Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Soergel, D."
  1. Wang, P.; Soergel, D.: ¬A cognitive model of document use during a research project : Study I: Document selection (1998) 0.02
    0.021364605 = product of:
      0.04272921 = sum of:
        0.04272921 = product of:
          0.08545842 = sum of:
            0.08545842 = weight(_text_:assessment in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08545842 = score(doc=443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a model of document selection by real users of a bibliographic retrieval system. It reports on Part 1 of a longitudinal study of decision making on document use by academics during a actual research project. (Part 2 followed up the same users on how the selected documents were actually used in subsequent stages). The participants are 25 self-selected faculty and graduate students in Agricultural Economics. After a reference interview, the researcher conducted a search of DIALOG databases and prepared a printout. The users selected documents from this printout, They were asked to read and think aloud while selecting documents. There verbal reports were recorded and analyzed from a utiliy-theoretic perspective. The following model of the decision-making in the selection process emerged: document information lemenets (DIEs) in document records provide the information for judging the documents on 11 criteria (including topicality, orientation, quality, novelty, and authority); the criteria judgments are comninded in an assessment of document value along 5 dimensions (Epistemic, functional, conditional, social, and emotional values), leading to the use decision. This model accounts for the use of personal knowledge and decision strategies applied in the selection process. The model has implications for the design of an intelligent document selection assistant
  2. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.02
    0.021364605 = product of:
      0.04272921 = sum of:
        0.04272921 = product of:
          0.08545842 = sum of:
            0.08545842 = weight(_text_:assessment in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08545842 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.
  3. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.02
    0.017017247 = product of:
      0.034034494 = sum of:
        0.034034494 = product of:
          0.06806899 = sum of:
            0.06806899 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06806899 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
  5. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.01
    0.010314009 = product of:
      0.020628018 = sum of:
        0.020628018 = product of:
          0.041256037 = sum of:
            0.041256037 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041256037 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
  6. Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014) 0.01
    0.010314009 = product of:
      0.020628018 = sum of:
        0.020628018 = product of:
          0.041256037 = sum of:
            0.041256037 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041256037 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.01
    0.0085950075 = product of:
      0.017190015 = sum of:
        0.017190015 = product of:
          0.03438003 = sum of:
            0.03438003 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03438003 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  8. Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015) 0.01
    0.0085950075 = product of:
      0.017190015 = sum of:
        0.017190015 = product of:
          0.03438003 = sum of:
            0.03438003 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03438003 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.2015 20:52:22