Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
lcsh's%3a%22Machine %2f readable bibliographic data%22 1
lcsh's%3a%22Machine %2f readbale bibliographic data%22 1
lcshs%3a%22Machine %2f readable bibliographic data%22 1
lcsh's%3a%22Machine %2f readabie bibliographic data%22 1
lcshs%3a%22Machine %2f readbale bibliographic data%22 1

Green, R.: Semantic types, classes, and instantiation (2006) 0.00
```
0.0029865343 = product of:
  0.014932672 = sum of:
    0.014932672 = product of:
      0.029865343 = sum of:
        0.029865343 = weight(_text_:data in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029865343 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Semantic types provide a level of abstraction over particulars with shared behavior, such as in the participant structure of semantic frames. The paper presents a preliminary investigation, drawing on data from WordNet and FrameNet, into the relationship between hierarchical level and the semantic types that name frame elements (a.k.a. slots). Patterns discovered include: (1) The level of abstraction of a frame is generally matched by the level of abstraction of its frame elements. (2) The roles played by persons tend to be expressed very specifically. (3) Frame elements that mirror the name of the frame tend to be expressed specifically. (4) Some frame participants tend to be expressed at a constant (general) level of abstraction, regardless of the level of abstraction of the overall frame.