Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Winget, M.: Describing art : an alternative approach to subject access and interpretation (2009) 0.04
    0.037839223 = product of:
      0.113517664 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=3618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=3618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the art historical antecedents of providing subject access to images. After reviewing the assumptions and limitations inherent in the most prevalent descriptive method, the paper seeks to introduce a new model that allows for more comprehensive representation of visually-based cultural materials. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Panofsky's theory of iconography and iconology as the starting-point. Panofsky's conceptual model, while appropriate for art created in the Western academic tradition, ignores or misrepresents work from other eras or cultures. Continued dependence on Panofskian descriptive methods limits the functionality and usefulness of image representation systems. Findings - The paper recommends the development of a more precise and inclusive descriptive model for art objects, which is based on the premise that art is not another sort of text, and should not be interpreted as such. Practical implications - The paper provides suggestions for the development of representation models that will enhance the description of non-textual artifacts. Originality/value - The paper addresses issues in information science, the history of art, and computer science, and suggests that a new descriptive model would be of great value to both humanist and social science scholars.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.6, S.958-976
  2. Beghtol, C.: Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics : aboutness, analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents (1986) 0.02
    0.022654874 = product of:
      0.13592924 = sum of:
        0.13592924 = weight(_text_:documentation in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13592924 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.76970476 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 42(1986), S.84-113
  3. Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973) 0.02
    0.022654874 = product of:
      0.13592924 = sum of:
        0.13592924 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13592924 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.76970476 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.2, S.137-168
  4. Austin, J.; Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on user's value criteria. Pt.1 (1983) 0.02
    0.016991157 = product of:
      0.101946935 = sum of:
        0.101946935 = weight(_text_:documentation in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101946935 = score(doc=142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.57727855 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 39(1983), S.230-246
  5. Arastoopoor, S.; Fattahi, R.: Users' perception of aboutness and ofness in images : an approach to subject indexing based on Ervin Panofsky's theory and users'' view (2012) 0.01
    0.011839963 = product of:
      0.07103977 = sum of:
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    It is widely accepted that subject indexing of an image is based on a two-dimensional approach. The first is the ofness and the second focuses on aboutness of the image. Assigning a suitable set of subject tags based on these two groups depends, to a great deal, on users' perception of the image. This study aims at analyzing users' perception of aboutness and ofness of images. 25 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted in two phases. In the first phase a collection of 10 widely known photographs were given to the interviewees and they were asked to assign subject tags (as many as they wanted) to each image. In the second phase some facts regarding each image were given to him / her to assign further tags (again as many as they wanted) or even modify their previous tags. The results show that the interviewees do focus both on ofness and aboutness in subject tagging; but it seems that they emphasize more on aboutness in describing images. On the other hand, as soon as the interviewees were able to distinguish the iconographical ofness, they could speak of iconographical and iconological aboutness. The results also show that subject indexers must focus on the iconographical level, especially regarding those tags which represent the ofness at this level.
  6. Molina, M.P.: Interdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written documentary content analysis (WTDCA) (1994) 0.01
    0.009911507 = product of:
      0.059469044 = sum of:
        0.059469044 = weight(_text_:documentation in 6147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059469044 = score(doc=6147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.33674583 = fieldWeight in 6147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6147)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 50(1994) no.2, S.111-133
  7. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of 'subject' in information science (1992) 0.01
    0.008495579 = product of:
      0.050973468 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 48(1992), S.172-200
  8. Marsh, E.E.; White, M.D.: ¬A taxonomy of relationships between images and text (2003) 0.01
    0.008495579 = product of:
      0.050973468 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=4444,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.6, S.647-672
  9. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.01
    0.008495579 = product of:
      0.050973468 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29
  10. Buckland, M.K.: Obsolescence in subject description (2012) 0.01
    0.008495579 = product of:
      0.050973468 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 68(2012) no.2, S.154-161
  11. Mai, J.-E.: Semiotics and indexing : an analysis of the subject indexing process (2001) 0.01
    0.007079649 = product of:
      0.04247789 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=4480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 4480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4480)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 57(2001) no.5, S.591-622
  12. Sauperl, A.: Subject cataloging process of Slovenian and American catalogers (2005) 0.01
    0.007079649 = product of:
      0.04247789 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.6, S.713-734
  13. Enser, P.G.B.; Sandom, C.J.; Hare, J.S.; Lewis, P.H.: Facing the reality of semantic image retrieval (2007) 0.01
    0.007079649 = product of:
      0.04247789 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 63(2007) no.4, S.465-481
  14. Inskip, C.; MacFarlane, A.; Rafferty, P.: Meaning, communication, music : towards a revised communication model (2008) 0.01
    0.007079649 = product of:
      0.04247789 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.5, S.687-706
  15. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.0045793457 = product of:
      0.027476072 = sum of:
        0.027476072 = product of:
          0.054952145 = sum of:
            0.054952145 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054952145 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  16. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0036634763 = product of:
      0.021980857 = sum of:
        0.021980857 = product of:
          0.043961715 = sum of:
            0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043961715 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  17. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.00
    0.0036634763 = product of:
      0.021980857 = sum of:
        0.021980857 = product of:
          0.043961715 = sum of:
            0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043961715 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  18. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.00
    0.0032380861 = product of:
      0.019428516 = sum of:
        0.019428516 = product of:
          0.03885703 = sum of:
            0.03885703 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03885703 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  19. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.00
    0.0027476072 = product of:
      0.016485643 = sum of:
        0.016485643 = product of:
          0.032971285 = sum of:
            0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032971285 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  20. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.00
    0.0027476072 = product of:
      0.016485643 = sum of:
        0.016485643 = product of:
          0.032971285 = sum of:
            0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032971285 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik