Search (212 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.17 
    0.17178343 = product of:
  0.5153503 = sum of:
    0.25767514 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25767514 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.25767514 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25767514 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. White, H.D.; Zuccala, A.A.: Libcitations, worldcat, cultural impact, and fame (2018) 0.04 
    0.037839223 = product of:
  0.113517664 = sum of:
    0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04247789 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
    0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07103977 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Just as citations to a book can be counted, so can that book's libcitations-the number of libraries in a consortium that hold it. These holdings counts per title can be obtained from the consortium's union catalog, such as OCLC's WorldCat. Librarians seeking to serve their customers well must be attuned to various kinds of merit in books. The result in WorldCat is a great variation in the libcitations particular books receive. The higher a title's count (or percentile), the more famous it is-either absolutely or within a subject class. Degree of fame also indicates cultural impact, allowing that further documentation of impact may be needed. Using WorldCat data, we illustrate high, medium, and low degrees of fame with 170 titles published during 1990-1995 or 2001-2006 and spanning the 10 main Dewey classes. We use their total libcitation counts or their counts from members of the Association of Research Libraries, or both, as of late 2011. Our analysis of their fame draws on the recognizability of their authors, the extent to which they and their authors are covered by Wikipedia, and whether they have movie or TV versions. Ordinal scales based on Wikipedia coverage and on libcitation counts are very significantly associated.
  3. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.03 
    0.033911124 = product of:
  0.10173337 = sum of:
    0.08524773 = weight(_text_:great in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08524773 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
    0.016485643 = product of:
      0.032971285 = sum of:
        0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032971285 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  4. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.03 
    0.026234098 = product of:
  0.07870229 = sum of:
    0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059469044 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.01923325 = product of:
      0.0384665 = sum of:
        0.0384665 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0384665 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Source
    Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
  5. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.03 
    0.026234098 = product of:
  0.07870229 = sum of:
    0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059469044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.01923325 = product of:
      0.0384665 = sum of:
        0.0384665 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0384665 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
  6. Fairthorne, R.A.: Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction (1969) 0.02 
    0.024029125 = product of:
  0.14417474 = sum of:
    0.14417474 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14417474 = score(doc=4329,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.8163952 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck in: Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.2, S.171-193.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 25(1969), S.319-343
  7. Aiyepekn, W.O.: ¬The Bradford distribution theory (1977) 0.02 
    0.022654874 = product of:
  0.13592924 = sum of:
    0.13592924 = weight(_text_:documentation in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13592924 = score(doc=1322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.76970476 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 33(1977), S.210-219
  8. Brookes, B.C.: Theory of the Bradford law (1977) 0.02 
    0.022654874 = product of:
  0.13592924 = sum of:
    0.13592924 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13592924 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.76970476 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 33(1977), S.180-209
  9. Rousseau, R.: ¬A table for estimating the exponent in Lotka's law (1993) 0.02 
    0.022654874 = product of:
  0.13592924 = sum of:
    0.13592924 = weight(_text_:documentation in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13592924 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.76970476 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 49(1993) no.4, S.409-412
  10. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.02 
    0.02248637 = product of:
  0.06745911 = sum of:
    0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050973468 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
    0.016485643 = product of:
      0.032971285 = sum of:
        0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032971285 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  11. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.02 
    0.02248637 = product of:
  0.06745911 = sum of:
    0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050973468 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
    0.016485643 = product of:
      0.032971285 = sum of:
        0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032971285 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.1, S.84-104
  12. Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H.: New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature literature through citation indexing (1963) 0.02 
    0.019823015 = product of:
  0.11893809 = sum of:
    0.11893809 = weight(_text_:documentation in 8242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11893809 = score(doc=8242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.67349166 = fieldWeight in 8242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8242)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    American documentation. 14(1963) no.3, S.195-201
  13. Khurshid, A.; Sahai, H.: Bibliometric, scientometric and informetric distributions and laws : a selected bibliography (1991) 0.02 
    0.019823015 = product of:
  0.11893809 = sum of:
    0.11893809 = weight(_text_:documentation in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11893809 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.67349166 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 16(1991) no.2, S.18-29
  14. Kajberg, L.: ¬A citation analysis of LIS serial literature published in Denmark 1957-1986 (1996) 0.02 
    0.019823015 = product of:
  0.11893809 = sum of:
    0.11893809 = weight(_text_:documentation in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11893809 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.67349166 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 52(1996) no.1, S.69-85
  15. Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998) 0.02 
    0.018943941 = product of:
  0.11366364 = sum of:
    0.11366364 = weight(_text_:great in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11366364 = score(doc=5129,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
  16. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.02 
    0.018738642 = product of:
  0.056215927 = sum of:
    0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04247789 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
    0.013738036 = product of:
      0.027476072 = sum of:
        0.027476072 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027476072 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 66(2010) no.5, S.681-705
  17. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.02 
    0.017167237 = product of:
  0.10300342 = sum of:
    0.10300342 = weight(_text_:documentation in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10300342 = score(doc=1515,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.58326095 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    LCSH
    Documentation / Statistical methods
    Subject
    Documentation / Statistical methods
  18. Tang, L.; Hu, G.; Liu, W.: Funding acknowledgment analysis : queries and caveats (2017) 0.02 
    0.01657595 = product of:
  0.09945569 = sum of:
    0.09945569 = weight(_text_:great in 3442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09945569 = score(doc=3442,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 3442, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3442)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Thomson Reuters's Web of Science (WoS) began systematically collecting acknowledgment information in August 2008. Since then, bibliometric analysis of funding acknowledgment (FA) has been growing and has aroused intense interest and attention from both academia and policy makers. Examining the distribution of FA by citation index database, by language, and by acknowledgment type, we noted coverage limitations and potential biases in each analysis. We argue that despite its great value, bibliometric analysis of FA should be used with caution.
  19. Niemi, T.; Hirvonen, L.; Järvelin, K.: Multidimensional data model and query language for informetrics (2003) 0.01 
    0.014207955 = product of:
  0.08524773 = sum of:
    0.08524773 = weight(_text_:great in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08524773 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Multidimensional data analysis or On-line analytical processing (OLAP) offers a single subject-oriented source for analyzing summary data based an various dimensions. We demonstrate that the OLAP approach gives a promising starting point for advanced analysis and comparison among summary data in informetrics applications. At the moment there is no single precise, commonly accepted logical/conceptual model for multidimensional analysis. This is because the requirements of applications vary considerably. We develop a conceptual/logical multidimensional model for supporting the complex and unpredictable needs of informetrics. Summary data are considered with respect of some dimensions. By changing dimensions the user may construct other views an the same summary data. We develop a multidimensional query language whose basic idea is to support the definition of views in a way, which is natural and intuitive for lay users in the informetrics area. We show that this view-oriented query language has a great expressive power and its degree of declarativity is greater than in contemporary operation-oriented or SQL (Structured Query Language)-like OLAP query languages.
  20. Frandsen, T.F.: ¬The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system : three science fields (2009) 0.01 
    0.014207955 = product of:
  0.08524773 = sum of:
    0.08524773 = weight(_text_:great in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08524773 = score(doc=4210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040559217 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The greatest number of open access journals (OAJs) is found in the sciences and their influence is growing. However, there are only a few studies on the acceptance and thereby integration of these OAJs in the scholarly communication system. Even fewer studies provide insight into the differences across disciplines. This study is an analysis of the citing behaviour in journals within three science fields: biology, mathematics, and pharmacy and pharmacology. It is a statistical analysis of OAJs as well as non-OAJs including both the citing and cited side of the journal to journal citations. The multivariate linear regression reveals many similarities in citing behaviour across fields and media. But it also points to great differences in the integration of OAJs. The integration of OAJs in the scholarly communication system varies considerably across fields. The implications for bibliometric research are discussed.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 202
  • d 9
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 209
  • m 3
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications