Search (72 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  1. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.04
    0.038194444 = product of:
      0.07638889 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.557-570
  2. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Introduction (2004) 0.02
    0.023834879 = product of:
      0.047669757 = sum of:
        0.038341913 = weight(_text_:information in 2389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038341913 = score(doc=2389,freq=70.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.45898068 = fieldWeight in 2389, product of:
              8.3666 = tf(freq=70.0), with freq of:
                70.0 = termFreq=70.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2389)
        0.009327845 = product of:
          0.01865569 = sum of:
            0.01865569 = weight(_text_:technology in 2389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01865569 = score(doc=2389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 2389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This is the second part of a two-part special topic JASIST issue an information seeking. The first part presented papers an the topics of health information seeking and everyday life information seeking or ELIS (i.e., information seeking outside of work or school). This second issue presents papers an the topics of information retrieval and information seeking in industry environments. Information retrieval involves a specific kind of information seeking, as the user is in direct contact with an information interface and with potential sources of information from the system's database. The user conducts the search using various strategies, tactics, etc., but there is also the possibility that information processes will occur resulting in a change in the way the user thinks about the topic of the search. If this occurs, the user is, in effect, using the found data, turning it into an informational element of some kind. Such processes can be facilitated in the design of the information retrieval system. Information seeking in industry environments takes up more and more of our working day. Even companies producing industrial products are in fact mainly producing informational elements of some kind, often for the purpose of making decisions or as starting positions for further information seeking. While there may be company mechanisms in place to aid such information seeking, and to make it more efficient, if better information seeking structures were in place, not only would workers waste less time in informational pursuits, but they would also find things, discover new processes, etc., that would benefit the corporation's bottom line. In Figure l, we plot the six papers in this issue an an information behavior continuum, following a taxonomy of information behavior terms from Spink and Cole (2001). Information Behavior is a broad term covering all aspects of information seeking, including passive or undetermined information behavior. Information-Seeking Behavior is usually thought of as active or conscious information behavior. Information-Searching Behavior describes the interactive elements between a user and an information system. Information-Use Behavior is about the user's acquisition and incorporation of data in some kind of information process. This leads to the production of information, but also back to the broad range of Information Behavior in the first part of the continuum. Though we plot all papers in this issue along this continuum, they take into account more than their general framework. The three information retrieval reports veer from the traditional information-searching approach of usersystem interaction, while the three industry environment articles veer from the traditional information-seeking approach of specific context information-seeking studies.
    Footnote
    Einführung zum Themenheft: Information seeking research
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.9, S.767-768
  3. Wolfram, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Vox populi : the public searching of the Web (2001) 0.02
    0.023713216 = product of:
      0.047426432 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
        0.027983533 = product of:
          0.055967066 = sum of:
            0.055967066 = weight(_text_:technology in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055967066 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1073-1074
  4. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Human information behavior : integrating diverse approaches and information use (2006) 0.02
    0.023015158 = product of:
      0.046030317 = sum of:
        0.03437051 = weight(_text_:information in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03437051 = score(doc=4915,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.41144013 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
        0.011659805 = product of:
          0.02331961 = sum of:
            0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02331961 = score(doc=4915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    For millennia humans have sought, organized, and used information as they learned and evolved patterns of human information behaviors to resolve their human problems and survive. However, despite the current focus an living in an "information age," we have a limited evolutionary understanding of human information behavior. In this article the authors examine the current three interdisciplinary approaches to conceptualizing how humans have sought information including (a) the everyday life information seeking-sense-making approach, (b) the information foraging approach, and (c) the problem-solution perspective an information seeking approach. In addition, due to the lack of clarity regarding the rote of information use in information behavior, a fourth information approach is provided based an a theory of information use. The use theory proposed starts from an evolutionary psychology notion that humans are able to adapt to their environment and survive because of our modular cognitive architecture. Finally, the authors begin the process of conceptualizing these diverse approaches, and the various aspects or elements of these approaches, within an integrated model with consideration of information use. An initial integrated model of these different approaches with information use is proposed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.1, S.25-35
    Theme
    Information
  5. Spink, A.; Losee, R.M.: Feedback in information retrieval (1996) 0.02
    0.020553209 = product of:
      0.041106418 = sum of:
        0.022450726 = weight(_text_:information in 7441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022450726 = score(doc=7441,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7441, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7441)
        0.01865569 = product of:
          0.03731138 = sum of:
            0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 7441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03731138 = score(doc=7441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 7441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the mechanisms of feedback in information retrieval (IR) in terms of feedback concepts and models in cybernetics and social sciences. Critically evaluates feedback research based on the traditional IR models and comparing the different approaches to automatic relevance feedback techniques, and feedback research within the framework of interactive IR models. Calls for an extension of the concept of feedback beyond relevance feedback to interactive feedback. Cites specific examples of feedback models used within IR research and presents 6 challenges to future research
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 31(1996), S.33-78
  6. Spink, A.; Ozmutlu, H.C.; Ozmutlu, S.: Multitasking information seeking and searching processes (2002) 0.02
    0.020434562 = product of:
      0.040869124 = sum of:
        0.02920932 = weight(_text_:information in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02920932 = score(doc=600,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
        0.011659805 = product of:
          0.02331961 = sum of:
            0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02331961 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Recent studies show that humans engage in multitasking behaviors as they seek and search information retrieval (IR) systems for information on more than one topic at the same time. For example, a Web search session by a single user may consist of searching on single topics or multitasking. Findings are presented from four separate studies of the prevalence of multitasking information seeking and searching by Web, IR system, and library users. Incidence of multitasking identified in the four different studies included: (1) users of the Excite Web search engine who completed a survey form, (2) Excite Web search engine users filtered from an Excite transaction log from 20 December 1999, (3) mediated on-line databases searches, and (4) academic library users. Findings include: (1) multitasking information seeking and searching is a common human behavior, (2) users may conduct information seeking and searching on related or unrelated topics, (3) Web or IR multitasking search sessions are longer than single topic sessions, (4) mean number of topics per Web search ranged of 1 to more than 10 topics with a mean of 2.11 topic changes per search session, and (4) many Web search topic changes were from hobbies to shopping and vice versa. A more complex model of human seeking and searching levels that incorporates multitasking information behaviors is presented, and a theoretical framework for human information coordinating behavior (HICB) is proposed. Multitasking information seeking and searching is developing as major research area that draws together IR and information seeking studies toward a focus on IR within the context of human information behavior. Implications for models of information seeking and searching, IR/Web systems design, and further research are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.8, S.639-652
  7. Spink, A.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Ellis, D.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 1: theoretical framework and research design (2002) 0.02
    0.018902179 = product of:
      0.037804358 = sum of:
        0.02381259 = weight(_text_:information in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02381259 = score(doc=5240,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this issue we begin with the first of four parts of a five part series of papers by Spink, Wilson, Ford, Foster, and Ellis. Spink, et alia, in the first section of this report set forth the design of a project to test whether existing models of the information search process are appropriate for an environment of mediated successive searching which they believe characterizes much information seeking behavior. Their goal is to develop an integrated model of the process. Data were collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K., with individuals with real information needs engaged in interaction with operational information retrieval systems by use of transaction logs, recordings of interactions with intermediaries, pre, and post search interviews, questionnaire responses, relevance judgments of retrieved text, and responses to a test of cognitive styles. Questionnaires were based upon the Kuhlthau model, the Saracevic model, the Ellis model, and incorporated a visual analog scale to avoid a consistency bias.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.9, S.695-703
  8. Ford, N.; Wilson, T.D.; Foster, A.; Ellis, D.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 4: cognitive styles in information seeking (2002) 0.02
    0.017864795 = product of:
      0.03572959 = sum of:
        0.021737823 = weight(_text_:information in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021737823 = score(doc=5239,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=5239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In "Part 4. Cognitive Styles in Information Seeking,'' where Ford is the primary author, the results of the application of the Riding's Cognitive Styles Analysis and the Pask's holist/serialist portion of the Ford's Study Process Questionnaire to the 111 U.K. participants. were correlated using Spearman's coefficient with reports of focused thinking, degree of change in the intermediary's perception of the problem and personal knowledge, problem stage, degree of differentiating activity, change in problem perception, engagement in exploring activity, changes in questioning, valuing of serendipitous information, and other variables. The results would indicate that field independent individuals report clearer more focused thinking, see themselves in an earlier problem stage, and report higher levels of change in perception of the problem. Holists value serendipity and report engagement in Kuhlthau's exploring stage. They are seen by intermediaries as exhibiting fewer changes in questioning behavior. A fifth section will appear in a later issue.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.9, S.728-735
  9. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Pedersen, J.: ¬A temporal comparison of AItaVista Web searching (2005) 0.02
    0.016717333 = product of:
      0.033434667 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 3454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=3454,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3454, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3454)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 3454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=3454,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3454, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3454)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Major Web search engines, such as AItaVista, are essential tools in the quest to locate online information. This article reports research that used transaction log analysis to examine the characteristics and changes in AItaVista Web searching that occurred from 1998 to 2002. The research questions we examined are (1) What are the changes in AItaVista Web searching from 1998 to 2002? (2) What are the current characteristics of AItaVista searching, including the duration and frequency of search sessions? (3) What changes in the information needs of AItaVista users occurred between 1998 and 2002? The results of our research show (1) a move toward more interactivity with increases in session and query length, (2) with 70% of session durations at 5 minutes or less, the frequency of interaction is increasing, but it is happening very quickly, and (3) a broadening range of Web searchers' information needs, with the most frequent terms accounting for less than 1% of total term usage. We discuss the implications of these findings for the development of Web search engines.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.6, S.559-570
  10. Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Ellis, D.; Foster, A.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 2: uncertainty and Its correlates (2002) 0.02
    0.016717333 = product of:
      0.033434667 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=5232,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In "Part 2. Uncertainty and Its Correlates,'' where Wilson is the primary author, after a review of uncertainty as a concept in information seeking and decision research, it is hypothesized that if the Kuhlthau problem solving stage model is appropriate the searchers will recognize the stage in which they currently are operating. Secondly to test Wilson's contention that operationalized uncertainty would be useful in characterizing users, it is hypothesized that uncertainty will decrease as the searcher proceeds through problem stages and after the completion of the search. A review of pre and post search interviews reveals that uncertainty can be operationalized, and that academic researchers have no difficulty with a stage model of the information seeking process. Uncertainty is unrelated to sex, age, or discipline, but is related to problem stage and domain knowledge. Both concepts appear robust.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.9, S.704-715
  11. Spink, A.; Du, J.T.: Toward a Web search model : integrating multitasking, cognitive coordination, and cognitive shifts (2011) 0.02
    0.015751816 = product of:
      0.031503633 = sum of:
        0.019843826 = weight(_text_:information in 4624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019843826 = score(doc=4624,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4624, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4624)
        0.011659805 = product of:
          0.02331961 = sum of:
            0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 4624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02331961 = score(doc=4624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Limited research has investigated the role of multitasking, cognitive coordination, and cognitive shifts during web search. Understanding these three behaviors is crucial to web search model development. This study aims to explore characteristics of multitasking behavior, types of cognitive shifts, and levels of cognitive coordination as well as the relationship between them during web search. Data collection included pre- and postquestionnaires, think-aloud protocols, web search logs, observations, and interviews with 42 graduate students who conducted 315 web search sessions with 221 information problems. Results show that web search is a dynamic interaction including the ordering of multiple information problems and the generation of evolving information problems, including task switching, multitasking, explicit task and implicit mental coordination, and cognitive shifting. Findings show that explicit task-level coordination is closely linked to multitasking, and implicit cognitive-level coordination is related to the task-coordination process; including information problem development and task switching. Coordination mechanisms directly result in cognitive state shifts including strategy, evaluation, and view states that affect users' holistic shifts in information problem understanding and knowledge contribution. A web search model integrating multitasking, cognitive coordination, and cognitive shifts (MCC model) is presented. Implications and further research also are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1446-1472
  12. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: New directions in cognitive information retrieval : introduction (2005) 0.02
    0.015411388 = product of:
      0.030822776 = sum of:
        0.021494932 = weight(_text_:information in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021494932 = score(doc=647,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.25731003 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
        0.009327845 = product of:
          0.01865569 = sum of:
            0.01865569 = weight(_text_:technology in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01865569 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Humans have used electronic information retrieval (IR) systems for more than 50 years as they evolved from experimental systems to full-scale Web search engines and digital libraries. The fields of library and information science (LIS), cognitive science, human factors and computer science have historically been the leading disciplines in conducting research that seeks to model human interaction with IR systems for all kinds of information related behaviors. As technology problems have been mastered, the theoretical and applied framework for studying human interaction with IR systems has evolved from systems-centered to more user-centered, or cognitive-centered approaches. However, cognitive information retrieval (CIR) research that focuses on user interaction with IR systems is still largely under-funded and is often not included at computing and systems design oriented conferences. But CIR-focused research continues, and there are signs that some IR systems designers in academia and the Web search business are realizing that user behavior research can provide valuable insights into systems design and evaluation. The goal of our book is to provide an overview of new CIR research directions. This book does not provide a history of the research field of CIR. Instead, the book confronts new ways of looking at the human information condition with regard to our increasing need to interact with IR systems. The need has grown due to a number of factors, including the increased importance of information to more people in this information age. Also, IR was once considered document-oriented, but has now evolved to include multimedia, text, and other information objects. As a result, IR systems and their complexity have proliferated as users and user purposes for using them have also proliferated. Human interaction with IR systems can often be frustrating as people often lack an understanding of IR system functionality.
    Series
    The information retrieval series, vol. 19
    Source
    New directions in cognitive information retrieval. Eds.: A. Spink, C. Cole
  13. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: ¬A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval (2005) 0.02
    0.015020831 = product of:
      0.030041661 = sum of:
        0.017147025 = weight(_text_:information in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017147025 = score(doc=642,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.20526241 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
        0.012894635 = product of:
          0.02578927 = sum of:
            0.02578927 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02578927 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval (IR) research has developed considerably since the 1950's to include consideration of more cognitive, interactive and iterative processes during the interaction between humans and IR or Web systems (Ingwersen, 1992, 1996). Interactive search sessions by humans with IR systems have been depicted as interactive IR models (Saracevic, 1997). Human-IR system interaction is also modeled as taking place within the context of broader human information behavior (HIB) processes (Spink et al., 2002). Research into the human or cognitive (user modeling) aspects of IR is a growing body of research on user interactivity, task performance and measures for observing user interactivity. The task context and situational characteristics of users' searches and evaluation have also been identified as key elements in a user's interaction with an IR system (Cool and Spink, 2002; Vakkari, 2003). Major theorized interactive IR models have been proposed relating to the single search episode, including Ingwersen's (1992,1996) Cognitive Model of IR Interaction, Belkin et al.'s (1995) Episodic Interaction Model, and Saracevic's (1996,1997) Stratified Model of IR Interaction. In this chapter we examine Saracevic's Stratified Model of IR Interaction and extend the model within the framework of cognitive IR (CIR) to depict CIR as a multitasking process. This chapter provides a new direction for CIR research by conceptualizing IR with a multitasking context. The next section of the chapter defines the concept of multitasking in the cognitive sciences and Section 3 discusses the emerging understanding of multitasking information behavior. In Section 4, cognitive IR is depicted within a multitasking framework using Saracevic's (1996, 1997) Stratified Model of IR Interaction. In Section 5, we link information searching and seeking models together, via Saracevic's Stratified Model of IR Interaction, but starting with a unitask model of HIB. We begin to model multitasking in cognitive IR in Section 6. In Sections 7 and 8, we increase the complexity of our developing multitasking model of cognitive IR by adding coordinating mechanisms, including feedback loops. Finally, in Section 9, we conclude the chapter and indicate future directions for further research.
    Date
    19. 1.2007 12:55:22
    Series
    The information retrieval series, vol. 19
    Source
    New directions in cognitive information retrieval. Eds.: A. Spink, C. Cole
  14. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Pedersen , J.: Searching for people on Web search engines (2004) 0.01
    0.014887327 = product of:
      0.029774655 = sum of:
        0.01811485 = weight(_text_:information in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01811485 = score(doc=4429,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
        0.011659805 = product of:
          0.02331961 = sum of:
            0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02331961 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Web is a communication and information technology that is often used for the distribution and retrieval of personal information. Many people and organizations mount Web sites containing large amounts of information on individuals, particularly about celebrities. However, limited studies have examined how people search for information on other people, using personal names, via Web search engines. Explores the nature of personal name searching on Web search engines. The specific research questions addressed in the study are: "Do personal names form a major part of queries to Web search engines?"; "What are the characteristics of personal name Web searching?"; and "How effective is personal name Web searching?". Random samples of queries from two Web search engines were analyzed. The findings show that: personal name searching is a common but not a major part of Web searching with few people seeking information on celebrities via Web search engines; few personal name queries include double quotations or additional identifying terms; and name searches on Alta Vista included more advanced search features relative to those on AlltheWeb.com. Discusses the implications of the findings for Web searching and search engines, and further research.
  15. Koshman, S.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching on the Vivisimo search engine (2006) 0.01
    0.013973147 = product of:
      0.027946293 = sum of:
        0.011456838 = weight(_text_:information in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011456838 = score(doc=216,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
        0.016489455 = product of:
          0.03297891 = sum of:
            0.03297891 = weight(_text_:technology in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03297891 = score(doc=216,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The application of clustering to Web search engine technology is a novel approach that offers structure to the information deluge often faced by Web searchers. Clustering methods have been well studied in research labs; however, real user searching with clustering systems in operational Web environments is not well understood. This article reports on results from a transaction log analysis of Vivisimo.com, which is a Web meta-search engine that dynamically clusters users' search results. A transaction log analysis was conducted on 2-week's worth of data collected from March 28 to April 4 and April 25 to May 2, 2004, representing 100% of site traffic during these periods and 2,029,734 queries overall. The results show that the highest percentage of queries contained two terms. The highest percentage of search sessions contained one query and was less than 1 minute in duration. Almost half of user interactions with clusters consisted of displaying a cluster's result set, and a small percentage of interactions showed cluster tree expansion. Findings show that 11.1% of search sessions were multitasking searches, and there are a broad variety of search topics in multitasking search sessions. Other searching interactions and statistics on repeat users of the search engine are reported. These results provide insights into search characteristics with a cluster-based Web search engine and extend research into Web searching trends.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.14, S.1875-1887
  16. Tjondronegoro, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: ¬A study and comparison of multimedia Web searching : 1997-2006 (2009) 0.01
    0.013973147 = product of:
      0.027946293 = sum of:
        0.011456838 = weight(_text_:information in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011456838 = score(doc=3090,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.016489455 = product of:
          0.03297891 = sum of:
            0.03297891 = weight(_text_:technology in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03297891 = score(doc=3090,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Searching for multimedia is an important activity for users of Web search engines. Studying user's interactions with Web search engine multimedia buttons, including image, audio, and video, is important for the development of multimedia Web search systems. This article provides results from a Weblog analysis study of multimedia Web searching by Dogpile users in 2006. The study analyzes the (a) duration, size, and structure of Web search queries and sessions; (b) user demographics; (c) most popular multimedia Web searching terms; and (d) use of advanced Web search techniques including Boolean and natural language. The current study findings are compared with results from previous multimedia Web searching studies. The key findings are: (a) Since 1997, image search consistently is the dominant media type searched followed by audio and video; (b) multimedia search duration is still short (>50% of searching episodes are <1 min), using few search terms; (c) many multimedia searches are for information about people, especially in audio search; and (d) multimedia search has begun to shift from entertainment to other categories such as medical, sports, and technology (based on the most repeated terms). Implications for design of Web multimedia search engines are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.9, S.1756-1768
  17. Ellis, D.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Lam, H.M.; Burton, R.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 5: user-intermediary interaction (2002) 0.01
    0.013869986 = product of:
      0.027739972 = sum of:
        0.013748205 = weight(_text_:information in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013748205 = score(doc=5233,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.11, S.883-892
  18. He, S.; Spink, A.: ¬A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation (2002) 0.01
    0.01383271 = product of:
      0.02766542 = sum of:
        0.011341691 = weight(_text_:information in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011341691 = score(doc=5230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
        0.016323728 = product of:
          0.032647457 = sum of:
            0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032647457 = score(doc=5230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.11, S.953-959
  19. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Regions and levels : Measuring and mapping users' relevance judgements (2001) 0.01
    0.012845755 = product of:
      0.02569151 = sum of:
        0.0140317045 = weight(_text_:information in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0140317045 = score(doc=5586,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
        0.011659805 = product of:
          0.02331961 = sum of:
            0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02331961 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The dichotomous bipolar approach to relevance has produced an abundance of information retrieval (M) research. However, relevance studies that include consideration of users' partial relevance judgments are moving to a greater relevance clarity and congruity to impact the design of more effective [R systems. The study reported in this paper investigates the various regions of across a distribution of users' relevance judgments, including how these regions may be categorized, measured, and evaluated. An instrument was designed using four scales for collecting, measuring, and describing enduser relevance judgments. The instrument was administered to 21 end-users who conducted searches on their own information problems and made relevance judgments on a total of 1059 retrieved items. Findings include: (1) overlapping regions of relevance were found to impact the usefulness of precision ratios as a measure of IR system effectiveness, (2) both positive and negative levels of relevance are important to users as they make relevance judgments, (3) topicality was used more to reject rather than accept items as highly relevant, (4) utility was more used to judge items highly relevant, and (5) the nature of relevance judgment distribution suggested a new IR evaluation measure-median effect. Findings suggest that the middle region of a distribution of relevance judgments, also called "partial relevance," represents a key avenue for ongoing study. The findings provide implications for relevance theory, and the evaluation of IR systems
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.2, S.161-173
  20. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Patterns of query reformulation during Web searching (2009) 0.01
    0.011856608 = product of:
      0.023713216 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.7, S.1358-1371

Types

  • a 70
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…