-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.05
0.05036875 = product of:
0.201475 = sum of:
0.201475 = sum of:
0.15923434 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15923434 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.525837 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.042240653 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042240653 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This comparative case study of the diffusion and nondiffusion over time of eight theories in the social sciences uses citation analysis, citation context analysis, content analysis, surveys of editorial review boards, and personal interviews with theorists to develop a model of the theory functions that facilitate theory diffusion throughout specific intellectual communities. Unlike previous work on the diffusion of theories as innovations, this theory functions model differs in several important respects from the findings of previous studies that employed Everett Rogers's classic typology of innovation characteristics that promote diffusion. The model is also presented as a contribution to a more integrated theory of citation.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Milman, B.L.: Individual co-citation clusters as nuclei of complete and dynamic informetric models of scientific and technological areas (1994)
0.04
0.04210979 = product of:
0.16843916 = sum of:
0.16843916 = weight(_text_:technological in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16843916 = score(doc=37,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.7117617 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the construction of improved informetric models of individual scientific and technological areas on the basis of individual co citation clusters. The developed methodology of replenishment of research front with accidently absent papers describes the model more completely. Proposes the simple method of cluster 'dynamization' for the study of evolution of research area. The transition under consideration from co citation clusters to lexical maps of papers and patents enables the monitoring of the relationshuip between R and D in a given technological area. Provides the example from modern chemical engineering of Pressure-Swing Adsorption
-
Pair, C.I.: Formal evaluation methods : their utility and limitations (1995)
0.02
0.0243121 = product of:
0.0972484 = sum of:
0.0972484 = weight(_text_:technological in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972484 = score(doc=4259,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses evaluation techniques as an integral part of science with the emphasis on evalution for policy purposes. Outlines early attempts to validate the use of biliometric indicators. Concludes that: best results are obtained by applying a variety of methods simultaneously; reliable results can be obtained from citation analysis for purely scientific subfields such as physics; and citation analysis tends to give unreliable results for technological subjects. Concludes that bibliometrics as a technique for determining policy should never be used on its own. Describes an evaluation method used for selecting research projects for financial support, as applied by STW, the technology branch of the Netherlands' research council, NWO
-
Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles (2007)
0.02
0.017060824 = product of:
0.068243295 = sum of:
0.068243295 = product of:
0.13648659 = sum of:
0.13648659 = weight(_text_:innovations in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13648659 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In this article, we investigated the factors determining the capability of academic articles to be cited in the future using a topological analysis of citation networks. The basic idea is that articles that will have many citations were in a "similar" position topologically in the past. To validate this hypothesis, we investigated the correlation between future times cited and three measures of centrality: clustering centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality. We also analyzed the effect of aging as well as of self-correlation of times cited. Case studies were performed in the two following recent representative innovations: Gallium Nitride and Complex Networks. The results suggest that times cited is the main factor in explaining the near future times cited, and betweenness centrality is correlated with the distant future times cited. The effect of topological position on the capability to be cited is influenced by the migrating phenomenon in which the activated center of research shifts from an existing domain to a new emerging domain.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.010667375 = product of:
0.0426695 = sum of:
0.0426695 = product of:
0.085339 = sum of:
0.085339 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085339 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.007542974 = product of:
0.030171895 = sum of:
0.030171895 = product of:
0.06034379 = sum of:
0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06034379 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.006400426 = product of:
0.025601704 = sum of:
0.025601704 = product of:
0.051203407 = sum of:
0.051203407 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051203407 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.006034379 = product of:
0.024137516 = sum of:
0.024137516 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04827503 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.0052800816 = product of:
0.021120327 = sum of:
0.021120327 = product of:
0.042240653 = sum of:
0.042240653 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042240653 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.0052800816 = product of:
0.021120327 = sum of:
0.021120327 = product of:
0.042240653 = sum of:
0.042240653 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042240653 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.00
0.004525784 = product of:
0.018103136 = sum of:
0.018103136 = product of:
0.03620627 = sum of:
0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03620627 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
