Search (830 results, page 1 of 42)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.25
    0.2519334 = product of:
      0.5038668 = sum of:
        0.1259667 = product of:
          0.3779001 = sum of:
            0.3779001 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3779001 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3779001 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3779001 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.20
    0.20154673 = product of:
      0.40309346 = sum of:
        0.100773364 = product of:
          0.3023201 = sum of:
            0.3023201 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3023201 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3023201 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3023201 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.13
    0.1259667 = product of:
      0.2519334 = sum of:
        0.06298335 = product of:
          0.18895005 = sum of:
            0.18895005 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18895005 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18895005 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18895005 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Information als Rohstoff für Innovation : Programm der Bundesregierung 1996-2000 (1996) 0.04
    0.038751204 = product of:
      0.07750241 = sum of:
        0.025923865 = weight(_text_:information in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025923865 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
        0.05157854 = product of:
          0.10315708 = sum of:
            0.10315708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10315708 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:26:34
  5. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.04
    0.038751204 = product of:
      0.07750241 = sum of:
        0.025923865 = weight(_text_:information in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025923865 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
        0.05157854 = product of:
          0.10315708 = sum of:
            0.10315708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10315708 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
  6. Kirk, J.: Theorising information use : managers and their work (2002) 0.03
    0.031989142 = product of:
      0.063978285 = sum of:
        0.040893044 = weight(_text_:information in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040893044 = score(doc=560,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.4895196 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
        0.023085238 = product of:
          0.046170477 = sum of:
            0.046170477 = weight(_text_:technology in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046170477 = score(doc=560,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this thesis is information use. Although a key concept in information behaviour, information use has received little attention from information science researchers. Studies of other key concepts such as information need and information seeking are dominant in information behaviour research. Information use is an area of interest to information professionals who rely on research outcomes to shape their practice. There are few empirical studies of how people actually use information that might guide and refine the development of information systems, products and services.
    Content
    A thesis submitted to the University of Technology, Sydney in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. - Vgl. unter: http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2100/309/2/02whole.pdf.
    Imprint
    Sydney : University of Technology / Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
    Theme
    Information
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.03
    0.030895915 = product of:
      0.06179183 = sum of:
        0.016202414 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016202414 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.045589417 = product of:
          0.091178834 = sum of:
            0.091178834 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091178834 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  8. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.03
    0.0290634 = product of:
      0.0581268 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
        0.038683902 = product of:
          0.077367805 = sum of:
            0.077367805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077367805 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  9. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.024219502 = product of:
      0.048439004 = sum of:
        0.016202414 = weight(_text_:information in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016202414 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.032236587 = product of:
          0.064473175 = sum of:
            0.064473175 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064473175 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Präsentation zum Vortrag anlässlich des 98. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Erfurt: Ein neuer Blick auf Bibliotheken; TK10: Information erschließen und recherchieren Inhalte erschließen - mit neuen Tools
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  10. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.02
    0.023713216 = product of:
      0.047426432 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
        0.027983533 = product of:
          0.055967066 = sum of:
            0.055967066 = weight(_text_:technology in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055967066 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  11. Boss, R.W.: How to plan and implement a library portal (2002) 0.02
    0.023713216 = product of:
      0.047426432 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
        0.027983533 = product of:
          0.055967066 = sum of:
            0.055967066 = weight(_text_:technology in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055967066 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Series
    Library technology reports; vol.38, issue 6
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  12. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.02
    0.022624496 = product of:
      0.045248993 = sum of:
        0.022683382 = weight(_text_:information in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022683382 = score(doc=1267,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
        0.02256561 = product of:
          0.04513122 = sum of:
            0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04513122 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This video explores the changes in the way we find, store, create, critique, and share information. This video was created as a conversation starter, and works especially well when brainstorming with people about the near future and the skills needed in order to harness, evaluate, and create information effectively. Ein sehr schöner Kurzfilm von Michael Wesch, dem wir auch den Beitrag zu Web 2.0 (The Machine is Us/ing Us) verdanken (vor einiger Zeit hier besprochen), thematisiert die Veränderung der Handhabung von Information (insbesondere die Strukturierung und Ordnung, aber auch die Generierung und Speicherung), die auf ihre digitale Gestalt zurückzuführen ist. Kernaussage: Da die Informationen keine physikalischen Beschränkungen mehr unterworfen sind, wird die Ordnung der Informationen vielfältiger, flexibler und für jedermann einfacher zugänglich.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  13. Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016) 0.02
    0.022531245 = product of:
      0.04506249 = sum of:
        0.025720537 = weight(_text_:information in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025720537 = score(doc=3069,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
        0.019341951 = product of:
          0.038683902 = sum of:
            0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038683902 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Zielsetzung - Information Professionals sind in Unternehmen für den professionellen und strategischen Umgang mit Informationen verantwortlich. Da es keine allgemeingültige Definition für diese Berufsgruppe gibt, wird in der vorliegenden Arbeit eine Begriffsbestimmung unternommen. Methode - Mit Hilfe dreier Methoden - einer Auswertung von relevanter Fachliteratur, der Untersuchung von einschlägigen Stellenausschreibungen und dem Führen von Experteninterviews - wird ein Kompetenzprofil für Information Professionals erstellt. Ergebnisse - Die 16 wichtigsten Kompetenzen in den Bereichen Fach-, Methoden-, Sozial- und persönliche Kompetenzen sind IT-Kenntnisse, Sprachkenntnisse, Quellenkenntnisse, Recherchekenntnisse, Projektmanagement, Darstellungskompetenz, Problemlösungskompetenz, selbständiges Arbeiten, Kommunikationsfähigkeit, Teamfähigkeit, Servicementalität, Interkulturelle Kompetenz, Analytische Fähigkeiten, Eigenmarketing, Veränderungsbereitschaft und Stressresistenz. Schlussfolgerung - Die Kompetenzen geben eine Orientierung über vorhandene Fähigkeiten dieser Berufsgruppe für Personalfachleute, Vorgesetzte und Information Professionals selbst. Ein Kompetenzrad kann als Visualisierung dienen.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://yis.univie.ac.at/index.php/yis/article/view/1324/1234. Diesem Beitrag liegt folgende Abschlussarbeit zugrunde: Lamparter, Anna: Kompetenzprofil für Information Professionals in Unternehmen. Masterarbeit (M.A.), Hochschule Hannover, 2015. Volltext: https://serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/528 Vgl. auch: (geb. Lamparter): Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen. In:
    Date
    28. 7.2016 16:22:54
    Source
    Young information scientists. 1(2016), S.1-11
  14. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.02
    0.022060106 = product of:
      0.04412021 = sum of:
        0.018330941 = weight(_text_:information in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018330941 = score(doc=2686,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
        0.02578927 = product of:
          0.05157854 = sum of:
            0.05157854 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05157854 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : National Information Standards Organization
  15. Cossham, A.F.: Models of the bibliographic universe (2017) 0.02
    0.021364812 = product of:
      0.042729624 = sum of:
        0.019644385 = weight(_text_:information in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019644385 = score(doc=3817,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
        0.023085238 = product of:
          0.046170477 = sum of:
            0.046170477 = weight(_text_:technology in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046170477 = score(doc=3817,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    What kinds of mental models do library catalogue users have of the bibliographic universe in an age of online and electronic information? Using phenomenography and grounded analysis, it identifies participants' understanding, experience, and conceptualisation of the bibliographic universe, and identifies their expectations when using library catalogues. It contrasts participants' mental models with existing LIS models, and explores the nature of the bibliographic universe. The bibliographic universe can be considered to be a social object that exists because it is inscribed in catalogue records, cataloguing codes, bibliographies, and other bibliographic tools. It is a socially constituted phenomenon.
    Content
    A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Monash University in 2017 Faculty of Information Technology. Vgl.: https://figshare.com/articles/Models_of_the_bibliographic_universe/5216347.
    Imprint
    Melbourne : Monash University; Faculty of Information Technology
  16. Petras, V.: ¬The identity of information science (2023) 0.02
    0.020985875 = product of:
      0.04197175 = sum of:
        0.030311944 = weight(_text_:information in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030311944 = score(doc=1077,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
        0.011659805 = product of:
          0.02331961 = sum of:
            0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02331961 = score(doc=1077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper offers a definition of the core of information science, which encompasses most research in the field. The definition provides a unique identity for information science and positions it in the disciplinary universe. Design/methodology/approach After motivating the objective, a definition of the core and an explanation of its key aspects are provided. The definition is related to other definitions of information science before controversial discourse aspects are briefly addressed: discipline vs. field, science vs. humanities, library vs. information science and application vs. theory. Interdisciplinarity as an often-assumed foundation of information science is challenged. Findings Information science is concerned with how information is manifested across space and time. Information is manifested to facilitate and support the representation, access, documentation and preservation of ideas, activities, or practices, and to enable different types of interactions. Research and professional practice encompass the infrastructures - institutions and technology -and phenomena and practices around manifested information across space and time as its core contribution to the scholarly landscape. Information science collaborates with other disciplines to work on complex information problems that need multi- and interdisciplinary approaches to address them. Originality/value The paper argues that new information problems may change the core of the field, but throughout its existence, the discipline has remained quite stable in its central focus, yet proved to be highly adaptive to the tremendous changes in the forms, practices, institutions and technologies around and for manifested information.
  17. Scheir, P.; Pammer, V.; Lindstaedt, S.N.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : does it exist? (2007) 0.02
    0.020842262 = product of:
      0.041684523 = sum of:
        0.025360793 = weight(_text_:information in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025360793 = score(doc=4329,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
        0.016323728 = product of:
          0.032647457 = sum of:
            0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032647457 = score(doc=4329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Plenty of contemporary attempts to search exist that are associated with the area of Semantic Web. But which of them qualify as information retrieval for the Semantic Web? Do such approaches exist? To answer these questions we take a look at the nature of the Semantic Web and Semantic Desktop and at definitions for information and data retrieval. We survey current approaches referred to by their authors as information retrieval for the Semantic Web or that use Semantic Web technology for search.
    Source
    Lernen - Wissen - Adaption : workshop proceedings / LWA 2007, Halle, September 2007. Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Informatics, Databases and Information Systems. Hrsg.: Alexander Hinneburg
  18. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.020539887 = product of:
      0.041079774 = sum of:
        0.021737823 = weight(_text_:information in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021737823 = score(doc=3261,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
        0.019341951 = product of:
          0.038683902 = sum of:
            0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038683902 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  19. Faceted classification of information (o.J.) 0.02
    0.019761011 = product of:
      0.039522022 = sum of:
        0.016202414 = weight(_text_:information in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016202414 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
        0.02331961 = product of:
          0.04663922 = sum of:
            0.04663922 = weight(_text_:technology in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04663922 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    An explanation of faceted classification meant for people working in knowledge management. An example given for a high-technology company has the fundamental categories Products, Applications, Organizations, People, Domain objects ("technologies applied in the marketplace in which the organization participates"), Events (i.e. time), and Publications.
  20. World Factbook (1995) 0.02
    0.019761011 = product of:
      0.039522022 = sum of:
        0.016202414 = weight(_text_:information in 2690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016202414 = score(doc=2690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2690)
        0.02331961 = product of:
          0.04663922 = sum of:
            0.04663922 = weight(_text_:technology in 2690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04663922 = score(doc=2690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 2690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The new 1995 edition features the most recent CIA and State Department information available. All new maps, sounds, photographs and flags, combined with cultural, governmental, economic and demographic statistics allow you to explore every country in the world without leaving your desktop
    Imprint
    Grand Rapids : Wayzata Technology

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 403
  • r 21
  • i 18
  • m 18
  • s 17
  • x 16
  • n 9
  • b 4
  • p 4
  • More… Less…

Themes