Search (247 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × type_ss:"x"
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.30
    0.30232006 = product of:
      0.6046401 = sum of:
        0.15116003 = product of:
          0.4534801 = sum of:
            0.4534801 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4534801 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.4534801 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4534801 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.28
    0.27505004 = sum of:
      0.06298335 = product of:
        0.18895005 = sum of:
          0.18895005 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18895005 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.18895005 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18895005 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047586527 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.011456838 = weight(_text_:information in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011456838 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047586527 = queryNorm
          0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.011659805 = product of:
        0.02331961 = sum of:
          0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02331961 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
    Imprint
    Trento : University / Department of information engineering and computer science
  3. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.23
    0.23031747 = sum of:
      0.050386682 = product of:
        0.15116005 = sum of:
          0.15116005 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15116005 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.15116005 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15116005 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047586527 = queryNorm
          0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.019442897 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019442897 = score(doc=701,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047586527 = queryNorm
          0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.009327845 = product of:
        0.01865569 = sum of:
          0.01865569 = weight(_text_:technology in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01865569 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  4. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.23
    0.22734669 = product of:
      0.30312893 = sum of:
        0.22674005 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22674005 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.06666744 = sum of:
          0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983533 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038683902 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  5. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.21
    0.21186765 = product of:
      0.2824902 = sum of:
        0.050386682 = product of:
          0.15116005 = sum of:
            0.15116005 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15116005 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21377258 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21377258 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.018330941 = weight(_text_:information in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018330941 = score(doc=5820,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  6. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.20
    0.19754268 = product of:
      0.26339024 = sum of:
        0.06298335 = product of:
          0.18895005 = sum of:
            0.18895005 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18895005 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18895005 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18895005 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.011456838 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011456838 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
    Imprint
    Wien / Library and Information Studies : Universität
  7. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.13
    0.1259667 = product of:
      0.2519334 = sum of:
        0.06298335 = product of:
          0.18895005 = sum of:
            0.18895005 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18895005 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18895005 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18895005 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  8. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.13
    0.1259667 = product of:
      0.2519334 = sum of:
        0.06298335 = product of:
          0.18895005 = sum of:
            0.18895005 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18895005 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18895005 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18895005 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  9. Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017) 0.04
    0.03525167 = product of:
      0.07050334 = sum of:
        0.018330941 = weight(_text_:information in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018330941 = score(doc=4399,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
        0.0521724 = sum of:
          0.02638313 = weight(_text_:technology in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02638313 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.1861492 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.02578927 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02578927 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing plays a vital role in Information Retrieval. With the availability of huge volume of information, it has become necessary to index the information in such a way to make easier for the end users to find the information they want efficiently and accurately. Keyword-based indexing uses words as indexing terms. It is not capable of capturing the implicit relation among terms or the semantics of the words in the document. To eliminate this limitation, ontology-based indexing came into existence, which allows semantic based indexing to solve complex and indirect user queries. Ontologies are used for document indexing which allows semantic based information retrieval. Existing ontologies or the ones constructed from scratch are used presently for indexing. Constructing ontologies from scratch is a labor-intensive task and requires extensive domain knowledge whereas use of an existing ontology may leave some important concepts in documents un-annotated. Using multiple ontologies can overcome the problem of missing out concepts to a great extent, but it is difficult to manage (changes in ontologies over time by their developers) multiple ontologies and ontology heterogeneity also arises due to ontologies constructed by different ontology developers. One possible solution to managing multiple ontologies and build from scratch is to use modular ontologies for indexing.
    Modular ontologies are built in modular manner by combining modules from multiple relevant ontologies. Ontology heterogeneity also arises during modular ontology construction because multiple ontologies are being dealt with, during this process. Ontologies need to be aligned before using them for modular ontology construction. The existing approaches for ontology alignment compare all the concepts of each ontology to be aligned, hence not optimized in terms of time and search space utilization. A new indexing technique is proposed based on modular ontology. An efficient ontology alignment technique is proposed to solve the heterogeneity problem during the construction of modular ontology. Results are satisfactory as Precision and Recall are improved by (8%) and (10%) respectively. The value of Pearsons Correlation Coefficient for degree of similarity, time, search space requirement, precision and recall are close to 1 which shows that the results are significant. Further research can be carried out for using modular ontology based indexing technique for Multimedia Information Retrieval and Bio-Medical information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted to the Faculty of the Computer Science and Engineering Department of the University of Engineering and Technology Lahore in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science (2009 - 009-PhD-CS-04). Vgl.: http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/bitstream/123456789/8375/1/Taybah_Kiren_Computer_Science_HSR_2017_UET_Lahore_14.12.2017.pdf.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Imprint
    Lahore : University of Engineering and Technology / Department of Computer Science and Engineering
  10. Sperling, R.: Anlage von Literaturreferenzen für Onlineressourcen auf einer virtuellen Lernplattform (2004) 0.03
    0.0339073 = product of:
      0.0678146 = sum of:
        0.022683382 = weight(_text_:information in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022683382 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
        0.04513122 = product of:
          0.09026244 = sum of:
            0.09026244 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09026244 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    26.11.2005 18:39:22
    Imprint
    Potsdam : Fachhochschule, Institut für Information und Dokumentation
  11. Kirk, J.: Theorising information use : managers and their work (2002) 0.03
    0.031989142 = product of:
      0.063978285 = sum of:
        0.040893044 = weight(_text_:information in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040893044 = score(doc=560,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.4895196 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
        0.023085238 = product of:
          0.046170477 = sum of:
            0.046170477 = weight(_text_:technology in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046170477 = score(doc=560,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this thesis is information use. Although a key concept in information behaviour, information use has received little attention from information science researchers. Studies of other key concepts such as information need and information seeking are dominant in information behaviour research. Information use is an area of interest to information professionals who rely on research outcomes to shape their practice. There are few empirical studies of how people actually use information that might guide and refine the development of information systems, products and services.
    Content
    A thesis submitted to the University of Technology, Sydney in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. - Vgl. unter: http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2100/309/2/02whole.pdf.
    Imprint
    Sydney : University of Technology / Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
    Theme
    Information
  12. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.03
    0.0290634 = product of:
      0.0581268 = sum of:
        0.0194429 = weight(_text_:information in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0194429 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
        0.038683902 = product of:
          0.077367805 = sum of:
            0.077367805 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077367805 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  13. Makewita, S.M.: Investigating the generic information-seeking function of organisational decision-makers : perspectives on improving organisational information systems (2002) 0.02
    0.023215119 = product of:
      0.046430238 = sum of:
        0.030311944 = weight(_text_:information in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030311944 = score(doc=642,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
        0.016118294 = product of:
          0.032236587 = sum of:
            0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032236587 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The past decade has seen the emergence of a new paradigm in the corporate world where organisations emphasised connectivity as a means of exposing decision-makers to wider resources of information within and outside the organisation. Many organisations followed the initiatives of enhancing infrastructures, manipulating cultural shifts and emphasising managerial commitment for creating pools and networks of knowledge. However, the concept of connectivity is not merely presenting people with the data, but more importantly, to create environments where people can seek information efficiently. This paradigm has therefore caused a shift in the function of information systems in organisations. They have to be now assessed in relation to how they underpin people's information-seeking activities within the context of their organisational environment. This research project used interpretative research methods to investigate the nature of people's information-seeking activities at two culturally contrasting organisations. Outcomes of this research project provide insights into phenomena associated with people's information-seeking function, and show how they depend on the organisational context that is defined partly by information systems. It suggests that information-seeking is not just searching for data. The inefficiencies inherent in both people and their environments can bring opaqueness into people's data, which they need to avoid or eliminate as part of seeking information. This seems to have made information-seeking a two-tier process consisting of a primary process of searching and interpreting data and auxiliary process of avoiding and eliminating opaqueness in data. Based on this view, this research suggests that organisational information systems operate naturally as implicit dual-mechanisms to underpin the above two-tier process, and that improvements to information systems should concern maintaining the balance in these dual-mechanisms.
    Date
    22. 7.2022 12:16:58
  14. Lorenz, S.: Konzeption und prototypische Realisierung einer begriffsbasierten Texterschließung (2006) 0.01
    0.0145317 = product of:
      0.0290634 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
        0.019341951 = product of:
          0.038683902 = sum of:
            0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038683902 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wird eine Vorgehensweise entwickelt, die die Fixierung auf das Wort und die damit verbundenen Schwächen überwindet. Sie gestattet die Extraktion von Informationen anhand der repräsentierten Begriffe und bildet damit die Basis einer inhaltlichen Texterschließung. Die anschließende prototypische Realisierung dient dazu, die Konzeption zu überprüfen sowie ihre Möglichkeiten und Grenzen abzuschätzen und zu bewerten. Arbeiten zum Information Extraction widmen sich fast ausschließlich dem Englischen, wobei insbesondere im Bereich der Named Entities sehr gute Ergebnisse erzielt werden. Deutlich schlechter sehen die Resultate für weniger regelmäßige Sprachen wie beispielsweise das Deutsche aus. Aus diesem Grund sowie praktischen Erwägungen wie insbesondere der Vertrautheit des Autors damit, soll diese Sprache primär Gegenstand der Untersuchungen sein. Die Lösung von einer engen Termorientierung bei gleichzeitiger Betonung der repräsentierten Begriffe legt nahe, dass nicht nur die verwendeten Worte sekundär werden sondern auch die verwendete Sprache. Um den Rahmen dieser Arbeit nicht zu sprengen wird bei der Untersuchung dieses Punktes das Augenmerk vor allem auf die mit unterschiedlichen Sprachen verbundenen Schwierigkeiten und Besonderheiten gelegt.
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:17:30
  15. Mair, M.: Increasing the value of meta data by using associative semantic networks (2002) 0.01
    0.013869986 = product of:
      0.027739972 = sum of:
        0.013748205 = weight(_text_:information in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013748205 = score(doc=4972,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Momentan verbreitete Methoden zur Strukturierung von Information können ihre Aufgabe immer schlechter befriedigend erfüllen. Der Grund dafür ist das explosive Wachstum menschlichen Wissens. Diese Diplomarbeit schlägt als einen möglichen Ausweg die Verwendung assoziativer semantischer Netzwerke vor. Maschinelles Wissensmanagement kann wesentlich intuitiver und einfacher benutzbar werden, wenn man sich die Art und Weise zunutze macht, mit der das menschliche Gehirn Informationen verarbeitet (im Speziellen assoziative Verbindungen). Der theoretische Teil dieser Arbeit diskutiert verschiedene Aspekte eines möglichen Designs eines semantischen Netzwerks mit assoziativen Verbindungen. Außer den Grundelementen und Problemen der Visualisierung werden hauptsächlich Verbesserungen ausgearbeitet, welche ein leistungsstarkes Arbeiten mit einem solchen Netzwerk erlauben. Im praktischen Teil wird ein Netzwerk-Prototyp mit den wichtigsten herausgearbeiteten Merkmalen implementiert. Die Basis der Applikation bildet der Hyperwave Information Server. Dieser detailiiertere Design-Teil gewährt tieferen Einblick in Software Requirements, Use Cases und teilweise auch in Klassendetails. Am Ende wird eine kurze Einführung in die Benutzung des implementierten Prototypen gegeben.
    Imprint
    Graz : University of Technology
  16. Lehrke, C.: Architektur von Suchmaschinen : Googles Architektur, insb. Crawler und Indizierer (2005) 0.01
    0.013787566 = product of:
      0.027575132 = sum of:
        0.011456838 = weight(_text_:information in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011456838 = score(doc=867,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
        0.016118294 = product of:
          0.032236587 = sum of:
            0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032236587 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet mit seinen ständig neuen Usern und seinem extremen Wachstum bringt viele neue Herausforderungen mit sich. Aufgrund dieses Wachstums bedienen sich die meisten Leute der Hilfe von Suchmaschinen um Inhalte innerhalb des Internet zu finden. Suchmaschinen nutzen für die Beantwortung der User-Anfragen Information Retrieval Techniken. Problematisch ist nur, dass traditionelle Information Retrieval (IR) Systeme für eine relativ kleine und zusammenhängende Sammlung von Dokumenten entwickelt wurden. Das Internet hingegen unterliegt einem ständigen Wachstum, schnellen Änderungsraten und es ist über geographisch verteilte Computer verteilt. Aufgrund dieser Tatsachen müssen die alten Techniken erweitert oder sogar neue IRTechniken entwickelt werden. Eine Suchmaschine die diesen Herausforderungen vergleichsweise erfolgreich entgegnet ist Google. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es aufzuzeigen, wie Suchmaschinen funktionieren. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf der Suchmaschine Google. Kapitel 2 wird sich zuerst mit dem Aufbau von Suchmaschinen im Allgemeinen beschäftigen, wodurch ein grundlegendes Verständnis für die einzelnen Komponenten geschaffen werden soll. Im zweiten Teil des Kapitels wird darauf aufbauend ein Überblick über die Architektur von Google gegeben. Kapitel 3 und 4 dienen dazu, näher auf die beiden Komponenten Crawler und Indexer einzugehen, bei denen es sich um zentrale Elemente im Rahmen von Suchmaschinen handelt.
    Pages
    22 S
  17. Stünkel, M.: Neuere Methoden der inhaltlichen Erschließung schöner Literatur in öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01
    0.012894635 = product of:
      0.05157854 = sum of:
        0.05157854 = product of:
          0.10315708 = sum of:
            0.10315708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10315708 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    4. 8.2006 21:35:22
  18. Buß, M.: Unternehmenssprache in internationalen Unternehmen : Probleme des Informationstransfers in der internen Kommunikation (2005) 0.01
    0.012109751 = product of:
      0.024219502 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
        0.016118294 = product of:
          0.032236587 = sum of:
            0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032236587 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 18:25:26
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  19. Düring, M.: ¬Die Dewey Decimal Classification : Entstehung, Aufbau und Ausblick auf eine Nutzung in deutschen Bibliotheken (2003) 0.01
    0.012109751 = product of:
      0.024219502 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
        0.016118294 = product of:
          0.032236587 = sum of:
            0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032236587 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die ständig steigende Zahl an publizierter Information in immer neuen Formen verlangt besonders von Informations- und Dokumentationseinrichtungen immer präzisere Lösungen zur Erschließung dieser Informationen und ihrer benutzerfreundlichen Aufbereitung. Besonders im derzeitigen Zeitalter der Datenbanken und Online-Kataloge ist die Kombination von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Sacherschließung gefordert, ohne dabei die Verbindung zu den älteren, vielerorts noch (zumindest zusätzlich) in Verwendung befindlichen, Zettelkatalogen zu verlieren. Weltweit ist eine Vielzahl an verschiedenen Klassifikationen im Einsatz. Die Wahl der für eine Einrichtung passenden Klassifikation ist abhängig von ihrer thematischen und informationellen Ausrichtung, der Größe und Art der Bestände und nicht zuletzt von technischen und personellen Voraussetzungen. Auf Seiten der zu wählenden Klassifikation sind die Einfachheit der Handhabung für den Bibliothekar, die Verständlichkeit für den Benutzer, die Erweiterungsfähigkeit der Klassifikation durch das Aufkommen neuer Wissensgebiete und die Einbindung in informationelle Netze mit anderen Einrichtungen von entscheidender Bedeutung. In dieser Arbeit soll die Dewey Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) hinsichtlich dieser Punkte näher beleuchtet werden. Sie ist die weltweit am häufigsten benutzte Klassifikation. Etwa 200.000 Bibliotheken in 135 Ländern erschließen ihre Bestände mit diesem System. Sie liegt derzeit bereits in der 22. ungekürzten Auflage vor und wurde bisher in 30 Sprachen übersetzt. Eine deutsche Komplettübersetzung wird im Jahre 2005 erscheinen. Trotz teils heftig geführter Standardisierungsdebatten und Plänen für die Übernahme von amerikanischen Formalerschließungsregeln herrscht in Bezug auf die Sacherschließung unter deutschen Bibliotheken wenig Einigkeit. Die DDC ist in Deutschland und anderen europäischen Ländern kaum verbreitet, sieht von Großbritannien und von der Verwendung in Bibliografien ab. Diese Arbeit geht demzufolge auf die historischen Gründe dieser Entwicklung ein und wagt einen kurzen Ausblick in die Zukunft der Dezimalklassifikation.
  20. Geisriegler, E.: Enriching electronic texts with semantic metadata : a use case for the historical Newspaper Collection ANNO (Austrian Newspapers Online) of the Austrian National Libraryhek (2012) 0.01
    0.012109751 = product of:
      0.024219502 = sum of:
        0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008101207 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
        0.016118294 = product of:
          0.032236587 = sum of:
            0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032236587 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    3. 2.2013 18:00:22
    Footnote
    Wien, Univ., Lehrgang Library and Information Studies, Master-Thesis, 2012.

Authors

Languages

  • d 202
  • e 39
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types