-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.45
0.45093155 = product of:
0.9018631 = sum of:
0.12883759 = product of:
0.38651273 = sum of:
0.38651273 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.38651273 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.38651273 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.38651273 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.38651273 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.38651273 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.20
0.20367678 = product of:
0.40735355 = sum of:
0.042945858 = product of:
0.12883757 = sum of:
0.12883757 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12883757 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18220384 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18220384 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.18220384 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18220384 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.20
0.20149918 = product of:
0.40299836 = sum of:
0.19325636 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19325636 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.19325636 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19325636 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.016485643 = product of:
0.032971285 = sum of:
0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032971285 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.19
0.18788813 = product of:
0.37577626 = sum of:
0.053682324 = product of:
0.16104697 = sum of:
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.19
0.18788813 = product of:
0.37577626 = sum of:
0.053682324 = product of:
0.16104697 = sum of:
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
-
Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018)
0.19
0.18788813 = product of:
0.37577626 = sum of:
0.053682324 = product of:
0.16104697 = sum of:
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16104697 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
-
Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017)
0.02
0.022607416 = product of:
0.06782225 = sum of:
0.05683182 = weight(_text_:great in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05683182 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.010990429 = product of:
0.021980857 = sum of:
0.021980857 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021980857 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Indexing plays a vital role in Information Retrieval. With the availability of huge volume of information, it has become necessary to index the information in such a way to make easier for the end users to find the information they want efficiently and accurately. Keyword-based indexing uses words as indexing terms. It is not capable of capturing the implicit relation among terms or the semantics of the words in the document. To eliminate this limitation, ontology-based indexing came into existence, which allows semantic based indexing to solve complex and indirect user queries. Ontologies are used for document indexing which allows semantic based information retrieval. Existing ontologies or the ones constructed from scratch are used presently for indexing. Constructing ontologies from scratch is a labor-intensive task and requires extensive domain knowledge whereas use of an existing ontology may leave some important concepts in documents un-annotated. Using multiple ontologies can overcome the problem of missing out concepts to a great extent, but it is difficult to manage (changes in ontologies over time by their developers) multiple ontologies and ontology heterogeneity also arises due to ontologies constructed by different ontology developers. One possible solution to managing multiple ontologies and build from scratch is to use modular ontologies for indexing.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Castellanos Ardila, J.P.: Investigation of an OSLC-domain targeting ISO 26262 : focus on the left side of the software V-model (2016)
0.01
0.00980985 = product of:
0.0588591 = sum of:
0.0588591 = weight(_text_:documentation in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0588591 = score(doc=5819,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.33329198 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Industries have adopted a standardized set of practices for developing their products. In the automotive domain, the provision of safety-compliant systems is guided by ISO 26262, a standard that specifies a set of requirements and recommendations for developing automotive safety-critical systems. For being in compliance with ISO 26262, the safety lifecycle proposed by the standard must be included in the development process of a vehicle. Besides, a safety case that shows that the system is acceptably safe has to be provided. The provision of a safety case implies the execution of a precise documentation process. This process makes sure that the work products are available and traceable. Further, the documentation management is defined in the standard as a mandatory activity and guidelines are proposed/imposed for its elaboration. It would be appropriate to point out that a well-documented safety lifecycle will provide the necessary inputs for the generation of an ISO 26262-compliant safety case. The OSLC (Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration) standard and the maturing stack of semantic web technologies represent a promising integration platform for enabling semantic interoperability between the tools involved in the safety lifecycle. Tools for requirements, architecture, development management, among others, are expected to interact and shared data with the help of domains specifications created in OSLC. This thesis proposes the creation of an OSLC tool-chain infrastructure for sharing safety-related information, where fragments of safety information can be generated. The steps carried out during the elaboration of this master thesis consist in the identification, representation, and shaping of the RDF resources needed for the creation of a safety case. The focus of the thesis is limited to a tiny portion of the ISO 26262 left-hand side of the V-model, more exactly part 6 clause 8 of the standard: Software unit design and implementation. Regardless of the use of a restricted portion of the standard during the execution of this thesis, the findings can be extended to other parts, and the conclusions can be generalize. This master thesis is considered one of the first steps towards the provision of an OSLC-based and ISO 26262-compliant methodological approach for representing and shaping the work products resulting from the execution of the safety lifecycle, documentation required in the conformation of an ISO-compliant safety case.
-
Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018)
0.00
0.0047359853 = product of:
0.02841591 = sum of:
0.02841591 = weight(_text_:great in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02841591 = score(doc=4472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.12442382 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Since its appearance in the early 90's, the World Wide Web (WWW or Web) has provided universal access to knowledge and the world of information has been primarily witness to a great revolution (the digital revolution). It quickly became very popular, making it the largest and most comprehensive database and knowledge base thanks to the amount and diversity of data it contains. However, the considerable increase and evolution of these data raises important problems for users, in particular for accessing the documents most relevant to their search queries. In order to cope with this exponential explosion of data volume and facilitate their access by users, various models are offered by information retrieval systems (IRS) for the representation and retrieval of web documents. Traditional SRIs use simple keywords that are not semantically linked to index and retrieve these documents. This creates limitations in terms of the relevance and ease of exploration of results. To overcome these limitations, existing techniques enrich documents by integrating external keywords from different sources. However, these systems still suffer from limitations that are related to the exploitation techniques of these sources of enrichment. When the different sources are used so that they cannot be distinguished by the system, this limits the flexibility of the exploration models that can be applied to the results returned by this system. Users then feel lost to these results, and find themselves forced to filter them manually to select the relevant information. If they want to go further, they must reformulate and target their search queries even more until they reach the documents that best meet their expectations. In this way, even if the systems manage to find more relevant results, their presentation remains problematic. In order to target research to more user-specific information needs and improve the relevance and exploration of its research findings, advanced SRIs adopt different data personalization techniques that assume that current research of user is directly related to his profile and / or previous browsing / search experiences.
-
Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012)
0.00
0.0036634763 = product of:
0.021980857 = sum of:
0.021980857 = product of:
0.043961715 = sum of:
0.043961715 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043961715 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 11. 9.2012 19:43:22
-
Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011)
0.00
0.0032380861 = product of:
0.019428516 = sum of:
0.019428516 = product of:
0.03885703 = sum of:
0.03885703 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03885703 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 20:40:31
-
Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010)
0.00
0.0027476072 = product of:
0.016485643 = sum of:
0.016485643 = product of:
0.032971285 = sum of:
0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032971285 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013)
0.00
0.0027476072 = product of:
0.016485643 = sum of:
0.016485643 = product of:
0.032971285 = sum of:
0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032971285 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 4. 2.2015 9:22:39
-
Geisriegler, E.: Enriching electronic texts with semantic metadata : a use case for the historical Newspaper Collection ANNO (Austrian Newspapers Online) of the Austrian National Libraryhek (2012)
0.00
0.0022896728 = product of:
0.013738036 = sum of:
0.013738036 = product of:
0.027476072 = sum of:
0.027476072 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027476072 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040559217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 3. 2.2013 18:00:22
