-
Lewandowski, D.: Evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of web search engines using a representative query sample (2015)
0.01
0.014207955 = product of:
0.08524773 = sum of:
0.08524773 = weight(_text_:great in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08524773 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Search engine retrieval effectiveness studies are usually small scale, using only limited query samples. Furthermore, queries are selected by the researchers. We address these issues by taking a random representative sample of 1,000 informational and 1,000 navigational queries from a major German search engine and comparing Google's and Bing's results based on this sample. Jurors were found through crowdsourcing, and data were collected using specialized software, the Relevance Assessment Tool (RAT). We found that although Google outperforms Bing in both query types, the difference in the performance for informational queries was rather low. However, for navigational queries, Google found the correct answer in 95.3% of cases, whereas Bing only found the correct answer 76.6% of the time. We conclude that search engine performance on navigational queries is of great importance, because users in this case can clearly identify queries that have returned correct results. So, performance on this query type may contribute to explaining user satisfaction with search engines.
-
Lewandowski, D.: ¬The retrieval effectiveness of web search engines : considering results descriptions (2008)
0.01
0.007079649 = product of:
0.04247789 = sum of:
0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04247789 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.6, S.915-937
-
Behnert, C.; Lewandowski, D.: ¬A framework for designing retrieval effectiveness studies of library information systems using human relevance assessments (2017)
0.01
0.007079649 = product of:
0.04247789 = sum of:
0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04247789 = score(doc=3700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 3700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3700)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 73(2017) no.3, S.509-527
-
Lewandowski, D.: Alles nur noch Google? : Entwicklungen im Bereich der WWW-Suchmaschinen (2002)
0.00
0.0036634763 = product of:
0.021980857 = sum of:
0.021980857 = product of:
0.043961715 = sum of:
0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043961715 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 9.2002 18:49:22
-
Lewandowski, D.: Abfragesprachen und erweiterte Funktionen von WWW-Suchmaschinen (2004)
0.00
0.0036634763 = product of:
0.021980857 = sum of:
0.021980857 = product of:
0.043961715 = sum of:
0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043961715 = score(doc=2314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 28.11.2004 13:11:22
-
Lewandowski, D.: Query understanding (2011)
0.00
0.0036634763 = product of:
0.021980857 = sum of:
0.021980857 = product of:
0.043961715 = sum of:
0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043961715 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 18. 9.2018 18:22:18
-
Lewandowski, D.: ¬Die Macht der Suchmaschinen und ihr Einfluss auf unsere Entscheidungen (2014)
0.00
0.0027476072 = product of:
0.016485643 = sum of:
0.016485643 = product of:
0.032971285 = sum of:
0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032971285 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 18:54:11
-
Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011)
0.00
0.0022896728 = product of:
0.013738036 = sum of:
0.013738036 = product of:
0.027476072 = sum of:
0.027476072 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027476072 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 30. 9.2012 19:27:22
-
Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019)
0.00
0.0022896728 = product of:
0.013738036 = sum of:
0.013738036 = product of:
0.027476072 = sum of:
0.027476072 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027476072 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
