-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.06
0.06385712 = product of:
0.12771425 = sum of:
0.12771425 = sum of:
0.056769572 = weight(_text_:science in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056769572 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.070944674 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070944674 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.170-173
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.03
0.033326045 = product of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024085289 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042566802 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.03
0.033326045 = product of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024085289 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042566802 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.4, S.217-225
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.03
0.033326045 = product of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.06665209 = sum of:
0.024085289 = weight(_text_:science in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024085289 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.042566802 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042566802 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.03
0.027771706 = product of:
0.05554341 = sum of:
0.05554341 = sum of:
0.020071074 = weight(_text_:science in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020071074 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.035472337 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035472337 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997)
0.02
0.017952116 = product of:
0.035904232 = sum of:
0.035904232 = product of:
0.071808465 = sum of:
0.071808465 = weight(_text_:science in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071808465 = score(doc=2749,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Structured abstracts have now become widespread in medical research journals. Considers whether or not such structured abstracts can be used effectively in social science journals. Reviews a a selection of studies to see if structured abstracts written for social science journals are more informative, easier to read and easier to search than their traditional equivalents. Results suggest that structured abstracts are appropriate for social science journals. Editors of social science journals should consider adopting structured abstracts
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.02
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = product of:
0.06422744 = sum of:
0.06422744 = weight(_text_:science in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06422744 = score(doc=2999,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to consider whether or not structured abstracts can be used efectively in non medical science periodicals. Reviews a selection of studies on structured abstracts from the medical and psychological literature, presents examples of structured abstracts published in non medical science periodicals and considers how original abstracts might be written in a structured form for these periodicals. Concludes that, in light of these example studies, editors of these periodicals should consider the value of adopting structured abstracts
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.359-364
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.014188935 = product of:
0.02837787 = sum of:
0.02837787 = product of:
0.05675574 = sum of:
0.05675574 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05675574 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999)
0.01
0.014049753 = product of:
0.028099505 = sum of:
0.028099505 = product of:
0.05619901 = sum of:
0.05619901 = weight(_text_:science in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05619901 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.845-854
-
Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002)
0.01
0.014049753 = product of:
0.028099505 = sum of:
0.028099505 = product of:
0.05619901 = sum of:
0.05619901 = weight(_text_:science in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05619901 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.5, S.417-422
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991)
0.01
0.0121674435 = product of:
0.024334887 = sum of:
0.024334887 = product of:
0.048669774 = sum of:
0.048669774 = weight(_text_:science in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048669774 = score(doc=752,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library and information science resaerch 14(1992) no.1, S.117-118 (C. Tenopir); International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.227-228 (R. Fugmann); Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992) no.6, S.456 (B.R. Boyce); Cataloging & classification quarterly 15(1992) no.1, S.245-247 (E.M. Rasmussen) Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.39 (G.A. Crawford) // Winner of the 1992 ASIS best information science book award
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003)
0.01
0.012042644 = product of:
0.024085289 = sum of:
0.024085289 = product of:
0.048170578 = sum of:
0.048170578 = weight(_text_:science in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048170578 = score(doc=4913,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.1, S.144-145 (H. Saggion): "... This volume is a very valuable source of information for not only students and professionals in library and information science but also for individuals and institutions involved in knowledge management and organization activities. Because of its broad coverage of the information science topic, teachers will find the contents of this book useful for courses in the areas of information technology, digital as well as traditional libraries, and information science in general."
- Imprint
- Champaign, IL : Graduate School of Library and Information Science
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989)
0.01
0.010035537 = product of:
0.020071074 = sum of:
0.020071074 = product of:
0.04014215 = sum of:
0.04014215 = weight(_text_:science in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04014215 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Imprint
- Amsterdam : Elsevier Science Publishers
-
Sen, B.K.: Research articles in LISA Plus : problems of identification (1997)
0.01
0.009934675 = product of:
0.01986935 = sum of:
0.01986935 = product of:
0.0397387 = sum of:
0.0397387 = weight(_text_:science in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0397387 = score(doc=430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to determine how easy and quickly research articles in library and information science could be retrieved from the LISA Plus CD-ROM database. Results show that the search with the descriptor 'research' retrieves all types of articles and it is necessary to read through every abstract to locate the research articles. The introductory sentence of a substantial number of abstracts hinder the process of identification since the sentence provides such information as the conference where the paper was presented, the special issue or the section of a periodical where the article is located; or obvious background information. Suggests measures whereby research articles can be identified easily and rapidly
- Source
- Malaysian journal of library and information science. 2(1997) no.1, S.97-106
-
Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997)
0.01
0.009934675 = product of:
0.01986935 = sum of:
0.01986935 = product of:
0.0397387 = sum of:
0.0397387 = weight(_text_:science in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0397387 = score(doc=3699,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The library and information science (LIS) literature on abstracting makes little mention about abstracting conducted in the corporate / business environment, whereas the business literature suggests that abstarcting is a very important component of business writing. Examines a variety of publications from LIS and business in order to compare and contrast their approaches to the following aspects of abstracting: definitions of abstracts; types of abstracts; purpose of abstracts; and writing of abstracts. Summarises the results of the examination which revealed a number of similarities, differences, and inadequacies in the ways in which both fields approach abstracting. Concludes that both fields need to develop more detailed guidelines concerning the cognitive process of abstracting and suggests improvements to the training af absractors based on these findings
-
Montesi, M.; Urdiciain, B.G.: Recent linguistic research into author abstracts : its value for information science (2005)
0.01
0.008515436 = product of:
0.017030872 = sum of:
0.017030872 = product of:
0.034061745 = sum of:
0.034061745 = weight(_text_:science in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034061745 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper is a review of genre analysis of author abstracts carried out in the area of English for Special Purposes (ESP) since 1990. Given the descriptive character of such analysis, it can be valuable for Information Science (IS), as it provides a picture of the variation in author abstracts, depending an the discipline, culture and language of the author, and the envisaged context. The authors claim that such knowledge can be useful for information professionals who need to revise author abstracts, or use them for other activities in the organization of knowledge, such as subject analysis and control of vocabulary. With this purpose in mind, we summarize various findings of ESP research. We describe how abstracts vary in structure, content and discourse, and how linguists explain such variations. Other factors taken into account are the stylistic and discoursal features of the abstract, lexical choices, and the possible sources of blas. In conclusion, we show how such findings can have practical and theoretical implications for IS.
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences (2009)
0.01
0.008515436 = product of:
0.017030872 = sum of:
0.017030872 = product of:
0.034061745 = sum of:
0.034061745 = weight(_text_:science in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034061745 = score(doc=3115,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Detailed checklists and questionnaires have been used in the past to assess the quality of structured abstracts in the medical sciences. The aim of this article is to report the findings when a simpler checklist was used to evaluate the quality of 100 traditional abstracts published in 53 different social science journals. Most of these abstracts contained information about the aims, methods, and results of the studies. However, many did not report details about the sample sizes, ages, or sexes of the participants, or where the research was carried out. The correlation between the lengths of the abstracts and the amount of information present was 0.37 (p < .001), suggesting that word limits for abstracts may restrict the presence of key information to some extent. We conclude that authors can improve the quality of information in traditional abstracts in the social sciences by using the simple checklist provided in this article.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.10, S.2010-2018
-
Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.00802843 = product of:
0.01605686 = sum of:
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03211372 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
-
Molina, M.P.: Documentary abstracting : toward a methodological approach (1995)
0.01
0.00802843 = product of:
0.01605686 = sum of:
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 1790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03211372 = score(doc=1790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1790)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.3, S.225-234
-
Monday, I.: ¬Les processus cognitifs et la redaction de résumes (1996)
0.01
0.00802843 = product of:
0.01605686 = sum of:
0.01605686 = product of:
0.03211372 = sum of:
0.03211372 = weight(_text_:science in 6917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03211372 = score(doc=6917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052363027 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 6917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Attempts to explain the intellectual and cognitive processes which govern the understanding and structure of a text, on the one hand, and writing a summary or abstract on the other, based on the literature of information science, education, cognitive psychology and psychiatry
