Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Buckland, M."
  1. Buckland, M.; Hahn, T.B.: History of documentation and information science : Introduction (1997) 0.02
    0.0196197 = product of:
      0.1177182 = sum of:
        0.1177182 = weight(_text_:documentation in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1177182 = score(doc=49,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.66658396 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the substantial increase during the 90s in the quality and quatity of research on the history of documentation and information science. Introduces the 14 articles and 2 bibliographies in these 2 special issues
    Footnote
    Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
  2. Buckland, M.: Redesigning library services : a manifesto (1992) 0.02
    0.016991157 = product of:
      0.101946935 = sum of:
        0.101946935 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101946935 = score(doc=2310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.57727855 = fieldWeight in 2310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2310)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 50(1994) no.1, S.51-53 (L.J. Brindley)
  3. Buckland, M.: Documentation, information science, and library science in the USA (1996) 0.01
    0.011327437 = product of:
      0.06796462 = sum of:
        0.06796462 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06796462 = score(doc=3973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.38485238 = fieldWeight in 3973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3973)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  4. Buckland, M.: What kind of science can information science be? (2012) 0.01
    0.010012135 = product of:
      0.06007281 = sum of:
        0.06007281 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06007281 = score(doc=4958,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.34016466 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    During the 20th century there was a strong desire to develop an information science from librarianship, bibliography, and documentation and in 1968 the American Documentation Institute changed its name to the American Society for Information Science. By the beginning of the 21st century, however, departments of (library and) information science had turned instead towards the social sciences. These programs address a variety of important topics, but they have been less successful in providing a coherent explanation of the nature and scope of the field. Progress can be made towards a coherent, unified view of the roles of archives, libraries, museums, online information services, and related organizations if they are treated as information-providing services. However, such an approach seems significantly incomplete on ordinary understandings of the providing of information. Instead of asking what information science is or what we might wish it to become, we ask instead what kind of field it can be given our assumptions about it. We approach the question by examining some keywords: science, information, knowledge, and interdisciplinary. We conclude that if information science is concerned with what people know, then it is a form of cultural engagement, and at most, a science of the artificial.
  5. Buckland, M.: ¬The landscape of information science : the American Society for Information Science at 62 (1999) 0.01
    0.009911507 = product of:
      0.059469044 = sum of:
        0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059469044 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Founded in 1937 as the American Documentation Institution, the ASIS is 62 years old. Information science includes 2 fundamental different traditions: a 'document' traditiion concerned with signifying objects and their use; and a 'computational' tradition of applying algorithmic, logical, mathematical, and mechanical techniques to information management. Both traditions have been deeply influenced by technological modernism: Technology, standards, systems, and efficiency enable progress. Both traditions are needed. Information Science is rooted in part in humanities and qualitative social sciences. The landscape of Information Science is complex. An ecumenical view is needed
  6. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.01
    0.009911507 = product of:
      0.059469044 = sum of:
        0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059469044 = score(doc=4536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  7. Shaw, R.; Golden, P.; Buckland, M.: Using linked library data in working research notes (2015) 0.01
    0.0054952144 = product of:
      0.032971285 = sum of:
        0.032971285 = product of:
          0.06594257 = sum of:
            0.06594257 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06594257 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    15. 1.2016 19:22:28
  8. Shaw, R.; Buckland, M.: Open identification and linking of the four Ws (2008) 0.00
    0.0016027708 = product of:
      0.009616625 = sum of:
        0.009616625 = product of:
          0.01923325 = sum of:
            0.01923325 = weight(_text_:22 in 2665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01923325 = score(doc=2665,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2665, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2665)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas