Search (572 results, page 1 of 29)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  1. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.08
    0.07924721 = product of:
      0.15849441 = sum of:
        0.028063409 = weight(_text_:information in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028063409 = score(doc=4878,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
        0.130431 = sum of:
          0.06595782 = weight(_text_:technology in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06595782 = score(doc=4878,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.46537298 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.064473175 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064473175 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Subject gateways zu den Bereichen: Business economics - The virtual music library - clinical information - food science and food technology - energy technology
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.84
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  2. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.04
    0.04175274 = product of:
      0.08350548 = sum of:
        0.016838044 = weight(_text_:information in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016838044 = score(doc=1540,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2381-2403
  3. Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015) 0.04
    0.040207822 = product of:
      0.080415644 = sum of:
        0.013748205 = weight(_text_:information in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013748205 = score(doc=2358,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A naïve user seeking introductory information on a topic may perceive a domain as it is shown by the search results in a database; however, inconsistencies in indexing can misrepresent the full picture of the domain by including irrelevant documents or omitting relevant ones, sometimes inexplicably. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the domain of ethics in knowledge organization in the World of Science (WoS) and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases to discern how it is being presented by search results in those databases and to attempt to determine why inconsistencies occurred.
    Date
    17. 2.2018 16:50:22
  4. Chi, Y.; He, D.; Jeng, W.: Laypeople's source selection in online health information-seeking process (2020) 0.04
    0.039929908 = product of:
      0.079859816 = sum of:
        0.02430362 = weight(_text_:information in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02430362 = score(doc=34,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
        0.055556197 = sum of:
          0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02331961 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
          0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032236587 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    For laypeople, searching online health information resources can be challenging due to topic complexity and the large number of online sources with differing quality. The goal of this article is to examine, among all the available online sources, which online sources laypeople select to address their health-related information needs, and whether or how much the severity of a health condition influences their selection. Twenty-four participants were recruited individually, and each was asked (using a retrieval system called HIS) to search for information regarding a severe health condition and a mild health condition, respectively. The selected online health information sources were automatically captured by the HIS system and classified at both the website and webpage levels. Participants' selection behavior patterns were then plotted across the whole information-seeking process. Our results demonstrate that laypeople's source selection fluctuates during the health information-seeking process, and also varies by the severity of health conditions. This study reveals laypeople's real usage of different types of online health information sources, and engenders implications to the design of search engines, as well as the development of health literacy programs.
    Date
    12.11.2020 13:22:09
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.12, S.1484-1499
  5. Subject gateways (2000) 0.04
    0.038605183 = product of:
      0.07721037 = sum of:
        0.032079145 = weight(_text_:information in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032079145 = score(doc=6483,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
        0.04513122 = product of:
          0.09026244 = sum of:
            0.09026244 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09026244 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.1-93
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  6. Boettcher, J.; Kingma, B.R.: Telephone directories : alternatives to print (1994) 0.04
    0.038194444 = product of:
      0.07638889 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 1712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=1712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1712)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 1712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=1712,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1712, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1712)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 1712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=1712,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1712, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1712)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Telephone directories are one of the most used sources of information in a reference collection. As the library literature indicates, they are a stable reference tool with a strong history of use. Further, it has been observed that telephone directories are familiar to most users, and resources such as the community pages and yellow pages are used extensively. However, the emergence of CD-ROM technology and libraries being charged for printed directories has raised questions concerning the future of an all-print telephone directory collection in libraries. Yet, evaluation of acquisitions alternatives for these resources is largely missing in the library literature. In this article, Boettcher and Kingma review the literature regarding the use of telephone directories in academic and public libraries and provide a cost analysis of the four purchasing options regarding telephone directories: printed directories, directory assistance, Phonefiche, and CD-ROMs
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.53-61
  7. Cho, H.; Chen, M.-H.; Chung, S.: Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia (2010) 0.04
    0.038194444 = product of:
      0.07638889 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2010 10:13:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1198-1212
  8. Evans, P.; Wurster, T.S.: Blown to bits : how the new economics of information transforms strategy (2000) 0.03
    0.034604304 = product of:
      0.06920861 = sum of:
        0.0362297 = weight(_text_:information in 3185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0362297 = score(doc=3185,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 3185, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3185)
        0.03297891 = product of:
          0.06595782 = sum of:
            0.06595782 = weight(_text_:technology in 3185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06595782 = score(doc=3185,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46537298 = fieldWeight in 3185, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    LCSH
    Information technology
    Subject
    Information technology
    Theme
    Information
    Information Resources Management
  9. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.03
    0.03425155 = product of:
      0.0685031 = sum of:
        0.022913676 = weight(_text_:information in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022913676 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
        0.045589417 = product of:
          0.091178834 = sum of:
            0.091178834 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091178834 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.59-63
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  10. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.03
    0.0339073 = product of:
      0.0678146 = sum of:
        0.022683382 = weight(_text_:information in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022683382 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
        0.04513122 = product of:
          0.09026244 = sum of:
            0.09026244 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09026244 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Profound ist das 1995 eingeführte Produkt der ehemaligen Firma M.A.I.D. (Market Analysis Information Database)
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  11. CD-ROMs in print (1995) 0.03
    0.033090156 = product of:
      0.06618031 = sum of:
        0.02749641 = weight(_text_:information in 7589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02749641 = score(doc=7589,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 7589, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7589)
        0.038683902 = product of:
          0.077367805 = sum of:
            0.077367805 = weight(_text_:22 in 7589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077367805 = score(doc=7589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    BK
    06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Audiovisual librarian 22(1996) no.2, S.130-131 ( R. Williams)
  12. Blake, P.: Who will be the king ... of the portals? : There is a lot of competition to be the alpha business information site (1999) 0.03
    0.033090156 = product of:
      0.06618031 = sum of:
        0.02749641 = weight(_text_:information in 6776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02749641 = score(doc=6776,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 6776, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6776)
        0.038683902 = product of:
          0.077367805 = sum of:
            0.077367805 = weight(_text_:22 in 6776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077367805 = score(doc=6776,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6776, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6776)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information today. 16(1999) no.8, S.20-22
  13. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.03
    0.0318287 = product of:
      0.0636574 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
        0.055556197 = sum of:
          0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02331961 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032236587 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1711-1726
  14. Rosen, L.: CD-ROM review : McGraw-Hill Multimedia Encyclopedia of Science and Technology (1994) 0.03
    0.031420816 = product of:
      0.06284163 = sum of:
        0.016202414 = weight(_text_:information in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016202414 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
        0.04663922 = product of:
          0.09327844 = sum of:
            0.09327844 = weight(_text_:technology in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09327844 = score(doc=1577,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.6581367 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the McGraw-Hill Multimedia Encyclopedia of Science and Technology; which incorporates text and graphics from the 20 volume 7th ed. of the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology and the new 5th ed. of the McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technological Terms
    Object
    McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology
    Source
    Information today. 11(1994) no.11, S.26-27
  15. Fallis, D.: Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia (2008) 0.03
    0.030795991 = product of:
      0.061591983 = sum of:
        0.017147025 = weight(_text_:information in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017147025 = score(doc=2010,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.20526241 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.04444496 = sum of:
          0.01865569 = weight(_text_:technology in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01865569 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
          0.02578927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02578927 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wikipedia (the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit) is having a huge impact on how a great many people gather information about the world. So, it is important for epistemologists and information scientists to ask whether people are likely to acquire knowledge as a result of having access to this information source. In other words, is Wikipedia having good epistemic consequences? After surveying the various concerns that have been raised about the reliability of Wikipedia, this article argues that the epistemic consequences of people using Wikipedia as a source of information are likely to be quite good. According to several empirical studies, the reliability of Wikipedia compares favorably to the reliability of traditional encyclopedias. Furthermore, the reliability of Wikipedia compares even more favorably to the reliability of those information sources that people would be likely to use if Wikipedia did not exist (viz., Web sites that are as freely and easily accessible as Wikipedia). In addition, Wikipedia has a number of other epistemic virtues (e.g., power, speed, and fecundity) that arguably outweigh any deficiency in terms of reliability. Even so, epistemologists and information scientists should certainly be trying to identify changes (or alternatives) to Wikipedia that will bring about even better epistemic consequences. This article suggests that to improve Wikipedia, we need to clarify what our epistemic values are and to better understand why Wikipedia works as well as it does. Somebody who reads Wikipedia is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom, says Mr. McHenry, Britannica's former editor. It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him. One wonders whether people like Mr. McHenry would prefer there to be no public lavatories at all. The Economist (Vol. 379, April 22, 2006, pp. 14-15)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.10, S.1662-1674
  16. Multimedia information resources (1997) 0.03
    0.0290634 = product of:
      0.0581268 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
        0.038683902 = product of:
          0.077367805 = sum of:
            0.077367805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077367805 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    31.12.1998 22:05:21
  17. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.03
    0.0290634 = product of:
      0.0581268 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
        0.038683902 = product of:
          0.077367805 = sum of:
            0.077367805 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077367805 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  18. Lambert, J.: How to find information in science, technology and medicine (2003) 0.03
    0.027739972 = product of:
      0.055479944 = sum of:
        0.02749641 = weight(_text_:information in 1295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02749641 = score(doc=1295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1295)
        0.027983533 = product of:
          0.055967066 = sum of:
            0.055967066 = weight(_text_:technology in 1295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055967066 = score(doc=1295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 1295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A practical guide to the basic structure of STM information, describing in simple terms, with examples, how to locate what you need
  19. Lambert, L.; Lambert, P A.: Finding information in science, technology and medicine (2003) 0.03
    0.02766542 = product of:
      0.05533084 = sum of:
        0.022683382 = weight(_text_:information in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022683382 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
        0.032647457 = product of:
          0.065294914 = sum of:
            0.065294914 = weight(_text_:technology in 4037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065294914 = score(doc=4037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 4037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4037)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  20. Hardwick, D.: Electronic public information provision : on the eve of revolution? (1994) 0.03
    0.027658787 = product of:
      0.055317573 = sum of:
        0.036661882 = weight(_text_:information in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036661882 = score(doc=1024,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
        0.01865569 = product of:
          0.03731138 = sum of:
            0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03731138 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on the various issues, pressures and problems facing information workers in the setting up of a new electronic public information system or developing an existing system. These are: standards, open systems, information technology strategies, user expectations; exchange and cooperation; information expertise; finding the right location; the growing range of technologies; sources of information; and available resources. Discusses the aims and objectives of the Society of Public Information Networks which was established as a forum for ideas, advice and information on technologies, their selection and use

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 454
  • m 79
  • i 49
  • el 28
  • s 16
  • b 6
  • x 5
  • r 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications