Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Kokabi, M.: Is the future of MARC assured? (1996) 0.10 
    0.10106604 = product of:
  0.20213208 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
    0.09099106 = product of:
      0.18198211 = sum of:
        0.18198211 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18198211 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.60095656 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    MARC is now more than 20 years old. It has been, and still is, criticized from different point of view. Reviews some of the positive and negative opinions on MARC, as expressed by different sectors of the profession, and studies the future of MARC in relation to technological innovations. Concludes that MARC remains a valuable means of communicating bibliographical information
  2. Kokabi, M.: Is the future of MARC assured? (1996) 0.10 
    0.10106604 = product of:
  0.20213208 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 6724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=6724,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 6724, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6724)
    0.09099106 = product of:
      0.18198211 = sum of:
        0.18198211 = weight(_text_:innovations in 6724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18198211 = score(doc=6724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.60095656 = fieldWeight in 6724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6724)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The MARC machine readable catalogue is now more than 20 years old. It has been, and still is, criticized from different points of view. Reviews some positive and negative opinions on MARC as expressed by different sectors of the profession, and considers its future in relation to technological innovations. MARC remains a valuable means of communicating bibliographical information
  3. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.07 
    0.07263832 = product of:
  0.14527664 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.034135602 = product of:
      0.068271205 = sum of:
        0.068271205 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068271205 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  4. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.07 
    0.06763927 = product of:
  0.13527854 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.024137516 = product of:
      0.04827503 = sum of:
        0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04827503 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  5. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.06 
    0.06355853 = product of:
  0.12711705 = sum of:
    0.0972484 = weight(_text_:technological in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0972484 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
    0.029868653 = product of:
      0.059737306 = sum of:
        0.059737306 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059737306 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  6. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.04 
    0.042274546 = product of:
  0.08454909 = sum of:
    0.06946314 = weight(_text_:technological in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946314 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.29352558 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
    0.015085948 = product of:
      0.030171895 = sum of:
        0.030171895 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030171895 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Durand, J.J.: Making your MARC (1997) 0.02 
    0.0243121 = product of:
  0.0972484 = sum of:
    0.0972484 = weight(_text_:technological in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0972484 = score(doc=871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Addresses some of the questions raised by school library media specialists but intended to help all those whose last cataloguing course was taken in library school before the technological revolution to make the most of the MARC record format. Covers necessary cataloguing tools and basic information needed to create an accurate MARC record, as well as successful additional information and some expectations of its future iuses. Emphasizes the importance of accurate MARC records if the online catalogue is to meet user needs, and be able to be merged with other catalogues. Also notes the MARC record's usefulness in streamlining activities such as circulation, use statistics, overdue notices, holding reports, bibliographies and inventories
  8. Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997) 0.02 
    0.0243121 = product of:
  0.0972484 = sum of:
    0.0972484 = weight(_text_:technological in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0972484 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Since Sep 1996 a group with representatives from the French National Library (BNF), French Joint Catalogue (CCF), Directorate of Scientific and Technical Information (DISTNB), Directorate of Reading (DL) and the Higher Education Bibliography Agency (ABES) has been working on establishing a format for exchanging local data which will accomodtae the needs of all users; conform to international standards and take account of new technological tools (Z39.50-1995). Using pre-existing formats with UNIMARC as the basis, the new format will allow selection of documents by different location criteria, establish conditions of communication and manage interlibrary loan. To date fields have been defined for data on location and management of copies, and for descriptive data on copies
  9. Sandberg-Fox, A.M.: ¬The microcomputer revolution (2001) 0.02 
    0.0243121 = product of:
  0.0972484 = sum of:
    0.0972484 = weight(_text_:technological in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0972484 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    With the introduction of the microcomputer in the 1980s, a revolution of sorts was initiated. In libraries this was evidenced by the acquisition of personal computers and the software to run on them. All that catalogers needed were cataloging rules and a MARC format to ensure their bibliographic control. However, little did catalogers realize they were dealing with an industry that introduced rapid technological changes, which effected continual revision of existing rules and the formulation of special guidelines to deal with the industry's innovative products. This article focuses on the attempts of libraries and organized cataloging groups to develop the Chapter 9 descriptive cataloging rules in AACR2; it highlights selected events and includes cataloging examples that illustrate the evolution of the chapter.
  10. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.012800852 = product of:
  0.051203407 = sum of:
    0.051203407 = product of:
      0.102406815 = sum of:
        0.102406815 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102406815 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.012068758 = product of:
  0.04827503 = sum of:
    0.04827503 = product of:
      0.09655006 = sum of:
        0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09655006 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.010560163 = product of:
  0.042240653 = sum of:
    0.042240653 = product of:
      0.08448131 = sum of:
        0.08448131 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08448131 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.010560163 = product of:
  0.042240653 = sum of:
    0.042240653 = product of:
      0.08448131 = sum of:
        0.08448131 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08448131 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  14. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01 
    0.010560163 = product of:
  0.042240653 = sum of:
    0.042240653 = product of:
      0.08448131 = sum of:
        0.08448131 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08448131 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.010560163 = product of:
  0.042240653 = sum of:
    0.042240653 = product of:
      0.08448131 = sum of:
        0.08448131 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08448131 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  16. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01 
    0.009051568 = product of:
  0.03620627 = sum of:
    0.03620627 = product of:
      0.07241254 = sum of:
        0.07241254 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07241254 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  17. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.008533901 = product of:
  0.034135602 = sum of:
    0.034135602 = product of:
      0.068271205 = sum of:
        0.068271205 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068271205 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  18. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01 
    0.007542974 = product of:
  0.030171895 = sum of:
    0.030171895 = product of:
      0.06034379 = sum of:
        0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034379 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  19. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01 
    0.007542974 = product of:
  0.030171895 = sum of:
    0.030171895 = product of:
      0.06034379 = sum of:
        0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034379 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  20. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01 
    0.006034379 = product of:
  0.024137516 = sum of:
    0.024137516 = product of:
      0.04827503 = sum of:
        0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04827503 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 12
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 55
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes