Search (442 results, page 1 of 23)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Hufford, J.R.: Use studies and OPACs (1991) 0.12
    0.12080085 = product of:
      0.2416017 = sum of:
        0.014975886 = weight(_text_:information in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014975886 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
        0.1529484 = weight(_text_:united in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1529484 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.61983573 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
        0.07367742 = product of:
          0.14735484 = sum of:
            0.14735484 = weight(_text_:states in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14735484 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.608396 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the major catalog use studies that have been conducted in the United States and Great Britain. The potential to influence the construction of new online public access catalogs is emphasized. The cumulative findings could serve as an information base which designers of OPAC systems could refer to in the course of their work
  2. Matthews, J.R.; Lawrence, G.S.; Ferguson, D.K.: Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey, a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.11
    0.10575872 = product of:
      0.31727615 = sum of:
        0.21412776 = weight(_text_:united in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21412776 = score(doc=4168,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.86777 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
        0.10314838 = product of:
          0.20629676 = sum of:
            0.20629676 = weight(_text_:states in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20629676 = score(doc=4168,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.85175437 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    LCSH
    Libraries / United States / Automation
    Library surveys / United States
    Subject
    Libraries / United States / Automation
    Library surveys / United States
  3. De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Cellentani, D.; Hawk, J.; Jenkins, L.; Wilson, A.: Perceptions of libraries and information resources : A Report to the OCLC Membership (2005) 0.10
    0.099701196 = product of:
      0.19940239 = sum of:
        0.025414921 = weight(_text_:information in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025414921 = score(doc=5018,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
        0.12978102 = weight(_text_:united in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12978102 = score(doc=5018,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
        0.044206448 = product of:
          0.088412896 = sum of:
            0.088412896 = weight(_text_:states in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088412896 = score(doc=5018,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizes findings of an international study on information-seeking habits and preferences: With extensive input from hundreds of librarians and OCLC staff, the OCLC Market Research team developed a project and commissioned Harris Interactive Inc. to survey a representative sample of information consumers. In June of 2005, we collected over 3,300 responses from information consumers in Australia, Canada, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Perceptions report provides the findings and responses from the online survey in an effort to learn more about: * Library use * Awareness and use of library electronic resources * Free vs. for-fee information * The "Library" brand The findings indicate that information consumers view libraries as places to borrow print books, but they are unaware of the rich electronic content they can access through libraries. Even though information consumers make limited use of these resources, they continue to trust libraries as reliable sources of information.
  4. Niu, X.; Hemminger, B.M.: ¬A study of factors that affect the information-seeking behavior of academic scientists (2012) 0.08
    0.079874486 = product of:
      0.15974897 = sum of:
        0.023773482 = weight(_text_:information in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023773482 = score(doc=4986,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
        0.09176904 = weight(_text_:united in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09176904 = score(doc=4986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
        0.044206448 = product of:
          0.088412896 = sum of:
            0.088412896 = weight(_text_:states in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088412896 = score(doc=4986,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In an effort to understand how academic scientists seek information relevant to their research in today's environment of ubiquitous electronic access, a correlation framework is built and regression analysis is applied to the survey results from 2,063 academic researchers in natural science, engineering, and medical science at five research universities in the United States. Previous work has reported descriptive statistics about these scientists' information-seeking behavior. This study extends that work to examine relationships between scientists' information-seeking behaviors and their personal and environmental factors. Several regression models, including the Poisson model, the logit model, and the ordered logit model, are built to interpret the correlation among scientists' behaviors. In addition, exploratory factor analysis is used for data reduction. Overall, many factors were found to affect the specific information-seeking behaviors of scientists, including demographic, psychological, role-related, and environmental factors. Of the factors having an effect, academic position was the most important determinant of information behavior.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.336-353
  5. Hert, C.A.: User goals on an online public access catalog (1996) 0.08
    0.07803388 = product of:
      0.15606776 = sum of:
        0.02009226 = weight(_text_:information in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02009226 = score(doc=4381,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
        0.09176904 = weight(_text_:united in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09176904 = score(doc=4381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
        0.044206448 = product of:
          0.088412896 = sum of:
            0.088412896 = weight(_text_:states in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088412896 = score(doc=4381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    An ongoing thread in information retrieval research has been the exploration of user goals (or information needs, or problems) on information retrieval systems. It has been suggested that an understanding of goals and their role in the information retrieval interaction can provide insight into appropriate retrieval strategies, relevant documents, and general system design. This article reports on empirical findings concerning goals of users searching an OPAC at a northeastern United States university. These findings were generated during a large inductive and qualitative study of users' interactions with the OPAC. It was found that respondents came to the OPAC to search for a variety of course- or degree-related projects in which they were engaged. Respondent goals were not greatly modified during the course of these interactions. A set of situational elements associated with the respondent's goal was also identified. The implications of these findings for OPAC design and the training of informational professionals are discussed
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.7, S.504-518
  6. Haas, S.W.: Improving the search environment : informed decision making in the search for statistical information (2003) 0.07
    0.06656207 = product of:
      0.13312414 = sum of:
        0.019811235 = weight(_text_:information in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019811235 = score(doc=1687,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.256578 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
        0.0764742 = weight(_text_:united in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0764742 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
        0.03683871 = product of:
          0.07367742 = sum of:
            0.07367742 = weight(_text_:states in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07367742 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.304198 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    A search for information can be viewed as a series of decisions made by the searcher. Two dimensions of the search environment affect a user's decisions: the user's knowledge, and the configuration of the information retrieval system. Drawing an previous findings an users' lack of search or domain knowledge, this article investigates what the user needs to know to make informed search decisions at the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Web site, which provides statistical information an labor and related topics. Its extensive Web site is a rich collection of statistical information, ranging from individual statistics such as the current Consumer Price Index (CM), to a [arge statistical database called LABSTAT that can be queried to construct a tabie or time series an the fly. Two models of the search environment and the query process in LABSTAT are presented. They provide complementary views of the decision points at which help may be needed, and also suggest useful help content. Extensive examples based an the industry concept illustrate how the information could assist users' search decisions. The article concludes with a discussion of the role of help facilities in Web searching, and the interesting question of how to initiate the provision of help.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.782-797
  7. Reuter, K.: Assessing aesthetic relevance : children's book selection in a digital library (2007) 0.06
    0.060400426 = product of:
      0.12080085 = sum of:
        0.007487943 = weight(_text_:information in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007487943 = score(doc=598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
        0.0764742 = weight(_text_:united in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0764742 = score(doc=598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
        0.03683871 = product of:
          0.07367742 = sum of:
            0.07367742 = weight(_text_:states in 598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07367742 = score(doc=598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.304198 = fieldWeight in 598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=598)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Recreational reading among young people is reportedly on the decline in the United States. Some researchers have suggested that supporting children's strategies for book selection is crucial to encouraging children to engage with books, indicating that improving these strategies might increase the amount of reading they do. In response, this study explores how elementary-school children select books for recreational reading using a digital library. The work extends traditional models of relevance assessment with reader-response theory, employing the concept of aesthetic relevance: the potential of a document to provide a suitable reading experience. Individuals define aesthetic relevance in personal terms and apply it as they assess documents, much as they do in traditional relevance assessment. This study identified a total of 46 factors organized along seven dimensions that influence children's assessment of the aesthetic relevance of books during selection. The analysis yielded differences in the prevalence of the aesthetic-relevance factors that children mention at various stages of book selection. In addition, the children exhibited differences by age and subtle differences by gender in the frequency of mention of various aesthetic-relevance factors. Recommendations drawn from the findings are offered to improve systems design and literacy education in order to enhance children's access to books and to promote recreational reading.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.12, S.1745-1763
  8. Lim, S.: How and why do college students use Wikipedia? (2009) 0.05
    0.054310694 = product of:
      0.10862139 = sum of:
        0.017971063 = weight(_text_:information in 3163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017971063 = score(doc=3163,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 3163, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3163)
        0.061179362 = weight(_text_:united in 3163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061179362 = score(doc=3163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.2479343 = fieldWeight in 3163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3163)
        0.029470965 = product of:
          0.05894193 = sum of:
            0.05894193 = weight(_text_:states in 3163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05894193 = score(doc=3163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.24335839 = fieldWeight in 3163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The purposes of this study were to explore college students' perceptions, uses of, and motivations for using Wikipedia, and to understand their information behavior concerning Wikipedia based on social cognitive theory (SCT). A Web survey was used to collect data in the spring of 2008. The study sample consisted of students from an introductory undergraduate course at a large public university in the midwestern United States. A total of 134 students participated in the study, resulting in a 32.8% response rate. The major findings of the study include the following: Approximately one-third of the students reported using Wikipedia for academic purposes. The students tended to use Wikipedia for quickly checking facts and finding background information. They had positive past experiences with Wikipedia; however, interestingly, their perceptions of its information quality were not correspondingly high. The level of their confidence in evaluating Wikipedia's information quality was, at most, moderate. Respondents' past experience with Wikipedia, their positive emotional state, their disposition to believe information in Wikipedia, and information utility were positively related to their outcome expectations of Wikipedia. However, among the factors affecting outcome expectations, only information utility and respondents' positive emotions toward Wikipedia were related to their use of it. Further, when all of the independent variables, including the mediator, outcome expectations, were considered, only the variable information utility was related to Wikipedia use, which may imply a limited applicability of SCT to understanding Wikipedia use. However, more empirical evidence is needed to determine the applicability of this theory to Wikipedia use. Finally, this study supports the knowledge value of Wikipedia (Fallis, [2008]), despite students' cautious attitudes toward Wikipedia. The study suggests that educators and librarians need to provide better guidelines for using Wikipedia, rather than prohibiting Wikipedia use altogether.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2189-2202
  9. Marcella, R.; Baxter, G.: ¬The information needs and the information seeking behaviour of a national sample of the population in the United Kingdom, with special reference to needs related to citizenship (1999) 0.04
    0.04432852 = product of:
      0.13298555 = sum of:
        0.024834696 = weight(_text_:information in 3423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024834696 = score(doc=3423,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3423, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3423)
        0.108150855 = weight(_text_:united in 3423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108150855 = score(doc=3423,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.43829006 = fieldWeight in 3423, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3423)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of a survey of information needs and information seeking behaviour of a national sample of the UK population. The project was funded by the BLR&IC and comprised a survey by questionnaire covering all regions of the United Kingdom. 1.294 responses were received giving a valid and demographically respresentative response rate of 45,7%. Major findings include: that the majority of respondents had sought information in the past (59,4%) and that an even greater number predicted a future need for information (78,4%). Over three quarters of respondents said that they would use public libraries and between half and three quarters would approach CABx, post offices, government departments or family and friends. Face to face communicationss and reading a book were the most popular means of accessing information but a wide variety of other preferred options were cited. Only a small proportion expressed a preference for using a computer to seek information and there was a clear emphasis on public libraries as an appropriate location for accessing computerised information. A highly significant majority (79,2%) believed that access to information was very important for exercising their rights as citizens. Many significant variables, in terms of age, gender, status and region were found. In particular it was felt significant that young people were less sure of the importance of being able to access information
  10. Liebscher, P.; Abels, E.G.; Denman, D.W.: Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions : Part II: Preliminary use indicators (1997) 0.04
    0.039370134 = product of:
      0.1181104 = sum of:
        0.010483121 = weight(_text_:information in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010483121 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
        0.10762728 = weight(_text_:networks in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10762728 = score(doc=391,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.517335 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study that examined factors influencing the adoption and use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty in 6 small universities in the southerneaster USA. Part of the study gathered data on the purpose, type, and extent of electronic communications. Data were gathered by mail questionnaire and by follow up site visits. Reports on 5 types of network use, electronic mail, electronic discussion groups, accessing remote databases, accessing remote computer facilities, and file transfer. For each service, data are reported for frequency of use by purpose: research, teaching administration, social and current awareness. Outlines preliminary use indicators for each service in terms of heavy and moderate use
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.6, S.496-507
  11. Rowley, J.; Urquhart, C.: Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services : lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, part 1 (2007) 0.03
    0.033384386 = product of:
      0.100153156 = sum of:
        0.023678957 = weight(_text_:information in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023678957 = score(doc=449,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
        0.0764742 = weight(_text_:united in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0764742 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This two-part article establishes a model of the mediating factors that influence student information behavior concerning electronic or digital information sources that support their learning. The first part reviews the literature that underpinned the development of the research methodology for the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) User Behavior Monitoring and Evaluation Framework, as well as the literature that has subsequently helped to develop the model over the 5 years the Framework operated in the United Kingdom, in five cycles of research that were adjusted to meet the emerging needs of the JISC at the time. The literature review attempts to synthesize the two main perspectives in the research studies: (a) smallscale studies of student information behavior; and (b) the studies that focus on the quantitative usage of particular electronic information services in universities, often including implications for training and support. As the review indicates, there are gaps in the evidence concerning the browsing and selection strategies of undergraduate students and the interaction of some of the mediating influences on information behavior. The Framework developed a multimethod, qualitative and quantitative methodology for the continued monitoring of user behavior. This article discusses the methods used and the projectmanagement challenges involved, and concludes that at the outset, intended impacts need to be specified carefully, and that funding needs to be committed at that point for a longitudinal study. A research project on information behavior, intended to inform current policymaking on infrastructure provision, is inherently difficult as behavior changes lag behind provision.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1162-1174
  12. Nye, J.B.: User interaction with the authority structure of the online catalog : results of a survey (1988) 0.03
    0.032985564 = product of:
      0.09895669 = sum of:
        0.011980709 = weight(_text_:information in 2286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011980709 = score(doc=2286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2286)
        0.08697598 = weight(_text_:networks in 2286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08697598 = score(doc=2286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.4180698 = fieldWeight in 2286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2286)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A survey was conducted during 1987 to identify how online catalog users interact with various aspects of the catalog's authority control structure. Questionnaires were sent to major online catalog system vendors and to selected university libraries and networks known to have developed in-house online catalogs; additional copies were distributed to ACIG meeting participants during the ALA conference in San Francisco, June 1987. Twenty-one usable responses were received, twelve describing commercially available systems and nine from lacally developed systems.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 7(1988), S.313-316
  13. Ferl, T.E.; Millsap, L.: Remote use of the University of California MELVYL Library System : an online survey (1992) 0.03
    0.032985564 = product of:
      0.09895669 = sum of:
        0.011980709 = weight(_text_:information in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011980709 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
        0.08697598 = weight(_text_:networks in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08697598 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.4180698 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This report presents the results of a survey of users who access the University of California's online union catalog, the MELVYL library system, via microcomputers with modems or connections carried through local or wide area networks. The report includes descriptive statistics on user location, status, subject interest, affiliation, in-library versus out-of-library usage patterns, need for assistance, and desire for new features
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 11(1992) no.3, S.285-303
  14. Hargittai, E.: Beyond logs and surveys : in-depth measures of peoples's Web use skills (2002) 0.03
    0.029668488 = product of:
      0.08900546 = sum of:
        0.023773482 = weight(_text_:information in 897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023773482 = score(doc=897,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 897, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=897)
        0.06523198 = weight(_text_:networks in 897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06523198 = score(doc=897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=897)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Finding information an the Web can be a much more complex search process than previously experienced an many pre-Web information retrieval systems given that finding content online does not have to happen via a search algorithm typed into a search field. Rather, the Web allows for a myriad of search strategies. Although there are numerous studies of Web search techniques, these studies often limit their focus to just one part of the search process and are not based an the behavior of the general user population, nor do they include information about the users. To remedy these shortcomings, this project looks at how peopie find information online in the context of their other media use, their general Internet use patterns, in addition to using information about their demographic background and social support networks. This article describes the methodology in detail, and suggests that a mix of survey instruments and in-person observations can yield the type of rich data set that is necessary to understand in depth the differences in people's information retrieval behavior online.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1239-1244
  15. Micco, M.: ¬The next generation of online public access catalogs : a new look at subject access using hypermedia (1991) 0.03
    0.028862368 = product of:
      0.0865871 = sum of:
        0.010483121 = weight(_text_:information in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010483121 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
        0.07610398 = weight(_text_:networks in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07610398 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.36581108 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Current online catalogs have problems providing reasonable subject access, often resulting in searches with too few or too many hits. These problems can be improved by enhancing MARC records, building semantic networks through cross-references, and linking subject headings to classification numbers. This paper describes a pilot project to design a hypertext search engine using these principles
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  16. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.03
    0.027592983 = product of:
      0.16555789 = sum of:
        0.16555789 = sum of:
          0.11788386 = weight(_text_:states in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11788386 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043984205 = queryNorm
              0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.047674023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047674023 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043984205 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  17. Newhagen, J.E.: ¬The role of feedback in the assessment of news (1997) 0.02
    0.024739172 = product of:
      0.07421751 = sum of:
        0.0089855315 = weight(_text_:information in 1547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0089855315 = score(doc=1547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1547)
        0.06523198 = weight(_text_:networks in 1547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06523198 = score(doc=1547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 1547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1547)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the problem of a compelling online news delivery system by focusing on how mass media audiences and online users differ in their assessment of news. It employed a 2-wave USA national survey to study the perception of interactivity in mass media and computer networks and its relationship to the assessment of news. The 1st wave looked a national probability sample, ahile the 2nd targeted viewers of NBC Nightly News who responded to the show via e-mail. NBC respondents rated mass media to be less interactive, while they rated computer communication more interactive than the national sample. The NBC group also rated mass media news less important and of lower quality than did the national sample. Interactivity ratings did not predict mass media credibility assessment for either group. However, respondents who defined interactivity as cybernetic feedback or who contacted NBC by e-mail rated computer communication to be more credible than thos who did not
    Source
    Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.5, S.583-594
  18. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.023788504 = product of:
      0.07136551 = sum of:
        0.029650742 = weight(_text_:information in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029650742 = score(doc=3924,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
        0.04171477 = product of:
          0.08342954 = sum of:
            0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08342954 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  19. Cole, C.; Leide, J.; Beheshti, J.; Large, A.; Brooks, M.: Investigating the Anomalous States of Knowledge hypothesis in a real-life problem situation : a study of history and psychology undergraduates seeking information for a course essay (2005) 0.02
    0.023479816 = product of:
      0.07043944 = sum of:
        0.01834164 = weight(_text_:information in 4814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01834164 = score(doc=4814,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4814, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4814)
        0.0520978 = product of:
          0.1041956 = sum of:
            0.1041956 = weight(_text_:states in 4814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1041956 = score(doc=4814,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.43020093 = fieldWeight in 4814, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4814)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The authors present a study of the real-life information needs of 59 McGill University undergraduates researching essay topics for either a history or psychology course, interviewed just after they had selected their essay topic. The interview's purpose was to transform the undergraduate's query from general topic terms, based an vague conceptions of their essay topic, to an information need-based query. To chart the transformation, the authors investigate N. J. Belkin, R. N. Oddy, and H. M. Brooks' Anomalous States of Knowledge (ASK) hypothesis (1982a, 1982b), which links the user's ASK to a relevant document set via a common code based an structural facets. In the present study an interoperable structural code based an eight essay styles is created, then notions of structural facets compatible with a highimpact essay structure are presented. The important findings of the study are: (a) the undergraduates' topic statements and terms derived from it do not constitute an effective information need statement because for most of the subjects in the study the topic terms conformed to a low-impact essay style; (b) essay style is an effective interoperable structural code for charting the evolution of the undergraduate's knowledge state from ASK to partial resolution of the ASK in an information need statement.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.14, S.1544-1554
  20. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Research on Web-search behavior (2001) 0.02
    0.02324383 = product of:
      0.06973149 = sum of:
        0.018157298 = weight(_text_:information in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018157298 = score(doc=2277,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
        0.05157419 = product of:
          0.10314838 = sum of:
            0.10314838 = weight(_text_:states in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10314838 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article reviews studies, conducted between 1995 and 2000, on Web search behavior. These studies reported on children as well as on adults. Most of the studies on children described their interaction with the Web. Research on adult searchers focused on describing search patterns, and many studies investigated effects of selected factors on search behavior, including information organization and presentation, type of search task, Web experience, cognitive abilities, and affective states. What distinguishes the research on adult searchers is the use of multiple data-gathering methods. The research on Web search behavior reflects researchers' commitment to examine users in their information environment and exhibits rigor in design and data analysis. However, many studies lack external validity. Implications of this body of research are discussed.
    Source
    Library and information science research. 23(2001) no.2, S.167-185

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 432
  • el 6
  • r 4
  • m 2
  • b 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…