-
McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009)
0.03
0.033911124 = product of:
0.10173337 = sum of:
0.08524773 = weight(_text_:great in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08524773 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.016485643 = product of:
0.032971285 = sum of:
0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032971285 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This entry describes the development of the MARC Communications format. After a brief overview of the initial 10 years it describes the succeeding phases of development up to the present. This takes the reader through the expansion of the format for all types of bibliographic data and for a multiple character scripts. At the same time a large business community was developing that offered products based on the format to the library community. The introduction of the Internet in the 1990s and the Web technology brought new opportunities and challenges and the format was adapted to this new environment. There has been a great deal of international adoption of the format that has continued into the 2000s. More recently new syntaxes for MARC 21 and models are being explored.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:38
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.03
0.029981827 = product of:
0.08994548 = sum of:
0.06796462 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06796462 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.38485238 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.021980857 = product of:
0.043961715 = sum of:
0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043961715 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
- Source
- Art documentation. 8(1989) no.4, S.183-185
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.03
0.029981827 = product of:
0.08994548 = sum of:
0.06796462 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06796462 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.38485238 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.021980857 = product of:
0.043961715 = sum of:
0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043961715 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
-
Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989)
0.03
0.026234098 = product of:
0.07870229 = sum of:
0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059469044 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.01923325 = product of:
0.0384665 = sum of:
0.0384665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0384665 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:51:36
- Source
- Art documentation. 8(1989) no.4, S.189-190
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.03
0.026234098 = product of:
0.07870229 = sum of:
0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059469044 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.01923325 = product of:
0.0384665 = sum of:
0.0384665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0384665 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.03
0.026234098 = product of:
0.07870229 = sum of:
0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059469044 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.01923325 = product of:
0.0384665 = sum of:
0.0384665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0384665 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Graham, C.; Johnston, J.: Format integration and serials cataloging (1997)
0.02
0.023679925 = product of:
0.14207955 = sum of:
0.14207955 = weight(_text_:great in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14207955 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Outlines some goals which format integration has achieved, and also some new problems which it brings. Cataloguers therefore have a great deal to consider in formulating policies
-
MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000)
0.02
0.018738642 = product of:
0.056215927 = sum of:
0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04247789 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.013738036 = product of:
0.027476072 = sum of:
0.027476072 = weight(_text_:22 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027476072 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress, the National Library of Canada, and the British Library began discussing the harmonization of their respective MARC formats in 1994. The differences between USMARC and CAN/MARC were primarily in details rather than general specifications. Changes were made to CAN/MARC that eliminated many of the differences between CAN/MARC and the other two formats (USMARC and UKMARC). In addition, changes in USMARC that aligned USMARC and CAN/MARC were approved in 1997. The nature of the differences between UKMARC and CAN/MARC has necessitated a different process of harmonization. The differences between these two formats are many in extent, details, and approach to some requirements. Although total harmonization of USMARC-CAN/MARC with UKMARC is not feasible at this time, the British Library's program to add USMARC-CAN/MARC fields to UKMARC has increased the congruency of these formats. The National Library of Canada and the Library of Congress have begun to work on joint maintenance procedures and plan to have joint documentation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Standards: back to the future? : Proceedings of a workshop on the future of bibliographic standards (1993)
0.02
0.016991157 = product of:
0.101946935 = sum of:
0.101946935 = weight(_text_:documentation in 7527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101946935 = score(doc=7527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.57727855 = fieldWeight in 7527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7527)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of documentation 50(1994) no.2, S.158-160 (A. Hopkinson)
-
¬The core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings (1998)
0.01
0.011327437 = product of:
0.06796462 = sum of:
0.06796462 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06796462 = score(doc=3801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.38485238 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the background to the creation of a core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings, provides a definition of a core bibliographic record and presents the core record for printed and manuscript music and the core record for sound recordings which were prepared by the International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres Working Group in Perugia, 1-6 Sep 1996
-
Salgáné, M.M.: Our electronic era and bibliographic informations computer-related bibliographic data formats, metadata formats and BDML (2005)
0.01
0.009471971 = product of:
0.05683182 = sum of:
0.05683182 = weight(_text_:great in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05683182 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Using new communication technologies libraries must face continuously new questions, possibilities and expectations. This study discusses library-related aspects of our electronic era and how computer-related data formats affect bibliographic dataprocessing to give a summary of the most important results. First bibliographic formats for the exchange of bibliographic and related information in the machine-readable form between different types of computer systems were created more than 30 years ago. The evolution of information technologies leads to the improvement of computer systems. In addition to the development of computers and media types Internet has a great influence on data structure as well. Since the introduction of MARC bibliographic format, technology of data exchange between computers and between different computer systems has reached a very sophisticated stage and has contributed to the creation of new standards in this field. Today libraries work with this new infrastructure that induces many challenges. One of the most significant challenges is moving from a relatively homogenous bibliographic environment to a diverse one. Despite these challenges such changes are achievable and necessary to exploit possibilities of new metadata and technologies like the Internet and XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is an open standard, a universal language for data on the Web. XML is nearly six-years-old standard designed for the description and computer-based management of (semi)-structured data and structured texts. XML gives developers the power to deliver structured data from a wide variety of applications and it is also an ideal format from server-to-server transfer of structured data. XML also isn't limited for Internet use and is an especially valuable tool in the field of library. In fact, XML's main strength - organizing information - makes it perfect for exchanging data between different systems. Tools that work with the XML can be used to process XML records without incurring additional costs associated with one's own software development. In addition, XML is also a suitable format for library web services. The Department of Computer-related Graphic Design and Library and Information Sciences of Debrecen University launched the BDML (Bibliographic Description Markup Language) development project in order to standardize bibliogrphic description with the help of XML.
-
Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994)
0.01
0.008495579 = product of:
0.050973468 = sum of:
0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050973468 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.01
0.0077714073 = product of:
0.04662844 = sum of:
0.04662844 = product of:
0.09325688 = sum of:
0.09325688 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09325688 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.0073269526 = product of:
0.043961715 = sum of:
0.043961715 = product of:
0.08792343 = sum of:
0.08792343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08792343 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Aalberg, T.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of MARC data, or, challenges of frbrisation (2013)
0.01
0.007079649 = product of:
0.04247789 = sum of:
0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04247789 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.6, S.851-872
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.006411083 = product of:
0.0384665 = sum of:
0.0384665 = product of:
0.076933 = sum of:
0.076933 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076933 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000)
0.01
0.006411083 = product of:
0.0384665 = sum of:
0.0384665 = product of:
0.076933 = sum of:
0.076933 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076933 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 26. 8.2000 19:22:35
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.01
0.006411083 = product of:
0.0384665 = sum of:
0.0384665 = product of:
0.076933 = sum of:
0.076933 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076933 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.006411083 = product of:
0.0384665 = sum of:
0.0384665 = product of:
0.076933 = sum of:
0.076933 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076933 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information : papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London, 3-18 August 1990 (1991)
0.01
0.0056637186 = product of:
0.03398231 = sum of:
0.03398231 = weight(_text_:documentation in 7884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03398231 = score(doc=7884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.19242619 = fieldWeight in 7884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7884)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of documentation 48(1992) no.1, S.105-106 (V. de Roper)
