-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.08
0.084304884 = product of:
0.16860977 = sum of:
0.16860977 = sum of:
0.09865115 = weight(_text_:theory in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09865115 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.4594418 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.06995861 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06995861 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.07
0.0674439 = product of:
0.1348878 = sum of:
0.1348878 = sum of:
0.078920916 = weight(_text_:theory in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078920916 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.055966888 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055966888 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993)
0.05
0.048829824 = product of:
0.09765965 = sum of:
0.09765965 = product of:
0.1953193 = sum of:
0.1953193 = weight(_text_:theory in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1953193 = score(doc=7555,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.90964836 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Beghtol, C.: Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics : aboutness, analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents (1986)
0.04
0.039460458 = product of:
0.078920916 = sum of:
0.078920916 = product of:
0.15784183 = sum of:
0.15784183 = weight(_text_:theory in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15784183 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973)
0.04
0.039460458 = product of:
0.078920916 = sum of:
0.078920916 = product of:
0.15784183 = sum of:
0.15784183 = weight(_text_:theory in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15784183 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Andersen, J.; Christensen, F.S.: Wittgenstein and indexing theory (2001)
0.03
0.034878444 = product of:
0.06975689 = sum of:
0.06975689 = product of:
0.13951378 = sum of:
0.13951378 = weight(_text_:theory in 1590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13951378 = score(doc=1590,freq=16.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.6497488 = fieldWeight in 1590, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper considers indexing an activity that deals with linguistic entities. It rests an the assumption that a theory of indexing should be based an a philosophy of language, because indexing is concerned with the linguistic representation of meaning. The paper consists of four sections: It begins with some basic considerations an the nature of indexing and the requirements for a theory an this; it is followed by a short review of the use of Wittgenstein's philosophy in LIS-literature; next is an analysis of Wittgenstein's work Philosophical Investigations; finally, we deduce a theory of indexing from this philosophy. Considering an indexing theory a theory of meaning entails that, for the purpose of retrieval, indexing is a representation of meaning. Therefore, an indexing theory is concerned with how words are used in the linguistic context. Furthermore, the indexing process is a communicative process containing an interpretative element. Through the philosophy of the later Wittgenstein, it is shown that language and meaning are publicly constituted entities. Since they form the basis of indexing, a theory hereof must take into account that no single actor can define the meaning of documents. Rather this is decided by the social, historical and linguistic context in which the document is produced, distributed and exchanged. Indexing must clarify and reflect these contexts.
-
Hays, D.G.: Linguistic foundations of the theory of content analysis (1969)
0.03
0.0345279 = product of:
0.0690558 = sum of:
0.0690558 = product of:
0.1381116 = sum of:
0.1381116 = weight(_text_:theory in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1381116 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.6432185 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980)
0.03
0.029595342 = product of:
0.059190683 = sum of:
0.059190683 = product of:
0.118381366 = sum of:
0.118381366 = weight(_text_:theory in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118381366 = score(doc=1329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H.: Theories of cognition and image categorization : what category labels reveal about basic level theory (2008)
0.03
0.02563032 = product of:
0.05126064 = sum of:
0.05126064 = product of:
0.10252128 = sum of:
0.10252128 = weight(_text_:theory in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10252128 = score(doc=1958,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.47746593 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Information search and retrieval interactions usually involve information content in the form of document collections, information retrieval systems and interfaces, and the user. To fully understand information search and retrieval interactions between users' cognitive space and the information space, researchers need to turn to cognitive models and theories. In this article, the authors use one of these theories, the basic level theory. Use of the basic level theory to understand human categorization is both appropriate and essential to user-centered design of taxonomies, ontologies, browsing interfaces, and other indexing tools and systems. Analyses of data from two studies involving free sorting by 105 participants of 100 images were conducted. The types of categories formed and category labels were examined. Results of the analyses indicate that image category labels generally belong to superordinate to the basic level, and are generic and interpretive. Implications for research on theories of cognition and categorization, and design of image indexing, retrieval and browsing systems are discussed.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001)
0.02
0.024414912 = product of:
0.048829824 = sum of:
0.048829824 = product of:
0.09765965 = sum of:
0.09765965 = weight(_text_:theory in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09765965 = score(doc=6032,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Theories of aboutness and theories of subject analysis and of related concepts such as topicality are often isolated from each other in the literature of information science (IS) and related disciplines. In IS it is important to consider the nature and meaning of these concepts, which is closely related to theoretical and metatheoretical issues in information retrieval (IR). A theory of IR must specify which concepts should be regarded as synonymous concepts and explain how the meaning of the nonsynonymous concepts should be defined
-
Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013)
0.02
0.024414912 = product of:
0.048829824 = sum of:
0.048829824 = product of:
0.09765965 = sum of:
0.09765965 = weight(_text_:theory in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09765965 = score(doc=946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.45482418 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of 'subject' in information science (1992)
0.02
0.020927068 = product of:
0.041854136 = sum of:
0.041854136 = product of:
0.08370827 = sum of:
0.08370827 = weight(_text_:theory in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08370827 = score(doc=2247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article presents a theoretical investigation of the concept of 'subject' or 'subject matter' in library and information science. Most conceptions of 'subject' in the literature are not explicit but implicit. Various indexing and classification theories, including automatic indexing and citation indexing, have their own more or less implicit concepts of subject. This fact puts the emphasis on making the implicit theorie of 'subject matter' explicit as the first step. ... The different conceptions of 'subject' can therefore be classified into epistemological positions, e.g. 'subjective idealism' (or the empiric/positivistic viewpoint), 'objective idealism' (the rationalistic viewpoint), 'pragmatism' and 'materialism/realism'. The third and final step is to propose a new theory of subject matter based on an explicit theory of knowledge. In this article this is done from the point of view of a realistic/materialistic epistemology. From this standpoint the subject of a document is defined as the epistemological potentials of that document
-
Todd, R.J.: Academic indexing : what's it all about? (1992)
0.02
0.019730229 = product of:
0.039460458 = sum of:
0.039460458 = product of:
0.078920916 = sum of:
0.078920916 = weight(_text_:theory in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078920916 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While the literature identifies some broad approaches to subject analysis there is little supporting empirical evidence and few attempts to explicate any specifiable procedures. A productive step forward with indexing research would be to begin by examining how indexers actually undertake the process of subject analysis and to explore systematically factors that guide and influence this process. This would shed some light on a theory of subject analysis, clarify some of the central concepts of indexing, and provide an intelligent knowledge-base for effective, academic indexing practice
-
Wilson, P.: Subjects and the sense of position (1968)
0.02
0.019730229 = product of:
0.039460458 = sum of:
0.039460458 = product of:
0.078920916 = sum of:
0.078920916 = weight(_text_:theory in 1353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078920916 = score(doc=1353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 1353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1353)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck in: Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Eds.: L.M. Chan et al., S.308-325.
-
Rorissa, A.: User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images : a comparison using basic level theory (2008)
0.02
0.017439222 = product of:
0.034878444 = sum of:
0.034878444 = product of:
0.06975689 = sum of:
0.06975689 = weight(_text_:theory in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06975689 = score(doc=2122,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although images are visual information sources with little or no text associated with them, users still tend to use text to describe images and formulate queries. This is because digital libraries and search engines provide mostly text query options and rely on text annotations for representation and retrieval of the semantic content of images. While the main focus of image research is on indexing and retrieval of individual images, the general topic of image browsing and indexing, and retrieval of groups of images has not been adequately investigated. Comparisons of descriptions of individual images as well as labels of groups of images supplied by users using cognitive models are scarce. This work fills this gap. Using the basic level theory as a framework, a comparison of the descriptions of individual images and labels assigned to groups of images by 180 participants in three studies found a marked difference in their level of abstraction. Results confirm assertions by previous researchers in LIS and other fields that groups of images are labeled using more superordinate level terms while individual image descriptions are mainly at the basic level. Implications for design of image browsing interfaces, taxonomies, thesauri, and similar tools are discussed.
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994)
0.02
0.01726395 = product of:
0.0345279 = sum of:
0.0345279 = product of:
0.0690558 = sum of:
0.0690558 = weight(_text_:theory in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0690558 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The work is an adaptation of the author's dissertation and has the following chapters: (1) background and introduction; (2) a problem in classification theory; (3) previous fiction analysis theories and systems and 'The left hand of darkness'; (4) fiction warrant and critical warrant; (5) experimental fiction analysis system (EFAS); (6) application and evaluation of EFAS. Appendix 1 gives references to fiction analysis systems and appendix 2 lists EFAS coding sheets
-
Nahotko, M.: Genre groups in knowledge organization (2016)
0.02
0.01726395 = product of:
0.0345279 = sum of:
0.0345279 = product of:
0.0690558 = sum of:
0.0690558 = weight(_text_:theory in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0690558 = score(doc=5139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article is an introduction to the development of Andersen's concept of textual tools used in knowledge organization (KO) in light of the theory of genres and activity systems. In particular, the question is based on the concepts of genre connectivity and genre group, in addition to previously established concepts such as genre hierarchy, set, system, and repertoire. Five genre groups used in KO are described. The analysis of groups, systems, and selected genres used in KO is provided, based on the method proposed by Yates and Orlikowski. The aim is to show the genre system as a part of the activity system, and thus as a framework for KO.
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021)
0.01
0.013991722 = product of:
0.027983444 = sum of:
0.027983444 = product of:
0.055966888 = sum of:
0.055966888 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055966888 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.01
0.012367052 = product of:
0.024734104 = sum of:
0.024734104 = product of:
0.049468208 = sum of:
0.049468208 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049468208 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18081778 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Campbell, G.: Queer theory and the creation of contextual subject access tools for gay and lesbian communities (2000)
0.01
0.012331394 = product of:
0.024662787 = sum of:
0.024662787 = product of:
0.049325574 = sum of:
0.049325574 = weight(_text_:theory in 6054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049325574 = score(doc=6054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21471956 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.05163523 = queryNorm
0.2297209 = fieldWeight in 6054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
