-
Bergeron, P.: Information resources management (1996)
0.02
0.020838942 = product of:
0.08335577 = sum of:
0.08335577 = weight(_text_:technological in 7364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08335577 = score(doc=7364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 7364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7364)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of the concept and practice of information resources management (IRM), particularly during the period 1986 to 1995. Notes the emergence of 2 approaches: the technological view emphasizing the technical aspect of IRM; and the integrative view which considers IRM as a convergent approach to information problems. Identifies the perceived barriers to IRM implementation: lack of well defined IRM concepts, practices, guidelines and tools; failure of organizations to perceive information as a resource; lack of measurement of information costs and value; and resistance to organizational change, such as the modification of organizational structures, policies, procedures, and the new roles for information professionals. Concludes by suggesting that there is a trend toward an integrative approach to IRM in terms of value added processes and considers whether IRM is finding its way as a discipline or subdiscipline within information science
-
Solomon, S.: Discovering information in context (2002)
0.02
0.020838942 = product of:
0.08335577 = sum of:
0.08335577 = weight(_text_:technological in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08335577 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This chapter has three purposes: to illuminate the ways in which people discover, shape, or create information as part of their lives and work; to consider how the resources and rules of people's situations facilitate or limit discovery of information; and to introduce the idea of a sociotechnical systems design science that is founded in part an understanding the discovery of information in context. In addressing these purposes the chapter focuses an both theoretical and research works in information studies and related fields that shed light on information as something that is embedded in the fabric of people's lives and work. Thus, the discovery of information view presented here characterizes information as being constructed through involvement in life's activities, problems, tasks, and social and technological structures, as opposed to being independent and context free. Given this process view, discovering information entails engagement, reflection, learning, and action-all the behaviors that research subjects often speak of as making sense-above and beyond the traditional focus of the information studies field: seeking without consideration of connections across time.
-
Gilliland-Swetland, A.: Electronic records management (2004)
0.01
0.013892628 = product of:
0.055570513 = sum of:
0.055570513 = weight(_text_:technological in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055570513 = score(doc=4280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23482047 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- What is an electronic record, how should it best be preserved and made available, and to what extent do traditional, paradigmatic archival precepts such as provenance, original order, and archival custody hold when managing it? Over more than four decades of work in the area of electronic records (formerly known as machine-readable records), theorists and researchers have offered answers to these questions-or at least devised approaches for trying to answer them. However, a set of fundamental questions about the nature of the record and the applicability of traditional archival theory still confronts researchers seeking to advance knowledge and development in this increasingly active, but contested, area of research. For example, which characteristics differentiate a record from other types of information objects (such as publications or raw research data)? Are these characteristics consistently present regardless of the medium of the record? Does the record always have to have a tangible form? How does the record manifest itself within different technological and procedural contexts, and in particular, how do we determine the parameters of electronic records created in relational, distributed, or dynamic environments that bear little resemblance an the surface to traditional paper-based environments? At the heart of electronic records research lies a dual concern with the nature of the record as a specific type of information object and the nature of legal and historical evidence in a digital world. Electronic records research is relevant to the agendas of many communities in addition to that of archivists. Its emphasis an accountability and an establishing trust in records, for example, addresses concerns that are central to both digital government and e-commerce. Research relating to electronic records is still relatively homogeneous in terms of scope, in that most major research initiatives have addressed various combinations of the following: theory building in terms of identifying the nature of the electronic record, developing alternative conceptual models, establishing the determinants of reliability and authenticity in active and preserved electronic records, identifying functional and metadata requirements for record keeping, developing and testing preservation
-
Cho, H.; Pham, M.T.N.; Leonard, K.N.; Urban, A.C.: ¬A systematic literature review on image information needs and behaviors (2022)
0.01
0.013892628 = product of:
0.055570513 = sum of:
0.055570513 = weight(_text_:technological in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055570513 = score(doc=606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23482047 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose With ready access to search engines and social media platforms, the way people find image information has evolved and diversified in the past two decades. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the literature on image information needs and behaviors. Design/methodology/approach Following an eight-step procedure for conducting systematic literature reviews, the paper presents an analysis of peer-reviewed work on image information needs and behaviors, with publications ranging from the years 1997 to 2019. Findings Application of the inclusion criteria led to 69 peer-reviewed works. These works were synthesized according to the following categories: research methods, users targeted, image types, identified needs, search behaviors and search obstacles. The reviewed studies show that people seek and use images for multiple reasons, including entertainment, illustration, aesthetic appreciation, knowledge construction, engagement, inspiration and social interactions. The reviewed studies also report that common strategies for image searches include keyword searches with short queries, browsing, specialization and reformulation. Observed trends suggest common deployment of query analysis, survey questionnaires and undergraduate participant pools to research image information needs and behavior. Originality/value At this point, after more than two decades of image information needs research, a holistic systematic review of the literature was long overdue. The way users find image information has evolved and diversified due to technological developments in image retrieval. By synthesizing this burgeoning field into specific foci, this systematic literature review provides a foundation for future empirical investigation. With this foundation set, the paper then pinpoints key research gaps to investigate, particularly the influence of user expertise, a need for more diverse population samples, a dearth of qualitative data, new search features and information and visual literacies instruction.
-
MacFarlane, A.; Missaoui, S.; Makri, S.; Gutierrez Lopez, M.: Sender vs. recipient-orientated information systems revisited (2022)
0.01
0.013892628 = product of:
0.055570513 = sum of:
0.055570513 = weight(_text_:technological in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055570513 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.23482047 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose Belkin and Robertson (1976a) reflected on the ethical implications of theoretical research in information science and warned that there was potential for abuse of knowledge gained by undertaking such research and applying it to information systems. In particular, they identified the domains of advertising and political propaganda that posed particular problems. The purpose of this literature review is to revisit these ideas in the light of recent events in global information systems that demonstrate that their fears were justified. Design/methodology/approach The authors revisit the theory in information science that Belkin and Robertson used to build their argument, together with the discussion on ethics that resulted from this work in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The authors then review recent literature in the field of information systems, specifically information retrieval, social media and recommendation systems that highlight the problems identified by Belkin and Robertson. Findings Information science theories have been used in conjunction with empirical evidence gathered from user interactions that have been detrimental to both individuals and society. It is argued in the paper that the information science and systems communities should find ways to return control to the user wherever possible, and the ways to achieve this are considered. Research limitations/implications The ethical issues identified require a multidisciplinary approach with research in information science, computer science, information systems, business, sociology, psychology, journalism, government and politics, etc. required. This is too large a scope to deal with in a literature review, and we focus only on the design and implementation of information systems (Zimmer, 2008a) through an information science and information systems perspective. Practical implications The authors argue that information systems such as search technologies, social media applications and recommendation systems should be designed with the recipient of the information in mind (Paisley and Parker, 1965), not the sender of that information. Social implications Information systems designed ethically and with users in mind will go some way to addressing the ill effects typified by the problems for individuals and society evident in global information systems. Originality/value The authors synthesize the evidence from the literature to provide potential technological solutions to the ethical issues identified, with a set of recommendations to information systems designers and implementers.
-
Rogers, Y.: New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction (2003)
0.01
0.01215605 = product of:
0.0486242 = sum of:
0.0486242 = weight(_text_:technological in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486242 = score(doc=4270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.20546791 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- "Theory weary, theory leery, why can't I be theory cheery?" (Erickson, 2002, p. 269). The field of human-computer interaction (HCI) is rapidly expanding. Alongside the extensive technological developments that are taking place, a profusion of new theories, methods, and concerns has been imported into the field from a range of disciplines and contexts. An extensive critique of recent theoretical developments is presented here together with an overview of HCI practice. A consequence of bringing new theories into the field has been much insightful explication of HCI phenomena and also a broadening of the field's discourse. However, these theoretically based approaches have had limited impact an the practice of interaction design. This chapter discusses why this is so and suggests that different kinds of mechanisms are needed that will enable both designers and researchers to better articulate and theoretically ground the challenges facing them today. Human-computer interaction is bursting at the seams. Its mission, goals, and methods, well established in the '80s, have all greatly expanded to the point that "HCI is now effectively a boundless domain" (Barnard, May, Duke, & Duce, 2000, p. 221). Everything is in a state of flux: The theory driving research is changing, a flurry of new concepts is emerging, the domains and type of users being studied are diversifying, many of the ways of doing design are new, and much of what is being designed is significantly different. Although potentially much is to be gained from such rapid growth, the downside is an increasing lack of direction, structure, and coherence in the field. What was originally a bounded problem space with a clear focus and a small set of methods for designing computer systems that were easier and more efficient to use by a single user is now turning into a diffuse problem space with less clarity in terms of its objects of study, design foci, and investigative methods. Instead, aspirations of overcoming the Digital Divide, by providing universal accessibility, have become major concerns (e.g., Shneiderman, 2002a). The move toward greater openness in the field means that many more topics, areas, and approaches are now considered acceptable in the worlds of research and practice.
-
Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:01:26
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.01
0.012068758 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = product of:
0.09655006 = sum of:
0.09655006 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09655006 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011)
0.01
0.010560163 = product of:
0.042240653 = sum of:
0.042240653 = product of:
0.08448131 = sum of:
0.08448131 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08448131 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27.12.2014 18:54:22
-
Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994)
0.01
0.007542974 = product of:
0.030171895 = sum of:
0.030171895 = product of:
0.06034379 = sum of:
0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06034379 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
-
Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992)
0.01
0.006034379 = product of:
0.024137516 = sum of:
0.024137516 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04827503 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22
-
Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994)
0.01
0.006034379 = product of:
0.024137516 = sum of:
0.024137516 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04827503 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
-
Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995)
0.01
0.006034379 = product of:
0.024137516 = sum of:
0.024137516 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04827503 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 6.1996 19:22:20
-
Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996)
0.01
0.006034379 = product of:
0.024137516 = sum of:
0.024137516 = product of:
0.04827503 = sum of:
0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04827503 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0445387 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
