstract of each article. These results suggest that usage reports from COUNTER-compliant publishers are not directly comparable in their current form. One solution may be to modify publisher numbers with adjustment factors deemed to be representative of the benefit or disadvantage due to its interface. Standardization of some interface and linking protocols may obviate these differences and allow for more accurate cross-publisher comparisons.
  2. Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.; Hubbard, B.; Millington, P.; Anders, J.H.S.; Hussain, A.: Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012 : past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities (2014) 0.06
    0.05507814 = product of:
      0.16523442 = sum of:
        0.098280884 = weight(_text_:united in 1542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098280884 = score(doc=1542,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.43829006 = fieldWeight in 1542, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1542)
        0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 1542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06695353 = score(doc=1542,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.304198 = fieldWeight in 1542, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1542)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the worldwide growth of open-access (OA) repositories, 2005 to 2012, using data collected by the OpenDOAR project. Initial repository development was focused on North America, Western Europe, and Australasia, particularly the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia, followed by Japan. Since 2010, there has been repository growth in East Asia, South America, and Eastern Europe, especially in Taiwan, Brazil, and Poland. During the period, some countries, including France, Italy, and Spain, have maintained steady growth, whereas other countries, notably China and Russia, have experienced limited growth. Globally, repositories are predominantly institutional, multidisciplinary and English-language based. They typically use open-source OAI-compliant software but have immature licensing arrangements. Although the size of repositories is difficult to assess accurately, available data indicate that a small number of large repositories and a large number of small repositories make up the repository landscape. These trends are analyzed using innovation diffusion theory, which is shown to provide a useful explanatory framework for repository adoption at global, national, organizational, and individual levels. Major factors affecting both the initial development of repositories and their take-up include IT infrastructure, cultural factors, policy initiatives, awareness-raising activity, and usage mandates. Mandates are likely to be crucial in determining future repository development.
  3. Zhang, Y.; Kudva, S.: E-books versus print books : readers' choices and preferences across contexts (2014) 0.05
    0.045482874 = product of:
      0.13644862 = sum of:
        0.06949508 = weight(_text_:united in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06949508 = score(doc=1335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
        0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06695353 = score(doc=1335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.304198 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    With electronic book (e-book) sales and readership rising, are e-books positioned to replace print books? This study examines the preference for e-books and print books in the contexts of reading purpose, reading situation, and contextual variables such as age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, income, community type, and Internet use. In addition, this study aims to identify factors that contribute to e-book adoption. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 2,986 people in the United States from the Reading Habits Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project (http://pewinternet.org/Shared-Content/Data-Sets/2011/December-2011--Reading-Habits.aspx). While the results of this study support the notion that e-books have firmly established a place in people's lives, due to their convenience of access, e-books are not yet positioned to replace print books. Both print books and e-books have unique attributes and serve irreplaceable functions to meet people's reading needs, which may vary by individual demographic, contextual, and situational factors. At this point, the leading significant predictors of e-book adoption are the number of books read, the individual's income, the occurrence and frequency of reading for research topics of interest, and the individual's Internet use, followed by other variables such as race/ethnicity, reading for work/school, age, and education.
  4. Roberts, R.: Searching the New Dictionary of National Biography (1997) 0.03
    0.031927094 = product of:
      0.19156256 = sum of:
        0.19156256 = product of:
          0.38312513 = sum of:
            0.38312513 = weight(_text_:biography in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38312513 = score(doc=968,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.31627175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                1.2113795 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the eidtorial thinking and planning behind the preparation of the New Dictionary of National Biography (DNB) for publication in print and electronic form. Focuses on issues arising from the attempt to capture 'clean' information from literary prose. Details the characters of the DNB, access through indexes, core data, clean data, indexing the subject, indexing the text, and editorial tracking
    Object
    Dictionary of National Biography
  5. Rodrigues, R.S.; Abadal, E.: Scientific journals in Brazil and Spain : alternative publishing models (2014) 0.01
    0.013899016 = product of:
      0.083394095 = sum of:
        0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083394095 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes high-quality journals in Brazil and Spain, with an emphasis on the distribution models used. It presents the general characteristics (age, type of publisher, and theme) and analyzes the distribution model by studying the type of format (print or digital), the type of access (open access or subscription), and the technology platform used. The 549 journals analyzed (249 in Brazil and 300 in Spain) are included in the 2011 Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. Data on each journal were collected directly from their websites between March and October 2012. Brazil has a fully open access distribution model (97%) in which few journals require payment by authors thanks to cultural, financial, operational, and technological support provided by public agencies. In Spain, open access journals account for 55% of the total and have also received support from public agencies, although to a lesser extent. These results show that there are systems support of open access in scientific journals other than the "author pays" model advocated by the Finch report for the United Kingdom.
  6. Harter, S.P.; Park, T.K.: Impact of prior electronic publication on manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals (2000) 0.01
    0.012624878 = product of:
      0.07574927 = sum of:
        0.07574927 = weight(_text_:states in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07574927 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.34416074 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this research was to study current policies and practices of scholarly journals on evaluating manuscripts for publication that had been previously published electronically. Various electronic forms were considered: a manuscript having been e-mailed to members of a listserv, attached to a personal or institutional home page, stored in an electronic preprint collection, or published in an electronic proceedings or electronic journal. Factors that might affect the consideration of such manuscripts were also examined, including characteristics of the journal, the previously published work, and the submitted manuscript. A sample of 202 scholarly journals in the sciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities was selected for study. A questionnaire and cover letters were sent to the journal editors in the summer and fall of 1997, with an overall return rate of 57.4%. Results are reported for all journals, with comparisons being made between journals edited in the Unites States and outside the Unites States, by journal impact factor, and by discipline. The findings suggest that editorial policies regarding prior electronic publication are in an early stage of development. Most journal editors do not have a formal policy regarding the evaluation of work previously published in electronic form, nor are they currently evaluating such a policy. Editors disagreed widely on the importance of the various factors that might affect their decision to consider a work previously published electronically. The form or type of prior electronic publication was an important variable. Although some editors currently have a fairly rigid and negative posture towards work previously published electronically, most are willing to consider certain forms of such work for publication in their journals. Probably the most significant results of the study were the many differences in practices among scholarly disciplines. The findings of this study reveal how the Internet and the World Wide Web are currently affecting manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals at this early stage of Web and Internet publishing
  7. Kapustina, T.A.: Electronic library, electronic publishing, electronic document delivery : impressions from a Belarusian-German seminar (2002) 0.01
    0.009266011 = product of:
      0.055596065 = sum of:
        0.055596065 = weight(_text_:united in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055596065 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.2479343 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    There is an "information burst" going on in our world. Therefore we think more about the role of information in modern society and in our personal life. The political waves of the peaceful revolutionary process virtually start to erase the borders of the countries drawn on the maps. A little more than ten years ago we had not even a concept for "Belarusian-German relations", because both countries "the new united Germany and the Republic of Belarus did not exist on the maps of the world. Today the communication between our countries covers all aspects of public life "culture" science and education. We have laid a foundation for our economic and cultural cooperation. We already have had some experience in the joint solution of internal and international problems. And "what is most striking" the warm human contacts of the people consolidate and accelerate the process of mutual understanding between our countries and broaden our view. Today no country in the world can yield their citizens more freedom of choice than the "state" of the Internet. The people, freely migrating in a boundless information space, know how to use the invaluable treasures of human thought and creatively increase the achievements of mankind by intellectual work. These people become the pride of every country in our time. In educating, shaping and supporting such persons we see a new social role of the libraries. It is clearly visible that libraries turn into modern information centers. The introduction of new information know-how and the access to electronic information by means of an electronic library satisfy the increasing need of effective and comprehensive information. All steps of the work with documents (publication "search" delivery) are automated. The fast electronic delivery of documents is promoted by the growth of global information networks, by the increase of transfer rates of dates" by the capability of online search in the electronic catalogues and databases connected with the automated systems of the ordering of copies, by the technical equipment and software of scanning and recognition of the text.
  8. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.01
    0.009025674 = product of:
      0.054154046 = sum of:
        0.054154046 = product of:
          0.10830809 = sum of:
            0.10830809 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10830809 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  9. Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000) 0.01
    0.007658539 = product of:
      0.045951232 = sum of:
        0.045951232 = product of:
          0.091902465 = sum of:
            0.091902465 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091902465 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    18. 6.2000 9:11:22
  10. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.01
    0.0072205393 = product of:
      0.043323234 = sum of:
        0.043323234 = product of:
          0.08664647 = sum of:
            0.08664647 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08664647 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  11. Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992) 0.01
    0.0072205393 = product of:
      0.043323234 = sum of:
        0.043323234 = product of:
          0.08664647 = sum of:
            0.08664647 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08664647 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
  12. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.01
    0.0072205393 = product of:
      0.043323234 = sum of:
        0.043323234 = product of:
          0.08664647 = sum of:
            0.08664647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08664647 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  13. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01
    0.006382115 = product of:
      0.03829269 = sum of:
        0.03829269 = product of:
          0.07658538 = sum of:
            0.07658538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07658538 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  14. Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994) 0.01
    0.006317972 = product of:
      0.03790783 = sum of:
        0.03790783 = product of:
          0.07581566 = sum of:
            0.07581566 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07581566 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
  15. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.01
    0.006317972 = product of:
      0.03790783 = sum of:
        0.03790783 = product of:
          0.07581566 = sum of:
            0.07581566 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07581566 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  16. Schmitz, H.: Lese- und Lernstoff allerwege : NuvoMedia bietet 'RocketBook' an, Bertelsmann ist dabei (1998) 0.01
    0.006317972 = product of:
      0.03790783 = sum of:
        0.03790783 = product of:
          0.07581566 = sum of:
            0.07581566 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07581566 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    12. 2.1996 22:34:46
  17. Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998) 0.01
    0.005415404 = product of:
      0.032492425 = sum of:
        0.032492425 = product of:
          0.06498485 = sum of:
            0.06498485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06498485 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
  18. Friesel, U.: ¬Das Buch wie Cola aus dem Automaten : Book-on-Demand: Gedruckt aus dem Internet, was gewünscht wird, und zwar sofort (1999) 0.01
    0.005415404 = product of:
      0.032492425 = sum of:
        0.032492425 = product of:
          0.06498485 = sum of:
            0.06498485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06498485 = score(doc=3902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  19. Oßwald, A.: Proaktives Wissensmanagement für Fachbereiche, Hochschule und externe Partner : Bibliotheksdienstleistungen als Brücke zur Praxis (2000) 0.01
    0.005415404 = product of:
      0.032492425 = sum of:
        0.032492425 = product of:
          0.06498485 = sum of:
            0.06498485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06498485 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27.10.2001 12:22:54
  20. ap: Virtuelle Bibliotheken überall hin mitnehmen : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000) 0.01
    0.005415404 = product of:
      0.032492425 = sum of:
        0.032492425 = product of:
          0.06498485 = sum of:
            0.06498485 = weight(_text_:22 in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06498485 = score(doc=747,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22

Years

Languages

  • d 46
  • e 34

Types

  • a 74
  • el 6
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • More… Less…