Search (687 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003) 0.06
    0.060661335 = product of:
      0.12132267 = sum of:
        0.019644385 = weight(_text_:information in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019644385 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
        0.10167828 = sum of:
          0.056547057 = weight(_text_:technology in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056547057 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.39897424 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04513122 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
  2. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.05
    0.053670634 = product of:
      0.10734127 = sum of:
        0.016039573 = weight(_text_:information in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016039573 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.091301695 = sum of:
          0.046170477 = weight(_text_:technology in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046170477 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04513122 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.05
    0.050925925 = product of:
      0.10185185 = sum of:
        0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012961932 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
        0.08888992 = sum of:
          0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03731138 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.05157854 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05157854 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  4. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.04
    0.044560187 = product of:
      0.08912037 = sum of:
        0.011341691 = weight(_text_:information in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011341691 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
        0.07777868 = sum of:
          0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032647457 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
          0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04513122 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000) 0.04
    0.043990027 = product of:
      0.087980054 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
        0.078258604 = sum of:
          0.039574698 = weight(_text_:technology in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039574698 = score(doc=5386,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
    Date
    27. 7.2006 18:22:11
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
  6. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.04
    0.04175274 = product of:
      0.08350548 = sum of:
        0.016838044 = weight(_text_:information in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016838044 = score(doc=4199,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
  7. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.04
    0.04175274 = product of:
      0.08350548 = sum of:
        0.016838044 = weight(_text_:information in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016838044 = score(doc=941,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
  8. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.04
    0.040207822 = product of:
      0.080415644 = sum of:
        0.013748205 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013748205 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
  9. Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000) 0.04
    0.038194444 = product of:
      0.07638889 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.04
    0.038194444 = product of:
      0.07638889 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
  11. Tannehill, R.S. Jr.: Bibliographic and information processing standards (1983) 0.04
    0.03698663 = product of:
      0.07397326 = sum of:
        0.036661882 = weight(_text_:information in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036661882 = score(doc=293,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
        0.03731138 = product of:
          0.07462276 = sum of:
            0.07462276 = weight(_text_:technology in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07462276 = score(doc=293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 18(1983), S.61-98
  12. Park, M.K.: Bibliographic and information processing standards (1977) 0.03
    0.032363303 = product of:
      0.064726606 = sum of:
        0.032079145 = weight(_text_:information in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032079145 = score(doc=3848,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
        0.032647457 = product of:
          0.065294914 = sum of:
            0.065294914 = weight(_text_:technology in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065294914 = score(doc=3848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 12(1977), S.59-80
  13. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.03
    0.0318287 = product of:
      0.0636574 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
        0.055556197 = sum of:
          0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02331961 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032236587 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  14. Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016) 0.03
    0.0318287 = product of:
      0.0636574 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
        0.055556197 = sum of:
          0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02331961 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
          0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032236587 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 21:22:27
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1462-1472
  15. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.03
    0.0318287 = product of:
      0.0636574 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
        0.055556197 = sum of:
          0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02331961 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
          0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032236587 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.839-855
  16. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.03
    0.0318287 = product of:
      0.0636574 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.055556197 = sum of:
          0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02331961 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032236587 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
  17. Artandi, S.: Document description and representation (1970) 0.03
    0.031617623 = product of:
      0.063235246 = sum of:
        0.025923865 = weight(_text_:information in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025923865 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
        0.03731138 = product of:
          0.07462276 = sum of:
            0.07462276 = weight(_text_:technology in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07462276 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 5(1970), S.143-168
  18. Vickery, B.C.: Document description and representation (1971) 0.03
    0.031617623 = product of:
      0.063235246 = sum of:
        0.025923865 = weight(_text_:information in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025923865 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.03731138 = product of:
          0.07462276 = sum of:
            0.07462276 = weight(_text_:technology in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07462276 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 6(1971), S.113-140
  19. Richmond, P.A.: Document description and representation (1972) 0.03
    0.031617623 = product of:
      0.063235246 = sum of:
        0.025923865 = weight(_text_:information in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025923865 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
        0.03731138 = product of:
          0.07462276 = sum of:
            0.07462276 = weight(_text_:technology in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07462276 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 7(1972), S.73-102
  20. Batten, W.E.: Document description and representation (1973) 0.03
    0.031617623 = product of:
      0.063235246 = sum of:
        0.025923865 = weight(_text_:information in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025923865 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
        0.03731138 = product of:
          0.07462276 = sum of:
            0.07462276 = weight(_text_:technology in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07462276 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 8(1973), S.43-68

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 622
  • m 39
  • el 29
  • b 16
  • s 14
  • r 6
  • x 3
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects