-
Dierickx, H. (Bearb.); Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): UNISIST reference manual for machine-readable bibliographic description (1986)
0.08
0.07651721 = product of:
0.34432745 = sum of:
0.2456848 = weight(_text_:readable in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2456848 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2262076 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
1.0861032 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.09864265 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09864265 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
-
Leeves, J.: Harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange (1993)
0.04
0.03651195 = product of:
0.16430378 = sum of:
0.10678381 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10678381 = score(doc=6031,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.7449978 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
0.057519976 = weight(_text_:data in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057519976 = score(doc=6031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.49407038 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Reviews the provision for bibliographic data within EDIFACT, compares those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and examines the implications for MARC based standards. Outlines the role of the major players involved. Describes stanbdards dealing with EDIFACT in greatest detail. Describes the library systems using the records
-
Leeves, J.: EDIBIB: harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange : a report prepared for Book Industry Communication (1993)
0.03
0.034444552 = product of:
0.15500048 = sum of:
0.09864265 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09864265 = score(doc=9,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.05635784 = weight(_text_:data in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05635784 = score(doc=9,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Report commissioned by Book Industry Communications (BIC) and funded by the British National Bibliography Research Fund and the Britsh National Bibliographic Service. The aims of the project were: to review the provisions for bibliographic data within EDIFACT (Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport); to compare those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and the book publishing industry, and to examine the implications for MARC based databases, such as UKMARC
-
Barker, P.: ¬An examination of the use of the OSI Directory for accessing bibliographic information : project ABDUX (1993)
0.03
0.031141633 = product of:
0.14013734 = sum of:
0.097868964 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097868964 = score(doc=7310,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6828017 = fieldWeight in 7310, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7310)
0.042268377 = weight(_text_:data in 7310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042268377 = score(doc=7310,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 7310, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7310)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Describes the work of the ABDUX project, containing a brief description of the rationale for using X.500 for access to bibliographic information. Outlines the project's design work and a demonstration system. Reviews the standards applicable to bibliographic data and library OPACs. Highlights difficulties found when handling bibliographic data in library systems. Discusses the service requirements of OPACs for accessing bibliographic, discussing how X.500 Directory services may be used. Suggests the DIT structures that coulb be used for storing both bibliographic information and descriptions on information resources in general in the directory. Describes the way in which the model of bibliographic data is presented. Outlines the syntax of ASN.1 and how records and fields may be described in terms of X.500 object classes and attribute types. Details the mapping of MARC format into an X.500 compatible form. Provides the schema information for representing research notes and archives, not covered by MARC definitions. Examines the success in implementing the designs and loos ahead to future possibilities
-
¬The future of national bibliography (1997)
0.02
0.023091564 = product of:
0.10391203 = sum of:
0.073981985 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073981985 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
0.029930046 = product of:
0.05986009 = sum of:
0.05986009 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05986009 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
- Imprint
- Boston Spa : British Library, National Bibliographic Service
-
Sweeney, R.: Standard book subject categories for EDI (1994)
0.02
0.022738762 = product of:
0.102324426 = sum of:
0.06165166 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165166 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.040672768 = weight(_text_:data in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040672768 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of an investigation into existing systems of subject categories at present in use in the bibliographic community. Makes recommendations for establishing a standard set of book subject categories for Electronic Data Interchange
-
Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007)
0.02
0.019660873 = product of:
0.08847393 = sum of:
0.06407028 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06407028 = score(doc=1271,freq=24.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.024403658 = weight(_text_:data in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024403658 = score(doc=1271,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
The Library of Congress must begin by prioritizing the recommendations that are directed in whole or in part at LC. Some define tasks that can be achieved immediately and with moderate effort; others will require analysis and planning that will have to be coordinated broadly and carefully. The Working Group has consciously not associated time frames with any of its recommendations. The recommendations fall into five general areas: 1. Increase the efficiency of bibliographic production for all libraries through increased cooperation and increased sharing of bibliographic records, and by maximizing the use of data produced throughout the entire "supply chain" for information resources. 2. Transfer effort into higher-value activity. In particular, expand the possibilities for knowledge creation by "exposing" rare and unique materials held by libraries that are currently hidden from view and, thus, underused. 3. Position our technology for the future by recognizing that the World Wide Web is both our technology platform and the appropriate platform for the delivery of our standards. Recognize that people are not the only users of the data we produce in the name of bibliographic control, but so too are machine applications that interact with those data in a variety of ways. 4. Position our community for the future by facilitating the incorporation of evaluative and other user-supplied information into our resource descriptions. Work to realize the potential of the FRBR framework for revealing and capitalizing on the various relationships that exist among information resources. 5. Strengthen the library profession through education and the development of metrics that will inform decision-making now and in the future. The Working Group intends what follows to serve as a broad blueprint for the Library of Congress and its colleagues in the library and information technology communities for extending and promoting access to information resources.
- Editor
- Library of Congress / Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control
- Source
- http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-report-draft-11-30-07-final.pdf
-
Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996)
0.02
0.015917132 = product of:
0.071627095 = sum of:
0.04315616 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315616 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
0.028470935 = weight(_text_:data in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028470935 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.01
0.014580995 = product of:
0.06561448 = sum of:
0.040672768 = weight(_text_:data in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040672768 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.024941705 = product of:
0.04988341 = sum of:
0.04988341 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04988341 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12893063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Diese Publikation beschreibt die Zusammenhänge zwischen wissenshaltigen begriffsorientierten Terminologien, Ontologien, Big Data und künstliche Intelligenz.
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
AG KIM Gruppe Titeldaten DINI: Empfehlungen zur RDF-Repräsentation bibliografischer Daten (2014)
0.01
0.012710861 = product of:
0.057198875 = sum of:
0.024660662 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024660662 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.17204987 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
0.032538213 = weight(_text_:data in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032538213 = score(doc=4668,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- In den letzten Jahren wurde eine Vielzahl an Datensets aus Kultur- und Wissenschaftseinrichtungen als Linked Open Data veröffentlicht. Auch das deutsche Bibliothekswesen hat sich aktiv an den Entwicklungen im Bereich Linked Data beteiligt. Die zuvor lediglich in den Bibliothekskatalogen vorliegenden Daten können weiteren Sparten geöffnet und so auf vielfältige Weise in externe Anwendungen eingebunden werden. Gemeinsames Ziel bei der Veröffentlichung der Bibliotheksdaten als Linked Data ist außerdem, Interoperabilität und Nachnutzbarkeit zu ermöglichen und sich auf diese Weise stärker mit anderen Domänen außerhalb der Bibliothekswelt zu vernetzen. Es bestehen sowohl Linked-Data-Services einzelner Bibliotheken als auch der deutschen Bibliotheksverbünde. Trotz ihres gemeinsamen Ziels sprechen die bestehenden Services nicht die gleiche Sprache, da sie auf unterschiedlichen Modellierungen basieren. Um die Interoperabilität dieser Datenquellen zu gewährleisten, sollten die Dienste künftig einer einheitlichen Modellierung folgen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde im Januar 2012 eine Arbeitsgruppe gegründet, in der alle deutschen Bibliotheksverbünde, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek sowie einige weitere interessierte und engagierte Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit entsprechender Expertise vertreten sind. Die Gruppe Titeldaten agiert seit April 2012 als Untergruppe des Kompetenzzentrums Interoperable Metadaten (DINI-AG KIM). Die Moderation und Koordination liegt bei der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Im Dezember 2012 schloss sich auch der OBVSG der Arbeitsgruppe an. Die Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek folgte im Mai 2013. Vorliegende Empfehlungen sollen zu einer Harmonisierung der RDFRepräsentationen von Titeldaten im deutschsprachigen Raum beitragen und so möglichst einen Quasi-Standard etablieren. Auch international wird an der Herausforderung gearbeitet, die bestehenden bibliothekarischen Strukturen in die heute zur Verfügung stehenden Konzepte des Semantic Web zu überführen und ihren Mehrwert auszuschöpfen. Die neuesten internationalen Entwicklungen im Bereich der Bereitstellung bibliografischer Daten im Semantic Web wie die Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative der Library of Congress (BIBFRAME) haben ebenfalls das Ziel, ein Modell zur RDF-Repräsentation bibliothekarischer Daten bereitzustellen. Die Gruppe Titeldaten beobachtet diese Entwicklungen und beabsichtigt, die Erfahrungen und Anforderungen der deutschsprachigen Bibliothekswelt mit einzubringen. Dabei werden einerseits international erarbeitete Empfehlungen aufgegriffen und andererseits Impulse aus der nationalen Kooperation dort eingebracht. Die hier verwendeten Properties könnten z. B. als Grundlage für ein Mapping zu BIBFRAME dienen.
-
Babeu, A.: Building a "FRBR-inspired" catalog : the Perseus digital library experience (2008)
0.01
0.011365456 = product of:
0.051144548 = sum of:
0.03487544 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03487544 = score(doc=2429,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.24331525 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.016269106 = weight(_text_:data in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016269106 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- If one follows any of the major cataloging or library blogs these days, it is obvious that the topic of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) has increasingly become one of major significance for the library community. What began as a proposed conceptual entity-relationship model for improving the structure of bibliographic records has become a hotly debated topic with many tangled threads that have implications not just for cataloging but for many aspects of libraries and librarianship. In the fall of 2005, the Perseus Project experimented with creating a FRBRized catalog for its current online classics collection, a collection that consists of several hundred classical texts in Greek and Latin as well as reference works and scholarly commentaries regarding these works. In the last two years, with funding from the Mellon Foundation, Perseus has amassed and digitized a growing collection of classical texts (some as image books on our own servers that will eventually be made available through Fedora), and some available through the Open Content Alliance (OCA)2, and created FRBRized cataloging data for these texts. This work was done largely as an experiment to see the potential of the FRBR model for creating a specialized catalog for classics.
-
Berger, M.G.: Information seeking in the online bibliographic system : an exploratory study (1994)
0.01
0.010960294 = product of:
0.09864265 = sum of:
0.09864265 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09864265 = score(doc=2149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 2149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2149)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
-
Ayres, F.H.: ¬The Bradford OPAC : a new concept in bibliographic control (1995)
0.01
0.010722235 = product of:
0.09650011 = sum of:
0.09650011 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09650011 = score(doc=6294,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 6294, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6294)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Describes a feasibility study funded by BLRDD to test a new concept in bibliographic control in OPACs based on the manifestation of the work. The research was conducted at Bradford University, leading directly from the QUALCAT project, and used bibliographic records supplied by OCLC. A new type of hierarchical bibliographic record structure was used to import sets of bibliographic records into a hierarchical relational database. This was used for an experimental Windows based OPAC. Much of the early part of the project was spent clarifying the practical and theoretical implications of the manifestations concept
-
Functional requirements for bibliographic records : Final report (1998)
0.01
0.009687622 = product of:
0.0871886 = sum of:
0.0871886 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0871886 = score(doc=6418,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Editor
- IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
-
Siemer, J.A.: ¬A conceptual model for an information retrieval expert system prototype for agricultural bibliographic literature databases (1994)
0.01
0.008220221 = product of:
0.073981985 = sum of:
0.073981985 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073981985 = score(doc=3105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
-
Buchbinder, R.; Weidemüller, H.U.; Tiedemann, E.: Biblio-Data, die nationalbibliographische Datenbank der Deutschen Bibliothek (1979)
0.01
0.008147097 = product of:
0.073323876 = sum of:
0.073323876 = weight(_text_:data in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073323876 = score(doc=4,freq=26.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.6298187 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Die deutschen nationalbibliographische Datenbank Biblio-Data wird in Teil A mit ihren Grundlagen vorgestellt. Biblio-Data basiert auf dem Information-Retrieval-System STAIRS von IBM, das durch Zusatzprogramme der ZMD verbessert wurde. Das Hauptgewicht dieses Beitrags liegt auf der Erörterung des Biblio-Data-Konzepts, nach dem die Daten der Deutschen Bibliographie retrievalgerecht aufbereitet und eingegeben werden. Auf Eigenarten, Probleme und Mängel, die daraus entstehen, dass Biblio-Data auf nationalbibliographischen Daten aufbaut, wird ausführlich eingegangen. Zwei weitere Beiträge zeigen an einigen Beispielen die vielfältigen Suchmöglichkeiten mit Biblio-Data, um zu verdeutlichen, dass damit nicht nur viel schenellere, sondern auch bessere Recherchen ausgeführt werden können. Teil B weist nach, dass Biblio-Data weder die Innhaltsanalyse noch die Zuordnung von schlagwörtern automatisieren kann. Im derzeitigen Einsatzstadium fällt Biblio-Data die Aufgabe zu, die weiterhin knventionall-intellektuell auszuführende Sacherschließung durch retrospektive Recherchen, insbesonderr durch den wesentlich erleichterten Zugriff auf frühere Indexierungsergebnisse, zu unterstützen. Teil C schildert die praktische Arbeit mit Biblio-Data bei bibliographischen Ermittlungen und Literaturzusammenstellunen und kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass effektive und bibliographische Arbeit aus der sinnvollen Kombination von Datenbank-Retrieval und konventioneller Suche bestehet.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Buchbinder, R.: Grundlagen von Biblio-Data (S.11-68); Weidemüller, H.U.: Biblio-Data in der Sacherschließung der Deutschen Bibliothek (S.69-105); Tiedemann, E.: Biblio-Data in der bibliographischen Auskunft der Deutschen Bibliothek (S.107-123)
- Object
- Biblio-Data
-
Robinson, B.: Mixed mode document research : the collected reports (1992)
0.01
0.0078274775 = product of:
0.070447296 = sum of:
0.070447296 = weight(_text_:data in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070447296 = score(doc=4796,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.60511017 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Presents the collected reports of work carried out under British Library grant no. SI/G/880 ('Extensions of mixed mode data bases to support temporal data types'). The studies were concerned with the storage and retrieval of multimedia data such as sound and motion picture scenes
-
Hoogcarspel, A.: Guidelines for cataloging monographic electronic texts at the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities (1994)
0.01
0.0068501844 = product of:
0.06165166 = sum of:
0.06165166 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165166 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- The guidelines are a response to 2 interconnected problems: little bibliographic control exists for electronic texts, and the AACR2 standards for control of computer files are not entirely satisfactory
-
Perkins, C.; Guest, P.: Operationalizing a sheet based cartographic information retrieval system (1993)
0.01
0.0068501844 = product of:
0.06165166 = sum of:
0.06165166 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165166 = score(doc=6573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 6573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6573)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Investigates and evaluates possible solutions to the problems facing map libraries wishing to gain carto-bibliographic control of its collections at the level of the sheet within the series. Assesses record availability and quality
-
Shared cataloguing : report to the principles of the six copyright libraries of the Copyright Libraries Shared Cataloguing Project Steering Group (1993)
0.01
0.0068501844 = product of:
0.06165166 = sum of:
0.06165166 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165166 = score(doc=8000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14333439 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.036818076 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 8000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8000)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Imprint
- Boston Spa : Bristish Library National Bibliographic Service
