Search (1473 results, page 1 of 74)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.23 
    0.22579512 = product of:
  0.30106017 = sum of:
    0.07073926 = product of:
      0.21221778 = sum of:
        0.21221778 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21221778 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21221778 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21221778 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.018103136 = product of:
      0.03620627 = sum of:
        0.03620627 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03620627 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.19 
    0.18863803 = product of:
  0.37727606 = sum of:
    0.094319016 = product of:
      0.28295705 = sum of:
        0.28295705 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28295705 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.28295705 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28295705 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.17 
    0.16505828 = product of:
  0.33011657 = sum of:
    0.08252914 = product of:
      0.24758743 = sum of:
        0.24758743 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24758743 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24758743 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24758743 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Hars, A.: From publishing to knowledge networks : reinventing online knowledge infrastructures (2003) 0.15 
    0.15472513 = product of:
  0.30945027 = sum of:
    0.17014925 = weight(_text_:technological in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17014925 = score(doc=1634,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.7189879 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
    0.13930103 = product of:
      0.27860206 = sum of:
        0.27860206 = weight(_text_:innovations in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27860206 = score(doc=1634,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.9200231 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Science publishing / Technological innovations
    Communication in science / Technological innovations
    Learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Science publishing / Technological innovations
    Communication in science / Technological innovations
    Learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
  5. Wu, J.-C.J.; Liu, H.-P.: Technological innovation assessment of business-to business electronic marketplaces (2006) 0.14 
    0.1424562 = product of:
  0.2849124 = sum of:
    0.16671154 = weight(_text_:technological in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16671154 = score(doc=5118,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.7044614 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
    0.11820085 = product of:
      0.2364017 = sum of:
        0.2364017 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2364017 = score(doc=5118,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.7806655 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Business opportunities created by the Internet economy and new business methods have triggered the development of the electronic or e-marketplace, and vice versa. To generate competitive new products/services, Internet firms need to have access to detailed technological innovations to compete. Despite the wealth of literature on e-marketplaces, research on patent analyses in e-marketplaces is scarce. The patent is a crucial indicator of the technological competitiveness of a company or a nation. This study provides a preliminary step in depicting a holistic picture of technological innovations associated with e-marketplace patents. This study analyzes patents issued during the period of 1990-2002 from major databases; hence, it provides the first empirical study on e-marketplaces and related innovations holistically. A comprehensive set of statistical patent analyses and a discussion on e-marketplaces' technology by means of a patent map analysis are presented.
  6. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.14 
    0.14147852 = product of:
  0.28295705 = sum of:
    0.07073926 = product of:
      0.21221778 = sum of:
        0.21221778 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21221778 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21221778 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21221778 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  7. Internet publishing and beyond : the economics of digital information and intellectual property ; a publication of the Harvard Information Infrastructure Project in collab. with the School of Information Management and Systems at the Univ. of California at Berkeley (2000) 0.13 
    0.12506284 = product of:
  0.25012568 = sum of:
    0.13753 = weight(_text_:technological in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13753 = score(doc=526,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.581151 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
    0.112595685 = product of:
      0.22519137 = sum of:
        0.22519137 = weight(_text_:innovations in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22519137 = score(doc=526,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.7436458 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Technological innovations / Economic aspects
    Subject
    Technological innovations / Economic aspects
  8. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.12 
    0.11789878 = product of:
  0.23579755 = sum of:
    0.05894939 = product of:
      0.17684816 = sum of:
        0.17684816 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17684816 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17684816 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17684816 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  9. ¬The digital university : building a learning community (2002) 0.12 
    0.115703434 = product of:
  0.23140687 = sum of:
    0.078588575 = weight(_text_:technological in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078588575 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
    0.15281829 = sum of:
      0.12868078 = weight(_text_:innovations in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12868078 = score(doc=1782,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0445387 = queryNorm
          0.42494047 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
      0.024137516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024137516 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0445387 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:43:03
    LCSH
    Education, Higher / Effect of technological innovations on / Great Britain
    Subject
    Education, Higher / Effect of technological innovations on / Great Britain
  10. Teo, H.-H.; Wang, X.; Wei, K.-K.; Sia, C.-L.; Lee, M.K.O.: Organizational learning capacity and attitude toward complex technological innovations : an empirical study (2006) 0.10 
    0.10077831 = product of:
  0.20155662 = sum of:
    0.08335577 = weight(_text_:technological in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08335577 = score(doc=4927,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
    0.11820085 = product of:
      0.2364017 = sum of:
        0.2364017 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2364017 = score(doc=4927,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.7806655 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Recent studies have found organizational learning capacity to be a key factor in influencing organizational assimilation and exploitation of knowledge-intensive innovations. Despite its increasing importance, the impact of organizational learning capacity an technology assimilation is not well understood. Distilling from extant works an organizational learning and technology assimilation, this study identifies four components of organizational learning capacity, namely, systems orientation, organizational climate for learning orientation, knowledge acquisition and utilization orientation, and information sharing and dissemination orientation. The authors subject these components to structural equation modeling analyses to better understand their structure and dimensionality. The analyses strongly support the proposed four major dimensions underlying organizational learning capacity. Organizational learning capacity, as a higher-order factor, has a significant impact an attitude towards organizational adoption of knowledge-intensive innovations. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
  11. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.09 
    0.094319016 = product of:
  0.18863803 = sum of:
    0.047159508 = product of:
      0.14147852 = sum of:
        0.14147852 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14147852 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14147852 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14147852 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  12. Shoham, S.: Cataloging instruction in Israel (2005) 0.09 
    0.09306307 = product of:
  0.18612614 = sum of:
    0.117882855 = weight(_text_:technological in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.117882855 = score(doc=5762,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.49812943 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
    0.068243295 = product of:
      0.13648659 = sum of:
        0.13648659 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13648659 = score(doc=5762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Despite its young age compared to similar programs in the United States, cataloging instruction in Israel has also been transformed to reflect the changes in the work done in libraries based on technological innovations and conceptions held by those involved in academia. Cataloging instruction in Israel is marked by a number of factors: * There has always been a division, carried through to today, between distinct and independent courses on various aspects of cataloging: A course on classification, a course on descriptive cataloging and a course on indexing. Even today, these courses are requirements in all of the instructional frameworks, though the length of the course has been reduced over the years * Over the years additional courses have been introduced as a reflection of the technological developments and work in the field * The majority of courses are now taught in computer labs * Switch to instruction by academics and not by librarians, workers in the field, as was customary for many decades * Focus of instruction in university departments on theory and understanding of concepts.
  13. Rackley, M.: Internet Archive (2009) 0.09 
    0.08843279 = product of:
  0.17686558 = sum of:
    0.0972484 = weight(_text_:technological in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0972484 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
    0.07961717 = product of:
      0.15923434 = sum of:
        0.15923434 = weight(_text_:innovations in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15923434 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.525837 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This entry describes the history of the Internet Archive from its founding in 1996 to its two billion page crawl in 2007. It describes the key individuals and organizations involved in the Archive's work and the technological innovations that make the Archive possible, such as the ARC file format, Heritrix, and the Wayback Machine. The focus of this entry is primarily the Internet Archive's Web archiving activities and collections, but it also briefly discusses the Archive's other activities and the impact it has had on the fields of library and information science and the public in general.
  14. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.07 
    0.07263832 = product of:
  0.14527664 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.034135602 = product of:
      0.068271205 = sum of:
        0.068271205 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068271205 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  15. Digital library development : the view from Kanazawa (2006) 0.07 
    0.07146448 = product of:
  0.14292896 = sum of:
    0.078588575 = weight(_text_:technological in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078588575 = score(doc=6732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
    0.06434039 = product of:
      0.12868078 = sum of:
        0.12868078 = weight(_text_:innovations in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12868078 = score(doc=6732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.42494047 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations / Congresses
    Subject
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations / Congresses
  16. Palfrey, J.; Gasser, U.: Generation Internet : die Digital Natives: Wie sie leben - Was sie denken - Wie sie arbeiten (2008) 0.07 
    0.07146448 = product of:
  0.14292896 = sum of:
    0.078588575 = weight(_text_:technological in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078588575 = score(doc=6056,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
    0.06434039 = product of:
      0.12868078 = sum of:
        0.12868078 = weight(_text_:innovations in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12868078 = score(doc=6056,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.42494047 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Technological innovations / Social aspects
    Subject
    Technological innovations / Social aspects
  17. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.07 
    0.06763927 = product of:
  0.13527854 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.024137516 = product of:
      0.04827503 = sum of:
        0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04827503 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  18. Morris, D.E.; Hobert, C.B.; Osmus, L.; Wool, G.: Cataloging staff costs revisited (2000) 0.07 
    0.06763927 = product of:
  0.13527854 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
    0.024137516 = product of:
      0.04827503 = sum of:
        0.04827503 = weight(_text_:22 in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04827503 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Staff costs for cataloging have declined at Iowa State University Library. This is demonstrated by data from a longitudinal time and cost study begun in 1987. We discuss the national developments, technological advancements, and reengineering efforts that have supported greater cataloging effectiveness and quality. We use the ISU findings as an example of a nationwide phenomenon resulting from the remarkable ability of catalogers to share work through national bibliographic utilities.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Guan, J.C.; Gao, X.: Exploring the h-index at patent level (2009) 0.06 
    0.063166276 = product of:
  0.12633255 = sum of:
    0.06946314 = weight(_text_:technological in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946314 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.29352558 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
    0.056869406 = product of:
      0.11373881 = sum of:
        0.11373881 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11373881 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.37559783 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    As an acceptable proxy for innovative activity, patents have become increasingly important in recent years. Patents and patent citations have been used for construction of technology indicators. This article presents an alternative to other citation-based indicators, i.e., the patent h-index, which is borrowed from bibliometrics. We conduct the analysis on a sample of the world's top 20 firms ranked by total patents granted in the period 1996-2005 from the Derwent Innovations Index in the semiconductor area. We also investigate the relationships between the patent h-index and other three indicators, i.e., patent counts, citation counts, and the mean family size (MFS). The findings show that the patent h-index is indeed an effective indicator for evaluating the technological importance and quality, or impact, for an assignee. In addition, the MFS indicator correlates negatively and not significantly with the patent h-index, which indicates that the social value of a patent is in disagreement with its private value. The two indicators, patent h-index and MFS, both provide an overview of the value of patents, but from two different angles.
  20. Roknuzzaman, M.; Kanai, H.; Umemoto, K.: Integration of knowledge management process into digital library system : a theoretical perspective (2009) 0.06 
    0.063166276 = product of:
  0.12633255 = sum of:
    0.06946314 = weight(_text_:technological in 2971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946314 = score(doc=2971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.29352558 = fieldWeight in 2971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2971)
    0.056869406 = product of:
      0.11373881 = sum of:
        0.11373881 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11373881 = score(doc=2971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.37559783 = fieldWeight in 2971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework of an integrated digital library (DL) system based on knowledge management (KM) process. Design/methodology/approach - The study is based on viewpoints, review of existing concepts and frameworks of DL and KM, and the result of an interview of nine DL practitioners world-wide. The respondents are purposively selected from the participants" lists of two international conferences held in 2008. The interview is conducted through e-mail using a short, structured and open-ended questionnaire. Findings - The study finds some significant overlaps between DL and KM and argues that a generic KM process of acquisition, organization, storage and retrieval, and dissemination of knowledge with receiving feedbacks can suitably be fitted in DL. Thus an integrated DL system can be consisted of digital resources, technological infrastructure, experience and expertise, DL services and a KM process. The integration of KM can add value to developing a knowledge-based culture, management of intellectual assets, promotion of knowledge sharing, innovations in DL services and a strong leadership position for DL. Research limitations/implications - The research presents theoretical viewpoints of DL and KM, and the model, therefore, demands for practical investigation. Practical implications - The study suggests the adoption of KM process in DL system to enhance its effectiveness. Originality/value - The proposed model is an original work and theoretically, it would contribute to the advancement of academic debate in both the areas of DL and KM.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1214
  • m 186
  • el 75
  • s 66
  • b 26
  • x 13
  • i 8
  • n 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications