Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken"
  1. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.05
    0.050378077 = product of:
      0.15113422 = sum of:
        0.09864265 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09864265 = score(doc=5286,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.032538213 = weight(_text_:data in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032538213 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.019953365 = product of:
          0.03990673 = sum of:
            0.03990673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03990673 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  2. Pfeffer, M.: Using clustering across union catalogues to enrich entries with indexing information (2014) 0.03
    0.02695852 = product of:
      0.12131333 = sum of:
        0.034511987 = weight(_text_:data in 3301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034511987 = score(doc=3301,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 3301, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3301)
        0.08680135 = weight(_text_:germany in 3301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08680135 = score(doc=3301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.39533097 = fieldWeight in 3301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3301)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The federal system in Germany has created a segmented library landscape. Instead of a central entity responsible for cataloguing and indexing, regional library unions share the workload cooperatively among their members. One result of this approach is limited sharing of cataloguing and indexing information across union catalogues as well as heterogeneous indexing of items with almost equivalent content: different editions of the same work. In this paper, a method for clustering entries in library catalogues is proposed that can be used to reduce this heterogeneity as well as share indexing information across catalogue boundaries. In two experiments, the method is applied to several union catalogues and the results show that a surprisingly large number of previously not indexed entries can be enriched with indexing information. The quality of the indexing has been positively evaluated by human professionals and the results have already been imported into the production catalogues of two library unions.
    Series
    Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization
    Source
    Data analysis, machine learning and knowledge discovery. Eds. Myra Spiliopoulou, Lars Schmidt-Thieme und Ruth Janning
  3. Barker, P.: ¬A study of the use of the X.500 directory for bibliographic querying (1995) 0.02
    0.019660873 = product of:
      0.08847393 = sum of:
        0.06407028 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06407028 = score(doc=1505,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
        0.024403658 = weight(_text_:data in 1505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024403658 = score(doc=1505,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 1505, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1505)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the work of the ABDUX project to investigate the use of the standardized protocol for the X.500 directory service for searching distributed bibliographic databases. It is a joint project between the Computer Science Department of the University College London, and the Library and Computer Service of Brunel University, UK. Gives a design overview and discusses the implementation phase of the project which involved: enhancements to an X.500 system; implementing user interfaces; and gathering test data for the system. Examines experiences with the system, and assesses why interest in the system has been less than hoped for. Puts forward a model for bibliographic querying which recognises the role of other protocols. Summarizes the main lessons to be drawn from the project
  4. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.02
    0.015394375 = product of:
      0.06927469 = sum of:
        0.049321324 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049321324 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
        0.019953365 = product of:
          0.03990673 = sum of:
            0.03990673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03990673 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the backgroud to the construction of a thesaurus at Hydro-Quebec, Quebec, Canada. Several information units, linked to form a network, share the same bibliographic database. The need for coherence and efficiency was the principle motive for the construction of the multidisciplinary thesaurus. Describes the construction process, discusses the specifity of the tool, its circulation, and considers its use on a partnership basis with other information services
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  5. Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA : a distributed, locally-oriented, Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996) 0.01
    0.011545782 = product of:
      0.051956017 = sum of:
        0.036990993 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036990993 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
        0.014965023 = product of:
          0.029930046 = sum of:
            0.029930046 = weight(_text_:22 in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029930046 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.127-141
  6. Holm, L.A.: ONE project : results and experiences (1999) 0.01
    0.009687622 = product of:
      0.0871886 = sum of:
        0.0871886 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0871886 = score(doc=6460,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 6460, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6460)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    ONE (OPAC Network Project in Europe) project aims at connecting major bibliographic services via Z39.50 and improving access by the EXPLAIN service
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 28(1999) no.1, S.29-33
  7. Kunz, M.: Subject retrieval in distributed resources : a short review of recent developments (2003) 0.01
    0.0067813364 = product of:
      0.061032027 = sum of:
        0.061032027 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061032027 = score(doc=1624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Subject-based retrieval in distributed resources is a current problem in online searches for bibliographic references. Building portals to similar resources is only the ferst step, the subsequent navigation via different search interfaces presents certain difficulties. To make retrieval easier it is necessary to adapt these different resources. Potential approaches (standardisation as opposed to "cross-walks") and methods (automated as opposed to intellectual effort) will be discussed. This includes a Brief appraisal of the future of work with multilingual terminology: - The "classical" approach (Multilingual Thesauri), - The "Internet" approach (linking) Recent developments in mono- and multilingual environments will be presented (MACS, CARMEN, Economics Crosswalk).
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 32(2003) no.1, S.17-20
  8. Lopatenko, A.; Asserson, A.; Jeffery, K.G.: CERIF - Information retrieval of research information in a distributed heterogeneous environment (2002) 0.01
    0.006641835 = product of:
      0.059776515 = sum of:
        0.059776515 = weight(_text_:data in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059776515 = score(doc=3597,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.513453 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    User demands to have access to complete and actual information about research may require integration of data from different CRISs. CRISs are rarely homogenous systems and problems of CRISs integration must be addressed from technological point of view. Implementation of CRIS providing access to heterogeneous data distributed among a number of CRISs is described. A few technologies - distributed databases, web services, semantic web are used for distributed CRIS to address different user requirements. Distributed databases serve to implement very efficient integration of homogenous systems, web services - to provide open access to research information, semantic web - to solve problems of integration semantically and structurally heterogeneous data sources and provide intelligent data retrieval interfaces. The problems of data completeness in distributed systems are addressed and CRIS-adequate solution for data completeness is suggested.
  9. Banwell, L.: Developing and evaluation framework for a supranational digital library (2003) 0.01
    0.00642973 = product of:
      0.057867568 = sum of:
        0.057867568 = weight(_text_:germany in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057867568 = score(doc=2769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21956629 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.26355398 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    The paper will explore the issues surrounding the development of an evaluation framework for a supranational digital library system, as seen through the TEL (The European Library) project. It will describe work an the project to date, and seek to establish what are the key drivers, priorities and barriers encountered, in developing such a framework. TEL is being funded by the EU as an Accompanying Measure in the IST program. Its main focus of is an consensus building, and also includes preparatory technical work to develop testbeds, which will gauge to what extent interoperability is achievable. In order for TEL to take its place as a major Information Society initiative of the EU, it needs to be closely attuned to the needs, expectations and realities of its user communities, which comprise the citizens of the project's national partners. To this end the evaluation framework described in this paper, is being developed by establishing the users' viewpoints and priorities in relation to the key project themes. A summary of the issues to be used in the baseline, and to be expanded upon in the paper, follows: - Establishing the differing contexts of the national library partners, and the differing national priorities which will impact an TEL - Exploring the differing expectations relating to building and using the hybrid library - Exploring the differing expectations relating to TEL. TEL needs to add value - what does this mean in each partner state, and for the individuals within them? 1. Introduction to TEL TEL (The European Library) is a thirty month project, funded by the European Commission as part of its Fifth Framework Programme for research. It aims to set up a co-operative framework for access to the major national, mainly digital, collections in European national libraries. TEL is funded as an Accompanying Measure, designed to support the work of the IST (Information Society Technologies) Programme an the development of access to cultural and scientific knowledge. TEL will stop short of becoming a live service during the lifetime of the project, and is focused an ensuring co-operative and concerted approaches to technical and business issues associated with large-scale content development. It will lay the policy and technical groundwork towards a pan European digital library based an distributed digital collections, and providing seamless access to the digital resources of major European national libraries. It began in February, 2001, and has eight national library partners: Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. It is also seeking to encourage the participation of all European national libraries in due course.
  10. Fuhr, N.: Towards data abstraction in networked information retrieval systems (1999) 0.01
    0.0063268747 = product of:
      0.05694187 = sum of:
        0.05694187 = weight(_text_:data in 4517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05694187 = score(doc=4517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 4517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4517)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  11. Sarinder, K.K.S.; Lim, L.H.S.; Merican, A.F.; Dimyati, K.: Biodiversity information retrieval across networked data sets (2010) 0.01
    0.005978335 = product of:
      0.053805016 = sum of:
        0.053805016 = weight(_text_:data in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053805016 = score(doc=3951,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.46216056 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Biodiversity resources are inevitably digital and stored in a wide variety of formats by researchers or stakeholders. In Malaysia, although digitizing biodiversity data has long been stressed, the interoperability of the biodiversity data is still an issue that requires attention. This is because, when data are shared, the question of copyright occurs, creating a setback among researchers wanting to promote or share data through online presentations. To solve this, the aim is to present an approach to integrate data through wrapping of datasets stored in relational databases located on networked platforms. Design/methodology/approach - The approach uses tools such as XML, PHP, ASP and HTML to integrate distributed databases in heterogeneous formats. Five current database integration systems were reviewed and all of them have common attributes such as query-oriented, using a mediator-based approach and integrating a structured data model. These common attributes were also adopted in the proposed solution. Distributed Generic Information Retrieval (DiGIR) was used as a model in designing the proposed solution. Findings - A new database integration system was developed, which is user-friendly and simple with common attributes found in current integration systems.
  12. Ostergren, M.; Wright, G.: Creating a bibliographic database for a widely distributed collection (1998) 0.01
    0.005480147 = product of:
      0.049321324 = sum of:
        0.049321324 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049321324 = score(doc=1503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  13. Smith, N.; Ashton, J.: ¬The British Library and Z39.50 (1994) 0.01
    0.005480147 = product of:
      0.049321324 = sum of:
        0.049321324 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049321324 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    The British Library is currently progressing several projects involving Z39.50 and SR standards. The Network OPAC trial service is being extended for a further year and the user base broadened. Future applications of Z39.50 currently being investigated include access from Z39.50 clients developed by other suppliers; a virtual database to cover all the library's diverse catalogues; and a national distributed bibliographic database
  14. Fang, L.: ¬A developing search service : heterogeneous resources integration and retrieval system (2004) 0.00
    0.0045191967 = product of:
      0.040672768 = sum of:
        0.040672768 = weight(_text_:data in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040672768 = score(doc=1193,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes two approaches for searching heterogeneous resources, which are explained as they are used in two corresponding existing systems-RIRS (Resource Integration Retrieval System) and HRUSP (Heterogeneous Resource Union Search Platform). On analyzing the existing systems, a possible framework-the MUSP (Multimetadata-Based Union Search Platform) is presented. Libraries now face a dilemma. On one hand, libraries subscribe to many types of database retrieval systems that are produced by various providers. The libraries build their data and information systems independently. This results in highly heterogeneous and distributed systems at the technical level (e.g., different operating systems and user interfaces) and at the conceptual level (e.g., the same objects are named using different terms). On the other hand, end users want to access all these heterogeneous data via a union interface, without having to know the structure of each information system or the different retrieval methods used by the systems. Libraries must achieve a harmony between information providers and users. In order to bridge the gap between the service providers and the users, it would seem that all source databases would need to be rebuilt according to a uniform data structure and query language, but this seems impossible. Fortunately, however, libraries and information and technology providers are now making an effort to find a middle course that meets the requirements of both data providers and users. They are doing this through resource integration.
  15. Lynch, C.A.: Building the infrastructure of resource sharing : union catalogs, distributed search, and cross database linkage (1997) 0.00
    0.0041101105 = product of:
      0.036990993 = sum of:
        0.036990993 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036990993 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Effective resourcesharing presupposes an infrastructure which permits users to locate materials of interest in both print and electronic formats. 2 approaches for providing this are union catalogues and Z39.50 based distributed search systems and computer to computer information retrieval protocols. The advantages and limitations of each approach are considered, paying particular attention to a relaistic assessment of Z39.50 implementations. Argues that the union catalogue is far from obsolete and the 2 approaches should be considered complementary rather than competitive. Technologies to create links between the bibliographic apparatus of catalogues and abstracting and indexing databases and primary content in electronic form, such as the new Serial Item and Contribution Identifier (SICI) standard are also discussed as key elements in the infrastructure to support resource sharing
  16. Vikor, D.L.; Gaumond, G.; Heath, F.M.: Building electronic cooperation in the 1990s : the Maryland, Georgia, and Texas experiences (1997) 0.00
    0.0041101105 = product of:
      0.036990993 = sum of:
        0.036990993 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036990993 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    During the 1990s statewide cooperative use of networks in the USA has moved towards providing mainly access to bibliographic and full-text resources not held locally and usually provided by commercial vendors for use by libraries. Describes 3 academic library networks: the University System of Maryland's Library Information Management System serving the information needs of users throughout the state; Georgia's GALILEO (Georgia Library Learning On-Line) which provides a set of electronic resources and services for the 34 colleges and universities of the University System of Georgia; and TexShare in which all 52 libraries from the public educational institutions in Texas participate. Although the development of funding sources, the technical implementations and support, and the management organization differ from state to state, all three reflect an incremental shift towards the electronic library
  17. Lunau, C.D.; Turner, F.: vCuc pilot project : status report and preliminary identification (1997) 0.00
    0.003615357 = product of:
      0.032538213 = sum of:
        0.032538213 = weight(_text_:data in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032538213 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the virtual Canadian union catalogue (vCuc) pilot project which aims to determine the long term feasibility of using Z39.50 for searching distributed individual library catalogues and union catalogues which together would emulate a centralized union catalogue. This 'virtual' catalogue will not replace the existing union catalogue at the National Library of Canada, but rather complement it. Describes progress to data with the project
  18. Dadam, P.: Verteilte Datenbanken und Client/Server-Systeme : Grundlagen, Konzepte und Realisierungsformen (1996) 0.00
    0.003615357 = product of:
      0.032538213 = sum of:
        0.032538213 = weight(_text_:data in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032538213 = score(doc=3110,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Classification
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
    RVK
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
  19. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.00
    0.0033255606 = product of:
      0.029930046 = sum of:
        0.029930046 = product of:
          0.05986009 = sum of:
            0.05986009 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05986009 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036818076 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
  20. Krause, J.: Heterogenität und Integration : Zur Weiterentwicklung von Inhaltserschließung und Retrieval in sich veränderten Kontexten (2001) 0.00
    0.0031955543 = product of:
      0.028759988 = sum of:
        0.028759988 = weight(_text_:data in 6071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028759988 = score(doc=6071,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 6071, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6071)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    As an important support tool in science research, specialized information systems are rapidly changing their character. The potential for improvement compared with today's usual systems is enormous. This fact will be demonstrated by means of two problem complexes: - WWW search engines, which were developed without any government grants, are increasingly dominating the scene. Does the WWW displace information centers with their high quality databases? What are the results we can get nowadays using general WWW search engines? - In addition to the WWW and specialized databases, scientists now use WWW library catalogues of digital libraries, which combine the catalogues from an entire region or a country. At the same time, however, they are faced with highly decentralized heterogeneous databases which contain the widest range of textual sources and data, e.g. from surveys. One consequence is the presence of serious inconsistencies in quality, relevance and content analysis. Thus, the main problem to be solved is as follows: users must be supplied with heterogeneous data from different sources, modalities and content development processes via a visual user interface without inconsistencies in content development, for example, seriously impairing the quality of the search results, e. g. when phrasing their search inquiry in the terminology to which they are accustomed

Languages

  • e 23
  • d 7
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…