-
USMARC format for bibliographic data : including guidelines for content designation (1994)
0.19
0.19187355 = product of:
0.31978923 = sum of:
0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15033525 = score(doc=8041,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
0.13496846 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13496846 = score(doc=8041,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.7694304 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
0.03448553 = product of:
0.06897106 = sum of:
0.06897106 = weight(_text_:data in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897106 = score(doc=8041,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Here is the standard for representing and exchanging bibliographic data in machine-readable form in the United States. This comprehensive publication defines the structure of the MARC bibliographic record in full detail. Also defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in USMARC bibliographic records. Includes specifications for a National Level Bibliographic record (both full and minimal). The remaining future format integration changes are specified
-
McQueen, J.: Record matching : non-numeric data fields (1993)
0.18
0.17913924 = product of:
0.2985654 = sum of:
0.18791907 = weight(_text_:readable in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18791907 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.67881453 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
0.07544966 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07544966 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
0.035196647 = product of:
0.070393294 = sum of:
0.070393294 = weight(_text_:data in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070393294 = score(doc=4633,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.49407038 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Discusses the matching of machine readable bibliographic records from non numeric data fields such as author/main entry, title, publisher, place, date, physical description and edition. Covers the use of non-numeric fields; database profiles; non-numeric fields and assessing the quality of match
-
Aluri, R.D.; Kemp, A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (1991)
0.18
0.1773388 = product of:
0.29556465 = sum of:
0.18603037 = weight(_text_:readable in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18603037 = score(doc=863,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.67199206 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
0.074691355 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074691355 = score(doc=863,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
0.0348429 = product of:
0.0696858 = sum of:
0.0696858 = weight(_text_:data in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0696858 = score(doc=863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- LCSH
- Subject cataloguing / Data processing
Machine / readable bibliographic data
- Subject
- Subject cataloguing / Data processing
Machine / readable bibliographic data
-
Dobrovits, P.: Resource sharing and restrospective conversion (1992)
0.17
0.17295392 = product of:
0.28825653 = sum of:
0.18791907 = weight(_text_:readable in 4235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18791907 = score(doc=4235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.67881453 = fieldWeight in 4235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4235)
0.07544966 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07544966 = score(doc=4235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 4235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4235)
0.024887787 = product of:
0.049775574 = sum of:
0.049775574 = weight(_text_:data in 4235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049775574 = score(doc=4235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 4235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4235)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The creation of an Australian database has been one of the greatest achievements in Australian librarianship. For this to work fully it must contain total holdings of all major Australian libraries. Conversion of library data into machine-readable form and participation in the Australian Bibliographic Network are seen as essential for a nation-wide sharing of library resources
-
Setting the record straight : understanding the MARC format (1993)
0.17
0.17110594 = product of:
0.28517655 = sum of:
0.19529122 = weight(_text_:readable in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19529122 = score(doc=2327,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.70544475 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
0.06402116 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06402116 = score(doc=2327,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
0.025864149 = product of:
0.051728297 = sum of:
0.051728297 = weight(_text_:data in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051728297 = score(doc=2327,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- MARC is an acronym for Machine Readable Catalogue or Cataloguing. This general description, howcver, is rather misleading as MARC is neither a kind of catalogue nor a method of cataloguing. In fact, MARC is a Standardformat for representing bibliographic information for handling by computer. While the MARC format was primarily designed to serve the needs of libraries, the concept has since been embraced by the wider information community as a convenient way of storing and exchanging bibliographic data. The original MARC format was developed at the Library of Congress in 1965-6 leading to a pilot project, known as MARC I, which had the aim of investigating the feasibility of producing machine-readable catalogue data. Similar work was in progress in the United Kingdom whcre the Council of the British National Bibliography had set up the BNB MARC Project with the rennt of examining the use of machine-readable data in producing the printed British National Bibliography (BNB). These parallel developments led to Anglo-American co-operation an the MARC 11 project which was initiated in 1968. MARC II was to prove instrumental in defining the concept of MARC as a communications format.
-
Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships : an empirical study of the LC machine-readable records (1992)
0.17
0.16855599 = product of:
0.42138997 = sum of:
0.3006705 = weight(_text_:readable in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3006705 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
1.0861032 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
0.120719455 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120719455 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
-
Taylor, M.; Winstanley, B.: Bibliographic control of computer files : the feasibility of a union catalogue of computer files (1990)
0.17
0.16668041 = product of:
0.27780068 = sum of:
0.18603037 = weight(_text_:readable in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18603037 = score(doc=832,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.67199206 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.03895555 = product of:
0.0779111 = sum of:
0.0779111 = weight(_text_:data in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0779111 = score(doc=832,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Describes a project based at the ESRC Data Archive, Esses University to examine standards for cataloguing computer files and the feasibility of creating a union catalogue of computer files. A pilot scheme was set up to enable the MARC record output of the ESRC Data Archive to be merged with the software records of the NISS (National Information on Software and Services) data base, which is available on the JANET network.
- LCSH
- Cataloging of machine / readable data files
- Subject
- Cataloging of machine / readable data files
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992)
0.15
0.14710832 = product of:
0.24518052 = sum of:
0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15033525 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.03448553 = product of:
0.06897106 = sum of:
0.06897106 = weight(_text_:data in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897106 = score(doc=2996,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
-
Keyser, P.d.: Conversie van bibliografische gegevens (1997)
0.15
0.14710832 = product of:
0.24518052 = sum of:
0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15033525 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
0.03448553 = product of:
0.06897106 = sum of:
0.06897106 = weight(_text_:data in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897106 = score(doc=96,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Programs for converting bibligraphic data are not only of interest to libraries but also to researchers compiling bibliographies. However, few programs are currently available. In choosing a suitable program care must be taken to ensure that it is capable of identifying and converting all fields likely to be encountered, to the required format. Optical scanning can provide a convenient solution for converting printed output to machine-readable format. Increasing acceptance of standardised formats will facilitate exchange of data
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Conversion of bibliographic data
-
Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990)
0.14
0.13836314 = product of:
0.23060521 = sum of:
0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15033525 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.01991023 = product of:
0.03982046 = sum of:
0.03982046 = weight(_text_:data in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03982046 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of research designed to explore the feasibility of automatically deriving name access points from machine readable title pages of English language monographs. Results show that approximately 88% of the access points selected by the Library of Congress or the National Library of Medicine could be automatically derived from title page data. These results have implications for the design of bibliographic standards and on-line catalogues.
-
Barry, R.K.: ¬The role of character sets in library automation : the development of 8 bit sets and Unicode (1997)
0.14
0.13836314 = product of:
0.23060521 = sum of:
0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15033525 = score(doc=7891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=7891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
0.01991023 = product of:
0.03982046 = sum of:
0.03982046 = weight(_text_:data in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03982046 = score(doc=7891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Offers a basic understanding of coded character sets in machine readable data with a particular focus on their role in library automation. Discusses character sets in general and assesses the many 8-bit character sets now in use and the impact of the development of universal (16 bit character set) Unicode. Considers parallels with the development of alphabets
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 26(1997) no.1, S.14-17
-
Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996)
0.14
0.13621907 = product of:
0.22703177 = sum of:
0.13154334 = weight(_text_:readable in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13154334 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.042673662 = product of:
0.085347325 = sum of:
0.085347325 = weight(_text_:data in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085347325 = score(doc=5578,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.59902847 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
-
Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997)
0.13
0.1347309 = product of:
0.2245515 = sum of:
0.11275144 = weight(_text_:readable in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11275144 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.07840959 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07840959 = score(doc=131,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.03339047 = product of:
0.06678094 = sum of:
0.06678094 = weight(_text_:data in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06678094 = score(doc=131,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.46871632 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
-
Masevich, A.C.; Zakharov, V.P.: ¬The role of a machine-readable format in planning an electronic catalogue in the two largest libraries of Saint Petersburg (1995)
0.13
0.126417 = product of:
0.31604248 = sum of:
0.22550288 = weight(_text_:readable in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22550288 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.8145774 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.09053959 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09053959 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.1, S.10-12
-
Simmons, P.: Preserving compatibility with standard data formats (1994)
0.13
0.12539746 = product of:
0.20899576 = sum of:
0.13154334 = weight(_text_:readable in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13154334 = score(doc=7129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7129)
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=7129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7129)
0.024637653 = product of:
0.049275305 = sum of:
0.049275305 = weight(_text_:data in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049275305 = score(doc=7129,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Librarians in countries without well-established national bibliographic systems increasingly find themselves faced with the problem of establishing local formats for machine-readable cataloguing and for referral data. Often they lack the background and the resources - especially trained staff - either to adopt an existing MARC format or to develop their own. Such international formats as UNIMARC and CCF, despite widespread international use, present problems of their own; MARC formats are not practical for agencies that do not follow standard cataloguing rules, and CCF offers little guidance to agencies wishing to adopt it for local use. A number of techniques useful in adapting and implementing international and national standard formats are presented, with some guidelines for preserving compatibility with standards
-
Ojedokun, A.A.: CD-MARC bibliographic databases as an alternative to other information sources : cataloguers' evaluation of the use of LC CD-MARC at Kenneth Dike Library, University of Ibadan, Nigeria (1996)
0.12
0.12106774 = product of:
0.20177956 = sum of:
0.13154334 = weight(_text_:readable in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13154334 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.01742145 = product of:
0.0348429 = sum of:
0.0348429 = weight(_text_:data in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348429 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The LoC compact disc machine readable catalogue (LC CD-MARC or simple CD-MARC) was recently acquired by the Kenneth Dike Library. Its use by the cataloguing staff was evaluated in terms of efficiency (effect on cataloguing time) and effectiveness (effect on monthly output) when compared with using other information sources such as microfiches, CIP data and printed sources: LCSH; LoC NUC; and LC monographic series. The positive influence of the new technology was evident as there were reductions in cataloguing time and increases in monthly output of items catalogued
-
Treadwell, W.; Cogswell, J.A.: ¬The machine readable data center : a model approach to data services in academic research libraries (1994)
0.12
0.12008351 = product of:
0.30020878 = sum of:
0.2603883 = weight(_text_:readable in 7721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2603883 = score(doc=7721,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.940593 = fieldWeight in 7721, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7721)
0.03982046 = product of:
0.07964092 = sum of:
0.07964092 = weight(_text_:data in 7721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07964092 = score(doc=7721,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 7721, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The University of Minnesota Libraries have established a full-service information center to facilitate end-user access to machine-readable datafiles, particularly US government datafiles such as the Census. The Machine Readable Data Center (MRDC), funded through a three-year, $240.000 grant from the College Library Technology and Cooperation Grants Program (HEA Title II-D), presents an alternative, library-centered model for providing students, faculty, and independent researchers with direct access to machine-readbale data
-
Salton, G.; Allen, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine-readable data (1994)
0.12
0.119171835 = product of:
0.29792958 = sum of:
0.26308668 = weight(_text_:readable in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26308668 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.9503403 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.0348429 = product of:
0.0696858 = sum of:
0.0696858 = weight(_text_:data in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0696858 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬A citation comparison of sourcebooks for audiovisuals to AVLINE records : access and the chief source of information (1994)
0.12
0.11873435 = product of:
0.19789058 = sum of:
0.11275144 = weight(_text_:readable in 8167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11275144 = score(doc=8167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 8167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8167)
0.06402116 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06402116 = score(doc=8167,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 8167, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8167)
0.021117989 = product of:
0.042235978 = sum of:
0.042235978 = weight(_text_:data in 8167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042235978 = score(doc=8167,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 8167, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8167)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Audiovisual materials present special difficulties for cataloguers by virtue of the fact that they must display the materials and take the cataloguing information from the title screens which may be inconsistent with data on the labels. The chief source cataloguing concept for audiovisual materials was examined through a comparison of citations from fully catalogued audiovisual records and their corresponding citations from bibliographic sourcebooks. A complete printout was taken of all AVLINE (National Library of Medicine's Audiovisual Online Catalog) records for videocassettes, slides and software. The comparison revealed much similarity with title and other title information, however, series, producer, credits, and dates were more completely described in the fully catalogued records than in the sourcebook citation. There was no evidence to support cataloguing using only eye readable materials. Cataloguing using the chief source of information consistently provides more bibliographic data
-
Beiser, K.: Library of Congress resources on CD-ROM (1995)
0.12
0.1178484 = product of:
0.294621 = sum of:
0.18791907 = weight(_text_:readable in 1845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18791907 = score(doc=1845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.67881453 = fieldWeight in 1845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1845)
0.10670193 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10670193 = score(doc=1845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 1845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1845)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reviews 2 CD-ROM products form the LoC. CDMARC Bibliographic is a multidisc collection of all machine readable cataloguing records distributed by the LoC since 1969, regardless of language or form of material. Cataloger's Desktop is a Windows based CD-ROM featuring full text access to a variety of referecne materials helpful in cataloguing materials
- Object
- CDMARC Bibliographic
