-
Floridi, L.: ¬Die 4. Revolution : wie die Infosphäre unser Leben verändert (2015)
0.01
0.013841723 = product of:
0.027683446 = sum of:
0.014491881 = weight(_text_:information in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014491881 = score(doc=3561,freq=10.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
0.013191565 = product of:
0.02638313 = sum of:
0.02638313 = weight(_text_:technology in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02638313 = score(doc=3561,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1861492 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- LCSH
- Information technology ; Social aspects
Information society
- Subject
- Information technology ; Social aspects
Information society
- Theme
- Information
-
Gorman, M.: Revisiting enduring values (2015)
0.01
0.011856608 = product of:
0.023713216 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=2943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the nature of values in general and the nature and utility of the values of librarianship. Delineates the changes that have occurred and are occurring in the wider world and the nature of change; also the importance of values in providing a framework for dealing with present and future change. Stresses the centrality of the human record to societal progress, the place of the human record in cultural heritage, and the central purpose of libraries in facilitating interaction with the human record and furthering the transmission of cultural heritage. Urges a turning away from the alien value systems of information technology, consumerism, materialism, and corporate management, and a consequent set of alliances between libraries and a wide range of cultural institutions and associations.
-
Kurzweil, R.: Menschheit 2.0 : die Singularität naht (2014)
0.00
0.004835488 = product of:
0.019341951 = sum of:
0.019341951 = product of:
0.038683902 = sum of:
0.038683902 = weight(_text_:22 in 4072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683902 = score(doc=4072,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4072, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4072)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2018 17:33:05
-
Stalder, F.: Kultur der Digitalität (2016)
0.00
0.0040506036 = product of:
0.016202414 = sum of:
0.016202414 = weight(_text_:information in 3559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016202414 = score(doc=3559,freq=8.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3559, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3559)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- LCSH
- Information society / Forecasting
Information society
- Subject
- Information society / Forecasting
Information society
-
Seefried, E.: ¬Die Gestaltbarkeit der Zukunft und ihre Grenzen : zur Geschichte der Zukunftsforschung (2015)
0.00
0.0040295734 = product of:
0.016118294 = sum of:
0.016118294 = product of:
0.032236587 = sum of:
0.032236587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032236587 = score(doc=4312,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4312, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4312)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2018 13:47:33
-
Harari, Y.N.: Homo deus : eine Geschichte von Morgen (2017)
0.00
0.0039890744 = product of:
0.015956298 = sum of:
0.015956298 = product of:
0.031912595 = sum of:
0.031912595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031912595 = score(doc=4066,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Kommentare: "Keine leichte Lektüre, doch wer auf den Horizont blickt, kann diesen auch erweitern." (Thorsten Schäfer-Gümbel, vorwärts.de, Lesetipp von SPD Spitzenpolitikern, 15. August 2017) "Das beste Buch dieses Frühjahrs." (Thorsten Giersch, Carina Kontio, Handelsblatt online, 29. Juni 2017) "Ein Sachbuch, so anregend, dass man dazu tanzen möchte!" (Denis Scheck, ARD Druckfrisch, 2. Juli 2017) "A thoughtful look of what may be in store for humanity (...). It is a deeply engaging book with lots of stimulating ideas (...). It makes you think about the future, which is another way of saying it makes you think about the present." (Bill Gates, via Facebook, 4. Juni 2017) "Yuval Noah Harari's insights are compelling." (Paul Collier, TLS, 25. November 2016 ) "Challenging, readable and thought-provoking." (Bill Gates, Gates Notes, Bill Gates' Sommer-Buchtipps, 22. Mai 2017) "Man sollte alle Geschichtslehrer von Harari coachen lassen." (Christian Jostmann, Die Furche, 20. April 2017) "Vielleicht brauchen wir ja düstere Szenarien, wie Hararis Buch 'Homo Deus', um den Mut für neue Utopien zu finden." (Sven Waskönig, ARD ttt, 30. April 2017)
"In einer verblüffenden Tour d'Horizon durch die Menschheitsgeschichte beschreibt Harari, wie der Mensch in einem Akt wachsender Selbstermächtigung zum Homo Deus avanciert." (Adrian Lobe, Zeit Online, 10. April 2017) "(Harari) hat ein anmaßendes Buch geschrieben. Und ein aufregendes." (Erik Raidt, Stuttgarter Nachrichten Online, 31. März 2017) "Intelligent, scharfsinnig und manchmal sogar überraschend witzig (...) eröffnet einen ganz anderen Blick auf Geschichte." (Klaus Bittermann, taz literataz, 22. März 2017) "Überraschend, informativ, abwechslungsreich und leicht zu lesen." (Hildegard Lorenz, Münchner Merkur, 21. März 2017) "Sehen, wie die Welt ist, ohne auf die Bremse zu treten. Das ist der Sound von Yuval Noah Hararis 'Homo Deus'." (Adolf Holl, Die Presse, 18. März 2017) "Hararis packendes Buch ist ein Bekenntnis zum Humanismus." (Thomas Vasek, P.M., 10. März 2017) "Überaus anregende und fesselnde Lektüre." (Wolfgang Schneider, SWR2, 19. Februar 2017) "Fulminant, klug und düster." (Deutschlandradio Kultur, März 2017)
-
Cerbo II, M.A.: Is there a future for library catalogers? (2011)
0.00
0.003240483 = product of:
0.012961932 = sum of:
0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012961932 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Is there a future for the library cataloger? For the past thirty years this debate has increased with the continued growth of online resources and greater access to the World Wide Web. Many are concerned that library administrators believe budgetary resources would be better spent on other matters, leaving library users with an overabundance of electronic information to muddle through on their own. This article focuses on the future of the cataloging profession and its importance to the needs of library patrons.
-
Speer, A.: Wovon lebt der Geist? (2016)
0.00
0.003240483 = product of:
0.012961932 = sum of:
0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012961932 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Information
-
Jäger, L.: Von Big Data zu Big Brother (2018)
0.00
0.0032236588 = product of:
0.012894635 = sum of:
0.012894635 = product of:
0.02578927 = sum of:
0.02578927 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02578927 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2018 11:33:49
-
Hawking, S.: This is the most dangerous time for our planet (2016)
0.00
0.002061182 = product of:
0.008244728 = sum of:
0.008244728 = product of:
0.016489455 = sum of:
0.016489455 = weight(_text_:technology in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016489455 = score(doc=3273,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116343245 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- This in turn will accelerate the already widening economic inequality around the world. The internet and the platforms which it makes possible allow very small groups of individuals to make enormous profits while employing very few people. This is inevitable, it is progress, but it is also socially destructive. We need to put this alongside the financial crash, which brought home to people that a very few individuals working in the financial sector can accrue huge rewards and that the rest of us underwrite that success and pick up the bill when their greed leads us astray. So taken together we are living in a world of widening, not diminishing, financial inequality, in which many people can see not just their standard of living, but their ability to earn a living at all, disappearing. It is no wonder then that they are searching for a new deal, which Trump and Brexit might have appeared to represent. It is also the case that another unintended consequence of the global spread of the internet and social media is that the stark nature of these inequalities are far more apparent than they have been in the past. For me, the ability to use technology to communicate has been a liberating and positive experience. Without it, I would not have been able to continue working these many years past. But it also means that the lives of the richest people in the most prosperous parts of the world are agonisingly visible to anyone, however poor and who has access to a phone. And since there are now more people with a telephone than access to clean water in Sub-Saharan Africa, this will shortly mean nearly everyone on our increasingly crowded planet will not be able to escape the inequality.
The consequences of this are plain to see; the rural poor flock to cities, to shanty towns, driven by hope. And then often, finding that the Instagram nirvana is not available there, they seek it overseas, joining the ever greater numbers of economic migrants in search of a better life. These migrants in turn place new demands on the infrastructures and economies of the countries in which they arrive, undermining tolerance and further fuelling political populism. For me, the really concerning aspect of this, is that now, more than at any time in our history, our species needs to work together. We face awesome environmental challenges. Climate change, food production, overpopulation, the decimation of other species, epidemic disease, acidification of the oceans. Together, they are a reminder that we are at the most dangerous moment in the development of humanity. We now have the technology to destroy the planet on which we live, but have not yet developed the ability to escape it. Perhaps in a few hundred years, we will have established human colonies amidst the stars, but right now we only have one planet, and we need to work together to protect it. To do that, we need to break down not build up barriers within and between nations. If we are to stand a chance of doing that, the world's leaders need to acknowledge that they have failed and are failing the many. With resources increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few, we are going to have to learn to share far more than at present. With not only jobs but entire industries disappearing, we must help people to re-train for a new world and support them financially while they do so. If communities and economies cannot cope with current levels of migration, we must do more to encourage global development, as that is the only way that the migratory millions will be persuaded to seek their future at home. We can do this, I am an enormous optimist for my species, but it will require the elites, from London to Harvard, from Cambridge to Hollywood, to learn the lessons of the past month. To learn above all a measure of humility."
-
Tegmark, M.: Leben 3.0 : Mensch sein im Zeitalter Künstlicher Intelligenz (2017)
0.00
0.002040466 = product of:
0.008161864 = sum of:
0.008161864 = product of:
0.016323728 = sum of:
0.016323728 = weight(_text_:technology in 4558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016323728 = score(doc=4558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.115173936 = fieldWeight in 4558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Künstliche Intelligenz ist unsere unausweichliche Zukunft. Wird sie uns ins Verderben stürzen oder zur Weiterentwicklung des Homo sapiens beitragen? Die Nobelpreis-Schmiede Massachusetts Institute of Technology ist der bedeutendste technologische Think Tank der USA. Dort arbeitet Professor Max Tegmark mit den weltweit führenden Entwicklern künstlicher Intelligenz zusammen, die ihm exklusive Einblicke in ihre Labors gewähren. Die Erkenntnisse, die er daraus zieht, sind atemberaubend und zutiefst verstörend zugleich. Neigt sich die Ära der Menschen dem Ende zu? Der Physikprofessor Max Tegmark zeigt anhand der neusten Forschung, was die Menschheit erwartet. Hier eine Auswahl möglicher Szenarien: - Eroberer: Künstliche Intelligenz übernimmt die Macht und entledigt sich der Menschheit mit Methoden, die wir noch nicht einmal verstehen. - Der versklavte Gott: Die Menschen bemächtigen sich einer superintelligenten künstlichen Intelligenz und nutzen sie, um Hochtechnologien herzustellen. - Umkehr: Der technologische Fortschritt wird radikal unterbunden und wir kehren zu einer prä-technologischen Gesellschaft im Stil der Amish zurück. - Selbstzerstörung: Superintelligenz wird nicht erreicht, weil sich die Menschheit vorher nuklear oder anders selbst vernichtet. - Egalitäres Utopia: Es gibt weder Superintelligenz noch Besitz, Menschen und kybernetische Organismen existieren friedlich nebeneinander. Max Tegmark bietet kluge und fundierte Zukunftsszenarien basierend auf seinen exklusiven Einblicken in die aktuelle Forschung zur künstlichen Intelligenz.
-
Drauz, S.; Plieninger, J.: Nutzerwünsche sind nur bedingt RAK-kompatibel : So wird der Katalog zukunftstauglich: Recommenderdienste - Anreicherungen - Katalog 2.0 - Table of Contents (2010)
0.00
0.0016202416 = product of:
0.006480966 = sum of:
0.006480966 = weight(_text_:information in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006480966 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- "Der herkömmliche Katalog und die herkömmlichen bibliothekarischen Methoden der Erschließung des Bestandes und von Literatur reichen nicht mehr aus. Kommerzielle Anbieter treffen die Informationsbedürfnisse von Benutzern weit eher - sie bieten zum einen weniger (bibliografische Angaben) und zum anderen mehr (Informationen zum Buch und zu ähnlichen Büchern). Für viele Theoretiker und Praktiker geht es darum, die Daten frei(er) zu lassen und sie angepasster, anpassbarer zu machen, so weit möglich. Wenn die Daten gefangen sind, kann man sie befreien, wie dies sogar bei proprietären Systemen zu schaffen ist, hat kürzlich Tim Spalding mit seinem Aufsatz »Breaking into the OPAC« im Buch »Library Mashups« (Nicole C. Engard; London: Facet, 2009; Seite 129-143) gezeigt. Aufwendig zwar, aber durchaus im Bereich des Möglichen! Letztlich aber handelt es sich als Leitfrage stets darum, den Bedürfnissen der Benutzer zu entsprechen, die Handhabung selbsterklärender, die Information reicher, die Weiterführung der Recherche mit anderen Mitteln einfacher zu machen. Sagen wir: Die Zukunft ist da, aber sie ist nur bedingt RAK-kompatibel ..."
