-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.10
0.10473203 = product of:
0.23564707 = sum of:
0.0921318 = weight(_text_:readable in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0921318 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.073981985 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073981985 = score(doc=302,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.054568242 = weight(_text_:data in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054568242 = score(doc=302,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.46871632 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.014965023 = product of:
0.029930046 = sum of:
0.029930046 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029930046 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Münnich, M.: REUSE or rule harmonization : just a project? (2000)
0.09
0.087519616 = product of:
0.19691913 = sum of:
0.053391904 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053391904 = score(doc=192,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.3724989 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.028759988 = weight(_text_:data in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028759988 = score(doc=192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.102296375 = weight(_text_:germany in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102296375 = score(doc=192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.46590203 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.012470853 = product of:
0.024941705 = sum of:
0.024941705 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024941705 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- German academic libraries acquire a large number of books from British and American publishers. The bibliographic records of the Library of Congress and the British National Bibliography are offered in most German library networks. Thus, projects REUSE and REUSE+ were undertaken when there was a demand for harmonization of Germany cataloging rules with AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules). Experts in the United States and Germany systematically analyzed bibliographic data and compared the codes on which the data were based. Major and minor differences in cataloging rules were identified. The REUSE group proposed German participation in international authority files and changes in RAK, the German cataloging rules. In REUSE+ the different types of hierarchical bibliographic structures in USMARC and MAB2 and other German formats were analyzed. The German project group made suggestions concerning both the German formats and the USMARC format. Steps toward rule alignment and harmonization of online requirements were made when the German Cataloging Rules Conference made decisions on resolutions prepared by the Working Groups on Descriptive Cataloging that dealt with titles, encoding of form titles and conference terms, prefixes in names, hierarchies, entries under persons and corporate bodies, and the conceptual basis of RAK2 in the context of harmonization. Although problems remain, German rule makers have made progress toward internationality.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Taylor, M.; Winstanley, B.: Bibliographic control of computer files : the feasibility of a union catalogue of computer files (1990)
0.09
0.08627628 = product of:
0.25882882 = sum of:
0.15200971 = weight(_text_:readable in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15200971 = score(doc=832,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.67199206 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315616 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.063662946 = weight(_text_:data in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063662946 = score(doc=832,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Describes a project based at the ESRC Data Archive, Esses University to examine standards for cataloguing computer files and the feasibility of creating a union catalogue of computer files. A pilot scheme was set up to enable the MARC record output of the ESRC Data Archive to be merged with the software records of the NISS (National Information on Software and Services) data base, which is available on the JANET network.
- LCSH
- Cataloging of machine / readable data files
- Subject
- Cataloging of machine / readable data files
-
Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: Bibliographic information organization in the Semantic Web (2013)
0.08
0.080413505 = product of:
0.2412405 = sum of:
0.10857837 = weight(_text_:readable in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10857837 = score(doc=2143,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.47999436 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
0.0871886 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0871886 = score(doc=2143,freq=16.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
0.04547354 = weight(_text_:data in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04547354 = score(doc=2143,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.39059696 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- New technologies will underpin the future generation of library catalogues. To facilitate their role providing information, serving users, and fulfilling their mission as cultural heritage and memory institutions, libraries must take a technological leap; their standards and services must be transformed to those of the Semantic Web. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web explores the technologies that may power future library catalogues, and argues the necessity of such a leap. The text introduces international bibliographic standards and models, and fundamental concepts in their representation in the context of the Semantic Web. Subsequent chapters cover bibliographic information organization, linked open data, methodologies for publishing library metadata, discussion of the wider environment (museum, archival and publishing communities) and users, followed by a conclusion.
- LCSH
- Machine / readable bibliographic data
- RSWK
- Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
Bibliografische Daten / Semantic Web / Metadaten / Linked Data
- Subject
- Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
Bibliografische Daten / Semantic Web / Metadaten / Linked Data
Machine / readable bibliographic data
-
Niu, J.: Hierarchical relationships in the bibliographic universe (2013)
0.08
0.07748605 = product of:
0.23245814 = sum of:
0.1074871 = weight(_text_:readable in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1074871 = score(doc=1950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
0.09650011 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09650011 = score(doc=1950,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
0.028470935 = weight(_text_:data in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028470935 = score(doc=1950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The hierarchical relationships among bibliographic entities include whole-part structures and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) hierarchical relationships among works, expression, manifestations, and items. The traditional MARC (Machine Readable Cataloging) format falls short in representing these hierarchical relationships. Based on detailed analyses of these hierarchical relationships and an examination of Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) and Encoded Archival Description (EAD), which are well suited for hierarchical description, the author proposes some features of a new data structure standard named Resource Description Metadata Schema (RDMS). New cataloging practices based on RDMS will bring bibliographic description closer to archival description, and take one step further toward merged descriptive practices for bibliographic and archival materials.
-
Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Pt.3: Subject description of machine-readable data files (1982)
0.07
0.07324712 = product of:
0.32961205 = sum of:
0.26058808 = weight(_text_:readable in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26058808 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
1.1519864 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.069023974 = weight(_text_:data in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069023974 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5928845 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
-
Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Part 1: a case for incorporating records of machine-readable data files into the public catalog (1981)
0.07
0.07324712 = product of:
0.32961205 = sum of:
0.26058808 = weight(_text_:readable in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26058808 = score(doc=269,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
1.1519864 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
0.069023974 = weight(_text_:data in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069023974 = score(doc=269,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5928845 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
-
Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009)
0.07
0.071468145 = product of:
0.21440443 = sum of:
0.0921318 = weight(_text_:readable in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0921318 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
0.097868964 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097868964 = score(doc=3750,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6828017 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
0.024403658 = weight(_text_:data in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024403658 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
-
Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997)
0.07
0.07025678 = product of:
0.21077032 = sum of:
0.0921318 = weight(_text_:readable in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0921318 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.06407028 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06407028 = score(doc=131,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.054568242 = weight(_text_:data in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054568242 = score(doc=131,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.46871632 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
-
Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009)
0.07
0.07025678 = product of:
0.21077032 = sum of:
0.0921318 = weight(_text_:readable in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0921318 = score(doc=2279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.06407028 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06407028 = score(doc=2279,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.054568242 = weight(_text_:data in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054568242 = score(doc=2279,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.46871632 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
-
Dodd, S.A.: Cataloging machine-readable data files : an interpretive manual (1982)
0.07
0.069058046 = product of:
0.3107612 = sum of:
0.2456848 = weight(_text_:readable in 4176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2456848 = score(doc=4176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
1.0861032 = fieldWeight in 4176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4176)
0.065076426 = weight(_text_:data in 4176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065076426 = score(doc=4176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 4176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4176)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
-
Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990)
0.07
0.06823398 = product of:
0.20470193 = sum of:
0.1228424 = weight(_text_:readable in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1228424 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.049321324 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049321324 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.032538213 = weight(_text_:data in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032538213 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of research designed to explore the feasibility of automatically deriving name access points from machine readable title pages of English language monographs. Results show that approximately 88% of the access points selected by the Library of Congress or the National Library of Medicine could be automatically derived from title page data. These results have implications for the design of bibliographic standards and on-line catalogues.
-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.07
0.06638454 = product of:
0.1991536 = sum of:
0.1228424 = weight(_text_:readable in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1228424 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.05635784 = weight(_text_:data in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05635784 = score(doc=4431,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.019953365 = product of:
0.03990673 = sum of:
0.03990673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03990673 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014)
0.06
0.064272106 = product of:
0.19281632 = sum of:
0.036990993 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036990993 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.069023974 = weight(_text_:data in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069023974 = score(doc=1589,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5928845 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.08680135 = weight(_text_:germany in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08680135 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.39533097 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
Wallheim, H.: From complex reality to formal description : bibliographic relationships and problems of operationalization in RDA (2016)
0.06
0.06363575 = product of:
0.19090724 = sum of:
0.1074871 = weight(_text_:readable in 5121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1074871 = score(doc=5121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.47517014 = fieldWeight in 5121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5121)
0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315616 = score(doc=5121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5121)
0.040263984 = weight(_text_:data in 5121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040263984 = score(doc=5121,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 5121, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5121)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Resource Description and Access (RDA) provides a system of instructions for recording relationships between resources by means of a controlled vocabulary of relationship designators. This article examines the system and a selection of relationship designators, focusing especially on whether the designators are defined in operationally satisfactory ways. The designators are compared to corresponding categories in literary theorist Gérard Genette's taxonomy of intertextual relationships. The analysis shows that although some of the selected designators are satisfactorily operationalized, most are not. A fundamental problem is that the emphasis is on how to record machine-readable data, not on how this data reflects reality.
-
Putz, M.; Schaffner, V.; Seidler, W.: FRBR: The MAB2 Perspective (2012)
0.06
0.0615628 = product of:
0.18468839 = sum of:
0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315616 = score(doc=1909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.040263984 = weight(_text_:data in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040263984 = score(doc=1909,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.10126825 = weight(_text_:germany in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10126825 = score(doc=1909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.46121946 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- FRBRizing legacy data has been a subject to research since the FRBR model was published in 1998. Studies were mainly conducted for MARC21, but in Austria MAB2, a data format based on the rules for descriptive cataloguing in academic libraries, mainly in Germany and Austria, is still in use. The implementation of Primo, an Ex Libris software, made research in FRBRizing MAB2 records necessary as Primo offers the possibility of building FRBR-groups by clustering different manifestations of a work. The first steps of FRBRizing bibliographic records in MAB2 at the Vienna University Library and the challenges in this context are highlighted in this paper.
-
Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging of machine-readable data files : Part 2: a practical application of the developing principles (1981)
0.06
0.060425792 = product of:
0.27191606 = sum of:
0.2149742 = weight(_text_:readable in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2149742 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.9503403 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
0.05694187 = weight(_text_:data in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05694187 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
-
Condron, L.; Tittemore, C.P.: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2004)
0.06
0.0603096 = product of:
0.1809288 = sum of:
0.076776505 = weight(_text_:readable in 5654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076776505 = score(doc=5654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.33940727 = fieldWeight in 5654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5654)
0.068928644 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068928644 = score(doc=5654,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.480894 = fieldWeight in 5654, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5654)
0.035223648 = weight(_text_:data in 5654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035223648 = score(doc=5654,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.30255508 = fieldWeight in 5654, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5654)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This article provides information on World Wide Web resources that would help catalogers understand the implications of the documents Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), a report of the International Federation of Library Associations Study Group, completed in September 1997. The Online Computer Library Center Office of Research has carried out a number of experiments to assess methods for the WorldCat database. The reports help explain the implications of FRBR concepts for a database such as WorldCat or for one's library catalog. The Research Libraries Group (RLG) has also been experimenting with FRBR concepts as part of the RedLightGreen project. This document, Mining the Catalog, includes a section Delivering the Goods, which includes a description of the group's work with FRBR concepts in a test subset of the RLG Bibliographic Database. The FRBR Display Tool link leads to a download page for the tool. This tool transforms the bibliographic data found in machine-readable cataloguing record files into meaningful by grouping the bibliographic data into the Work, Expression and Manifestation FRBR concepts. By experimenting with the FRBR Display Tool, librarians can see actual displays of library catalog data arranged in the manner described in the publication Displays for Multiple Versions From MARC 21 and FRBR.
-
Chandrakar, R.: Mapping CCF to MARC21 : an experimental approach (2001)
0.06
0.060201913 = product of:
0.18060574 = sum of:
0.0921318 = weight(_text_:readable in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0921318 = score(doc=5437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
0.06407028 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06407028 = score(doc=5437,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
0.024403658 = weight(_text_:data in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024403658 = score(doc=5437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this article is to raise and address a number of issues pertaining to the conversion of Common Communication Format (CCF) into MARC21. In this era of global resource sharing, exchange of bibliographic records from one system to another is imperative in today's library communities. Instead of using a single standard to create machine-readable catalogue records, more than 20 standards have emerged and are being used by different institutions. Because of these variations in standards, sharing of resources and transfer of data from one system to another among the institutions locally and globally has become a significant problem. Addressing this problem requires keeping in mind that countries such as India and others in southeast Asia are using the CCF as a standard for creating bibliographic cataloguing records. This paper describes a way to map the bibliographic catalogue records from CCF to MARC21, although 100% mapping is not possible. In addition, the paper describes an experimental approach that enumerates problems that may occur during the mapping of records/exchanging of records and how these problems can be overcome.
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬A citation comparison of sourcebooks for audiovisuals to AVLINE records : access and the chief source of information (1994)
0.06
0.05965232 = product of:
0.17895696 = sum of:
0.0921318 = weight(_text_:readable in 8167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0921318 = score(doc=8167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4072887 = fieldWeight in 8167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8167)
0.052313168 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052313168 = score(doc=8167,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 8167, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8167)
0.034511987 = weight(_text_:data in 8167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034511987 = score(doc=8167,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 8167, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8167)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Audiovisual materials present special difficulties for cataloguers by virtue of the fact that they must display the materials and take the cataloguing information from the title screens which may be inconsistent with data on the labels. The chief source cataloguing concept for audiovisual materials was examined through a comparison of citations from fully catalogued audiovisual records and their corresponding citations from bibliographic sourcebooks. A complete printout was taken of all AVLINE (National Library of Medicine's Audiovisual Online Catalog) records for videocassettes, slides and software. The comparison revealed much similarity with title and other title information, however, series, producer, credits, and dates were more completely described in the fully catalogued records than in the sourcebook citation. There was no evidence to support cataloguing using only eye readable materials. Cataloguing using the chief source of information consistently provides more bibliographic data
