Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

0.059585918 = product of:
  0.14896479 = sum of:
    0.13154334 = weight(_text_:readable in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13154334 = score(doc=5230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505818 = queryNorm
        0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
    0.01742145 = product of:
      0.0348429 = sum of:
        0.0348429 = weight(_text_:data in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0348429 = score(doc=5230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

With formal concept analysis surveys are analyzable in the way that a meaningful picture of the answers of the interviewed persons is available. Line diagrams of large concept lattices might become less readable up to the point that it is impossible to pursue the line segments with the eyes. Nested line diagrams give the opportunity to overcome these difficulties. The main idea of nested line diagrams is to partition the line diagram into boxes so that line segments between two boxes are all parallel and may be replaced by one line segment. The possibility to draw line diagrams with more than two factors does allow it to describe concept lattices with many hundred or thousand concepts in a clear structure. In practice it has often been proven useful to take standardized scales for the single levels

0.0256958 = product of:
  0.128479 = sum of:
    0.128479 = sum of:
      0.07964092 = weight(_text_:data in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07964092 = score(doc=1901,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04505818 = queryNorm
          0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.04883809 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04883809 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04505818 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes

Source

Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81

0.009855061 = product of:
  0.049275305 = sum of:
    0.049275305 = product of:
      0.09855061 = sum of:
        0.09855061 = weight(_text_:data in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09855061 = score(doc=3140,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.69169855 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Ed.: H.H. Bock u. P. Ihm

0.007964092 = product of:
  0.03982046 = sum of:
    0.03982046 = product of:
      0.07964092 = sum of:
        0.07964092 = weight(_text_:data in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07964092 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Conceptual and numerical analysis of data. Ed.: O. Opitz

0.007964092 = product of:
  0.03982046 = sum of:
    0.03982046 = product of:
      0.07964092 = sum of:
        0.07964092 = weight(_text_:data in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07964092 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.00696858 = product of:
  0.0348429 = sum of:
    0.0348429 = product of:
      0.0696858 = sum of:
        0.0696858 = weight(_text_:data in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0696858 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.00696858 = product of:
  0.0348429 = sum of:
    0.0348429 = product of:
      0.0696858 = sum of:
        0.0696858 = weight(_text_:data in 594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0696858 = score(doc=594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=594)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Data analysis, learning symbolic and numeric knowledge. Hrsg.: E. Diday

0.00696858 = product of:
  0.0348429 = sum of:
    0.0348429 = product of:
      0.0696858 = sum of:
        0.0696858 = weight(_text_:data in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0696858 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.00658469 = product of:
  0.03292345 = sum of:
    0.03292345 = product of:
      0.0658469 = sum of:
        0.0658469 = weight(_text_:data in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0658469 = score(doc=5083,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.46216056 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases (CKDD) in its connection with Data Analysis. Our approach is based on Formal Concept Analysis, a mathematical theory which has been developed and proven useful during the last 20 years. Formal Concept Analysis has led to a theory of conceptual information systems which has been applied by using the management system TOSCANA in a wide range of domains. In this paper, we use such an application in database marketing to demonstrate how methods and procedures of CKDD can be applied in Data Analysis. In particular, we show the interplay and integration of data mining and data analysis techniques based on Formal Concept Analysis. The main concern of this paper is to explain how the transition from data to knowledge can be supported by a TOSCANA system. To clarify the transition steps we discuss their correspondence to the five levels of knowledge representation established by R. Brachman and to the steps of empirically grounded theory building proposed by A. Strauss and J. Corbin

Theme

Data Mining

0.00658469 = product of:
  0.03292345 = sum of:
    0.03292345 = product of:
      0.0658469 = sum of:
        0.0658469 = weight(_text_:data in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0658469 = score(doc=4843,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.46216056 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is a well founded mathematical framework used for conceptual classication and knowledge management. Given a binary table describing a relation between objects and attributes, FCA consists in building a set of concepts organized by a subsumption relation within a concept lattice. Accordingly, FCA requires to transform complex data, e.g. numbers, intervals, graphs, into binary data leading to loss of information and poor interpretability of object classes. In this paper, we propose a pre-processing method producing binary data from complex data taking advantage of similarity between objects. As a result, the concept lattice is composed of classes being maximal sets of pairwise similar objects. This method is based on FCA and on a formalization of similarity as a tolerance relation (reexive and symmetric). It applies to complex object descriptions and especially here to interval data. Moreover, it can be applied to any kind of structured data for which a similarity can be dened (sequences, graphs, etc.). Finally, an application highlights that the resulting concept lattice plays an important role in information fusion problem, as illustrated with a real-world example in agronomy.

Series

Knowledge and data representation and management; no.7353

0.0061047617 = product of:
  0.030523809 = sum of:
    0.030523809 = product of:
      0.061047617 = sum of:
        0.061047617 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061047617 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

26. 2.2008 15:58:22

0.006034968 = product of:
  0.03017484 = sum of:
    0.03017484 = product of:
      0.06034968 = sum of:
        0.06034968 = weight(_text_:data in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034968 = score(doc=2710,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), a variant of classical Vector Space Model (VSM), is an Information Retrieval (IR) model that attempts to capture the latent semantic relationship between the data items. Mathematical lattices, under the framework of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), represent conceptual hierarchies in data and retrieve the information. However both LSI and FCA uses the data represented in form of matrices. The objective of this paper is to systematically analyze VSM, LSI and FCA for the task of IR using the standard and real life datasets.

0.0059730685 = product of:
  0.029865343 = sum of:
    0.029865343 = product of:
      0.059730686 = sum of:
        0.059730686 = weight(_text_:data in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059730686 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.0059730685 = product of:
  0.029865343 = sum of:
    0.029865343 = product of:
      0.059730686 = sum of:
        0.059730686 = weight(_text_:data in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059730686 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek

0.0049775573 = product of:
  0.024887787 = sum of:
    0.024887787 = product of:
      0.049775574 = sum of:
        0.049775574 = weight(_text_:data in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049775574 = score(doc=5908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek

0.004273333 = product of:
  0.021366665 = sum of:
    0.021366665 = product of:
      0.04273333 = sum of:
        0.04273333 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04273333 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 1.2016 17:47:06

0.004273333 = product of:
  0.021366665 = sum of:
    0.021366665 = product of:
      0.04273333 = sum of:
        0.04273333 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04273333 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 1.2016 17:30:31

0.0042235977 = product of:
  0.021117989 = sum of:
    0.021117989 = product of:
      0.042235978 = sum of:
        0.042235978 = weight(_text_:data in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042235978 = score(doc=5085,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Some possible treatments of incomplete knowledge in conceptual data representation, data analysis and knowledge acquisition are presented. In particular, some ways of conceptual scalings as well as the role of the three-valued KLEENE-logic are briefly investigated. This logic is also one background in attribute exploration, a conceptual tool for knowledge acquisition. For this method a strategy is given to obtain as much of (attribute) implicational knowledge about a given "universe" as possible; and we show how to represent incomplete knowledge in order to be able to pin down the questions still to be answered in order to obtain complete knowledge in this situation

0.003982046 = product of:
  0.01991023 = sum of:
    0.01991023 = product of:
      0.03982046 = sum of:
        0.03982046 = weight(_text_:data in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03982046 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices

0.003982046 = product of:
  0.01991023 = sum of:
    0.01991023 = product of:
      0.03982046 = sum of:
        0.03982046 = weight(_text_:data in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03982046 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

A central consideration in the study of whole language semantic space as encoded in thesauri is word sense comparability. Shows how word sense comparability can be adequately expressed by the logical implications and rules from Formal Concept Analysis. Formal concept analysis, a new approach to formal logic initiated by Rudolf Wille, has been used for data modelling, analysis and interpretation, and also for knowledge representation and knowledge discovery