Search (8470 results, page 1 of 424)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Gechman, M.C.: Generation and use of machine-readable bibliographic data bases (1972) 0.28
    0.27672628 = product of:
      0.46121043 = sum of:
        0.3006705 = weight(_text_:readable in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3006705 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            1.0861032 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
        0.120719455 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120719455 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
        0.03982046 = product of:
          0.07964092 = sum of:
            0.07964092 = weight(_text_:data in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07964092 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.22
    0.21907313 = product of:
      0.36512187 = sum of:
        0.07156433 = product of:
          0.214693 = sum of:
            0.214693 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.214693 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.214693 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.214693 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.078864545 = sum of:
          0.042235978 = weight(_text_:data in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042235978 = score(doc=562,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04505818 = queryNorm
              0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.036628567 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036628567 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04505818 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Source
    Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
  3. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.18
    0.18402033 = product of:
      0.30670053 = sum of:
        0.11275144 = weight(_text_:readable in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11275144 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
        0.09053959 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09053959 = score(doc=302,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
        0.10340951 = sum of:
          0.06678094 = weight(_text_:data in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06678094 = score(doc=302,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04505818 = queryNorm
              0.46871632 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.036628567 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036628567 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04505818 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.18
    0.180714 = product of:
      0.30119 = sum of:
        0.07156433 = product of:
          0.214693 = sum of:
            0.214693 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.214693 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.214693 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.214693 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.014932672 = product of:
          0.029865343 = sum of:
            0.029865343 = weight(_text_:data in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029865343 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  5. McQueen, J.: Record matching : non-numeric data fields (1993) 0.18
    0.17913924 = product of:
      0.2985654 = sum of:
        0.18791907 = weight(_text_:readable in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18791907 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.67881453 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
        0.07544966 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07544966 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
        0.035196647 = product of:
          0.070393294 = sum of:
            0.070393294 = weight(_text_:data in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070393294 = score(doc=4633,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.49407038 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the matching of machine readable bibliographic records from non numeric data fields such as author/main entry, title, publisher, place, date, physical description and edition. Covers the use of non-numeric fields; database profiles; non-numeric fields and assessing the quality of match
  6. Devadason, F.J.: Common format for machine-readable bibliographic records for India : a proposal (1978) 0.18
    0.17841695 = product of:
      0.4460424 = sum of:
        0.26308668 = weight(_text_:readable in 5539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26308668 = score(doc=5539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.9503403 = fieldWeight in 5539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5539)
        0.18295571 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18295571 = score(doc=5539,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            1.0429969 = fieldWeight in 5539, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5539)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Towards a common bibliographic exchange format? International Symposium on Bibliographic Exchange Formats, Taormina, Sicily, 27-29 April 1978
  7. Dobrovits, P.: Resource sharing and restrospective conversion (1992) 0.17
    0.17295392 = product of:
      0.28825653 = sum of:
        0.18791907 = weight(_text_:readable in 4235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18791907 = score(doc=4235,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.67881453 = fieldWeight in 4235, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4235)
        0.07544966 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07544966 = score(doc=4235,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 4235, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4235)
        0.024887787 = product of:
          0.049775574 = sum of:
            0.049775574 = weight(_text_:data in 4235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049775574 = score(doc=4235,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 4235, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4235)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The creation of an Australian database has been one of the greatest achievements in Australian librarianship. For this to work fully it must contain total holdings of all major Australian libraries. Conversion of library data into machine-readable form and participation in the Australian Bibliographic Network are seen as essential for a nation-wide sharing of library resources
  8. Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships : an empirical study of the LC machine-readable records (1992) 0.17
    0.16855599 = product of:
      0.42138997 = sum of:
        0.3006705 = weight(_text_:readable in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3006705 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            1.0861032 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
        0.120719455 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120719455 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  9. Niu, J.: Hierarchical relationships in the bibliographic universe (2013) 0.16
    0.16023731 = product of:
      0.2670622 = sum of:
        0.13154334 = weight(_text_:readable in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13154334 = score(doc=1950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
        0.11809741 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11809741 = score(doc=1950,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
        0.01742145 = product of:
          0.0348429 = sum of:
            0.0348429 = weight(_text_:data in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348429 = score(doc=1950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The hierarchical relationships among bibliographic entities include whole-part structures and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) hierarchical relationships among works, expression, manifestations, and items. The traditional MARC (Machine Readable Cataloging) format falls short in representing these hierarchical relationships. Based on detailed analyses of these hierarchical relationships and an examination of Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) and Encoded Archival Description (EAD), which are well suited for hierarchical description, the author proposes some features of a new data structure standard named Resource Description Metadata Schema (RDMS). New cataloging practices based on RDMS will bring bibliographic description closer to archival description, and take one step further toward merged descriptive practices for bibliographic and archival materials.
  10. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.15
    0.15267058 = product of:
      0.38167644 = sum of:
        0.09541911 = product of:
          0.28625733 = sum of:
            0.28625733 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28625733 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28625733 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28625733 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  11. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.15
    0.15267058 = product of:
      0.38167644 = sum of:
        0.09541911 = product of:
          0.28625733 = sum of:
            0.28625733 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28625733 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28625733 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28625733 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  12. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.15
    0.15007444 = product of:
      0.3751861 = sum of:
        0.07156433 = product of:
          0.214693 = sum of:
            0.214693 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.214693 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.30362174 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30362174 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  13. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.15
    0.15007444 = product of:
      0.3751861 = sum of:
        0.07156433 = product of:
          0.214693 = sum of:
            0.214693 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.214693 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.30362174 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30362174 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  14. Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009) 0.15
    0.14847405 = product of:
      0.24745674 = sum of:
        0.11275144 = weight(_text_:readable in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11275144 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
        0.11977262 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11977262 = score(doc=3750,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.6828017 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
        0.014932672 = product of:
          0.029865343 = sum of:
            0.029865343 = weight(_text_:data in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029865343 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
  15. Austin, D.: ¬The exchange of subject information (1975) 0.15
    0.1474865 = product of:
      0.3687162 = sum of:
        0.26308668 = weight(_text_:readable in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26308668 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.9503403 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
        0.105629526 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105629526 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    The interchange of bibliographic information in machine readable form. Ed.: R.E. Coward u. M. Yelland
  16. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.15
    0.14710832 = product of:
      0.24518052 = sum of:
        0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15033525 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
        0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060359728 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
        0.03448553 = product of:
          0.06897106 = sum of:
            0.06897106 = weight(_text_:data in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06897106 = score(doc=2996,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  17. Keyser, P.d.: Conversie van bibliografische gegevens (1997) 0.15
    0.14710832 = product of:
      0.24518052 = sum of:
        0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15033525 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
        0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060359728 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
        0.03448553 = product of:
          0.06897106 = sum of:
            0.06897106 = weight(_text_:data in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06897106 = score(doc=96,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Programs for converting bibligraphic data are not only of interest to libraries but also to researchers compiling bibliographies. However, few programs are currently available. In choosing a suitable program care must be taken to ensure that it is capable of identifying and converting all fields likely to be encountered, to the required format. Optical scanning can provide a convenient solution for converting printed output to machine-readable format. Increasing acceptance of standardised formats will facilitate exchange of data
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Conversion of bibliographic data
  18. Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Pt.3: Subject description of machine-readable data files (1982) 0.14
    0.14445807 = product of:
      0.36114517 = sum of:
        0.3189092 = weight(_text_:readable in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3189092 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            1.1519864 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
        0.042235978 = product of:
          0.084471956 = sum of:
            0.084471956 = weight(_text_:data in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084471956 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.5928845 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  19. Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Part 1: a case for incorporating records of machine-readable data files into the public catalog (1981) 0.14
    0.14445807 = product of:
      0.36114517 = sum of:
        0.3189092 = weight(_text_:readable in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3189092 = score(doc=269,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            1.1519864 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
        0.042235978 = product of:
          0.084471956 = sum of:
            0.084471956 = weight(_text_:data in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084471956 = score(doc=269,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.5928845 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  20. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.14
    0.14106841 = product of:
      0.23511402 = sum of:
        0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15033525 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060359728 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505818 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.024419045 = product of:
          0.04883809 = sum of:
            0.04883809 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04883809 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04505818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 288
  • b 36
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications