Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Silva, C.M.A. da; Ortega, C.D.: Proposals that preceded the call number : shelf arrangement in the Francofone manuals of librarianship from the mid-nineteenth century to 1930 (2017) 0.01
    0.0106701935 = product of:
      0.053350966 = sum of:
        0.053350966 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053350966 = score(doc=4138,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Shelf arrangement, from a bibliographic perspective, constitutes a reading proposal of the collection to the users as well as a resource for management and access to the documents. However, the centrality of the call number testifies the near forgetfulness of the different proposals that came before it and the role of the collection of documents and the target audience in the elaboration of the organization, in addition to the overlapping of the bibliographic classification to shelf arrangement. This work is justified by the need to restore shelf arrangement, seeking to understand its fundamental aspects from the literature in which the activity was systematized. Thus, this paper aims at contributing to reorient the shelf arrangement as an activity of information organization, exploring its conformation in the Francophone literature, from the midnineteenth century up to the 1930s. As for the methodology, this is an exploratory research made possible through the historical-conceptual investigation of shelf arrangement found in the Francophone manuals of librarianship of that period. This study concludes that the activity was placed by that line since the nineteenth century, when its own terminology was developed under the consideration of the intervention of the contexts, using methods and guided by the diversity of proposals.
  2. Bettella, C.; Capodaglio, C.; Ramous, C.; Vettore, M.C.: Declassifying the Library of Congress Classification : the case of the Department of Philosophy Library at the University of Padova (Padua, Italy) (2009) 0.01
    0.006035973 = product of:
      0.030179864 = sum of:
        0.030179864 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030179864 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.17204987 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The ongoing project to revise the arrangement of the open shelves library collections occasioned a historiographic account of the implementation phases of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), subclasses B-BJ - Philosophy and Psychology, at the Library of the Department of Philosophy of the University of Padua (Italy). The schema was adopted as a collection shelving and location device since the Library institution in 1997. The LCC international acknowledgement and the neutral framework of the schema have undoubtedly played a role of driving factors at the first stage of the selection process. However, the implementation of the classification scheme had to consider critical issues like the shortage of the library area, the selection criteria of the appropriate bibliographic material, as well as the effort to settle and tailor the original schema to the specific needs of the library collections and its end-users. The purpose of this paper is twofold: from one hand, we aim to examine in detail each stage of the implementation project in order to provide a preliminary impact evaluation of the classification schema both on the collections management and development and on the research practices of the local users community; from the other, we intend to highlight the principal factors that have implied a sort of declassification process of the system itself. In conclusion, we argue that the declassification of library collections can be read, from a bottom-up perspective, as index of vitality of the collections themselves, as well as a valuable basis for planning the next steps of the Library project.
  3. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.00
    0.004883809 = product of:
      0.024419045 = sum of:
        0.024419045 = product of:
          0.04883809 = sum of:
            0.04883809 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04883809 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  4. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.00
    0.004883809 = product of:
      0.024419045 = sum of:
        0.024419045 = product of:
          0.04883809 = sum of:
            0.04883809 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04883809 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  5. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.00
    0.004883809 = product of:
      0.024419045 = sum of:
        0.024419045 = product of:
          0.04883809 = sum of:
            0.04883809 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04883809 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  6. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.00
    0.004273333 = product of:
      0.021366665 = sum of:
        0.021366665 = product of:
          0.04273333 = sum of:
            0.04273333 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04273333 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  7. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.00
    0.004273333 = product of:
      0.021366665 = sum of:
        0.021366665 = product of:
          0.04273333 = sum of:
            0.04273333 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04273333 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  8. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.00
    0.004273333 = product of:
      0.021366665 = sum of:
        0.021366665 = product of:
          0.04273333 = sum of:
            0.04273333 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04273333 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  9. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.00
    0.004273333 = product of:
      0.021366665 = sum of:
        0.021366665 = product of:
          0.04273333 = sum of:
            0.04273333 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04273333 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59
  10. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.00
    0.0036628568 = product of:
      0.018314283 = sum of:
        0.018314283 = product of:
          0.036628567 = sum of:
            0.036628567 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036628567 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.00
    0.0036628568 = product of:
      0.018314283 = sum of:
        0.018314283 = product of:
          0.036628567 = sum of:
            0.036628567 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036628567 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  12. LeBlanc, J.: Classification and shelflisting as value added : some remarks on the relative worth and price of predictibility, serendipity, and depth of access (1995) 0.00
    0.00348429 = product of:
      0.01742145 = sum of:
        0.01742145 = product of:
          0.0348429 = sum of:
            0.0348429 = weight(_text_:data in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348429 = score(doc=3667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    There seems to be general agreement in the library community that a predictably ordered system of classification, leading to easy browsability of a library collection either in the stacks or in an OPAC, is an indispensible requirement for the kind of access patrons have come to expect, and for the reasonable success of the searching strategies they normally use. In this vein, examines the intrinsic value of browsing. In addition, with the help of some rough data compiled during a test conducted at Cornell University in the spring of 1994, estimates the cost of maintaining the collocative and alphabetical integrity of shelflist files for works by or about individual literary authors
  13. Massey, S.A.; Malinconico, S.M.: Cutting cataloging costs : accepting LC Classification call numbers from OCLC cataloging copy (1997) 0.00
    0.00348429 = product of:
      0.01742145 = sum of:
        0.01742145 = product of:
          0.0348429 = sum of:
            0.0348429 = weight(_text_:data in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348429 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging policy at the Alabama University Libraries allows the acceptance of LCC call numbers from OCLC cataloguing copy into the local database without shelflisting. Reports results of a study to measure error rates for locally unshelflisted samples and a control group of locally assigned and shelflisted call numbers to determine whether this policy produces disarrangement of the local online shelflist. Results show no significant differences between samples, indicating that the cataloguer's task of local shelflisting is not a cost effective use of their time. Analysis of the error data suggests that the types of disorder created by shelflisting errors would not impede the retrieval of items while subject browsing, but further study is needed to confirm this
  14. Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994) 0.00
    0.0030523809 = product of:
      0.015261904 = sum of:
        0.015261904 = product of:
          0.030523809 = sum of:
            0.030523809 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030523809 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)
  15. Bonse, C.; Fischer, N.: So wird die Sucheffizienz gesteigert : Stadtbibliothek Siegburg stellt nach Kundenbefragung den Bestand fast komplett um (2008) 0.00
    0.0021366666 = product of:
      0.010683333 = sum of:
        0.010683333 = product of:
          0.021366665 = sum of:
            0.021366665 = weight(_text_:22 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021366665 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2008 15:11:22