-
Bernhardt, R.: Erstellung von Registern (1971)
0.06
0.059585918 = product of:
0.14896479 = sum of:
0.13154334 = weight(_text_:readable in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13154334 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.01742145 = product of:
0.0348429 = sum of:
0.0348429 = weight(_text_:data in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348429 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The paper deals with procedures and problems arising when computers are used as tools in the production of indexes. The following steps of the procedure are explained and studied: 1) Correction of machine-readable records; 2) Production of index entries. Here, various methods and forms (KWIC, KWOC, rotation method) and dictionary use are described and discussed, and information about their advantages and disadvantages is given; 3) Sorting and cumulation of index entries; 4) Output and setting, output feasibilities are detailed. Emphasis is also laid on the problems arising from the non-satisfactory links of the processing chain: data recording, limited fonts, and choice of index terms.
-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.03
0.029672572 = product of:
0.07418143 = sum of:
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.021366665 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04273333 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
Valauskas, E.J.: Indexing magazines with bibliographic software on the Macintosh (1994)
0.02
0.021340387 = product of:
0.10670193 = sum of:
0.10670193 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10670193 = score(doc=8202,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 8202, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8202)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- EndNote Plus bibliographic software was used to create an index to the Apple Library users group Newsletter. Describes the newsletters and examines the software's use as an indexing program. Details how the indexing was carried out, and the creation of thesauri
-
Chisman, J.K.: Creating keyword indexes using PC-File Plus (1991)
0.02
0.015089932 = product of:
0.07544966 = sum of:
0.07544966 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07544966 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the work undertaken at the Owen Science and Engineering Library, Washington State University, to create a keyword index to the National Library of Medicine's Quick Bibliographic Series using the PC-File Plus software
-
Kaskus, M.A.: Indexing in theory and practice (1996)
0.01
0.012071946 = product of:
0.060359728 = sum of:
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=4448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4448)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Sketches the events and people that have impacted on the field of indexing, considering the indexing literature, indexers as information professionals, professional organizations; automatic indexing; and indexing evaluation. Notes on some of the challenges facing indexers, including electronic periodicals which themselves pose a serious challenge in terms of bibliographic description
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.01
0.010033744 = product of:
0.025084361 = sum of:
0.018862415 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018862415 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.10753117 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.006221947 = product of:
0.012443894 = sum of:
0.012443894 = weight(_text_:data in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012443894 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.08734013 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.009767618 = product of:
0.04883809 = sum of:
0.04883809 = product of:
0.09767618 = sum of:
0.09767618 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09767618 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.009767618 = product of:
0.04883809 = sum of:
0.04883809 = product of:
0.09767618 = sum of:
0.09767618 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09767618 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.009767618 = product of:
0.04883809 = sum of:
0.04883809 = product of:
0.09767618 = sum of:
0.09767618 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09767618 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.009767618 = product of:
0.04883809 = sum of:
0.04883809 = product of:
0.09767618 = sum of:
0.09767618 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09767618 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Lipetz, B.-A.: ¬The usefulness of indexes (1989)
0.01
0.0090539595 = product of:
0.045269795 = sum of:
0.045269795 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045269795 = score(doc=812,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In order to enhance indexing as a science and perhaps pave the way for futher advances in indexing technology, it is desirable for those who create indexes to reflect now and then on the fundamental objectives of their work. The concept of usefulness of indexes is discussed, and is shown to be highly subjective. Usefulness depends on the values and motives of the index users or evaluators, and it is not inherent in the index alone. Publishers are a very important class of evaluators of indexes. Publishers' values and motivations deserve the attention of indexers. The low regard that many publishers have shown for indexes as enhancers of book sales and profitability may well have been justified in the past. However, the advent of online bibliographic database services now makes it possible for enterprising publishers to profit by using book indexesfor the secondary, or even alternate, purpose of enhancing online database services and thus attracting new readers and purchasers for books long after their original dates of publication.
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Book and periodical indexing (1994)
0.01
0.0090539595 = product of:
0.045269795 = sum of:
0.045269795 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045269795 = score(doc=8265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 8265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8265)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The indexing of both books and periodicals must fulfill certain basic functions, prescribed by national and international standards. Regarding the requirements of their indexing, verbal texts in the form of books and periodicals form a continuum ranging from books written by a single author (or a small team), books written by multiple authors, encyclopedias, periodical volumes, and articles in periodicals. Problems of indexing policy, indexing language, depth of indexing, author's names, titles, the physical form of indexes, and indexes to single volumes of periodicals and cumulative indexes are discussed. Large bibliographic databases do not use fully automatic indexing systems, which are incapable of fulfilling all basic indexing functions. Rather, they employ teams of indexers supported by automated indexing aids for the execution of clerical tasks, vocabulary control, and other assistance for the intellectual tasks performed by indexers. Electronic journals are unlikely to be indexed because of the instability of their texts. The principal features of verbal texts and their indexes are displayed schematically
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.008546666 = product of:
0.04273333 = sum of:
0.04273333 = product of:
0.08546666 = sum of:
0.08546666 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08546666 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
