Search (990 results, page 1 of 50)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.45
    0.45093155 = product of:
      0.9018631 = sum of:
        0.12883759 = product of:
          0.38651273 = sum of:
            0.38651273 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38651273 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.38651273 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38651273 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.38651273 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38651273 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.38
    0.37577626 = product of:
      0.7515525 = sum of:
        0.10736465 = product of:
          0.32209393 = sum of:
            0.32209393 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.32209393 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.32209393 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32209393 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.32209393 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32209393 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.31
    0.30551517 = product of:
      0.61103034 = sum of:
        0.06441879 = product of:
          0.19325636 = sum of:
            0.19325636 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19325636 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.27330577 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27330577 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.27330577 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27330577 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.26
    0.2630434 = product of:
      0.5260868 = sum of:
        0.07515526 = product of:
          0.22546576 = sum of:
            0.22546576 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22546576 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22546576 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22546576 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.22546576 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22546576 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.23
    0.22546577 = product of:
      0.45093155 = sum of:
        0.06441879 = product of:
          0.19325636 = sum of:
            0.19325636 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19325636 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19325636 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19325636 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.19325636 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19325636 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  6. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.20
    0.20367678 = product of:
      0.40735355 = sum of:
        0.042945858 = product of:
          0.12883757 = sum of:
            0.12883757 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12883757 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18220384 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18220384 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.18220384 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18220384 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  7. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.20
    0.20149918 = product of:
      0.40299836 = sum of:
        0.19325636 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19325636 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.19325636 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19325636 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.016485643 = product of:
          0.032971285 = sum of:
            0.032971285 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032971285 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  8. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.19
    0.18788813 = product of:
      0.37577626 = sum of:
        0.053682324 = product of:
          0.16104697 = sum of:
            0.16104697 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16104697 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  9. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.19
    0.18788813 = product of:
      0.37577626 = sum of:
        0.053682324 = product of:
          0.16104697 = sum of:
            0.16104697 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16104697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  10. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.19
    0.18788813 = product of:
      0.37577626 = sum of:
        0.053682324 = product of:
          0.16104697 = sum of:
            0.16104697 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16104697 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.17
    0.17178343 = product of:
      0.5153503 = sum of:
        0.25767514 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25767514 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.25767514 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25767514 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  12. Wakeling, S.; Spezi, V.; Fry, J.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Willett, P.: Academic communities : the role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication (2019) 0.09
    0.08795534 = product of:
      0.17591068 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
        0.062393013 = product of:
          0.12478603 = sum of:
            0.12478603 = weight(_text_:britain in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12478603 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30268455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.4122643 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into publication practices from the perspective of academics working within four disciplinary communities: biosciences, astronomy/physics, education and history. The paper explores the ways in which these multiple overlapping communities intersect with the journal landscape and the implications for the adoption and use of new players in the scholarly communication system, particularly open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs (e.g. PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports) are large, broad scope, open-access journals that base editorial decisions solely on the technical/scientific soundness of the article. Design/methodology/approach Focus groups with active researchers in these fields were held in five UK Higher Education Institutions across Great Britain, and were complemented by interviews with pro-vice-chancellors for research at each institution. Findings A strong finding to emerge from the data is the notion of researchers belonging to multiple overlapping communities, with some inherent tensions in meeting the requirements for these different audiences. Researcher perceptions of evaluation mechanisms were found to play a major role in attitudes towards OAMJs, and interviews with the pro-vice-chancellors for research indicate that there is a difference between researchers' perceptions and the values embedded in institutional frameworks. Originality/value This is the first purely qualitative study relating to researcher perspectives on OAMJs. The findings of the paper will be of interest to publishers, policy-makers, research managers and academics.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.1, S.120-139
  13. Copeland, B.J.: Turing: pioneer of the information age (2012) 0.06
    0.06290083 = product of:
      0.18870246 = sum of:
        0.10046542 = weight(_text_:great in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10046542 = score(doc=3025,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.43990463 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
        0.08823705 = product of:
          0.1764741 = sum of:
            0.1764741 = weight(_text_:britain in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1764741 = score(doc=3025,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.30268455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.58302975 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    LCSH
    Mathematicians / Great Britain / Biography
    Subject
    Mathematicians / Great Britain / Biography
  14. Heuvel, C. van den: ¬The Decimal Office : administration as a science in the Netherlands in the first decades of the twentieth century (2013) 0.06
    0.062268637 = product of:
      0.1868059 = sum of:
        0.09945569 = weight(_text_:great in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09945569 = score(doc=5521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
        0.08735022 = product of:
          0.17470044 = sum of:
            0.17470044 = weight(_text_:britain in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17470044 = score(doc=5521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30268455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.57717 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 1983 Boyd Rayward described the early diffusion abroad of the Dewey Decimal Classification (and indirectly of the Universal Decimal Classification) in Australia, Great Britain, Belgium, France, Switzerland, and Russia. Here, I discuss the enormous interest in the decimal system in the Netherlands that went far beyond its original role for the classification of bibliographic knowledge. I will present Johan Zaalberg (1858-1934) and Ernst Hijmans (1890-1987) as two advocates for the use of the decimal system in the administration of public organizations and private companies and its role in the development of scientific management in the Netherlands.
  15. Budd, J.M.: Meaning, truth, and information : prolegomena to a theory (2011) 0.05
    0.045407068 = product of:
      0.1362212 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=4491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 4491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4491)
        0.08524773 = weight(_text_:great in 4491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08524773 = score(doc=4491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 4491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4491)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to examine the relationships between meaning and truth as they may contribute to a constitutive definition of information. The thesis is primarily that "information" cannot be defined unless within the context of meaning and truth, and that any theory based on, or related to, information is not possible without the foundational definition. Design/methodology/approach - A review of related literatures and an arrangement of frameworks forms the design of this conceptual proposal. Findings - While other definitions of information have been presented, the present one integrates meaning and truth in ways that others do not. The thoroughgoing semantic examination provides a starting-point for a much deeper analysis of the integral role that language plays in the formation of any theory related to information. Truth tends not to be spoken of a great deal in information science; the definitional positioning of truth adds to a more complete definition and basis for theory. Originality/value - This paper proposes a new definitional and theoretical construct for information.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 67(2011) no.1, S.56-74
  16. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.04
    0.043704193 = product of:
      0.13111258 = sum of:
        0.06007281 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06007281 = score(doc=3959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.34016466 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this paper is to systemize and improve the scientific status of studies on document abstracting. This is a diachronic, systematic study of document abstracting studies carried out from different perspectives and models (textual, psycholinguistic, social and communicative). Design/methodology/approach - A review of the perspectives and analysis proposals which are of interest to the various theoreticians of abstracting is carried out using a variety of techniques and approaches (cognitive, linguistic, communicative-social, didactic, etc.), each with different levels of theoretical and methodological abstraction and degrees of application. The most significant contributions of each are reviewed and highlighted, along with their limitations. Findings - It is found that the great challenge in abstracting is the systemization of models and conceptual apparatus, which open up this type of research to semiotic and socio-interactional perspectives. It is necessary to carry out suitable empirical research with operative designs and ad hoc measuring instruments which can measure the efficiency of the abstracting and the efficiency of a good abstract, while at the same time feeding back into the theoretical baggage of this type of study. Such research will have to explain and provide answers to all the elements and variables, which affect the realization and the reception of a quality abstract. Originality/value - The paper provides a small map of the studies on document abstracting. This shows how the conceptual and methodological framework has extended at the same time as the Science of Documentation has been evolving. All the models analysed - the communicative and interactional approach - are integrated in a new systematic framework.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 66(2010) no.4, S.563-584
  17. Rahmi, R.; Joho, H.; Shirai, T.: ¬An analysis of natural disaster-related information-seeking behavior using temporal stages (2019) 0.04
    0.038067818 = product of:
      0.11420345 = sum of:
        0.10046542 = weight(_text_:great in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10046542 = score(doc=5298,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.43990463 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.013738036 = product of:
          0.027476072 = sum of:
            0.027476072 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027476072 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Since natural disasters can affect many people over a vast area, studying information-seeking behavior (ISB) during disasters is of great importance. Many previous studies have relied on online social network data, providing insights into the ISB of those with Internet access. However, in a large-scale natural disaster such as the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011, people in the most severely affected areas tended to have limited Internet access. Therefore, an alternative data source should be explored to investigate disaster-related ISB. This study's contributions are twofold. First, we provide a detailed description of natural disaster-related ISB of people who experienced a large-scale earthquake and tsunami, based on analysis of written testimonies published by local authorities. This provided insight into the relationship between information needs, channels, and sources of disaster-related ISB. Also, our approach facilitates the study of ISB of people without Internet access both during and after a disaster. Second, we provide empirical evidence to demonstrate that the temporal stages of a disaster can characterize people's ISB during the disaster. Therefore, we propose further consideration of the temporal aspects of events for improved understanding of disaster-related ISB.
    Date
    12. 6.2019 13:22:15
  18. Niininen, S.; Nykyri, S.; Suominen, O.: ¬The future of metadata : open, linked, and multilingual - the YSO case (2017) 0.04
    0.037839223 = product of:
      0.113517664 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is threefold: to focus on the process of multilingual concept scheme construction and the challenges involved; to addresses concrete challenges faced in the construction process and especially those related to equivalence between terms and concepts; and to briefly outlines the translation strategies developed during the process of concept scheme construction. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on experience acquired during the establishment of the Finnish thesaurus and ontology service Finto as well as the trilingual General Finnish Ontology YSO, both of which are being maintained and further developed at the National Library of Finland. Findings Although uniform resource identifiers can be considered language-independent, they do not render concept schemes and their construction free of language-related challenges. The fundamental issue with all the challenges faced is how to maintain consistency and predictability when the nature of language requires each concept to be treated individually. The key to such challenges is to recognise the function of the vocabulary and the needs of its intended users. Social implications Open science increases the transparency of not only research products, but also metadata tools. Gaining a deeper understanding of the challenges involved in their construction is important for a great variety of users - e.g. indexers, vocabulary builders and information seekers. Today, multilingualism is an essential aspect at both the national and international information society level. Originality/value This paper draws on the practical challenges faced in concept scheme construction in a trilingual environment, with a focus on "concept scheme" as a translation and mapping unit.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 73(2017) no.3, S.451-465
  19. Tallerås, C.; Dahl, J.H.B.; Pharo, N.: User conceptualizations of derivative relationships in the bibliographic universe (2018) 0.04
    0.037839223 = product of:
      0.113517664 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Considerable effort is devoted to developing new models for organizing bibliographic metadata. However, such models have been repeatedly criticized for their lack of proper user testing. The purpose of this paper is to present a study on how non-experts in bibliographic systems map the bibliographic universe and, in particular, how they conceptualize relationships between independent but strongly related entities. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on an open concept-mapping task performed to externalize the conceptualizations of 98 novice students. The conceptualizations of the resulting concept maps are identified and analyzed statistically. Findings The study shows that the participants' conceptualizations have great variety, differing in detail and granularity. These conceptualizations can be categorized into two main groups according to derivative relationships: those that apply a single-entity model directly relating document entities and those (the majority) that apply a multi-entity model relating documents through a high-level collocating node. These high-level nodes seem to be most adequately interpreted either as superwork devices collocating documents belonging to the same bibliographic family or as devices collocating documents belonging to a shared fictional world. Originality/value The findings can guide the work to develop bibliographic standards. Based on the diversity of the conceptualizations, the findings also emphasize the need for more user testing of both conceptual models and the bibliographic end-user systems implementing those models.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 74(2018) no.4, S.894-916
  20. White, H.D.; Zuccala, A.A.: Libcitations, worldcat, cultural impact, and fame (2018) 0.04
    0.037839223 = product of:
      0.113517664 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Just as citations to a book can be counted, so can that book's libcitations-the number of libraries in a consortium that hold it. These holdings counts per title can be obtained from the consortium's union catalog, such as OCLC's WorldCat. Librarians seeking to serve their customers well must be attuned to various kinds of merit in books. The result in WorldCat is a great variation in the libcitations particular books receive. The higher a title's count (or percentile), the more famous it is-either absolutely or within a subject class. Degree of fame also indicates cultural impact, allowing that further documentation of impact may be needed. Using WorldCat data, we illustrate high, medium, and low degrees of fame with 170 titles published during 1990-1995 or 2001-2006 and spanning the 10 main Dewey classes. We use their total libcitation counts or their counts from members of the Association of Research Libraries, or both, as of late 2011. Our analysis of their fame draws on the recognizability of their authors, the extent to which they and their authors are covered by Wikipedia, and whether they have movie or TV versions. Ordinal scales based on Wikipedia coverage and on libcitation counts are very significantly associated.

Languages

  • e 795
  • d 186
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 875
  • el 66
  • m 66
  • s 22
  • x 14
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • n 2
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications