Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Schloegl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Impact and relevance of LIS journals : a scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey (2004) 0.02 
    0.019121442 = product of:
  0.08604649 = sum of:
    0.02817892 = weight(_text_:data in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02817892 = score(doc=5249,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.24204408 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
    0.057867568 = weight(_text_:germany in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057867568 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.26355398 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    The goal of the scientometric analysis presented in this article was to investigate international and regional (i.e., German-language) periodicals in the field of library and information science (LIS). This was done by means of a citation analysis and a reader survey. For the citation analysis, impact factor, citing half-life, number of references per article, and the rate of self-references of a periodical were used as indicators. In addition, the leading LIS periodicals were mapped. For the 40 international periodicals, data were collected from ISI's Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports (JCR); the citations of the 10 German-language journals were counted manually (overall 1,494 source articles with 10,520 citations). Altogether, the empirical base of the citation analysis consisted of nearly 90,000 citations in 6,203 source articles that were published between 1997 and 2000. The expert survey investigated reading frequency, applicability of the journals to the job of the reader, publication frequency, and publication preference both for all respondents and for different groups among them (practitioners vs. scientists, librarians vs. documentalists vs. LIS scholars, public sector vs. information industry vs. other private company employees). The study was conducted in spring 2002. A total of 257 questionnaires were returned by information specialists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Having both citation and readership data, we performed a comparative analysis of these two data sets. This enabled us to identify answers to questions like: Does reading behavior correlate with the journal impact factor? Do readers prefer journals with a short or a long half-life, or with a low or a high number of references? Is there any difference in this matter among librarians, documentalists, and LIS scholars?
  2. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Medizininformationen : Literaturnachweise, Volltexte und klinische Entscheidungen aus einer Hand (2004) 0.01 
    0.011252028 = product of:
  0.10126825 = sum of:
    0.10126825 = weight(_text_:germany in 3288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10126825 = score(doc=3288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.46121946 = fieldWeight in 3288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3288)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Ovid Technologies speist sich aus unterschiedlichen Unternehmensgeschichten; die Erfahrungen von BRS, SilverPlatter, Ovid und Wolters-Kluwer ergänzen sich in den derzeit betriebenen zwei Plattformen Ovid und SilverPlatter. Ovid spricht vor allem praktizierende wie forschende Spezialisten in der medizinisch-biowissenschaftlichen Sparte an, während SilverPlatter eher auf den gesamten akademischen Betrieb abzielt. Wir konzentrieren uns in diesem Artikel auf die Ovid-Plattform und vernachlässigen SilverPlatter. Das Interessante an Ovid ist die Einheit von bibliographischen Nachweisdaten, Volltexten und praxisrelevanten klinischen Entscheidungshilfen. U.E. lohnt die Retrievaloberfläche von Ovid und die hier praktizierte durchgehende Verlinkung von Nachweisen und Volltexten und von Volltexten untereinander einer näheren Betrachtung. Unsere Ergebnisse stützen sich auf den Fragebogen, Gespräche mit Jens Gräßler, National Sales Manager Germany, vom deutschen Ovid-Büro in Berlin sowie auf Tests im März und im April 2004.
  3. Stock, W.G.: Concepts and semantic relations in information science (2010) 0.01 
    0.008037162 = product of:
  0.07233446 = sum of:
    0.07233446 = weight(_text_:germany in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07233446 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.32944247 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Concept-based information retrieval and knowledge representation are in need of a theory of concepts and semantic relations. Guidelines for the construction and maintenance of knowledge organization systems (KOS) (such as ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005 in the U.S.A. or DIN 2331:1980 in Germany) do not consider results of concept theory and theory of relations to the full extent. They are not able to unify the currently different worlds of traditional controlled vocabularies, of the social web (tagging and folksonomies) and of the semantic web (ontologies). Concept definitions as well as semantic relations are based on epistemological theories (empiricism, rationalism, hermeneutics, pragmatism, and critical theory). A concept is determined via its intension and extension as well as by definition. We will meet the problem of vagueness by introducing prototypes. Some important definitions are concept explanations (after Aristotle) and the definition of family resemblances (in the sense of Wittgenstein). We will model concepts as frames (according to Barsalou). The most important paradigmatic relation in KOS is hierarchy, which must be arranged into different classes: Hyponymy consists of taxonomy and simple hyponymy, meronymy consists of many different part-whole-relations. For practical application purposes, the transitivity of the given relation is very important. Unspecific associative relations are of little help to our focused applications and should be replaced by generalizable and domain-specific relations. We will discuss the reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity of paradigmatic relations as well as the appearance of specific semantic relations in the different kinds of KOS (folksonomies, nomenclatures, classification systems, thesauri, and ontologies). Finally, we will pick out KOS as a central theme of the Semantic Web.
  4. Garfield, E.; Paris, S.W.; Stock, W.G.: HistCite(TM) : a software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage (2006) 0.00 
    0.004795129 = product of:
  0.04315616 = sum of:
    0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04315616 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    HistCite(TM) is a software tool for analyzing and visualizing direct citation linkages between scientific papers. Its inputs are bibliographic records (with cited references) from "Web of Knowledge" or other sources. Its outputs are various tables and graphs with informetric indicators about the knowledge domain under study. As an example we analyze informetrically the literature about Alexius Meinong, an Austrian philosopher and psychologist. The article shortly discusses the informetric functionality of "Web of Knowledge" and shows broadly the possibilities that HistCite offers to its users (e.g. scientists, scientometricans and science journalists).
  5. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.00 
    0.0044340813 = product of:
  0.03990673 = sum of:
    0.03990673 = product of:
      0.07981346 = sum of:
        0.07981346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07981346 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  6. Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995) 0.00 
    0.0044340813 = product of:
  0.03990673 = sum of:
    0.03990673 = product of:
      0.07981346 = sum of:
        0.07981346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07981346 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
  7. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.00 
    0.0044340813 = product of:
  0.03990673 = sum of:
    0.03990673 = product of:
      0.07981346 = sum of:
        0.07981346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07981346 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  8. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Intellectual property information : A comparative analysis of main information providers (2006) 0.00 
    0.0041101105 = product of:
  0.036990993 = sum of:
    0.036990993 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036990993 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).
  9. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.00 
    0.0038798207 = product of:
  0.034918386 = sum of:
    0.034918386 = product of:
      0.06983677 = sum of:
        0.06983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06983677 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  10. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981) 0.00 
    0.0031634374 = product of:
  0.028470935 = sum of:
    0.028470935 = weight(_text_:data in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028470935 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results
  11. Gremm, J.; Barth, J.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Stock, W.G.: Transitioning towards knowledge society : Qatar as a case study (2018) 0.00 
    0.0031634374 = product of:
  0.028470935 = sum of:
    0.028470935 = weight(_text_:data in 4251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028470935 = score(doc=4251,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 4251, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4251)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    The book offers a critical evaluation of Qatar's path from oil- and gas-based industries to a knowledge-based economy. This book gives basic information about the region and the country, including the geographic and demographic data, the culture, the politics and the economy, the health care conditions and the education system. It introduces the concepts of knowledge society and knowledge-based development and adds factual details about Qatar by interpreting indicators of the development status.
  12. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.0027713005 = product of:
  0.024941705 = sum of:
    0.024941705 = product of:
      0.04988341 = sum of:
        0.04988341 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04988341 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  13. Stock, W.G.: Informationswirtschaft : Management externen Wissens (2000) 0.00 
    0.0027115175 = product of:
  0.024403658 = sum of:
    0.024403658 = weight(_text_:data in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024403658 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: (1) Informationswirtschaft in der Informationsgesellschaft (2) Informationen und Informationskanäle (3) Hilfsmittel der Wirtschaftsdokumentation: Klassifikation und Thesaurus (4) Retrieval von elektronischen Informationen: Techniken und Strategien (5) Data Mining bei externen Informationen (6) Automatische Indexierung (7) Suchen und Browsen im World Wide Web (8) Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Informationen: Literaturnachweise und Volltexte (9) Ergebnisse der Marktforschung (10) Wirtschaftsnachrichten: Agenturmeldungen - Zeitungen - Newsletter - Pressearchive (11) Betriebswirtschaftliche Unternehmensinformationen (12) Ausschreibungen und Geschäftsanbahnungen (13) 'Selbstdarstellungen' von Unternehmen: Geschäftsberichte und Homepages (14) Gesetze und Urteile (15) Gewerbliche Schutzrechte als Wirtschaftsinformationen: Patente, Gebrauchsmuster, Marken, Geschmacksmuster (16) Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaktivitäten von Unternehmen (17) Personenbezogene Informationen in Datenbanken (18) Wirtschaftsstatistische Zeitreihen (19) Integration externer Informationen in das betriebliche Informationssystem (20) Fallstudien
  14. Stock, W.G.: Elektronische Informationsdienstleistungen und ihre Bedeutung für Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft (1995) 0.00 
    0.0025564434 = product of:
  0.02300799 = sum of:
    0.02300799 = weight(_text_:data in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02300799 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.19762816 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    LCSH
    Electronic data processing
    Subject
    Electronic data processing
  15. Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011) 0.00 
    0.0022595983 = product of:
  0.020336384 = sum of:
    0.020336384 = weight(_text_:data in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020336384 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The object of this empirical research study is emotion, as depicted and aroused in videos. This paper seeks to answer the questions: Are users able to index such emotions consistently? Are the users' votes usable for emotional video retrieval? Design/methodology/approach - The authors worked with a controlled vocabulary for nine basic emotions (love, happiness, fun, surprise, desire, sadness, anger, disgust and fear), a slide control for adjusting the emotions' intensity, and the approach of broad folksonomies. Different users tagged the same videos. The test persons had the task of indexing the emotions of 20 videos (reprocessed clips from YouTube). The authors distinguished between emotions which were depicted in the video and those that were evoked in the user. Data were received from 776 participants and a total of 279,360 slide control values were analyzed. Findings - The consistency of the users' votes is very high; the tag distributions for the particular videos' emotions are stable. The final shape of the distributions will be reached by the tagging activities of only very few users (less than 100). By applying the approach of power tags it is possible to separate the pivotal emotions of every document - if indeed there is any feeling at all. Originality/value - This paper is one of the first steps in the new research area of emotional information retrieval (EmIR). To the authors' knowledge, it is the first research project into the collective indexing of emotions in videos.
  16. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011) 0.00 
    0.0022170406 = product of:
  0.019953365 = sum of:
    0.019953365 = product of:
      0.03990673 = sum of:
        0.03990673 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03990673 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    23. 9.2010 11:15:22
  17. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.00 
    0.0019399103 = product of:
  0.017459193 = sum of:
    0.017459193 = product of:
      0.034918386 = sum of:
        0.034918386 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034918386 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
  18. Stock, W.G.: Information Retrieval : Informationen suchen und finden (2007) 0.00 
    0.0019173326 = product of:
  0.017255994 = sum of:
    0.017255994 = weight(_text_:data in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017255994 = score(doc=1851,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.14822112 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Classification
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
    RVK
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
  19. Stock, W.G.; Schlögl, C.: Practitioners and academics as authors and readers : the case of LIS journals (2008) 0.00 
    0.0018076785 = product of:
  0.016269106 = sum of:
    0.016269106 = weight(_text_:data in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016269106 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036818076 = queryNorm
        0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between practitioners and academics in scholarly communication in library and information science (LIS) journals. Design/methodology/approach - The research is based on a reader survey, a citation analysis and an editor survey. The reader survey identifies both differences in journal rankings between practitioners and academics and the contribution of practitioners to LIS journals. The editor survey provides the proportions of practitioners and academics for the journals. The citation analysis shows the disparities in information exchange between the journals mainly preferred by practitioners and those more favoured by academics. Furthermore, it is possible to explore if practitioner journals differ from academic journals in the citation indicators and in other data collected in the editor survey. Findings - It is found that: practitioners play an active role both as readers and as authors of articles in LIS journals; there is only a low level of information exchange between practitioner and academic journals; the placement of advertisements, the size of the editorial board, requirements concerning an extensive bibliography, the number and the half-life of the references show a clear distinction between practitioner and academic journals. Interestingly, the impact factor did not turn out to be a good indicator to differentiate a practitioner from an academic journal. Research limitations/implications - This research is only exploratory because it is based on separate studies previously conducted. Further research is also needed to explore the relationship between practitioners and academics more deeply. Originality/value - The value of this paper lies in bringing together the findings from complementary studies (reader survey, editor survey and citation analysis) and identifying hypotheses for future research, especially with regards to the roles of and interactions between LIS practitioners and academics in scholarly communication.
  20. Stock, W.G.: Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen : Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013856502 = product of:
  0.012470853 = sum of:
    0.012470853 = product of:
      0.024941705 = sum of:
        0.024941705 = weight(_text_:22 in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024941705 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Password. 2000, H.5, S.22-31

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 14
  • e 8

Types

  • a 16
  • m 6

Themes

Subjects

Classifications