Search (118 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. Visual interfaces to digital libraries : [extended papers presented at the first and second International Workshops on Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, held at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) in 2001 and 2002] (2002) 0.05
    0.052265037 = product of:
      0.23519266 = sum of:
        0.017255994 = weight(_text_:data in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017255994 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.14822112 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
        0.21793666 = sum of:
          0.19677293 = weight(_text_:congresses in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19677293 = score(doc=1784,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.2987186 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036818076 = queryNorm
              0.6587234 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
          0.02116374 = weight(_text_:22 in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02116374 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036818076 = queryNorm
              0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries exploit the power of human vision and spatial cognition to help individuals mentally organize and electronically access and manage large and complex information spaces. They draw on progress in the field of information visualization and seek to shift the users' mental load from slow reading to faster perceptual processes such as visual pattern recognition.Based on two workshops, the book presents an introductory overview as well as a closing listing of the top ten problems in the area by the volume editors. Also included are 16 thoroughly reviewed and revised full papers organized in topical sections on visual interfaces to documents, document parts, document variants, and document usage data; visual interfaces to image and video documents; visualization of knowledge domains; cartographic interfaces to digital libraries; and a general framework.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Katy Börner and Chaomei Chen: Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries: Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges - Part I. Visual interfaces to Documents, Document Parts, Document Variants, and Document Usage Data - George Buchanan, Ann Blandford, Matt Jones, and Harold Thimbleby: Spatial Hypertext as a Reader Tool in Digital Libraries; Michael Christoffel and Bethina Schmitt: Accessing Libraries as Easy as a Game; Carlos Monroy, Rajiv Kochumman, Richard Furuta, and Eduardo Urbina: Interactive Timeline Viewer (ItLv): A Tool to Visualize Variants Among Documents; Mischa Weiss-Lijn, Janet T. McDonnell, and Leslie James: An Empirical Evaluation of the Interactive Visualization of Metadata to Support Document Use; Stephen G. Eick: Visual Analysis of Website Browsing Patterns - Part II. Visual Interfaces to Image and Video Documents - Adrian Graham, Hector Garcia-Molina, Andreas Paepcke, and Terry Winograd: Extreme Temporal Photo Browsing; Michael G. Christel: Accessing News Video Libraries through Dynamic Information Extraction, Summarization, and Visualization; Anselm Spoerri: Handwritten Notes as a Visual Interface to Index, Edit and Publish Audio/Video Highlights - Part III. Visualization of Knowledge Domains - Jan W. Buzydlowski, Howard D. White, and Xia Lin: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries; Kevin W. Boyack, Brian N. Wylie, and George S. Davidson: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology: Domain Visualizations - Part IV. Cartographic Interfaces to Digital Libraries - André Skupin: On Geometry and Transformation in Map-Like Information Visualization; Guoray Cai: GeoVIBE: A Visual Interface for Geographic Digital Libraries: Teong Joo Ong, John J. Leggett, Hugh D. Wilson, Stephan L. Hatch, and Monique D. Reed: Interactive Information Visualization in the Digital Flora of Texas; Dan Ancona, Mike Freeston, Terry Smith, and Sara Fabrikant: Visual Explorations for the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype - Part V. Towards a General Framework - Rao Shen, Jun Wang, and Edward A. Fox: A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems; Chaomei Chen and Katy Börner: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 3.2008 15:02:37
    LCSH
    User interfaces (Computer systems) / Congresses
    Computer vision / Congresses
    Digital libraries / Congresses
    Subject
    User interfaces (Computer systems) / Congresses
    Computer vision / Congresses
    Digital libraries / Congresses
  2. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.03
    0.03084707 = product of:
      0.09254121 = sum of:
        0.04271352 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04271352 = score(doc=168,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2979991 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.039851006 = weight(_text_:data in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039851006 = score(doc=168,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.342302 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.009976682 = product of:
          0.019953365 = sum of:
            0.019953365 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019953365 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The effect that content and layout of bibliographic displays had on the ability of end-users to process catalog information was tested using a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. Participants were asked to perform two related tasks during the course of the experiment. In the first task, they were asked to select a set of items that they would examine further for a hypothetical paper they must write, using a simulated online catalog to make their assessments of relevance. In the second task, they were asked to examine 20 bibliographic records, decide whether they would choose to examine these items further on the shelf, and identify the data elements that they used to formulate their relevance decision. One group viewed bibliographic records on an interface similar to current online catalogs, one that used data labels and contained data elements commonly found. A second group viewed these records on an interface in which the labels had been removed, but the data elements were the same as those in the first. The third group viewed these records on a labeled display that included enhanced data elements on the brief record display. The final group viewed these records with the same brief record data elements as the third group, but with the labels removed, using ISBD and AACR2 punctuation standards. For the first task, participants using enhanced brief screen interfaces viewed more brief screens and fewer full screens than their counterparts. Screen durations for the second 10 screens were found to have dropped from those of the first 10 screens. Statistical analyses comparing demographic variables to the screen frequencies uncovered many significant differences. Participants using the enhanced-content interfaces made fewer selections from index and full screens, and more selections from brief screens. For the second task, participants who used enhanced-content interfaces were able to make some sort of relevance judgment more frequently than those who used standard-content interfaces.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Pollitt, A.S.; Ellis, G.P.; Smith, M.P.: HIBROWSE for bibliographic databases (1994) 0.02
    0.022730911 = product of:
      0.102289096 = sum of:
        0.06975088 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06975088 = score(doc=1069,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
        0.032538213 = weight(_text_:data in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032538213 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The HIBROWSE design offers improved searching functionality for users of bibliographic databases. The interface provides a multi windowed view of data stored on a relational database management system, using layered attribute value aggregation and classification. The user interrogates the database by invoking automatically formulated SQL queries that filter the contents of each window according to user selected attribute values. The interface is described using 'hand crafted' screens to create realistic examples of HIBROWSE systems for EPOQUE, INSPEC, MEDLINE and EMBASE
  4. Marchionini, G.; Meadow, C.T.; Dwiggins, S.; Lin, X.; Jiabin, W.; Yuan, W.: ¬A study of user interaction with information retrieval interfaces : progress report (1991) 0.02
    0.01853781 = product of:
      0.08342014 = sum of:
        0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04315616 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
        0.040263984 = weight(_text_:data in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040263984 = score(doc=4350,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports progress and future plans for a project to study the interactions of users with information retrieval interfaces. Tests are run with professional data base searchers and with end users who are members of a profession but have little or no searching experience. Interfaces tested include a command language search system used to search DIALOG bibliographic data bases, a non-procedural system that produces DIALOG commands, and several full text systems, including one using hypertext. The intent is to determine which kinds of users perform best with each type of interface. The project is being conducted jointly bay the University of Toronto and the University of Maryland
  5. Stewart, M.R.: Users, standards, and access : in search of the standard user (1992) 0.02
    0.01853781 = product of:
      0.08342014 = sum of:
        0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04315616 = score(doc=2725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2725)
        0.040263984 = weight(_text_:data in 2725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040263984 = score(doc=2725,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 2725, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2725)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Standards for user interfaces for access to bibliographic data bases cannot be developed without more complete understanding of the current user, user attitude and capabilities. Gives 3 means of achieving this based on observing the user. 45% of access points in subject searches results in no retrievals. Errors in searching on-line catalogues occur with a 40% no hit title search rate and a 51% no hit author search rate when those records were on the data base. Stresses the importance of fundamental user interface components contained in the IBM staff publication systems guide. Concludes that although there is no such thing as a standard user it is still vital to develop user standards
  6. Järvelin, K.; Ingwersen, P.; Niemi, T.: ¬A user-oriented interface for generalised informetric analysis based on applying advanced data modelling techniques (2000) 0.02
    0.017919907 = product of:
      0.080639586 = sum of:
        0.03082583 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03082583 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
        0.04981376 = weight(_text_:data in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04981376 = score(doc=4545,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.4278775 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a novel user-oriented interface for generalised informetric analysis and demonstrates how informetric calculations can easily and declaratively be specified through advanced data modelling techniques. The interface is declarative and at a high level. Therefore it is easy to use, flexible and extensible. It enables end users to perform basic informetric ad hoc calculations easily and often with much less effort than in contemporary online retrieval systems. It also provides several fruitful generalisations of typical informetric measurements like impact factors. These are based on substituting traditional foci of analysis, for instance journals, by other object types, such as authors, organisations or countries. In the interface, bibliographic data are modelled as complex objects (non-first normal form relations) and terminological and citation networks involving transitive relationships are modelled as binary relations for deductive processing. The interface is flexible, because it makes it easy to switch focus between various object types for informetric calculations, e.g. from authors to institutions. Moreover, it is demonstrated that all informetric data can easily be broken down by criteria that foster advanced analysis, e.g. by years or content-bearing attributes. Such modelling allows flexible data aggregation along many dimensions. These salient features emerge from the query interface's general data restructuring and aggregation capabilities combined with transitive processing capabilities. The features are illustrated by means of sample queries and results in the article.
  7. Kinnell, S.; Richards, T.: ¬An online interface within a hypertext system : Project Jefferson's electronic notebook (1989) 0.02
    0.015917132 = product of:
      0.071627095 = sum of:
        0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04315616 = score(doc=1039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1039)
        0.028470935 = weight(_text_:data in 1039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028470935 = score(doc=1039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1039)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Project Jefferson was designed to help new students at the University of Southern California (USC) to acquire skills necessary for writing research papers through the example of research into ethical issues raised by the US Constitution. It runs on Macintosh Computers and is based on Apple Computer's HyperCard, a system wich allows users to browse different sources of information at their own pace and along their own routes while noting down useful discoveries in the notebook part of the system. Access to USC's locally mounted bibliographic data bases is also given without any tedious logging-on routines.
  8. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.02
    0.015394375 = product of:
      0.06927469 = sum of:
        0.049321324 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049321324 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.019953365 = product of:
          0.03990673 = sum of:
            0.03990673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03990673 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  9. Crawford, W.; Stovel, L.; Bales, K.: Bibliographic displays in the online catalog (1986) 0.02
    0.015317476 = product of:
      0.13785729 = sum of:
        0.13785729 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13785729 = score(doc=222,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.961788 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    LCSH
    On / line bibliographic searching
    PRECIS
    Bibliographic on / line information retrieval services
    Subject
    On / line bibliographic searching
    Bibliographic on / line information retrieval services
  10. Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006) 0.01
    0.013470079 = product of:
      0.060615353 = sum of:
        0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04315616 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
        0.017459193 = product of:
          0.034918386 = sum of:
            0.034918386 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034918386 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:30:09
  11. Mochel, K.: Search in the Web shopping environment (2006) 0.01
    0.012827373 = product of:
      0.05772318 = sum of:
        0.040263984 = weight(_text_:data in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040263984 = score(doc=5301,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
        0.017459193 = product of:
          0.034918386 = sum of:
            0.034918386 = weight(_text_:22 in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034918386 = score(doc=5301,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The author presents a design case study of a search user interface for Web catalogs in the context of online shopping for consumer products such as clothing, furniture, and sporting goods. The case study provides a review of the user data for the user interface (UI), and the resulting redesign recommendations. Based on the case study and its user data, a set of common user requirements for searching in the context of online shopping is provided.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:23:19
  12. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Searching behaviour and the evaluation of online catalogues (1991) 0.01
    0.011664795 = product of:
      0.052491575 = sum of:
        0.032538213 = weight(_text_:data in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032538213 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
        0.019953365 = product of:
          0.03990673 = sum of:
            0.03990673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03990673 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief report on a study, carried out by the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, to investigate the techniques used for evaluating OPACs: to explore and assess different data gathering methods in studying information seeking behaviour at the on-line catalogue; and to examine how a transaction logging facility could be enhanced to serve as a more effective diagnostic tool. For a full report see British Library research paper 78
    Pages
    S.20-22
  13. Allen, B.L.: Designing information systems for user abilities and tasks : an experimental study (1998) 0.01
    0.011545782 = product of:
      0.051956017 = sum of:
        0.036990993 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036990993 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
        0.014965023 = product of:
          0.029930046 = sum of:
            0.029930046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029930046 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    With the many choices that can be built into information systems, it is possible to customize such systems for users, based on the tasks that users are accomplishing, on the personal characteristics of users, or a combination of these factors. Reports results of an experiment which detailed logging of use of experimental information systems and was used to determine the optimal configuration of these systems for each user. 4 experimental systems were specially designed and all used a single database of 668 bibliographic records. Tasks were varied, and the cognitive abilities of users were tested to assess one important personal characteristic. Results showed that it was possible to create an optimal configuration to match the cognitive abilities of users, but that it was more difficult to assess which configuration was the best match for specific tasks. The person in task interaction proved to be the least powerful indicator of design configurations. These results suggest that usable information systems can be created for users by careful analysis of the interaction of design features with personal characteristics such as cognitive abilities
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.139-153
  14. Cyr, D.; Trevor-Smith, H.: Localization of Web design : an empirical comparison of German, Japanese, and United States Web site characteristics (2004) 0.01
    0.011252028 = product of:
      0.10126825 = sum of:
        0.10126825 = weight(_text_:germany in 5251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10126825 = score(doc=5251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.46121946 = fieldWeight in 5251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5251)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    To explore issues of user interface design and experience, including culturally preferred design elements, a study was conducted analyzing sites in Germany, Japan, and the United States (30 municipal sites in each country). Design elements considered are use of symbols and graphics, color preferences, site features (links, maps, search functions, and page layout), language, and content. Significant modal differences were found in each of the listed categories. Outcomes from the study are used to discuss future research directions in the areas of experience design and localization.
  15. Brooks, M.; Campbell, J.: Interactive graphical queries for bibliographic search (1999) 0.01
    0.009687622 = product of:
      0.0871886 = sum of:
        0.0871886 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0871886 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents 'Islands', an interactive graphical interface for construction, modification, and management of queries during a search session on a bibliographic database. The islands interface is compared to the Dialog interface on a search of the INSPEC database
  16. Keyser, P. de: Drie belangrijke Belgische bibliografische bestanden op CD-ROM (1999) 0.01
    0.009687622 = product of:
      0.0871886 = sum of:
        0.0871886 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0871886 = score(doc=6426,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 6426, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6426)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluation of WinSPIRS as interface for bibliographic databases
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Three important Belgian bibliographic databases on CD-ROM
  17. Crawford, W.: Testing bibliographic displays for online catalogs (1987) 0.01
    0.009590258 = product of:
      0.08631232 = sum of:
        0.08631232 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08631232 = score(doc=3865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 3865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3865)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  18. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.01
    0.008748596 = product of:
      0.03936868 = sum of:
        0.024403658 = weight(_text_:data in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024403658 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.014965023 = product of:
          0.029930046 = sum of:
            0.029930046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029930046 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
  19. Kopak, R.W.; Cherry, J.M.: Bibliographic displays and Web catalogues : user evaluations of three prototype displays (1998) 0.01
    0.008305406 = product of:
      0.07474866 = sum of:
        0.07474866 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07474866 = score(doc=3379,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an evaluation study of 3 WWW based prototypes for bibliographic displays developed as part of an ongoing research project at the Faculty of Information Studies, Toronto University. The development of these prototypes builds upon results obtained in earlier phases of the project that addressed issues of both the content and form of bibliographic displays in OPACs. Anticipation of continued growth in the number of catalogues available through the WWW, combined with research evidence that existing Web based displays have not shown improvement over their text based counterparts, motivated the development of these prototypes for use on the Web. Reports findings from a focus group evaluation of the 3 prototypes and makes suggestions for future research
  20. Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997) 0.01
    0.0072904974 = product of:
      0.03280724 = sum of:
        0.020336384 = weight(_text_:data in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020336384 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
        0.012470853 = product of:
          0.024941705 = sum of:
            0.024941705 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024941705 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22

Years

Languages

  • e 104
  • d 10
  • nl 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 108
  • m 7
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…