Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.01
    0.014207955 = product of:
      0.08524773 = sum of:
        0.08524773 = weight(_text_:great in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08524773 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
  2. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (2015) 0.01
    0.011839963 = product of:
      0.07103977 = sum of:
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields.
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual structures and systematization (1995) 0.01
    0.011327437 = product of:
      0.06796462 = sum of:
        0.06796462 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06796462 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.38485238 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.3, S.9-24
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.01
    0.009158691 = product of:
      0.054952145 = sum of:
        0.054952145 = product of:
          0.10990429 = sum of:
            0.10990429 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10990429 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.01
    0.009158691 = product of:
      0.054952145 = sum of:
        0.054952145 = product of:
          0.10990429 = sum of:
            0.10990429 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10990429 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.01
    0.009158691 = product of:
      0.054952145 = sum of:
        0.054952145 = product of:
          0.10990429 = sum of:
            0.10990429 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10990429 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  7. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.01
    0.006411083 = product of:
      0.0384665 = sum of:
        0.0384665 = product of:
          0.076933 = sum of:
            0.076933 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076933 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00
    0.0045793457 = product of:
      0.027476072 = sum of:
        0.027476072 = product of:
          0.054952145 = sum of:
            0.054952145 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054952145 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.00
    0.0036634763 = product of:
      0.021980857 = sum of:
        0.021980857 = product of:
          0.043961715 = sum of:
            0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043961715 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  10. Dahlberg, I.: How to improve ISKO's standing : ten desiderata for knowledge organization (2011) 0.00
    0.0035398244 = product of:
      0.021238945 = sum of:
        0.021238945 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021238945 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.12026637 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    6. Establishment of national Knowledge Organization Institutes should be scheduled by national chapters, planned energetically and submitted to corresponding administrative authorities for support. They could be attached to research institutions, e.g., the Max-Planck or Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany or to universities. Their scope and research areas relate to the elaboration of knowledge systems of subject related concepts, according to Desideratum 1, and may be connected to training activities and KOsubject-related research work. 7. ISKO experts should not accept to be impressed by Internet and Computer Science, but should demonstrate their expertise more actively on the public plane. They should tend to take a leading part in the ISKO Secretariats and the KO Institutes, and act as consultants and informants, as well as editors of statistics and other publications. 8. All colleagues trained in the field of classification/indexing and thesauri construction and active in different countries should be identified and approached for membership in ISKO. This would have to be accomplished by the General Secretariat with the collaboration of the experts in the different secretariats of the countries, as soon as they start to work. The more members ISKO will have, the greater will be its reputation and influence. But it will also prove its professionalism by the quality of its products, especially its innovating conceptual order systems to come. 9. ISKO should-especially in view of global expansion-intensify the promotion of knowledge about its own subject area through the publications mentioned here and in further publications as deemed necessary. It should be made clear that, especially in ISKO's own publications, professional subject indexes are a sine qua non. 10. 1) Knowledge Organization, having arisen from librarianship and documentation, the contents of which has many points of contact with numerous application fields, should-although still linked up with its areas of descent-be recognized in the long run as an independent autonomous discipline to be located under the science of science, since only thereby can it fully play its role as an equal partner in all application fields; and, 2) An "at-a-first-glance knowledge order" could be implemented through the Information Coding Classification (ICC), as this system is based on an entirely new approach, namely based on general object areas, thus deviating from discipline-oriented main classes of the current main universal classification systems. It can therefore recoup by simple display on screen the hitherto lost overview of all knowledge areas and fields. On "one look", one perceives 9 object areas subdivided into 9 aspects which break down into 81 subject areas with their 729 subject fields, including further special fields. The synthesis and place of order of all knowledge becomes thus evident at a glance to everybody. Nobody would any longer be irritated by the abundance of singular apparently unrelated knowledge fields or become hesitant in his/her understanding of the world.
  11. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.00
    0.0032380861 = product of:
      0.019428516 = sum of:
        0.019428516 = product of:
          0.03885703 = sum of:
            0.03885703 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03885703 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.00
    0.0027476072 = product of:
      0.016485643 = sum of:
        0.016485643 = product of:
          0.032971285 = sum of:
            0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032971285 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13