Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × author_ss:"Moed, H.F."
  1. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.03
    0.027771706 = product of:
      0.05554341 = sum of:
        0.05554341 = sum of:
          0.020071074 = weight(_text_:science in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020071074 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.035472337 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035472337 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1833664 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052363027 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.412-431
  2. Halevi, G.; Moed, H.F.: ¬The thematic and conceptual flow of disciplinary research : a citation context analysis of the journal of informetrics, 2007 (2013) 0.01
    0.0070961965 = product of:
      0.014192393 = sum of:
        0.014192393 = product of:
          0.028384786 = sum of:
            0.028384786 = weight(_text_:science in 1049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028384786 = score(doc=1049,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052363027 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 1049, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article analyzes the context of citations within the full text of research articles. It studies articles published in a single journal: the Journal of Informetrics (JOI), in the first year the journal was published, 2007. The analysis classified the citations into in- and out-disciplinary content and looked at their use within the articles' sections such as introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusions. In addition, it took into account the age of cited articles. A thematic analysis of these citations was performed in order to identify the evolution of topics within the articles sections and the journal's content. A matrix describing the relationships between the citations' use, and their in- and out-disciplinary focus within the articles' sections is presented. The findings show that an analysis of citations based on their in- and out-disciplinary orientation within the context of the articles' sections can be an indication of the manner by which cross-disciplinary science works, and reveals the connections between the issues, methods, analysis, and conclusions coming from different research disciplines.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.9, S.1903-1913
  3. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact (2015) 0.01
    0.0050177686 = product of:
      0.010035537 = sum of:
        0.010035537 = product of:
          0.020071074 = sum of:
            0.020071074 = weight(_text_:science in 2212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020071074 = score(doc=2212,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13793045 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052363027 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2212, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2212)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.1988-2002