-
Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021)
0.02
0.019065496 = product of:
0.08579473 = sum of:
0.073323876 = weight(_text_:data in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073323876 = score(doc=106,freq=26.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6298187 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.012470853 = product of:
0.024941705 = sum of:
0.024941705 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024941705 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the concepts, component parts and relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (KGs) from the perspectives of data and knowledge transitions. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses conceptual analysis methods. This study focuses on distinguishing concepts and analyzing composition and intercorrelations to explore data and knowledge transitions. Findings Vocabularies are the cornerstone for accurately building understanding of the meaning of data. Vocabularies provide for a data-sharing model and play an important role in supporting the semantic expression of linked data and defining the schema layer; they are also used for entity recognition, alignment and linkage for KGs. KGs, which consist of a schema layer and a data layer, are presented as cubes that organically combine vocabularies, linked data and big data. Originality/value This paper first describes the composition of vocabularies, linked data and KGs. More importantly, this paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes the interrelatedness of these factors, which comes from frequent interactions between data and knowledge. The three factors empower each other and can ultimately empower the Semantic Web.
- Date
- 22. 1.2021 14:24:32
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983)
0.01
0.01285946 = product of:
0.115735136 = sum of:
0.115735136 = weight(_text_:germany in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115735136 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.52710795 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.01
0.012718533 = product of:
0.0572334 = sum of:
0.042268377 = weight(_text_:data in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042268377 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.014965023 = product of:
0.029930046 = sum of:
0.029930046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029930046 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Integration of information data banks and compatibility of indexing languages
-
Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996)
0.01
0.011369381 = product of:
0.051162213 = sum of:
0.03082583 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03082583 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
0.020336384 = weight(_text_:data in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020336384 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
-
Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008)
0.01
0.011369381 = product of:
0.051162213 = sum of:
0.03082583 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03082583 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
0.020336384 = weight(_text_:data in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020336384 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Content
- The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
-
Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999)
0.01
0.009644595 = product of:
0.08680135 = sum of:
0.08680135 = weight(_text_:germany in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08680135 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.39533097 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Principles of 11 subject heading languages from USA, Germany, Portugal, Iran, Canada, Norway, Spain, Poland, France, Russia
-
Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001)
0.01
0.00711892 = product of:
0.06407028 = sum of:
0.06407028 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06407028 = score(doc=1138,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- In a changing information environment, we need to reassess each element of bibliographic control, including classification theories and systems. Every classification system is a theoretical construct imposed an "reality." The classificatory relationships that are assumed to be valuable have generally received less attention than the topics included in the systems. Relationships are functions of both the syntactic and semantic axes of classification systems, and both explicit and implicit relationships are discussed. Examples are drawn from a number of different systems, both bibliographic and non-bibliographic, and the cultural warrant (i. e., the sociocultural context) of classification systems is examined. The part-whole relationship is discussed as an example of a universally valid concept that is treated as a component of the cultural warrant of a classification system.
-
Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996)
0.01
0.0067813364 = product of:
0.061032027 = sum of:
0.061032027 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061032027 = score(doc=5608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Discusses the problems in establishing commonly accepted principles for subject retrieval between different bibliographic systems. The Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages was established to devise general principles for any subject retrieval system and to review existing real systems in the light of such principles and compare them in order to evaluate the extent of their coverage and their application in current practices. Provides a background and history of the Working Group. Discusses the principles underlying subject headings and their purposes and the state of the work and major findings
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 25(1995) no.1, S.10-12
-
Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001)
0.00
0.004843811 = product of:
0.0435943 = sum of:
0.0435943 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0435943 = score(doc=1139,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- With fourteen contributions grouped in two sections, "Theoretical background" and "Systems", this work discusses the most common relationships used in the organization of recorded knowledge to facilitate information retrieval: the relationships between bibliographic entities, intra- and intertextual relationships, relevance relationships, and subject relationships in thesauri and other classificatory structures. The editors' goal is to "spur further interest, debate, research, and development".
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: GREEN, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview; TILLETT, B.: Bibliographic relationships; CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesaural relationships; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms; HUDON, M.: Relationships in multilingual thesauri; BODENREIDER, O. u. C.A. BEAN: Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain; BEGHTOL, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning; BEAN, C.A. u. R. GREEN: Relevance relationships; EL-HOSHY, L.M.: Relationships in Library of Congress Subject Headings; MOLHOLT, P.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus: controlling relationships through rules and structure; NELSON, S.J. u.a.: Relationships in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH); NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, mulrilingual databases in the spiritual and religous domains: the OM information service; SATIJA, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon classification; MITCHELL, J.S.: Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.00
0.0038798207 = product of:
0.034918386 = sum of:
0.034918386 = product of:
0.06983677 = sum of:
0.06983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06983677 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996)
0.00
0.0031353687 = product of:
0.028218318 = sum of:
0.028218318 = product of:
0.056436636 = sum of:
0.056436636 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056436636 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 31. 7.2006 14:22:21
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.00
0.0027713005 = product of:
0.024941705 = sum of:
0.024941705 = product of:
0.04988341 = sum of:
0.04988341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04988341 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004)
0.00
0.0027400735 = product of:
0.024660662 = sum of:
0.024660662 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024660662 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.17204987 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
-
¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002)
0.00
0.0022595983 = product of:
0.020336384 = sum of:
0.020336384 = weight(_text_:data in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020336384 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Work on relationships takes place in many communities, including, among others, data modeling, knowledge representation, natural language processing, linguistics, and information retrieval. Unfortunately, continued disciplinary splintering and specialization keeps any one person from being familiar with the full expanse of that work. By including contributions form experts in a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, this volume demonstrates both the parallels that inform work on relationships across a number of fields and the singular emphases that have yet to be fully embraced, The volume is organized into 3 parts: (1) Types of relationships (2) Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning (3) Applications of relationships
-
Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998)
0.00
0.0019399103 = product of:
0.017459193 = sum of:
0.017459193 = product of:
0.034918386 = sum of:
0.034918386 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034918386 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.00
0.0019399103 = product of:
0.017459193 = sum of:
0.017459193 = product of:
0.034918386 = sum of:
0.034918386 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034918386 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.00
0.0019399103 = product of:
0.017459193 = sum of:
0.017459193 = product of:
0.034918386 = sum of:
0.034918386 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034918386 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.00
9.699552E-4 = product of:
0.008729597 = sum of:
0.008729597 = product of:
0.017459193 = sum of:
0.017459193 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017459193 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
