-
Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999)
0.03
0.02543363 = product of:
0.063584074 = sum of:
0.045269795 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045269795 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.018314283 = product of:
0.036628567 = sum of:
0.036628567 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036628567 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
- Date
- 10. 8.2001 13:22:14
-
Gnoli, C.: Notation (2018)
0.01
0.012804233 = product of:
0.06402116 = sum of:
0.06402116 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06402116 = score(doc=4650,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.
-
Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
-
Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996)
0.00
0.004883809 = product of:
0.024419045 = sum of:
0.024419045 = product of:
0.04883809 = sum of:
0.04883809 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04883809 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
-
Craven, T.C.: Salient node notation (1979)
0.00
0.00348429 = product of:
0.01742145 = sum of:
0.01742145 = product of:
0.0348429 = sum of:
0.0348429 = weight(_text_:data in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348429 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Salient node notation is a technique for decreasing the average length of notation in a classification scheme without sacrficing expressiveness or disturbing the succession of chracteristics of the filing order. Assignment of notation begins at a node of the classification tree other than the root. This salient node may be determined algorithmically, given data on the bias of the collection to be classified, even if only part of the tree has been developed. A dummy value is reserved to indicate upward movement in the tree. The technique is especially applicable to classification schemes for spevialized collections and to facets such as space in which the biases of human existence are especially prominent
-
Satija, M.P.; Comaroni, J.P.: Beyond classification: book numbers (1992)
0.00
0.0024887787 = product of:
0.012443894 = sum of:
0.012443894 = product of:
0.024887787 = sum of:
0.024887787 = weight(_text_:data in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024887787 = score(doc=1470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Kapitel: Book numbers, introduction. - Debate over the usefulness of book numbers. - History of book numbers. - Chronological book numbers. - Biscoe's chronological book numbers. - Brown's extended data table. - Colong book numbers. - Rider's book numbers. - Merrill's book numbers. - Appendices: 1) Chronology of book numbers: 2) Bibliography of 181 references in chronological order
-
Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005)
0.00
0.0024419045 = product of:
0.012209523 = sum of:
0.012209523 = product of:
0.024419045 = sum of:
0.024419045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024419045 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
