Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.21 
    0.20501526 = product of:
  0.51253814 = sum of:
    0.25626907 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25626907 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419851 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040337894 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.25626907 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25626907 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419851 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040337894 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015) 0.06 
    0.06050467 = product of:
  0.15126167 = sum of:
    0.13486598 = weight(_text_:austria in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13486598 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28647035 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040337894 = queryNorm
        0.47078514 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
    0.016395682 = product of:
      0.032791365 = sum of:
        0.032791365 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032791365 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The causal relation between research and economic growth is of particular importance for political support of science and technology as well as for academic purposes. This article revisits the causal relationship between research articles published and economic growth in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries for the period 1981-2011, using bootstrap panel causality analysis, which accounts for cross-section dependency and heterogeneity across countries. The article, by the use of the specific method and the choice of the country group, makes a contribution to the existing literature. Our empirical results support unidirectional causality running from research output (in terms of total number of articles published) to economic growth for the US, Finland, Hungary, and Mexico; the opposite causality from economic growth to research articles published for Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand, the UK, Austria, Israel, and Poland; and no causality for the rest of the countries. Our findings provide important policy implications for research policies and strategies for OECD countries.
    Date
    8. 7.2015 22:00:42
  3. Schloegl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Impact and relevance of LIS journals : a scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey (2004) 0.02 
    0.01798213 = product of:
  0.089910656 = sum of:
    0.089910656 = weight(_text_:austria in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089910656 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28647035 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040337894 = queryNorm
        0.31385675 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The goal of the scientometric analysis presented in this article was to investigate international and regional (i.e., German-language) periodicals in the field of library and information science (LIS). This was done by means of a citation analysis and a reader survey. For the citation analysis, impact factor, citing half-life, number of references per article, and the rate of self-references of a periodical were used as indicators. In addition, the leading LIS periodicals were mapped. For the 40 international periodicals, data were collected from ISI's Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports (JCR); the citations of the 10 German-language journals were counted manually (overall 1,494 source articles with 10,520 citations). Altogether, the empirical base of the citation analysis consisted of nearly 90,000 citations in 6,203 source articles that were published between 1997 and 2000. The expert survey investigated reading frequency, applicability of the journals to the job of the reader, publication frequency, and publication preference both for all respondents and for different groups among them (practitioners vs. scientists, librarians vs. documentalists vs. LIS scholars, public sector vs. information industry vs. other private company employees). The study was conducted in spring 2002. A total of 257 questionnaires were returned by information specialists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Having both citation and readership data, we performed a comparative analysis of these two data sets. This enabled us to identify answers to questions like: Does reading behavior correlate with the journal impact factor? Do readers prefer journals with a short or a long half-life, or with a low or a high number of references? Is there any difference in this matter among librarians, documentalists, and LIS scholars?
  4. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.01 
    0.008744366 = product of:
  0.043721825 = sum of:
    0.043721825 = product of:
      0.08744365 = sum of:
        0.08744365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08744365 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  5. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.008744366 = product of:
  0.043721825 = sum of:
    0.043721825 = product of:
      0.08744365 = sum of:
        0.08744365 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08744365 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  6. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.01 
    0.008744366 = product of:
  0.043721825 = sum of:
    0.043721825 = product of:
      0.08744365 = sum of:
        0.08744365 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08744365 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  7. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.01 
    0.007728999 = product of:
  0.038644996 = sum of:
    0.038644996 = product of:
      0.07728999 = sum of:
        0.07728999 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07728999 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.007728999 = product of:
  0.038644996 = sum of:
    0.038644996 = product of:
      0.07728999 = sum of:
        0.07728999 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07728999 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  9. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.01 
    0.0076513193 = product of:
  0.038256597 = sum of:
    0.038256597 = product of:
      0.07651319 = sum of:
        0.07651319 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07651319 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.01 
    0.0076513193 = product of:
  0.038256597 = sum of:
    0.038256597 = product of:
      0.07651319 = sum of:
        0.07651319 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07651319 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  11. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.01 
    0.0076513193 = product of:
  0.038256597 = sum of:
    0.038256597 = product of:
      0.07651319 = sum of:
        0.07651319 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07651319 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  12. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.01 
    0.006558273 = product of:
  0.032791365 = sum of:
    0.032791365 = product of:
      0.06558273 = sum of:
        0.06558273 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06558273 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  13. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01 
    0.006558273 = product of:
  0.032791365 = sum of:
    0.032791365 = product of:
      0.06558273 = sum of:
        0.06558273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06558273 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  14. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.00 
    0.0046374 = product of:
  0.023187 = sum of:
    0.023187 = product of:
      0.046374 = sum of:
        0.046374 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046374 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  15. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0046374 = product of:
  0.023187 = sum of:
    0.023187 = product of:
      0.046374 = sum of:
        0.046374 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046374 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  16. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.00 
    0.004372183 = product of:
  0.021860912 = sum of:
    0.021860912 = product of:
      0.043721825 = sum of:
        0.043721825 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043721825 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  17. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.00 
    0.004372183 = product of:
  0.021860912 = sum of:
    0.021860912 = product of:
      0.043721825 = sum of:
        0.043721825 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043721825 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  18. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.00 
    0.004372183 = product of:
  0.021860912 = sum of:
    0.021860912 = product of:
      0.043721825 = sum of:
        0.043721825 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043721825 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  19. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.00 
    0.004372183 = product of:
  0.021860912 = sum of:
    0.021860912 = product of:
      0.043721825 = sum of:
        0.043721825 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043721825 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  20. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.00 
    0.004372183 = product of:
  0.021860912 = sum of:
    0.021860912 = product of:
      0.043721825 = sum of:
        0.043721825 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043721825 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14125644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040337894 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 109
  • d 9
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications